Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

John McKay, Liberal MP in the Liberal party was just "recorded" as referring to his leader, Justin Trudeau, as a Bozo. The content of that should and will be debated on another thread in this section.

The reporter breaking that story admitted that the recording was taken secretly of a private conversation but in a "public" venue. We have recently had a number of "gotcha" recordings made public - recordings that were made without the knowledge of both participants.

From Mitt Romney's “47% video”, to Donald Sterling's taped racist phone call and now John McKay speaking “off the record” but being recorded as criticizing Trudeau.

http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/bozo-eruption-liberal-mp-secretly-recorded-slamming-trudeau-s-abortion-stance-1.1839528

The ability to record what someone is doing and saying in private is increasing every year with the exponential evolution of communications technology. It is probably now possible to record what someone is doing and saying in their bedrooms.

What is the level of designation of “celebrity” or “public figure” or “important participant” who can be targeted for secret recordings?

Is it fair or productive or informative or correct or ... to record a private conversation without the knowledge of all participants?

Should there be restrictions? What should they be?

Note - For those expecting a response from Big Guy: I generally do not read or respond to posts longer then 300 words nor to parsed comments.

Posted (edited)

Should we start with what the laws are?

US ... depends ...

http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/recording-phone-calls-and-conversations

Canada ... Yes ... IF you are a party to the conversation ...

http://www.winningcourtstrategies.com/divorces-in-canada/tape-recording-a-conversation-legal-or-illegal-canada/

And Yes if you are eavesdropping where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.

http://www.legaltree.ca/node/908

Edited by Charles Anthony
deleted quote that re-copied Opening Post
Posted

Hey, remember when Vic Toews personal information was legally accessed and he flipped out then quit politics? Those were good times.

Once you turn the cameras in on them, they simply freak out. And that information was already public information on Toews, so nothing illegal was done to obtain that information. But yet he cried like a school girl and left politics. The level of integrity in our leaders needs to be just a bit higher than what it currently is.

Posted

Offhand I would argue the Romney incident is quite unlike the Sterling one, at very least. I am not sure how like it is to the McKay one. Romney was at a clearly political function giving a clearly political speech. It was not a private conversation per se, it was a targeted public one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,025
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Jameslive
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Longley earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Longley earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • maro ay earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • maro ay earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Longley earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...