9/11: No real planes hit the towers

[jacee]

-cia-pilot-presents-evidence-that-no-planes-hit-towers-on-9-11

Ex-CIA and commercial jet pilot John Lear claims that the Twin Towers were not bought to the ground by planes crashing into them on 9/11, and now detailed information has been posted online corroborating his account.

In Lears expert opinion the official claim that two planes crashed into the towers is actually physically impossible.

...

Why didnt we see 99 feet of AA Flight 11 sticking out of the North Tower or broken off, crumpled up, and/or crumbling to the ground below? Why didnt we see 122 feet of UA Flight 175 sticking out of the South Tower or crumpled up, and/or crumbling to the WTC plaza below?

There is no plane or plane wreckage at all to be seen in the hole of either tower in any video or photos.

Of course, there are no planes to be seen in the holes of either tower or on the street below because there were no real planes.

...

THERE ARE NO VERIFIED AIRPLANE PARTS

Apart from one or two props placed there like a bit of tire and a bit of engineparts that didnt even match a Boeing 767 ...

In reality, if a plane had hit the tower it would have crushed up like a car hitting a wall and its wings would have broken off and the majority of the plane would have fallen to the street below. The street below would have been littered with plane debris and the charred remains of the passengers yet it wasnt because there was no plane.

...

NO OFFICIAL CRASH REPORTS

FAA Regulation 121 requires a comprehensive investigation of all crashes of scheduled commercial flights yet there are no official crash reports on the 4 incidents because there were no planes.

...

PLANES HAVE A CGI APPEARANCE

In all of the footage the alleged planes hitting the twin towers clearly do not look real. The planes have a computer generated appearance. In the different footage we see the planes changing shape and color, missing wings, are featureless and blurred. Pilot John Lear made the observation that the plane has no strobe lights. The plane also casts no shadow.

Well ... what do you make of this, folks?

Among other things ... what happened to the people supposedly on those nonexistent planes?

.

[Icebound]

Has somebody hacked this account, or is it really serious?

[Argus]

It's utter moronic nonsense. I saw the damn videos of the second aircraft hitting the tower from multiple angles. These pictures and videos were taken by numerous video cameras, some belonging to the media, some belonging to private individuals, like the French documentary maker who was making a film on a rookie firefighter that month. I've also seen parts that were recovered from the planes in various videos taken around the streets at that time, including landing gear. Not only is this stupid junk science but it beggars belief that a huge mass of people would cooperate in a wide-ranging, government, media, and military involved conspiracy to blow up these towers by some other means and cover it up - successfully. And the people on the planes fried in the jet-fuel fire and then were crushed to paste by a billion tons of concrete collapsing around.

John Lear is a wack job who is part of a group who believe the world is controlled by a secret agency in touch with space aliens whose space ship is actually the moon.

[Icebound]

I thought that everybody knew that by now

[jacee]

It's utter moronic nonsense. I saw the damn videos of the second aircraft hitting the tower from multiple angles. These pictures and videos were taken by numerous video cameras, some belonging to the media, some belonging to private individuals, like the French documentary maker who was making a film on a rookie firefighter that month. I've also seen parts that were recovered from the planes in various videos taken around the streets at that time, including landing gear.

Show me.

Not only is this stupid junk science but it beggars belief that a huge mass of people would cooperate in a wide-ranging, government, media, and military involved conspiracy to blow up these towers by some other means and cover it up - successfully. And the people on the planes fried in the jet-fuel fire and then were crushed to paste by a billion tons of concrete collapsing around.

Collapsing ... why?

John Lear is a wack job who is part of a group who believe the world is controlled by a secret agency in touch with space aliens whose space ship is actually the moon.

Prove it.

[Wilber]

Oh Gawd, not this crap again.

[Argus]

Oh Gawd, not this crap again.

I don't know why people have such an obsessive need to believe ridiculous conspiracy theories. It's usually people who have a deep distrust of society, government and media and don't bother to think out the logic of such things.

[capricorn]

I don't know why people have such an obsessive need to believe ridiculous conspiracy theories.

To give their life meaning? Who the heck knows.

[betsy]

-cia-pilot-presents-evidence-that-no-planes-hit-towers-on-9-11

Ex-CIA and commercial jet pilot John Lear claims that the Twin Towers were not bought to the ground by planes crashing into them on 9/11, and now detailed information has been posted online corroborating his account.

In Lears expert opinion the official claim that two planes crashed into the towers is actually physically impossible.

...

Why didnt we see 99 feet of AA Flight 11 sticking out of the North Tower or broken off, crumpled up, and/or crumbling to the ground below? Why didnt we see 122 feet of UA Flight 175 sticking out of the South Tower or crumpled up, and/or crumbling to the WTC plaza below?

