Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Argus said:

For clarity's sake it should be pointed out the resolution did not merely condemn Islamophobia without defining it but called on the government to launch a study to see how they could eliminate Islamophobia. Nor is there any question the government will do just that.

According to the CBC news there was a demonstration just the other day against Motion 103 in Toronto. Those demonstrators appear to have a problem with Motion 103, and how the Peel Region school board is trying to implement Islamic prayers in their schools. No Christmas ceremonies allowed but Islamic prayer rooms will be allowed. Those concerned demonstrators have every bit of reason to be concerned. They believe that church and state should be separate, and that there should be no special privaleges be given to any religion in any educational institutions. But I guess there will be some here who will call it anti-Islamic or they are just a bunch of racists showing their colors again.

But when we see that it is not only white people there but there were Sikhs and Hindus, and even other muslims there also demonstrating against the motion it would be hard pressed to call it racism. But some will try to make it appear so. Like I have said before many times, and that is we can see now what happens when programs and agendas like   multiculturalism is implemented? It does nothing to unite anyone, but instead it works to divide everyone. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, taxme said:

 No Christmas ceremonies allowed but Islamic prayer rooms will be allowed.  

Here's an example of 'not giving an inch'.  One example is a private prayer club, another is public celebration of Christianity for all students.  If you're not even willing to recognize the difference then I have to discount your ability to be objective on these issues.

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
14 minutes ago, Argus said:

What do you think of this guy?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEYVCNgYA6s

I like him. He tells it like it is. Very refreshing coming from a man who is not Caucasian. If we only had more Caucasians who would use more common sense and logic like this guy does, Canada would be in better shape than what it is today. Everything today is coming down to multiculturalism, and the problems that it is creating. It is the only program and agenda in Canada that is causing all of our racial problems and divisions in this country. The multiculturalism department in Canada needs to be abolished. Why not? 

Posted
On 3/27/2017 at 2:49 PM, taxme said:

Geez, don't scare me like that. Now I have to have a shot of scotch to calm my nerves. :D

This explains a lot of your posts, I think.

Posted
3 hours ago, Argus said:

For clarity's sake it should be pointed out the resolution did not merely condemn Islamophobia without defining it but called on the government to launch a study to see how they could eliminate Islamophobia. Nor is there any question the government will do just that.

 

Here's the full text:

Quote

That, in the opinion of the House, the government should: (a) recognize the need to quell the increasing public climate of hate and fear; (b) condemn Islamophobia and all forms of systemic racism and religious discrimination and take note of House of Commons’ petition e-411 and the issues raised by it; and (c) request that the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage undertake a study on how the government could (i) develop a whole-of-government approach to reducing or eliminating systemic racism and religious discrimination including Islamophobia, in Canada, while ensuring a community-centered focus with a holistic response through evidence-based policy-making, (ii) collect data to contextualize hate crime reports and to conduct needs assessments for impacted communities, and that the Committee should present its findings and recommendations to the House no later than 240 calendar days from the adoption of this motion, provided that in its report, the Committee should make recommendations that the government may use to better reflect the enshrined rights and freedoms in the Constitution Acts, including the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

 

Not only do they want to 'reduce or eliminate' (undefined) Islamaphobia, but also (undefined) 'system racism and religious discrimination'.   Why are we not demanding a definition of 'systemic racism and religious discrimination'?  What does that mean, exactly?  It's not exactly defined so - I bet the Christians will use this lack of clarity to argue that because Canada is a Christian country, Christian prayer should be held before every school day, and all students should take part unless they ask for special dispensation.   Also, gays - Christians will demand the right to not serve gays because forcing them to do so against their beliefs is religious discrimination.   This motion just allows too much leeway for Christians and other religions to just impose what they want on the rest of us.   

Are you scared yet?

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Here's an example of 'not giving an inch'.  One example is a private prayer club, another is public celebration of Christianity for all students.  If you're not even willing to recognize the difference then I have to discount your ability to be objective on these issues.

