LemonPureLeaf Posted March 9, 2015 Report Posted March 9, 2015 Which you chalk up to non-white people. Not Islamic radicals, not religious fanatics or political enemies. Non-white people. That's racist. Empty words. Protip: if you don't want to appear racist (but you are racist) maybe don't double down on the racism, hey? It's completely racist. You actually think punishing people for "looking like" terrorists will fight terrorism? You're even dumber than you come off, and that is quite the feat, Explain how telling the truth is racist please. I'm simply telling the truth without PC blinders on. Most Muslims are brown people. Most terrorism we hear about today are done by Muslims. We are drafting legislation because of said brown people and their actions so .... We're going to profile people who look Muslim because they are the largest threat. Its Muslims who are crashing planes into buildings. Its Muslims who are lighting shoe bombs and its Muslims who are killing cartoonists. If some other group was doing these things I'd expect the government to go after them with equal vigor. Islam has a large problem and if they won't deal with it than we have no choice but to do it for them. I'm not disparaging any racial group. Therefore I'm not a racist. Being truthful and is not racist. Quote
jacee Posted March 9, 2015 Author Report Posted March 9, 2015 We're going to profile people who look Muslim ...That's racism.Are we going to profile people who "look" Aboriginal, or people who "look" like anti-pipeline activists too? Because that's who Harper is after. . Quote
LemonPureLeaf Posted March 9, 2015 Report Posted March 9, 2015 That's racism. Are we going to profile people who "look" Aboriginal, or people who "look" like anti-pipeline activists too? Because that's who Harper is after. . that's reality of the world we live in. Muslims blow up buildings and kill cartoonists. Blacks sell crack. Whites sell meth and Rx pills. Just how it is. So if you want to catch someone within those groups you're going to target them. Just how it is Will the enforcement agencies come out and say this? No. Because people who are PC will go crazy. But that's the way it is and should be. That's police work 101. Quote
On Guard for Thee Posted March 9, 2015 Report Posted March 9, 2015 Explain how telling the truth is racist please. I'm simply telling the truth without PC blinders on. Most Muslims are brown people. Most terrorism we hear about today are done by Muslims. We are drafting legislation because of said brown people and their actions so .... We're going to profile people who look Muslim because they are the largest threat. Its Muslims who are crashing planes into buildings. Its Muslims who are lighting shoe bombs and its Muslims who are killing cartoonists. If some other group was doing these things I'd expect the government to go after them with equal vigor. Islam has a large problem and if they won't deal with it than we have no choice but to do it for them. I'm not disparaging any racial group. Therefore I'm not a racist. Being truthful and is not racist. Again you are buying the kool aid Harper is selling and the MSM is helping to flog. Stats have been presented here before which show Muslims commit a very low percentage of terror attacks. Quote
LemonPureLeaf Posted March 9, 2015 Report Posted March 9, 2015 Again you are buying the kool aid Harper is selling and the MSM is helping to flog. Stats have been presented here before which show Muslims commit a very low percentage of terror attacks. Great. So some other group with 2 billion members has waged a worldwide effort to try and take over? Who is it? Where? In Canada? When? Facts are what they are. No other group is killing people over drawing a cartoon. Such an attack on freedom has never been seen. The west did nothing with the Nazis either when they first came to power and now many suggest we do nothing about the growing Islamic theocracy tide. The west pandered to the Nazis too and look how well that turned out. Now the left suggest we pander to the Islamic people. Please don't gamble with our future. PCness is going to be the downfall of the west. When our society falls it will be because of the left wing political correct types who choose to do nothing. Quote
Black Dog Posted March 9, 2015 Report Posted March 9, 2015 Explain how telling the truth is racist please. I'm simply telling the truth without PC blinders on. Telling the truth isn't racist. Whatever it you;re doing here certainly is. Most Muslims are brown people. Most terrorism we hear about today are done by Muslims.We are drafting legislation because of said brown people and their actions so .... Skin colour has absolutely nothing to do with their actions so...you're racist. We're going to profile people who look Muslim because they are the largest threat. Its Muslims who are crashing planes into buildings. Its Muslims who are lighting shoe bombs and its Muslims who are killing cartoonists. If some other group was doing these things I'd expect the government to go after them with equal vigor. If it's about Muslims, why the emphasis on skin colour? I'm not disparaging any racial group. Therefore I'm not a racist. Being truthful and is not racist. You're focusing on skin colour when it's about ideology. Scapegoating all brown people for the beliefs and actions of a few. From where I sit, that's pretty much Racism 101. Quote
