New evidence about Obama birth certicate

[Bryan]

9 hours ago, ?Impact said:

Obviously you have zero understanding of flatbed scanner technology. You are aware are you not that there is not a single sensor array that spans the width of the document, but several. That artifact is generated by stitching those sensor arrays into a single wide image. If you understood semiconductor manufacturing, you would know that creating a single wide sensor array would be very difficult technically and extremely costly. Put down you conspiracy theory books, and start learning about technology.

I'm quite aware of how flatbed scanners work, and what a scanned document looks like -- people pay us a lot of money to scan things for them. We have a couple very big Creo ones.

 

I often have to piece together scans where the artboard is too large for the bed, and you need to do it in several pieces, often having to rotate them to get them on the bed. Now you're dealing not only with images that were stitched together to begin with, but having to join them together when the scan lines ran in opposing directions. 

Edited December 18, 2016 by Bryan
added

[Bryan]

3 hours ago, BubberMiley said:

And you and Sherrif Joe are the only ones capable of seeing these artifacts? 

Anyone who can't see them is pretty stupid. They're blatantly obvious.

[Argus]

14 hours ago, Bryan said:

The fact that I haven't seen the actual documents is the point. The digital image that was officially released was poorly photoshopped. I have no idea why. Perhaps the actual documents have the same pertinent information. Perhaps there's a different reason why the official image was manipulated. 

So despite the incredible importance of the birth certificate, and the scrutiny it would be under, and the wealth and power of the Democratic establishment, the best they could come up with was someone's ham-handed teenage son photoshopping a document? Is that what you're really trying to suggest?

I put it to you that if the document were going to be forged it would actually be so perfect no one would be able to tell there was anything wrong with it except with the most extensive testing by experts. Yet you feel it is such a bad effort it can be dismissed out of hand by some guy on the internet giving a casual glance? Have you ever considered the benefits of applying logic to your beliefs?

[Wilber]

16 minutes ago, Bryan said:

Anyone who can't see them is pretty stupid. They're blatantly obvious.

Why is it only you, Sheriff Joe and the other birthers can see them?

Edited December 18, 2016 by Wilber

[BubberMiley]

18 minutes ago, Bryan said:

Anyone who can't see them is pretty stupid. They're blatantly obvious.

Ever thought that maybe the pictures of the documents with the blatant errors weren't actually pictures of the documents submitted, and they were just created to make gullible people think they're smarter than everyone else?

[kimmy]

9 minutes ago, Argus said:

So despite the incredible importance of the birth certificate, and the scrutiny it would be under, and the wealth and power of the Democratic establishment, the best they could come up with was someone's ham-handed teenage son photoshopping a document? Is that what you're really trying to suggest?

Consider also that the actual location of Obama's birth is unimportant, for the same reason that the location of Ted Cruz's or John McCain's birth was not a barrier to their legal right to be president.

 -k

[Hal 9000]

I couldn't care less whether a president or prime minister is born in that country.  With that said, it does seem that there is more evidence that Obama was not born in the US, than there is he was born in america.

[Wilber]

Just now, Hal 9000 said:

I couldn't care less whether a president or prime minister is born in that country.  With that said, it does seem that there is more evidence that Obama was not born in the US, than there is he was born in america.

What evidence?

[Smallc]

30 minutes ago, Wilber said:

What evidence?

The Russians got it from hacking the DNC ha

[Bryan]

8 hours ago, BubberMiley said:

Ever thought that maybe the pictures of the documents with the blatant errors weren't actually pictures of the documents submitted

The one I saw was on CNN. Are you saying they doctored it?

[Wilber]

4 minutes ago, Bryan said:

The one I saw was on CNN. Are you saying they doctored it?

If it was so obvious, are you saying they wouldn't know if it was doctored?

Edited December 19, 2016 by Wilber

[Bryan]

8 hours ago, Argus said:

So despite the incredible importance of the birth certificate, and the scrutiny it would be under, and the wealth and power of the Democratic establishment, the best they could come up with was someone's ham-handed teenage son photoshopping a document? Is that what you're really trying to suggest?

I put it to you that if the document were going to be forged it would actually be so perfect no one would be able to tell there was anything wrong with it except with the most extensive testing by experts. Yet you feel it is such a bad effort it can be dismissed out of hand by some guy on the internet giving a casual glance? Have you ever considered the benefits of applying logic to your beliefs?

I'm not trying to suggest a motive for anything. I have no opinion whatsoever about where Obama was born. I have no idea why a fake document was released. I have no idea why it was so badly done either.

[?Impact]

2 hours ago, Hal 9000 said:

I couldn't care less whether a president or prime minister is born in that country.  With that said, it does seem that there is more evidence that Obama was not born in the US, than there is he was born in america.

What evidence, what friggen scrap of evidence is there that he was not born in America?

[BubberMiley]

10 hours ago, Bryan said:

The one I saw was on CNN. Are you saying they doctored it?

Either that or you are easily fooled.

[Argus]

15 hours ago, Hal 9000 said:

I couldn't care less whether a president or prime minister is born in that country.  With that said, it does seem that there is more evidence that Obama was not born in the US, than there is he was born in america.

There is precisely ZERO evidence Obama was born outside the US.

[Argus]

14 hours ago, Bryan said:

I'm not trying to suggest a motive for anything. I have no opinion whatsoever about where Obama was born. I have no idea why a fake document was released. I have no idea why it was so badly done either.

Your belief it was an obviously doctored document ignores all logic, common sense and reality.