Let's just keep all religions out of all schools. We send our children to school to get an education, not get brainwashed into religious doctrine. From what I have gathered here, you do not appear to have any problem with the Peel Region School Board trying to implement Islam into their schools. Why? Many parents appear to have a big problem with it, and there have been many demonstrations lately against allowing muslim prayer rooms in school. I am trying to be honest and up front here. But you appear to have a problem with that. Why do I always get the feeling that to like to attack me over this issue? I am against giving them an inch on this one because from my understanding of Islam, there is no compromising with Islam. What's next, groceries stores will have to have a separate area where bacon and pork is sold just so as not to offend some muslim?

We are dealing with a tenth century religion here that will not smarten up, and get into the 21st century. Why anyone would want to defend a religion that does what it does to other human beings whom it does not like is beyond me. Maybe those who want to support Islam should go and live in a country like Saudi Arabia for a year. I wonder after living there for a year would they still come back and want make us all believe and think that Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance. I personally think that those who did just that for one year would be dam glad to be back in Canada. If muslims would just keep their religion in their mosques, and not bring it out on to the streets, than all should be fine. But will they do that? This is the question of the day. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, dialamah said:

Here's the full text:

Not only do they want to 'reduce or eliminate' (undefined) Islamaphobia, but also (undefined) 'system racism and religious discrimination'.   Why are we not demanding a definition of 'systemic racism and religious discrimination'?  What does that mean, exactly?  It's not exactly defined so - I bet the Christians will use this lack of clarity to argue that because Canada is a Christian country, Christian prayer should be held before every school day, and all students should take part unless they ask for special dispensation.   Also, gays - Christians will demand the right to not serve gays because forcing them to do so against their beliefs is religious discrimination.   This motion just allows too much leeway for Christians and other religions to just impose what they want on the rest of us.   

Are you scared yet?

 

I could remember in my younger days when all this bull was not happening as to what is happening today thanks to multiculturalism. When our immigrants were mainly from Britain, Australia, and Europe racism and religious discrimination was not that much in the news. There may have been a bit going on but not like it is suppose to be happening today according to our fake liberal media. Most of all this supposed racism and religious discrimination that is going on is all being manufactured by the elite, and their fake media.

The end result is to cause division. And by mixing up all the different races and cultures and traditions and religions of the world our puppet politicians have now opened up a huge can of rotten worms. Most here will never admit nor ever will get it that massive non-white immigration and multiculturalism is the main problem that is causing division in Canada. Sad indeed. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Taxme, we do allow Christian prayer clubs.

This I am pretty sure is allowed and does happen. So, why are you asking me this?  

Posted
9 minutes ago, taxme said:

I could remember in my younger days when all this bull was not happening as to what is happening today thanks to multiculturalism. When our immigrants were mainly from Britain, Australia, and Europe racism and religious discrimination was not that much in the news. There may have been a bit going on but not like it is suppose to be happening today according to our fake liberal media. Most of all this supposed racism and religious discrimination that is going on is all being manufactured by the elite, and their fake media.

The end result is to cause division. And by mixing up all the different races and cultures and traditions and religions of the world our puppet politicians have now opened up a huge can of rotten worms. Most here will never admit nor ever will get it that massive non-white immigration and multiculturalism is the main problem that is causing division in Canada. Sad indeed. 

The crazy thing is that you don't even see how internally conflicted you are. 

Posted
33 minutes ago, taxme said:

This I am pretty sure is allowed and does happen. So, why are you asking me this?  

You said:

' No Christmas ceremonies allowed but Islamic prayer rooms will be allowed.'

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
1 hour ago, taxme said:

I like him. He tells it like it is. Very refreshing coming from a man who is not Caucasian.

If you can imagine you have more in common with him, that you agree more with him and his political and ideological beliefs, than you do with an awful lot of white people, maybe you should consider the possibility that you are not so much a "pro white activist" as you are a "pro-western civilization and culture" activist...

 

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted (edited)

This is a CITY report which says several busloads a day of illegals, mostly from Islamic countries, are arriving at the border every day. Notice how these people completely ignore the police telling them they can't cross here. They will come in if they want to and there's nothing the cops can do and they know it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XpELKOV5N8

Edited by Argus
  • Like 1

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
5 hours ago, taxme said:

If you don't care well good for you, but I do care.

