Jump to content

U.S. imposing steel and aluminum tariffs on Canada, Mexico and Europe


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Machjo said:

... I don't believe that Canadians have any clear agreement on what precisely our values are.

 

Indeed, but many think no matter what they may be, they are a defense for the American barbarians at the gate.  

Some only need the very general definition of Canadian values as "not American".

USMCA chips away a little more at such quaint notions by forcing the CRTC to allow carriage for American shopping networks (previously denied).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

Indeed, but many think no matter what they may be, they are a defense for the American barbarians at the gate.  

Some only need the very general definition of Canadian values as "not American".

USMCA chips away a little more at such quaint notions by forcing the CRTC to allow carriage for American shopping networks (previously denied).

And we should have just called it a revised version of NAFTA. USMCA is just too damned difficult to pronounce as a word.

Edited by Machjo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Machjo said:

And we should have just called it a revised notion of NAFTA. USMCA is just too damned difficult to pronounce as a word.

 

Maybe....but the Americans have "values" as well, including nationalism.   Trump wanted to put his scent on the agreement.

Though awkward to pronounce as an acronym, I think it helps to elevate Mexico, so often discounted as part of North America in CanAm media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

Maybe....but the Americans have "values" as well, including nationalism.   Trump wanted to put his scent on the agreement.

Though awkward to pronounce as an acronym, I think it helps to elevate Mexico, so often discounted as part of North America in CanAm media.

Ha ha, are you pretending that the US elevates Mexico's status more than Canada does?  What a snow job.  I seem to remember Trump talking about all the drug pushers and rapists coming up from Mexico, though he did say that "some of them are good people."  So charitable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

Ha ha, are you pretending that the US elevates Mexico's status more than Canada does?  What a snow job.  I seem to remember Trump talking about all the drug pushers and rapists coming up from Mexico, though he did say that "some of them are good people."  So charitable.

 

???   What part of "CanAm" media don't you understand ?   (Canadian/American)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Machjo said:

I totally agree that Trump is making matters worse for his country and ours. That said, just what are these 'Canadian' values? The PQ was slammed two elections ago over its Charter of Quebec Values. The incoming Quebec government wants to keep a crucifix over the speaker's chair in the National Assembly while of course preventing public servants from expressing themselves, Ontario defends the separate school system even though it discriminates on the basis of religion and violates an international covenant to which Canada is a signatory member-state. I don't believe that Canadians have any clear agreement on what precisely our values are.

The basis of Canadian values are parliamentary democracy, common law, French Civil Law (in Quebec), and Judeo-Christian principles (the Ten Commandments and respect/Golden Rule minus the "no other gods before me" and matters of private morality such as adultery, coveting, etc., as there is a basic separation between church and state).  There's also a component of aboriginal spirituality reflected in these traditions, which varies but includes respect for land and all life (spirit is in all), equality (the circle), and freedom to live according to native traditions.  There's also the notion of "the just society", which is equity and rule of law (emphasizing the spirit over the letter of the law), protected rights and freedoms (the Charter), free expression, protection of property, appreciation of multiple cultures (multiculturalism), and deference to English and French as official languages.  To some extent our safety net is counted in these values, including free child education, the CPP, and universal health care (The Canada Health Act).  While I don't think we need many hard and fast rules about what constitutes unreasonable accommodations of cultural practices that diverge from these values, which are open to interpretation and revised over time, I think that anyone who poses a threat to our physical safety, democratic freedoms and constitutional protections should NOT be allowed to immigrate to Canada.  In addition, any foreign power that poses a threat to such rights and freedoms must be called out.  We must have the capacity to defend ourselves against threats.  That's why Canada needs a stronger military, more like the one of half a century ago.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

The basis of Canadian values are parliamentary democracy, common law, French Civil Law (in Quebec), and Judeo-Christian principles (the Ten Commandments and respect/Golden Rule minus the "no other gods before me" and matters of private morality such as adultery, coveting, etc., as there is a basic separation between church and state).  There's also a component of aboriginal spirituality reflected in these traditions, which varies but includes respect for land and all life (spirit is in all), equality (the circle), and freedom to live according to native traditions.  There's also the notion of "the just society", which is equity and rule of law (emphasizing the spirit over the letter of the law), protected rights and freedoms (the Charter), free expression, protection of property, appreciation of multiple cultures (multiculturalism), and deference to English and French as official languages.  To some extent our safety net is counted in these values, including free child education, the CPP, and universal health care (The Canada Health Act).  While I don't think we need many hard and fast rules about what constitutes unreasonable accommodations of cultural practices that diverge from these values, which are open to interpretation and revised over time, I think that anyone who poses a threat to our physical safety, democratic freedoms and constitutional protections should NOT be allowed to immigrate to Canada.  In addition, any foreign power that poses a threat to such rights and freedoms must be called out.  We must have the capacity to defend ourselves against threats.  That's why Canada needs a stronger military, more like the one of half a century ago.  

I disagree with a few of the above mentioned to varying degrees, either fundamentally or in the specifics, yet I was born and raised in Canada and even work in both official languages. I even attended Catholic separate school as a child. Can't get much more 'Canadian' than that.

Ironically, my work in the language industry has actually made me even more opposed to official bilingualism than before I'd entered the workforce after I'd completed school. Romeo Saganash has slammed official bilingualism on a few occasions himself, and I remember a Catholic once speaking out against the separate school system as discriminatory. I think Canadians are changing and this is shaking the ideological foundation of 'two founding races' on which Canada was built.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Machjo said:

I disagree with a few of the above mentioned to varying degrees, either fundamentally or in the specifics, yet I was born and raised in Canada and even work in both official languages. I even attended Catholic separate school as a child. Can't get much more 'Canadian' than that.

Ironically, my work in the language industry has actually made me even more opposed to official bilingualism than before I'd entered the workforce after I'd completed school. Romeo Saganash has slammed official bilingualism on a few occasions himself, and I remember a Catholic once speaking out against the separate school system as discriminatory. I think Canadians are changing and this is shaking the ideological foundation of 'two founding races' on which Canada was built.

I think you missed my points though.  I'm saying that essentially the religious and ideological cultural basis of our society is changing, which is fine, whether Catholic, French or anything else.  Nevertheless, this is Canada where such rights and protections will live, in perpetuity.  That's the security of Canada.  The fundamentals won't be compromised, ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,723
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    DACHSHUND
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronaldo_ earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • babetteteets went up a rank
      Rookie
    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...