CITIZEN_2015 Posted June 24, 2018 Report Posted June 24, 2018 24 minutes ago, kactus said: A good mullah is a dead mullah.... The lion hearted brave Iranian women and the brave nation of Iran will not rest and press on to the end untill all mullahs become good mullahs. Quote
marcus Posted June 25, 2018 Report Posted June 25, 2018 8 hours ago, kactus said: A good mullah is a dead mullah.... Fortunately, these fucktards are literally so old and out of touch that the younger generations of population don’t take them seriously. They just want to attach themselves to people like a bunch of leech sucking their blood whilst creating an outside enemy. Their mission is accomplished....They achieved yo turn Iranians against religion by their enforcement of their version of islamic laws. ffs why should a mullah rule Iran and get involved in politics when their place should be in religious institutions just like the archbishops in churches!!! I don’t get it. I don’t think they are even welcome in mosques..... Agreed. So how do you think the mullahs could be removed? Quote "What do you think of Western civilization?" Gandhi was asked. "I think it would be a good idea," he said.
kactus Posted June 25, 2018 Report Posted June 25, 2018 3 minutes ago, marcus said: Agreed. So how do you think the mullahs could be removed? Mullahs language is not to start a conversation with them. They will negotiate their way out of it.... 1- Unilateral and systematic sanctions by US as well as ass kissers of mullahs namely UK, France and Germany on ‘Sepah’ and other governmental organisations. 2- Freezing mullah’s assets in Swiss and other foreign bank accounts. 3- Targetted surveillance of activities by Sepah through charitable organisations where they “waste” Iranian’s money on buying arms and building the infrastructure of other countries rather than helping Iranians. The only language a mullah will understand is force! Weaken their position by cutting off the money supplies that they use to prop up their survival. This will give ammunition to people to come out in masses. Any killings of people in masses will be met by force. 1 1 Quote
CITIZEN_2015 Posted June 25, 2018 Report Posted June 25, 2018 (edited) Iranian women harassed by Russian security. Down with Russia. There is nothing lower than being a stooge of mullahs as damn Russians are. I have more respect for a cockroach. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2018/jun/25/iran-women-fans-attending-matches-world-cup-russia Edited June 25, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015 Quote
CITIZEN_2015 Posted June 25, 2018 Report Posted June 25, 2018 (edited) The brave nation of Iran rises up AGAIN. Fresh mass anti-regime demonstrations started TODAY this time in Tehran and a few other cities. The crowd swarm on Grand Bazaar angry over the regime policies resulting in plunging currency and bad economy. https://www.google.ca/search?source=hp&ei=bQgxW8mNKoL4zgLGorbYDw&q=world+cup+results&oq=worl&gs_l=psy-ab.1.2.0i131k1l7j0j0i131k1l2.1340.3192.0.5402.4.4.0.0.0.0.145.521.0j4.4.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..0.4.518....0.Xb9wW3Mg0WY#sie=lg;/m/06qjc4;2;/m/030q7;mt;fp;1&spf=1529940083940 Demonstrations later spread to Iran's Parliament where regime mercenaries used tear gas to forcefully disperse the crowd. Demonstrators clashed with the police in front of Parliament. After the Islamic Regime police violently attacked the protesters in front of the Parliament, protesters set on fire one of their bikes. https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/iran/iranian-protesters-swarm-grand-bazaar-confront-police-at-parliament-1.6203408 Some mullahs are now calling for the repressive and hated Sepah to intervene and topple the Rouhani government and declare martial law. The Shah did that too and it is not going to work this time either when the nation is fed up with Mullahs and this regime of mullahs. The US and those countries who speak of democratic values MUST now issue a clear warning to Mullahs and their mercenaries. Take your bloody hands off the defenseless nation or all options will be on the table. Including being put on trial as war criminals. Edited June 25, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015 Quote
CITIZEN_2015 Posted June 26, 2018 Report Posted June 26, 2018 (edited) More protests in Iran and it is even more massive with harsher slogans for the regime. https://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-economic-protests-enter-second-day-amid-rials-collapse/ Demonstrators out again in force and demanding the regime stop stealing money from Iranians and give it away to terrorists and Arabs who historically have always been enemies of Persians and Iran. Among slogans are : Death to Palestine. Death to Syria. We don't want ayatollahs, No to Gaza, No to Lebanon, My life for Iran. Edit: The regime has announced mass arrest in order to intimidate the nation into not pouring into streets: https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/iran/large-number-arrested-after-mass-protests-close-iran-bazaar-1.6216868 Meanwhile US of A tighting screws on the regime. Any country or company who buys Iranian oil after November will be subjected to sanctions by the biggest economy in the world. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/26/oil-buyers-must-cut-all-iranian-crude-imports-by-november-state-dept-.html Edited June 26, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015 Quote
