Topaz Posted January 22, 2014 Report Share Posted January 22, 2014 Frank Klees, says he had enough and is leaving when the next election comes. I always thought he wanted the leadership and would stay for it but I guess not. Could he be headed for the Ottawa as a MP or a senator?? http://www.bramptonguardian.com/news-story/4328099-tory-mpp-frank-klees-retiring-from-politics/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boges Posted January 22, 2014 Report Share Posted January 22, 2014 If I remember correctly he was musing about running for speaker after the election. Doing that would have given the Liberals a defacto majority. He clearly doesn't play nice with Hudak. I'm shocked Wynne doesn't want to call a by-election for him today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted January 22, 2014 Report Share Posted January 22, 2014 Thought this tread was gonna be about the candidate from Windsor that Hudak dumped for not toeing the party line on anti-union measures. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted January 22, 2014 Report Share Posted January 22, 2014 Thought this tread was gonna be about the candidate from Windsor that Hudak dumped for not toeing the party line on anti-union measures. You mean freedom of choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted January 22, 2014 Report Share Posted January 22, 2014 You mean freedom of choice. A freedom that was not afforded the candidate in question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boges Posted January 22, 2014 Report Share Posted January 22, 2014 (edited) A freedom that was not afforded the candidate in question. Yeah because a Liberal candidate that speaks out again increased transit funding would last long. Edited January 22, 2014 by Boges Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted January 22, 2014 Report Share Posted January 22, 2014 A freedom that was not afforded the candidate in question. I agree. That applies to all parties. See NDP and gay marriage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted January 22, 2014 Report Share Posted January 22, 2014 Yeah because a Liberal candidate that speaks out again increased transit funding would last long. Perhaps, but there's an tasty bit of irony in the Tories doing what they did over this particular issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boges Posted January 22, 2014 Report Share Posted January 22, 2014 (edited) I can understand why the candidate would take that position considering the Windsor area is CAW country. I also don't think dismissing this candidate is something that stands to hurt Hudak as I doubt they have any chance of winning a seat in the Windsor area anyway. Edited January 22, 2014 by Boges Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.