scribblet Posted July 26, 2013 Report Posted July 26, 2013 According to Liberal Minister Kevin Costane, the cost of recovering the deleted emails will be between $1.7 million and $3.5 million. Any idea why it would cost that much to recover, and why are they still using tapes, I thought everyone used disks now? http://www.thespec.com/news-story/3907755-cost-of-recovering-deleted-gas-plant-emails-could-hit-3-5-million-tories-say/ Quote Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province
Topaz Posted July 26, 2013 Report Posted July 26, 2013 Since Hudak is beyond foaming at the mouth to be the next Premier, why don't the PC party pay for it, they have lots of money and maybe he could get a fund raising going for them. Quote
guyser Posted July 26, 2013 Report Posted July 26, 2013 Well, first they will hire someone at approx $100,000 a day , give him a contract to do the work, then cancel the contract the next day without looking at the cancellation penalty which will be 16 days worth , then they'll get some lackey to do it for p[eanuts plus lunch and living expenses. See....$1.7M spent. Since it could be done for about $500....who knows? Quote
Boges Posted July 26, 2013 Report Posted July 26, 2013 Since Hudak is beyond foaming at the mouth to be the next Premier, why don't the PC party pay for it, they have lots of money and maybe he could get a fund raising going for them. Cuz that's not the point. For a premier that says she wants to be transparent, this isn't transparent at all. Quote
scribblet Posted July 26, 2013 Author Report Posted July 26, 2013 (edited) Since Hudak is beyond foaming at the mouth to be the next Premier, why don't the PC party pay for it, they have lots of money and maybe he could get a fund raising going for them. What does Hudak have to do with my post, your off base there. and really, whose the one foaming at the mouth I was curious as to how it could actually cost that much, but I think post #3 explains it. Edited July 26, 2013 by scribblet Quote Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province
Topaz Posted July 27, 2013 Report Posted July 27, 2013 First of all, I think pretty much most Ontarians are peeved at the Liberals for the spending on the gas plants but those people in the area of the gas plants , made it clear, move them or lose our vote so he did what ANY Premier would do, he moved them and the Liberals will probably pay for that at the next election or will they? I saw a poll that had the Ontario Liberals leading which shock me but too many people don't like Hudak and the PC had a chance to change leaders and they didn't. As far as the e-mails are concern, one way or the other, WE taxpayers always pay for the politicians mistakes on all three -levels of government. Quote
Boges Posted July 27, 2013 Report Posted July 27, 2013 (edited) First of all, I think pretty much most Ontarians are peeved at the Liberals for the spending on the gas plants but those people in the area of the gas plants , made it clear, move them or lose our vote so he did what ANY Premier would do Except Dalton accused opponents if being Nimbys and went full speed ahead on these plant. In the case of the Mississauga plant, construction had already been started. He wasn't listening to opponents because it was right, the party finally listened for political gains, at a great cost to the rest of the province. Then when the outcry was the greatest, Dalton quit. Then it's come out him and his party have been trying to cover their tracks. Had Stephen Harper done something like this people would be on the streets. Edited July 27, 2013 by Boges Quote
gunrutz Posted July 29, 2013 Report Posted July 29, 2013 Had Stephen Harper done something like this people would be on the streets. No way, those are reasoanable people you are talking about. Quote
jbg Posted July 29, 2013 Report Posted July 29, 2013 Since Hudak is beyond foaming at the mouth to be the next Premier, why don't the PC party pay for it, they have lots of money and maybe he could get a fund raising going for them. The legal term for destroying evidence is "spoliation." The presumption is that the deleted e-mails were damaging to the deleter. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
PIK Posted July 29, 2013 Report Posted July 29, 2013 Now it seems that they tried to strong arm the speaker to change his rulings. http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2013/07/29/scott-stinson-an-appalling-new-chapter-in-ontario-liberals-gas-plant-saga/ Never in the history of canada have we had such a corrupt government. Quote Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
The_Squid Posted July 29, 2013 Report Posted July 29, 2013 Now it seems that they tried to strong arm the speaker to change his rulings. http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2013/07/29/scott-stinson-an-appalling-new-chapter-in-ontario-liberals-gas-plant-saga/ Never in the history of canada have we had such a corrupt government. Reminds me very much of the PMO using cash to influence a senator... Both acts are equally corrupt. But you will defend one while condemning the other. Does this make your position more than a little hypocritical? Quote