GostHacked Posted June 27, 2018 Author Report Posted June 27, 2018 On 6/23/2018 at 4:12 PM, CITIZEN_2015 said: In Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan it was US military invasion and those countries are culturally very aggressive in addition. In Iran it is the fed up people of Iran who are changing the regime. And do not indicate Iran as other Arab terrorist nations. This shows your total lack of knowledge. Educate yourself before commenting on a topic you don't know anything about. first off Iran is NOT an Arab nation and it is the regime in Iran which is terrorist NOT the nation of Iran. You have not been here as long as I have, and you would take back the comment about 'lack of knowledge' when you read my posts. The invasion of those countries had nothing to do with terrorism. Nor did the USA give a crap about human rights or removing brutal dictators. These leaders went against the petro dollar and they faces the consequences of the petro dollar being enforced with a very large global army. And yes, I know that Iranians are not Arabs, they are Persians. However under the guise of 'regime' change, the fact that Iranians are Persians means little to the ones that will invade. So if you want to see how Iran will be, we need to look at the nations already invaded and obliterated by going after global terrorism. So again, I ask, what about Saudi Arabia? When do they get their regime change? They are as oppresive as all the other regimes, if not more. And well, I guess they allow women to drive now, so they got that going for them. Real progressive of them considering they still lop heads off in the middle of the street. Quote
kactus Posted June 27, 2018 Report Posted June 27, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, GostHacked said: You have not been here as long as I have, and you would take back the comment about 'lack of knowledge' when you read my posts. The invasion of those countries had nothing to do with terrorism. Nor did the USA give a crap about human rights or removing brutal dictators. These leaders went against the petro dollar and they faces the consequences of the petro dollar being enforced with a very large global army. And yes, I know that Iranians are not Arabs, they are Persians. However under the guise of 'regime' change, the fact that Iranians are Persians means little to the ones that will invade. So if you want to see how Iran will be, we need to look at the nations already invaded and obliterated by going after global terrorism. So again, I ask, what about Saudi Arabia? When do they get their regime change? They are as oppresive as all the other regimes, if not more. And well, I guess they allow women to drive now, so they got that going for them. Real progressive of them considering they still lop heads off in the middle of the street. Ghost, you have misread his post. Citizen is saying that in arab countries of those nations and even Turkey that is not even an Arab country people like their leaders. This is not the case in Iran as people loathe mullahs as much as the islamic doctrines they are shovelling down their throats...That’s the reality and what makes it different from the rest. The unfortunate thing is the survival of mullah regime hinges on the behaviour of western countries most notably UK, France and Germany cosying up to mullahs in Iran. There is no common consensus and strategy by western governments on how to deal with the mullahs as it’s prevalent by the stance of US nuclear deal vis a vis the big three in Europe! It’s widely recognised that change is inevitable but that change must be initiated by Iranian people to choose their government hopefully with no finacial assustance and back kissing of the mullahs butts by European Union. Now when there is no consensus even amongst europeans and US over how to deal with Iran how on earth do you expect the western governments hold rich oil Saudi Arabia to a different standard!? Ofcourse they are not going to forego their national interests over poor treatments or democracy....There will always be ‘business as usual’ when dealing with oil rich Saudi Arabia regardless of their poor human rights etc....That’s a no brainer. Edited June 27, 2018 by kactus Quote
CITIZEN_2015 Posted June 27, 2018 Report Posted June 27, 2018 (edited) 8 hours ago, GostHacked said: You have not been here as long as I have, and you would take back the comment about 'lack of knowledge' when you read my posts. The invasion of those countries had nothing to do with terrorism. Nor did the USA give a crap about human rights or removing brutal dictators. These leaders went against the petro dollar and they faces the consequences of the petro dollar being enforced with a very large global army. And yes, I know that Iranians are not Arabs, they are Persians. However under the guise of 'regime' change, the fact that Iranians are Persians means little to the ones that will invade. So if you want to see how Iran will be, we need to look at the nations already invaded and obliterated by going after global terrorism. So again, I ask, what about Saudi Arabia? When do they get their regime change? They are as oppresive as all the other regimes, if not more. And well, I guess they allow women to drive now, so they got that going for them. Real progressive of them considering they still lop heads off in the middle of the street. You called Iranians as "other terrorist arab nation" and that showed your total lack of knowledge no matter how long you have been here. We have discussed it here many times that Iranians (Mainly Persians, Azeris, Kurds) are NOT arabs and have totally different culture (not aggressive like arabs who used to bury their daughters when Iran was a civilized empire bringing the first charter of human right) and also different traditions and language. And also again you did not differentiate between Iran nation and Iran regime and called the nation a terrorist nation whereas we have said many times they are completely two different entities. And as kactus said it well, in Saudi Arabia and other arab countries (with exclusion of very few like Morocco and Tunasia) a good majority of people like the islamic laws that Saudi regime imposes but quite the opposite in Iran and the gap between the very educated nation and the aging ape mullahs is very wide and widening every day as they are centuries apart. Edited June 27, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015 Quote