On Guard for Thee Posted March 9, 2015 Report Posted March 9, 2015 Great. So some other group with 2 billion members has waged a worldwide effort to try and take over? Who is it? Where? In Canada? When? Facts are what they are. No other group is killing people over drawing a cartoon. Such an attack on freedom has never been seen. The west did nothing with the Nazis either when they first came to power and now many suggest we do nothing about the growing Islamic theocracy tide. The west pandered to the Nazis too and look how well that turned out. Now the left suggest we pander to the Islamic people. Please don't gamble with our future. PCness is going to be the downfall of the west. When our society falls it will be because of the left wing political correct types who choose to do nothing. And you sir, obviously dont know the facts. There have been lins posted in other threads on this discussion that show just who all are involved in terrorism and you might be surprised to find Muslims are far from leading the pack. Quote
PIK Posted March 9, 2015 Report Posted March 9, 2015 Name calling has become the new norm for the left when someone disagrees with them. Just like the premier calling everyone homophobic if you do not like the new sex ed. Or boring if you want to talk Sudbury. Quote Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
PIK Posted March 9, 2015 Report Posted March 9, 2015 Islam is leading the world in terrorism at the moment. Quote Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
jacee Posted March 9, 2015 Author Report Posted March 9, 2015 that's reality of the world we live in. Muslims blow up buildings and kill cartoonists. Blacks sell crack. Whites sell meth and Rx pills. Just how it is. So if you want to catch someone within those groups you're going to target them. Just how it is Will the enforcement agencies come out and say this? No. Because people who are PC will go crazy. But that's the way it is and should be. That's police work 101. I don't think you'll find many police forces who will admit to racial profiling, nor teach in it in policing 101 or anywhere else. And Harper's real target for Bill C51 is environmental activists who are mostly white. The Muslim thing is just a hook to convince Canadians our freedoms are under attack ... to justify him taking away our freedoms. :/ And yes, racists like you and capt Canada (now banned) love to drink the fearmongering koolaid. . . Quote
LemonPureLeaf Posted March 9, 2015 Report Posted March 9, 2015 I don't think you'll find many police forces who will admit to racial profiling, nor teach in it in policing 101 or anywhere else. And Harper's real target for Bill C51 is environmental activists who are mostly white. The Muslim thing is just a hook to convince Canadians our freedoms are under attack ... to justify him taking away our freedoms. :/ And yes, racists like you and capt Canada (now banned) love to drink the fearmongering koolaid. . . . I'm not a racist. I don't dislike people based on their race. I prefer to live around people who live a "white" lifestyle if you will but i myself, am a non white person.Bill c51 is a necessary bill that will give police the tools to protect Canada for all Canadians. Police don't teach it but that's how it is. Certain racial groups do certain types of activities. Plain and simple. Stereotypes are based on patterns of behaviour. Quote
guyser Posted March 9, 2015 Report Posted March 9, 2015 (edited) . I'm not a racist. I don't dislike people based on their race.Just their colour . Ok. I prefer to live around people who live a "white" lifestyle if you will Whats a 'white' lifestyle? Edited March 9, 2015 by Guyser2 Quote
PIK Posted March 10, 2015 Report Posted March 10, 2015 Calling people names when you don't agree ,has become the lefts new weapon. Quote Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
LemonPureLeaf Posted March 10, 2015 Report Posted March 10, 2015 Calling people names when you don't agree ,has become the lefts new weapon. I am not a white person. I don't know why I should have to prove that. Would a poster ask a white person to prove they are white?Or is a poster saying that non white people aren't smart enough to operate a computer or device to be online? Or that a non white person wouldn't be interested in politics? Quote
Black Dog Posted March 10, 2015 Report Posted March 10, 2015 I am not a white person. I don't know why I should have to prove that. Would a poster ask a white person to prove they are white? Or is a poster saying that non white people aren't smart enough to operate a computer or device to be online? Or that a non white person wouldn't be interested in politics? I'm not asking you to prove you're not white. I just find it interesting that you drop this "fact" so late in the game after posting so many racist statements. Which, btw, are still racist no matter what colour you are. Quote
LemonPureLeaf Posted March 10, 2015 Report Posted March 10, 2015 (edited) I'm not asking you to prove you're not white. I just find it interesting that you drop this "fact" so late in the game after posting so many racist statements. Which, btw, are still racist no matter what colour you are. I mentioned the fact in one if my first posts on this forum, ever as well. Obviously you wouldn't know that unless you read every one of my posts and no one does that. Just a misunderstanding. Have a great one! Edited March 10, 2015 by LemonPureLeaf Quote