Boges Posted July 29, 2013 Report Posted July 29, 2013 (edited) Reminds me very much of the PMO using cash to influence a senator... Both acts are equally corrupt. But you will defend one while condemning the other. Does this make your position more than a little hypocritical? You mean the Mike Duffy/Nigel Wright thing? In no way are they equal in corruption. The Gas Plant Scandal might end up costing the Ontario taxpayer $1 billion. If Wright hadn't paid off Duffy it would have cost the Canadian taxpayer $90,000. It ended up costing them nothing, but you have a Liberal Senator scamming more than double what Duffy did. The cover-up was worse than the crime. This Ontario government wasted hundreds of millions of dollars with impunity just to win a few seats then deleted e-mails to cover their tracks. I can't see how anyone could objectively see that as worse then the Wright/Duffy affair. Edited July 29, 2013 by Boges Quote
The_Squid Posted July 29, 2013 Report Posted July 29, 2013 You mean the Mike Duffy/Nigel Wright thing? In no way are they equal in corruption. The Gas Plant Scandal might end up costing the Ontario taxpayer $1 billion. If Wright hadn't paid off Duffy it would have cost the Canadian taxpayer $90,000. It ended up costing them none, but you have a Liberal Senator scamming more than double what Duffy did. The cover-up was worse than the crime. This Ontario government wasted hundreds of millions of dollars with impunity just to win a few seats then deleted e-mails to cover their tracks. I can't see how anyone could objectively see that as worse then the Wright/Duffy affair. I argue that the level of corruption is not entirely dependent upon the dollar figures involved... It is not the dollar figure... it is the nature of the corruption. So you can argue the level of corruption... the hypocritical part is that CPC supporters who post on these forums, and PIK in particular, do not see the Duffy affair as corrupt whatsoever. If the PMO was bribing judges, instead of senators, then as long as the dollar amounts were low enough and it didn't cost the taxpayers much, then this would be OK as well? Quote
Boges Posted July 29, 2013 Report Posted July 29, 2013 (edited) If the PMO was bribing judges, instead of senators, then as long as the dollar amounts were low enough and it didn't cost the taxpayers much, then this would be OK as well? But what makes the Gas Plant scandal bad is the price. Had they cancelled these plants in the early phases of planning like many wanted them to then the outcry wouldn't exist at all. Instead they called opponents NIMBYS. So it's a different type of scandal. I'd argue it's less corruption and more disrespect for the taxpayer, incompetence and entitlement. The corruption happens later when they refuse to be transparent and lie about their motives multiple times. Also you have a premiere that shuts down the house for months to avoid fielding questions about the matter. And you have a crime committed, in deleting public e-mails. There's multiple levels of outrage you can attach to this scandal. I'll agree the Wright/Duffy thing was handled horribly by the CPC but, and perhaps it's my bias, but I can't get as worked up over this as I can over what the Ontario Liberals did. Edited July 29, 2013 by Boges Quote
madmax Posted July 30, 2013 Report Posted July 30, 2013 Its definitely your bias. I can get worked up easily with both of them. If you want to check your bias. Hudak was campaigning on cancelling those same gas plants. Hindsight is 20/20 but the Liberals Billion Dollar Flip Flop was driven by Hudaks attempt to drive a NIMBY issue. However, its not the crime, its the coverup that always gets one in trouble... and this coverup is going to be the Ontario Liberals Adscam, its just a matter of time before all the election seeds are harvested.. Quote
Boges Posted July 30, 2013 Report Posted July 30, 2013 Its definitely your bias. I can get worked up easily with both of them. If you want to check your bias. Hudak was campaigning on cancelling those same gas plants. Hindsight is 20/20 but the Liberals Billion Dollar Flip Flop was driven by Hudaks attempt to drive a NIMBY issue. However, its not the crime, its the coverup that always gets one in trouble... and this coverup is going to be the Ontario Liberals Adscam, its just a matter of time before all the election seeds are harvested.. It wasn't Hudak as much as it was the residents. Oakville brought in Erin Brockovich. Had Hudak decided to cancel the plants (had he won) he could have blamed it on the incompetence of the Liberals for deciding to put it there in the first place. It is the cover-up. They weren't honest and forward with the investigation and move evidence keeps coming out showing how political the move was. It keeps this story going. The fact they were lobbying the speaker in the conflict ruling keeps the story going further. The fact Dalton quit and prorogued government for months because of the scrutiny he was receiving is even more evidence they didn't want the truth to come out. We'll see on Thursday the damage their actions have really done. Quote
scribblet Posted July 30, 2013 Author Report Posted July 30, 2013 Here's a link with some emails if anyone is interested. I haven't read it. http://www.tomadamsenergy.com/2013/07/26/gas-busters-part-51-emails-ontario-liberal-insiders-tried-to-destroy/ http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2013/07/29/scott-stinson-an-appalling-new-chapter-in-ontario-liberals-gas-plant-saga/ Quote Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.