GostHacked Posted June 27, 2018 Author Report Posted June 27, 2018 43 minutes ago, CITIZEN_2015 said: You called Iranians as "other terrorist arab nation" and that showed your total lack of knowledge no matter how long you have been here. We have discussed it here many times that Iranians (Mainly Persians, Azeris, Kurds) are NOT arabs and have totally different culture (not aggressive like arabs who used to bury their daughters when Iran was a civilized empire bringing the first charter of human right) and also different traditions and language. And also again you did not differentiate between Iran nation and Iran regime and called the nation a terrorist nation whereas we have said many times they are completely two different entities. And as kactus said it well, in Saudi Arabia and other arab countries (with exclusion of very few like Morocco and Tunasia) a good majority of people like the islamic laws that Saudi regime imposes but quite the opposite in Iran and the gap between the very educated nation and the aging ape mullahs is very wide and widing every day as they are centuries apart. Just because I did not show the difference in this post, (I was not expecting to be required to make that denouncement on every post) does not mean I never said there are no differences between the people and the government. I's actually like that in MOST nations, but not every nation. I've also talked about the many attacks in Iran from entities like Israel, the UK and the US. So the US and Israel and Saudi Arabia, are carrying out terror attacks in Iran. But you also have to say, and it's by the definition they go by, that Iran also takes part in terrorism. The US and Israel and Saudi Arabia has been wanting regime change in Iran. It's failed so far to get regime change, but that won't stop them from trying. Essentially you are creating an argument where there does not need to be one. I made this thread and if you look back you'll maybe have a different outlook on what I post. Quote
CITIZEN_2015 Posted June 27, 2018 Report Posted June 27, 2018 (edited) 52 minutes ago, GostHacked said: Just because I did not show the difference in this post, (I was not expecting to be required to make that denouncement on every post) does not mean I never said there are no differences between the people and the government. So the US and Israel and Saudi Arabia, are carrying out terror attacks in Iran. But you also have to say, and it's by the definition they go by, that Iran also takes part in terrorism. The US and Israel and Saudi Arabia has been wanting regime change in Iran. It's failed so far to get regime change, but that won't stop them from trying. I made this thread and if you look back you'll maybe have a different outlook on what I post. I quoted THIS post and objected to THIS post. If I say all the right thing in all other posts and make a big mistake in one post then I deserve to be corrected in that one post. That said I apologize for my rather aggressive response as I was upset by quoting Iran as other terrorist arab nation. And again I have to correct you that it is not US and Israel and Saudi Arabia who have been wanting a regime change in Iran. It is mainly the Iranian people who are fed up with 40 years of lies and deception and corruptions and repressions and executions and poverty who have risen up against the regime and of course the countries that you named also would like to see a regime change so what is the surprise there?, join the 6 billion club, who dosn't?, apart from muderous Assad and terrorist hamas and hezbolah and may be prostitute governments in Russia and China. Yes I appreciate that you made this thread. Though may be the title should be Iran needs full democracy as Iran nation and brave women of Iran would settle for nothing less. Edited June 27, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015 Quote
marcus Posted June 28, 2018 Report Posted June 28, 2018 The goal of the U.S. government and the neo-cons is not regime change. The goal is state collapse. A civil war that leads to a prolonged state of debilitating instability, which in turn will shift the regional balance of power in favour of Saudi Arabia and other states aligned with the US. "Two close confidants of President Donald Trump are scheduled to speak Saturday before a controversial Iranian opposition group previously designated as a terrorist outfit, raising fresh questions about the group’s Washington influence as Trump pursues a pressure campaign against Tehran. "In the spring of last year, for instance, Joel Rayburn, a senior National Security Council official who deals with the Middle East, spoke with Washington think-tanks experts about the possibility of creating a coalition of Iranian minority groups — such as the Kurds, the Baluch or the Azeris — to try to topple the regime, according to a former senior Trump administration official." Link Nothing to see here, CITIZEN_2015? Quote "What do you think of Western civilization?" Gandhi was asked. "I think it would be a good idea," he said.
