Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

What's a little Jihad next to the wonders of Middle Eastern cooking?

But the thing is you are so wildly off the mark. The US planned a genocide in Iraq and it followed thru murdering over a million people when there was absolutely no reason to do so. Only the deepest of evil people plan a genocide to kill a million children. 

Muslims have not done anything remotely close to that, and the US genocide in Iraq was followed up by illegal invasions that slaughtered another one or more million people. 

Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

Islam is a religion and is not free from criticism...no matter your desire for blasphemy laws to protect it above my personal freedom. 

Fanatacism is dangerous with or without religion.

You'd have to be quite dull, unstable or brainwashed by sociopaths to follow ANY religion's texts literally, in my opinion.

And you'd have to be fanatic to slog through them to cherry-pick literal bits to use to smear all who practice that religion, to incite hatred against them. 

Edited by jacee
  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, jacee said:

Fanatacism is dangerous with or without religion.

You'd have to be quite dull, unstable or brainwashed by sociopaths to follow ANY religion's texts literally, in my opinion.

And you'd have to be fanatic to slog through them to cherry-pick literal bits to use to smear all who practice that religion, to incite hatred against them. 

 

You're free to try and get those blasphemy laws cemented into criminal law and then use said laws to throw me in jail.

Posted
5 minutes ago, TTM said:

So the current and historical crimes of committed in the names of other religions are OK because their religious texts are slightly nicer?

We're not talking about the texts.  You said, quite correctly I think, that such particulars do not matter.  Interpretations are the only things that matter.  

Posted

 

1 minute ago, bcsapper said:

We're not talking about the texts.  You said, quite correctly I think, that such particulars do not matter.  Interpretations are the only things that matter.  

We seem to more or less agree.  My mistake then.  

Posted
6 minutes ago, TTM said:

 

We seem to more or less agree.  My mistake then.  

Well, my point was that it's okay to discuss religions individually, based on current performance.  I don't see a problem with that, and I think it does a disservice to some religions to lump them in with others, when, over the years, some have overcome their tendency towards literal interpretation rather more than others. 

Posted
1 minute ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

I note your lack of resolve.

I have you on the ropes...would you like to be let-up?

Lack of resolve ... oh, you mean my amused bewilderment?

I recognise the point you are trying to make.  It's wasted effort ... your aim is askew.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

Well, my point was that it's okay to discuss religions individually, based on current performance.  I don't see a problem with that, and I think it does a disservice to some religions to lump them in with others, when, over the years, some have overcome their tendency towards literal interpretation rather more than others. 

Right, but it is is not the religion (as in the fixed texts) that changed, but the culture around it and hence the interpretation (or better yet, lack of) of that religion

Posted
7 minutes ago, TTM said:

Lack of resolve ... oh, you mean my amused bewilderment?

I recognise the point you are trying to make.  It's wasted effort ... your aim is askew.

 

So how many did Mohammad murder personally?

How about rape?

Child molestation?

If I'm gonna respect the preferred cult at the threat of imprisonment, I'd at least like to be clear on who we're all supporting and what he did according to Islam's own history.

Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, TTM said:

Right, but it is is not the religion (as in the fixed texts) that changed, but the culture around it and hence the interpretation (or better yet, lack of) of that religion

Well, a book never hurt anyone, unless someone else hit them with it.

Edited by bcsapper

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,907
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    derek848
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...