guyser Posted March 10, 2015 Report Posted March 10, 2015 I mentioned the fact in one if my first posts on this forum, ever as well. Obviously you wouldn't know that unless you read every one of my posts and no one does that. Just a misunderstanding. Have a great one!In fact one can easily go and read everyone of your posts. So for the record? No you didnt. Quote
Black Dog Posted March 10, 2015 Report Posted March 10, 2015 In fact one can easily go and read everyone of your posts. So for the record? No you didnt. I think the skin colour of the poster is less important than the racist stuff he says. Quote
cybercoma Posted March 10, 2015 Report Posted March 10, 2015 (edited) Name calling has become the new norm for the left when someone disagrees with them. Just like the premier calling everyone homophobic if you do not like the new sex ed. Or boring if you want to talk Sudbury.Saying that a lesbian shouldn't be drafting legislation about sex education is what she was calling homophobic. It has nothing to do with constructive criticism of the legislation and everything to do with the closed-minded bigots who seem to find comfort in Conservative parties everywhere. You'll note that the particular MPP she targeted quickly got on his bike and learned how to pedal backwards after being talked to by the party brass as well. Edited March 10, 2015 by cybercoma Quote
jacee Posted March 10, 2015 Author Report Posted March 10, 2015 (edited) In fact one can easily go and read everyone of your posts. So for the record? No you didnt. Doesn't really matter does it?He can say anything true or untrue. Has to cover his aliases you know. Another thread wasted ... :/ Edited March 10, 2015 by jacee Quote
On Guard for Thee Posted March 10, 2015 Report Posted March 10, 2015 Islam is leading the world in terrorism at the moment. Yeah, they are all the way up to 6% of all terrorist attacks in the US. Quote
LemonPureLeaf Posted March 10, 2015 Report Posted March 10, 2015 Doesn't really matter does it? He can say anything true or untrue. Has to cover his aliases you know. Another thread wasted ... :/ I think the skin colour of the poster is less important than the racist stuff he says. http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums/topic/24261-niqab-ban-at-citizenship-ceremonies-struck-down-by-courts/?p=1035447 I first mentioned my race on Feb 28, 2015. Which is what I had mentioned. You guys obviously didn't read all of my posts. So you're wrong. Quote
guyser Posted March 10, 2015 Report Posted March 10, 2015 (edited) http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums/topic/24261-niqab-ban-at-citizenship-ceremonies-struck-down-by-courts/?p=1035447 I first mentioned my race on Feb 28, 2015. Which is what I had mentioned. You guys obviously didn't read all of my posts. So you're wrong. Well now you are outright full of it. And really? It doesnt much matter except it goes to your style if you will. I lost count at around 130 posts before you mentioned any colour or lack of. So this.... I mentioned the fact in one if my first posts on this forum,Is BS. But BD is right I think the skin colour of the poster is less important than the racist stuff he says. Edited March 10, 2015 by Guyser2 Quote
LemonPureLeaf Posted March 10, 2015 Report Posted March 10, 2015 I think the skin colour of the poster is less important than the racist stuff he says. So again explain how telling the truth is racist. So I'm only allowed to criticize someone if they are white? Is that what you're saying? As I say I am not a white person myself so who am I being racist against exactly? Most of the Muslims are non white people so it just makes sense that we scrutinize people who are non white when it comes to keeping Canadians safe from Muslim terrorism. The people who flew the planes into the WTC were non white. The people who killed cartoonists in Paris were non white. So I don't see how targeting non brown people would be more helpful in catching terrorists. It's brown terrorists that are carrying out the terror attacks we are talking about. Bin Laden was brown, the leader of Hamas is brown, the leader of Fatah is brown, the leadership of ISIS is brown, Jihadi John is brown, Boko Haram members are largely black. It just makes sense that we target the people of the race which the majority of the Muslim terrorists belong. I don't see how this is racist? So if anyone can explain it to me please do. I'm listening. In regards to terrorism time is always a factor and the faster we can catch the terrorists the faster we can save lives. The terrorists we're talking about are Muslims which happen to be brown for the most part. If some people cannot deal with that, well then those people are in denial. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted March 11, 2015 Report Posted March 11, 2015 Name calling has become the new norm for the left when someone disagrees with them. Just like the premier calling everyone homophobic if you do not like the new sex ed. Or boring if you want to talk Sudbury. As Cyber pointed out, you really shouldn't bawl about being called a name if you're openly homophobic, or racist. As long as people can point out the homophobia and racism in your argument without derailing/stopping the discussion you should be grown up enough to realize how your arguments come across and respond to that criticism... maybe for the first time in your life. It could cause you to consider and even reflect on yourself. Imagine that. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.