CITIZEN_2015 Posted June 28, 2018 Report Posted June 28, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, marcus said: The goal of the U.S. government and the neo-cons is not regime change. The goal is state collapse. A civil war that leads to a prolonged state of debilitating instability, which in turn will shift the regional balance of power in favour of Saudi Arabia and other states aligned with the US. Nothing to see here, CITIZEN_2015? Iran regime mouth piece speaks again so what is new? Statements above are by Iran regime mouth piece or paid mercenaries or both. Exact same nonsense that Iran regime is claiming and nobody believes them is echoed here. Those who benefit from this murderous regime spread these false claims. Iran is stratigically and geo-politically the most importamt country in the world located at the top of Persian Gulf and strait of Hormuz where 40% of world oil is passing every day. The whole world wants stable Iran otherwise the world's lifeline (oil) would be in serious jeopardy. The US wants a regime change and so do the Iranians who are fed up with 40 years of repression, executions, corruptions, desctructions, wars, hate, terror, hunger............ There is no need to shift any balance of power in favor of anyone if a civilized government is in power in Iran who lives at peace with its neighbors and the world. The whole world would benefit from a united, stable and strong Iran except maybe those terrorist groups such as Syria, Hamas and Hezbolah and their supporters. Yes Iranians needs all the international support they can get including US but to call Iranians who risk their lives every day so that they can take back their country from these occupying murderers as US agents is treason at best and contributing to bloodshed at worse. The nation shouted: We will die we will die but we will take back Iran. Yes US may be helping the minorities so that they bring about or help to bring about a regime change but in no bloody way the US wishes to see civil war in Iran. It is Pure lies and deception marcus is spreading. Edited June 28, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015 Quote
CITIZEN_2015 Posted June 28, 2018 Report Posted June 28, 2018 (edited) Iranian MP dares to speak out. https://en.radiofarda.com/a/iran-mo-bonyadi-attacks-putin-assad-policies/29325152.html The voice of Iran regime critics gets louder and fed up Iranians pour into streets demanding an end to military intervention abroad and demand an end to the imposed islamic republic. While the head of so called islamic justice department threatens those who come out with hanging and execution. The MP in the link spoke against those who attributes iran's problems to foreigners and the US. Bonyadi also attacked the Islamic Republic’s policy of supporting foreign groups and countries, saying that the Iran needs $60 billion dollars of investments annually. “Why we should constantly live in fear of war, sanctions and bad news”, he lamented. In a broadside to the hardliners who often attribute the country’s problems to the “enemy”, Bonyadi said, “Which international conspiracy has destroyed our rivers, wetlands, lakes and underground water reserves. Which foreigner has deprived our people of clean air? Why harmony and accommodation with the international community is so hard for us?” He also criticized heavy handed security measures against critics and protesters and said that increasingly many Iranians are left out of any role in the country, to the extent that every critic is labelled as an anti-regime element. Edited June 28, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015 Quote
paxamericana Posted June 28, 2018 Report Posted June 28, 2018 12 minutes ago, CITIZEN_2015 said: Iranian MP dares to speak out. https://en.radiofarda.com/a/iran-mo-bonyadi-attacks-putin-assad-policies/29325152.html The voice of Iran regime critics gets louder and fed up Iranians pour into streets demanding an end to military intervention abroad and demand an end to the imposed islamic republic. While the head of so called islamic justice department threatens those who come out with hanging and execution. The MP in the link spoke against those who attributes iran's problems to foreigners and the US. Bonyadi also attacked the Islamic Republic’s policy of supporting foreign groups and countries, saying that the Iran needs $60 billion dollars of investments annually. “Why we should constantly live in fear of war, sanctions and bad news”, he lamented. In a broadside to the hardliners who often attribute the country’s problems to the “enemy”, Bonyadi said, “Which international conspiracy has destroyed our rivers, wetlands, lakes and underground water reserves. Which foreigner has deprived our people of clean air? Why harmony and accommodation with the international community is so hard for us?” He also criticized heavy handed security measures against critics and protesters and said that increasingly many Iranians are left out of any role in the country, to the extent that every critic is labelled as an anti-regime element. Yes its ironic that their own objective to destabilize others have come back to bite them. Quote
