Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 681
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

You can murder people in broad daylight and not get anywhere near 30 years in Canada...so what ?

And you can not murder people in the US and get put to death for it. Especially if you're black and poor. First degree murder in Canada carries life imprisonment for your edification.

Posted

Since she's been given asylum, I would suggest they disagree.

And I don't think 30 years in prison for sex with a 16 year old represents international norms, unless they're set by Iran.

I'd like to read the IRB's decision as the appeal judge threw it out the last time as they failed to identify "how" the sentence met the clause I quoted. If they just repeated the same mistake, expect another go 'round the mulberry bush.
Posted

Let's hope Obama does the right thing and issues her a pardon at the end of his mandate.

There are tons of Americans, thousands upon thousands serving ridiculously long sentences for minor crimes that didn't hurt anyone. Obama doesn't have the balls to pardon any but a tiny tithe of them for fear the Republicans will scream about how he and his party are soft on crime.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

George Zimmerman gets to murder an unarmed kid and walk free, while this woman gets a 30 year sentence. Brilliant justice system in Florida.

"Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions." --Thomas Jefferson

Posted

George Zimmerman gets to murder an unarmed kid and walk free, while this woman gets a 30 year sentence. Brilliant justice system in Florida.

It may be bass ackwards to us but just sensible enough to not trample on our diplomatic relation over. I would say again if an Albertan shot unarmed trespassers on his ranch and ran to FLA to "stand his ground", we'd expect extradition.

Posted

It may be bass ackwards to us but just sensible enough to not trample on our diplomatic relation over. I would say again if an Albertan shot unarmed trespassers on his ranch and ran to FLA to "stand his ground", we'd expect extradition.

You're conveniently leaving out the part about her actually being sentenced and the sentence begin ludicrous. That's what this is about. It's not about getting charged with a crime and fleeing trial, as your example suggests.

"Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions." --Thomas Jefferson

Posted

Here's another point, why did she have to come to Canada, would not a "sensible" state she travelled through on the way not have fought the extradition as well? As well how did she enter the country in the first place, she was a convicted felon when she made entry and she didn't apply for asylum for awhile.....were CBSA snoozing here?

Posted

Federal law in the US does not allow you to circumvent state consent laws by going to another state.

"Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions." --Thomas Jefferson

Posted

I should add, the only reason I brought up the other states' consent laws is that it demonstrates the unreasonableness of Florida's sentencing.

"Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions." --Thomas Jefferson

Posted

George Zimmerman gets to murder an unarmed kid and walk free, while this woman gets a 30 year sentence. Brilliant justice system in Florida.

Zimmerman was found not guilty, Harvey was convicted on all five counts...jumped bail..and fled the country Big difference in Florida or any other jurisdiction.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

... As well how did she enter the country in the first place, she was a convicted felon when she made entry and she didn't apply for asylum for awhile.....were CBSA snoozing here?

It appears so...she was a convicted felon and sex offender to boot. Maybe the CBSA would have denied entry for drunk driving if she had any priors.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Not from me. 30 years for consentual sex is nuts.

I wish everybody would stop saying it was consensual sex.

It cannot be consensual if one of the parties is legally a child.

I'm not saying the sentence is just, but the humping cannot be consensual.

Science too hard for you? Try religion!

Posted

Zimmerman was found not guilty, Harvey was convicted on all five counts...jumped bail..and fled the country Big difference in Florida or any other jurisdiction.

She was convicted 5 times for something that is not a crime in Canada. 6 times wouldn't have made it a crime either. or 7 or 8...

Posted

I wish everybody would stop saying it was consensual sex.

It cannot be consensual if one of the parties is legally a child.

I'm not saying the sentence is just, but the humping cannot be consensual.

Once again, he's not a child in Canada. Do you conclude the "humping" was not consensual 5 times. He must be a gluten for "punishment".

Posted

It's ridiculous to say that a 16 year old boy cannot consent to sex. I would imagine he was incredibly enthusiastic about the whole idea.

While 30 years in jail for sex with a 16 year old is not quite as bad as some of the stuff coming out of other countries as mentioned on other threads, it is nonetheless an atrocious sentence that has no basis in reality.

Welcome to Canada.

Posted (edited)

It's ridiculous to say that a 16 year old boy cannot consent to sex. I would imagine he was incredibly enthusiastic about the whole idea.

No it's not...when the sex offender is a person of authority or control, parent, guardian, etc. Also, if the 16 year old has a mental disability then someone (male or female) can take advantage of them.

What next...are Florida's incest laws and punishment unreasonable too after age 16 ?

Edited by bush_cheney2004

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

She was convicted 5 times for something that is not a crime in Canada. 6 times wouldn't have made it a crime either. or 7 or 8...

Florida can't and shouldn't run its criminal justice system based on the hug-a-thug laws in Canada, nor should any other state.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

I wish everybody would stop saying it was consensual sex.

It cannot be consensual if one of the parties is legally a child.

I'm not saying the sentence is just, but the humping cannot be consensual.

I don't care what the law says in Florida. A 16 yr old can give consent or not. He is not a child.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted (edited)

No it's not...when the sex offender is a person of authority or control, parent, guardian, etc. Also, if the 16 year old has a mental disability then someone (male or female) can take advantage of them.

None of which was the case here.

And even if it was, 30 years is still ludicrous, no matter what the American Ayatollahs think.

Edited by Argus

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

I don't care what the law says in Florida. A 16 yr old can give consent or not. He is not a child.

That is precisely the crux of this topic for many......you don't care what the law says in FLA. The state jurisdiction obviously means nothing to you, which can easily be reciprocated. You are more enlightened than those rube Floridians.....this attitude is the beginning of many cultural wars.

Do you pay your speeding tickets from other state/provinces?

Posted

I don't care what the law says in Florida. A 16 yr old can give consent or not. He is not a child.

Then you obviously have no "respect for the law" when you disagree. The age of consent varies around the world. Sorry Canada.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Then you obviously have no "respect for the law" when you disagree. The age of consent varies around the world. Sorry Canada.

Sure and in some parts of the world adulterers are stoned to death. It doesn't mean Canada should respect their laws.

The issue here is cruel and unusual punishment and 30 years in jail does not fit the crime.

It's kind of the worst thing that any humans could be doing at this time in human history. Other than that, it's fine." Bill Nye on Alberta Oil Sands

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,857
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Tony Eveland
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...