There is no plane or plane wreckage at all to be seen in the hole of either tower in any video or photos.

Of course, there are no planes to be seen in the holes of either tower or on the street below because there were no real planes.

...

THERE ARE NO VERIFIED AIRPLANE PARTS

Apart from one or two props placed there like a bit of tire and a bit of engineparts that didnt even match a Boeing 767 ...

In reality, if a plane had hit the tower it would have crushed up like a car hitting a wall and its wings would have broken off and the majority of the plane would have fallen to the street below. The street below would have been littered with plane debris and the charred remains of the passengers yet it wasnt because there was no plane.

...

NO OFFICIAL CRASH REPORTS

FAA Regulation 121 requires a comprehensive investigation of all crashes of scheduled commercial flights yet there are no official crash reports on the 4 incidents because there were no planes.

...

PLANES HAVE A CGI APPEARANCE

In all of the footage the alleged planes hitting the twin towers clearly do not look real. The planes have a computer generated appearance. In the different footage we see the planes changing shape and color, missing wings, are featureless and blurred. Pilot John Lear made the observation that the plane has no strobe lights. The plane also casts no shadow.

Well ... what do you make of this, folks?

Among other things ... what happened to the people supposedly on those nonexistent planes?

.

Other articles given by source (under Hot), also includes the following:

Russian Pilot reported close encounter with Two UFOs !!! July 2016

REAL UFO WITH ALIENS CAUGHT ON CAMERA FROM SAUDI ARABIA | UFO OR MILITARY VEHICLE? ALIEN SIGHTINGS

Russia Issues Grave Warning: “Prepare To Defend Earth, Fallen Angels Have Returned”

NASA hacker: I found evidence America has Deep Space Warships

http://zonnews.com/hot

A lot of the articles have also been written by the author of your article, Ibtissem menad!

This is one of her articles:

BREAKING:

EIFFEL TOWER ENGULFED IN FLAMES Immediately Following France Terror Attack

:lol:

Edited July 23, 2016 by betsy

[kimmy]

I think Betsy's post sums up the overall credibility of this source.

-k

[Smallc]

This is why Aliens don't talk to us.

[cybercoma]

Anyone here ever read Weekly World News? This reminds me of that only not nearly as entertaining.

[Guest]

Anyone here ever read Weekly World News? This reminds me of that only not nearly as entertaining.

Only when I'm in the store check out line. But I am sorely tempted to buy one sometimes.

I have nightmares about Bat Boy.

Edited July 24, 2016 by bcsapper

[poochy]

I must not be the same species, it's a more likely explanation than in the op.

[eyeball]

Didn't Trump say it was Hillary's fault?

[GostHacked]

I don't know why people have such an obsessive need to believe ridiculous conspiracy theories. It's usually people who have a deep distrust of society, government and media and don't bother to think out the logic of such things.

How many occasions where the government says 'no we are not doing that' but they are in fact doing that? (NSA warrentless wiretapping as one example).

There are good reasons to not trust everything the government is saying.

[eyeball]

What reason is there to believe the government could pull off such a stunt without cocking it up?

They can't even make buses run on time

[GostHacked]

What reason is there to believe the government could pull off such a stunt without cocking it up?

They can't even make buses run on time

They cocked it up from day one. And considering it was all used as a nice pretext to get into the M.E. and how the failed war on terror has given us more terrorism and more failed states all while increasing the surveillance network and militarizing the police.

It's a catalyst for our new lives in which we are to live in fear of everything. It was used as a conditioning tool for idiots who cannot think for themselves.

[eyeball]

And not one single deathbed confession in 15 years? Unbelievable.

As for 9/11 being cocked up...no, it was and still remains the most successful attack in the history of warfare. A bullseye in other words.

[Argus]

How many occasions where the government says 'no we are not doing that' but they are in fact doing that? (NSA warrentless wiretapping as one example).

There are good reasons to not trust everything the government is saying.

Sure. But that doesn't mean you believe every cock and bull story you read on the internet. Wide ranging conspiracies aren't entirely impossible but they're damned unlikely to last long without someone spilling the beans, and you have to consider things like motivation. Just because someone says something different from the government that does not mean they're automatically more believable than the government.

You also have to look at the back ground of these people, and at the very least do minimal checking. I mean, Jaycee repeats this idiot's nonsense about no aircraft parts being found without doing the most basic, elementary google search.

https://www.google.ca/search?q=9/11+aircraft+parts+streets+of+new+york&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjtwd65u4zOAhXJ64MKHe85BusQ_AUICCgB&biw=1280&bih=611

Edited July 24, 2016 by Argus

[Wilber]

It's a catalyst for our new lives in which we are to live in fear of everything. It was used as a conditioning tool for idiots who cannot think for themselves.

So are 98% of conspiracy theories.