marcus Posted June 28, 2018 Report Posted June 28, 2018 1 hour ago, CITIZEN_2015 said: Iran regime mouth piece speaks again so what is new? Statements above are by Iran regime mouth piece or paid mercenaries or both. Exact same nonsense that Iran regime is claiming and nobody believes them is echoed here. Those who benefit from this murderous regime spread these false claims. You are a joke. You say this even though I keep repeating over and over that I would like to see the Iranian regime removed? I would love to see a true democracy in Iran and all of the mullahs to be pushed aside. BUT of course, I would not like to see them be replaced at the expense of seeing Iran turn into another Iraq/Libya. We have Trump advisors meeting with MEK, a terrorist group which has attacked Iran, and you're not willing to respond to this. Who are you a mouthpiece for? Definitely not majority of Iranian people who despise MEK. This is a group who coordinated attacks with Iraq, on Iran and carried out terrorist attacks inside Iran. Why do you insist on brushing aside the agenda of the Trump administration? Why are you not concerned about Saudi and Israel's role in this? Quote "What do you think of Western civilization?" Gandhi was asked. "I think it would be a good idea," he said.
kactus Posted June 28, 2018 Report Posted June 28, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, CITIZEN_2015 said: Iranian MP dares to speak out. https://en.radiofarda.com/a/iran-mo-bonyadi-attacks-putin-assad-policies/29325152.html The voice of Iran regime critics gets louder and fed up Iranians pour into streets demanding an end to military intervention abroad and demand an end to the imposed islamic republic. While the head of so called islamic justice department threatens those who come out with hanging and execution. The MP in the link spoke against those who attributes iran's problems to foreigners and the US. Bonyadi also attacked the Islamic Republic’s policy of supporting foreign groups and countries, saying that the Iran needs $60 billion dollars of investments annually. “Why we should constantly live in fear of war, sanctions and bad news”, he lamented. In a broadside to the hardliners who often attribute the country’s problems to the “enemy”, Bonyadi said, “Which international conspiracy has destroyed our rivers, wetlands, lakes and underground water reserves. Which foreigner has deprived our people of clean air? Why harmony and accommodation with the international community is so hard for us?” He also criticized heavy handed security measures against critics and protesters and said that increasingly many Iranians are left out of any role in the country, to the extent that every critic is labelled as an anti-regime element. I would take the words of people like Bonyadi with a pinch of salt....It is not the first time a so called reformist says something to align himself with the view of public majority only to preserve the existence of Ayatollahs. Notwithstanding his criticism from the regime, what influence if any do so called reformists have on these issues when the supreme leader Khamenei can silence any criticism including the reformists??? After all, he is the one that ultimately has a say in these things.... Edited June 28, 2018 by kactus 1 Quote
CITIZEN_2015 Posted June 28, 2018 Report Posted June 28, 2018 (edited) 13 minutes ago, marcus said: You are a joke. You say this even though I keep repeating over and over that I would like to see the Iranian regime removed? I would love to see a true democracy in Iran and all of the mullahs to be pushed aside. BUT of course, I would not like to see them be replaced at the expense of seeing Iran turn into another Iraq/Libya. We have Trump advisors meeting with MEK, a terrorist group which has attacked Iran, and you're not willing to respond to this. Who are you a mouthpiece for? Definitely not majority of Iranian people who despise MEK. This is a group who coordinated attacks with Iraq, on Iran and carried out terrorist attacks inside Iran. Why do you insist on brushing aside the agenda of the Trump administration? Why are you not concerned about Saudi and Israel's role in this? This is your cover. Under the cover of so called supporting regime change you are a propaganda machine for the brutal Iran regime. If you had said you support the regime then nobody would have even read your posts. I have said it again and you know it too. Iran will never turn into Iraq and Libya because those two are Arab nations and Iran is not. Iranians are very nationalist and wise with 2500 years of shared history and culture and strong sense of nationalism. Unlike Iraq, Syria and Libya Iran's borders did not appear out of nowhere less than a century ago. Yes I am a mouthpiece for the majority of Iranians. The voices that are repressed and cannot be heard. I do not support MEK and you know it. I feel they have no chances in Iran because they are hated. Israel has done nothing to Iranians but Arabs have. Many wrongs so you alone in this mission. Edited June 28, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015 Quote