I do care though, but way down deep I think I must be an activist for the un-whitening of the human species.  It stands to reason we'd have one less thing to squabble over if we were all the same colour.

That said the real trouble with Whiteness would just just find a new shade or other physical, religious, ideological, economic, etc etc difference to wrap its self-assumed self-absorbed superiority around. 

  • Like 1

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
21 hours ago, hot enough said:

The crazy thing is that you don't even see how internally conflicted you are. 

You keep telling me that I have a problem but yet when I ask you as to what my problem is you won't tell me? Are you just trying to make yourself look good, and me bad? Curious.

Posted
21 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

You said:

' No Christmas ceremonies allowed but Islamic prayer rooms will be allowed.'

Many school districts do not allow Christmas concerts anymore is what I believe I said in some past post. When I was in school we celebrated Christmas all the time. I am sure that you did too. So, most schools today have stopped celebrating Christmas, but those same schools are now going to offer prayer rooms for another religion. Hypocrisy at it's best.

This should not be allowed. Are we still living in Canada where we are willing to get rid of our traditions and culture to try not offend another tradition and culture? Are we now living in some an Arab country?  You tell me because it certainly is starting to look like it.

Posted
21 hours ago, Argus said:

If you can imagine you have more in common with him, that you agree more with him and his political and ideological beliefs, than you do with an awful lot of white people, maybe you should consider the possibility that you are not so much a "pro white activist" as you are a "pro-western civilization and culture" activist...

 

I did say that I agreed with him, and what he was saying, but I am pretty sure that he would probably not agree with many of my own personal opinions and points of view concerning other political and ideology beliefs. He might believe that calling myself a pro-white activist would be a racist thing. Than we do not have all that much in common.

Posted
18 hours ago, eyeball said:

I do care though, but way down deep I think I must be an activist for the un-whitening of the human species.  It stands to reason we'd have one less thing to squabble over if we were all the same colour.

That said the real trouble with Whiteness would just just find a new shade or other physical, religious, ideological, economic, etc etc difference to wrap its self-assumed self-absorbed superiority around. 

Maybe if there were only just a white race there would not be all the squabbles, and being called racists, that white people have to live and put up with all the time. Maybe you are an activist for the un-whitening of the human species. There have been many people that have called for the extermination of white people. And it would appear that there are many white people out there that want to help this elimination to take place. The many pro-white activists out there have a real big problem when they see their own people attack them, and call them racists or Nazis. But the fight must go on to try and save and educate those white people that are not so proud of who they are or have developed a hatred of their white skin before they are able to destroy their own white race. After all, I do believe that the white people should have a right to exist as a race. Don't you? Yes/no?

Posted
Just now, taxme said:

Maybe if there were only just a white race there would not be all the squabbles,

Or maybe if there were only the 'black' race or the 'asian' race or the 'muslim religion' or the 'christian religion'  ....

Posted
11 minutes ago, dialamah said:

Or maybe if there were only the 'black' race or the 'asian' race or the 'muslim religion' or the 'christian religion'  ....

Maybe the creator of this world made a big mistake when he thought that having a variety of different colored looking races that things would be just fantastic. Maybe now the creator is starting to have second thoughts about this. Hey, you never know.

Posted
1 hour ago, taxme said:

I did say that I agreed with him, and what he was saying, but I am pretty sure that he would probably not agree with many of my own personal opinions and points of view concerning other political and ideology beliefs. He might believe that calling myself a pro-white activist would be a racist thing. Than we do not have all that much in common.

Do you agree with him about this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Saqo9FGvVlc

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
2 hours ago, taxme said:

  You tell me because it certainly is starting to look like it.

You're still conflating private and public religious practice in the schools.  I can't tell if you're confused or dishonest.

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
23 hours ago, Argus said:

Do you agree with him about this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Saqo9FGvVlc

How can one not agree with someone who uses common sense and logic? Many decades ago I was pretty much a liberal until I listened to the other side of the story. Today the liberal left cannot make me believe anything they say anymore. They are nothing more than a bunch of intolerant and bigoted liars and crap disturbers. Do you agree? 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,017
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    taylor66
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...