Twitter Won't Auto-Ban Nazis

[ReeferMadness]

Twitter won't auto-ban Nazis because the AI can't reliably distinguish between them and Republican politicians.

I wish I were making this up. 

[Guest]

That's almost a great pun.  All it needed was an "h".

[OftenWrong]

1 hour ago, ReeferMadness said:

Twitter won't auto-ban Nazis because the AI can't reliably distinguish between them and Republican politicians.

I wish I were making this up. 

I'd be fine with it banning the Nazi's, or better yet the fascists, but only if it also bans the communists. Oh wait, that gets rid of all of us.

[Scott Mayers]

If the same treatment were extended to ALL 'supremacists', they'd exclude even the Democrats. Today's extremists aren't merely the 'white' ones. The majority of such groups often sign up with whatever party strengthens their power. As such, if the same kind of logic is applied to ANY 'supremacists' of ANY group, the Democrats would be more likely eliminated over the Republicans because unlike the more solidified extremists on the right, the left-wing has most of all the other 'supremacists' there. For instance, a group like the Black Panthers, a Black version of 'supremacist' would align with the left and act as a unit demograph. Then take each other such similar groups of other races or religions and you have a 'democratic' majority of pluralities of extremists extant in the Democratic party. 

So given Google, Twitter, and Facebook, tend to favor more 'liberal' licence towards non-white versions of supremacists, any kind of neutral program that seeks out pychological rhetoric supporting the factors that contribute to actual racism and sexism will more likely eliminate the Democratic party over the Republican. This is what is NOT spelled out appropriately. The only alternative way to do this is to seek language that is already biased against specific groups. This would clearly point out where and how the actual discrimination exists apart from the arrogancy of today's majority of media to be propping up only the 'white' variety of supremacists as symbolic of all that is racist.

[OftenWrong]

38 minutes ago, Scott Mayers said:

This would clearly point out where and how the actual discrimination exists apart from the arrogancy of today's majority of media to be propping up only the 'white' variety of supremacists as symbolic of all that is racist.

And likewise allowing the anti-white discrimination to continue, as though it were not racist.

[BubberMiley]

I can certainly see just from this thread how it would be difficult to distinguish them.

[Michael Hardner]

20 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

I can certainly see just from this thread how it would be difficult to distinguish them.

Didn't you know that the Black Panthers are a threat?  It's 1968 after all.

That said - no, Canadian Conservatives aren't Nazis.  You hurt your credibility with such statements.

[BubberMiley]

One would. I didn't say that. There are still plenty of same conservatives. My point is they are no longer anywhere near this forum.

[Charles Anthony]

This thread is locked because it is a poor attempt to start a discussion. 

 

Start a new thread with a proper Opening Post that clearly delineates the topic of discussion.