CITIZEN_2015 Posted June 28, 2018 Report Posted June 28, 2018 (edited) 9 minutes ago, kactus said: I would take the words of people like Bonyadi with s pinch of salt....It is not the first time a so called reformist says something to align himself with the view of public majority only to preserve the existence of Ayatollahs. It is not yhe first time reformists have used these tactics. Notwithstanding his criticism from the regime, does it ever occur to anyone what influence if any do so called reformists have on these issues when the supreme leader Khamenei can silence any criticism including the reformists??? After all, he is the one that ultimately has a say in these things.... Yes absolutely agree. It is a show and deception. And now the Iranian people know it too. They were fooled for 20 years and the regime survived by playing the so called reformist against the so called principalists but they are both from the same piece of shit (excuse the language). I just quoted the guy because I wanted to show to public that even within the regime they admit that it is not the US but the enemy is right there at home occupying the land of Aryans. Edited June 28, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015 Quote
marcus Posted June 28, 2018 Report Posted June 28, 2018 Just now, CITIZEN_2015 said: This is your cover. Under the cover of so called supporting regime change you are a propaganda machine for the brutal Iran regime. If you had said you support the regime then nobody would have even read your posts. You're still a joke. You are no better than those who flash the anti-semite card whenever Israel is criticized. You are either a supporter of the MEK or you're just not sophisticated enough to realize that life is not always black and white. Just because I am against the U.S./Israel/Saudi agenda, it does not mean that I support the Iranian regime. Just now, CITIZEN_2015 said: I have said it again and you know it too. Iran will never turn into Iraq and Libya because those two are Arab nations and Iran is not. Iranians are very nationalist and wise with 2500 years of history. Unlike Iraq, Syria and Libya our borders did not appear out of nowhere less than a century ago. Yes I am a mouthpiece for the majority of Iranians. The voices that are repressed and cannot be heard. I do not support MEK and you know it. I feel they have no chances in Iran because they are hated. Israel has done nothing to Iranians but Arabs have. Many wrongs so you alone in this mission. Majority of Iranian people do not want the MEK (Mujahedeen) in power. Are you an MEK supporter? If you are not, as an Iranian, why are you not concerned that this cult has been handpicked as the official opposition by the neo-cons and to lead Iran? Quote "What do you think of Western civilization?" Gandhi was asked. "I think it would be a good idea," he said.
CITIZEN_2015 Posted June 28, 2018 Report Posted June 28, 2018 (edited) 14 minutes ago, marcus said: You're still a joke. You are no better than those who flash the anti-semite card whenever Israel is criticized. You are either a supporter of the MEK or you're just not sophisticated enough to realize that life is not always black and white. Just because I am against the U.S./Israel/Saudi agenda, it does not mean that I support the Iranian regime. Majority of Iranian people do not want the MEK (Mujahedeen) in power. Are you an MEK supporter? If you are not, as an Iranian, why are you not concerned that this cult has been handpicked as the official opposition by the neo-cons and to lead Iran? You are making an *** out of yourself in public marcus. You quote my comment which says I don't support MEK and they are hated and then you ask me if I am a MEK supporter under that quote!!!!!!. Edited June 28, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015 Quote
marcus Posted June 28, 2018 Report Posted June 28, 2018 1 minute ago, CITIZEN_2015 said: You are making an *** out of yourself in public marcus. You quote my comment which says I don't support MEK and they are hated and then you ask me if I am a MEK supporter under that quote!!!!!!. This is your cover. Under the cover of so called not supporting MEK you are a propaganda machine for the brutal MEK. If you had said you support MEK then nobody would have even read your posts. Quote "What do you think of Western civilization?" Gandhi was asked. "I think it would be a good idea," he said.
CITIZEN_2015 Posted June 28, 2018 Report Posted June 28, 2018 (edited) 19 minutes ago, marcus said: This is your cover. Under the cover of so called not supporting MEK you are a propaganda machine for the brutal MEK. If you had said you support MEK then nobody would have even read your posts. You need help man. Seriously seek help. At least be original rather than an imitation. You seriously discredited yourself in public by such absurd claim.. That was all was left to be called. I was called Muslim fanatic, An ISIS supporter, An Iran supporter, a leftist, and now I am a MEK supporter!!!!!!!!!!!!! Btw, If you think that MEK is brutal then read about what mullahs have done in Iran past 40 years which include the RAPE of underage MEK female supporters (as young as 12) the night before their execution only because they sold MEK newspapers in early 80"s and the world stayed silent. Anything is an improvement however, my choice is clear in all my posts. And that is not MEK. Edited June 28, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015 Quote
marcus Posted June 28, 2018 Report Posted June 28, 2018 (edited) 36 minutes ago, CITIZEN_2015 said: You need help man. Seriously seek help. At least be original rather than an imitation. You seriously discredited yourself in public by such absurd claim.. You needed help and I offered it by showing you how ridiculous you with your insinuation that I support the Iranian regime by responding the same way to your denial of supporting MEK. You need to grow up and learn how to have a debate and show respect for people who are not looking to attack or have a fight. Quote That was all was left to be called. I was called Muslim fanatic, An ISIS supporter, An Iran supporter, a leftist, and now I am a MEK supporter!!!!!!!!!!!!! Btw, If you think that MEK is brutal then read about what mullahs have done in Iran past 40 years which include the RAPE of underage MEK supporters the night before their execution because they sold MEK newspapers in early 80"s. Anything is an improvement however, my choice is clear in all my posts. And that is not MEK. I think both the MEK and the Iranian regime are brutal and I support neither. There is nothing wrong with criticizing the Iranian regime and criticizing the powers outside of Iran who do not care for Iran or Iranians. These outside groups would be just fine if Iran turns into a lawless quagmire. It doesn't matter if Iranians are proud, nationalistic or whatever else. It doesn't mean that they can stop the potential of everything falling into pieces. Edited June 28, 2018 by marcus Quote "What do you think of Western civilization?" Gandhi was asked. "I think it would be a good idea," he said.
CITIZEN_2015 Posted June 29, 2018 Report Posted June 29, 2018 (edited) 54 minutes ago, marcus said: You needed help and I offered it by showing you how ridiculous you with your insinuation that I support the Iranian regime by responding the same way to your denial of supporting MEK. You need to grow up and learn how to have a debate and show respect for people who are not looking to attack or have a fight. I think both the MEK and the Iranian regime are brutal and I support neither. There is nothing wrong with criticizing the Iranian regime and criticizing the powers outside of Iran who do not care for Iran or Iranians. These outside groups would be just fine if Iran turns into a lawless quagmire. It doesn't matter if Iranians are proud, nationalistic or whatever else. It doesn't mean that they can stop the potential of everything falling into pieces. Iran regime ssupporters and mouth pieces will have no respect and deserve none. When you repeat exactly what the regime is saying (that the US and Israel and Arabia plotting to disintegrate Iran (to save their asses) or cause civil war and all Iran's problems is because of the US and etc. etc.) then whether you know it or not you are a regime mouthpiece. MEK may be brutal and I have no love affair for them as they initially supported the mullahs against the Shah and brought them to power and I hate them just for that alone and of course helping Saddam too but the Iran regime has surpassed brutality by millions of light years. No comparison. Either you cannot read my comments or purposely close your eyes to all the facts that nobody US and Israel included wishes instability in Iran and what they want is a stable strong Iran living in peace with its neighbors. Iranians are nationalist and will never START anything having the potential of falling into pieces. Edited June 29, 2018 by CITIZEN_2015 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.