The_Squid Posted December 14, 2012 Report Posted December 14, 2012 http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/12/12/bc-chinese-miners-documents.html "What the document says categorically is it will be 4½ years before a single Canadian will be working underground at the mine," said B.C. Federation of Labour president Jim Sinclair."After 4½ years, it will be 10 years before it will be a majority of Canadians working underground, and it will be 15 years before the temporary foreign workers are finished working in that mine." Temporary means 14+ years? That's nearly a career! Temporary should mean temporary.... And 15 years is not temporary. The government has let the temp worker program become a fiasco. Quote
Fletch 27 Posted December 14, 2012 Report Posted December 14, 2012 Its a shame Canadians dont want these jobs. Quote
cybercoma Posted December 14, 2012 Report Posted December 14, 2012 Riight. Because Canadians will go work the oil fields, but they won't do this, eh? Quote
Fletch 27 Posted December 14, 2012 Report Posted December 14, 2012 Riight. Because Canadians will go work the oil fields, but they won't do this, eh? Correct Quote
cybercoma Posted December 14, 2012 Report Posted December 14, 2012 (edited) It's funny, you free-market zealots. You claim the market corrects itself and that companies will have to offer higher wages for people to do the work. People are free to not work for a company because they don't pay well enough, so they're forced to offer competitive wages to get the labour. Then you're just absolutely giddy that they will bend Canadians over by hiring "temporary" workers for 14 years, who can be paid less than the industry average thanks to the Conservatives. This assault on the working class needs to end. Edited December 14, 2012 by cybercoma Quote
Fletch 27 Posted December 14, 2012 Report Posted December 14, 2012 It's funny, you free-market zealots. You claim the market corrects itself and that companies will have to offer higher wages for people to do the work. People are free to not work for a company because they don't pay well enough, so they're forced to offer competitive wages to get the labour. Then you're just absolutely giddy that they will bend Canadians over by hiring "temporary" workers for 14 years, who can be paid less than the industry average thanks to the Conservatives. This assault on the working class needs to end. The Market has corrected itself... Please see the link that was provided. Cyber, We can not force people to work in Coal-Mines... This is not the 1800's. Quote
cybercoma Posted December 14, 2012 Report Posted December 14, 2012 http://m.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/economy-lab/does-canada-have-a-labour-shortage-or-a-skills-shortage/article5992219/?service=mobile People would work in coal mines if the employers paid them enough. Since they don't want to pay them enough, they turn to the government and beg them to bring in foreign workers. There is not a labour shortage that needs to be filled by foreign workers here. There is a shortage of people willing to do the work for the price that the companies want to pay. A true free-marketer would find it appalling that they would go to the government and beg for foreign workers. Instead, you would rally behind the market and criticize them for not adapting to the market conditions without government intervention. Instead, you want to have your cake and eat it too. You want to pretend the free-market corrects itself, but you ignore the fact that these companies are undermining the labour market by importing cheap labour. It's readily apparent in this case example that the free market is a sham. Conservatives like yourself like to argue that a company offering minimum wage that doesn't find employees will raise those wages until the reach the fair market value for labour in those positions. Except that's not the way it works. The company offers a low wage and if that's not what the fair market value is for the labour, they ask the government to go to import employees from piss poor developing countries and pay them unfairly low wages. Further to the point, the government has even made this situation worse. How do they know there's a "shortage" of labour? It's the companies that tell them. The government doesn't then look at whether or not the company is offering fair market value for the jobs. They just assume that they are. But why should they? The government has recently allowed companies to pay temporary foreign workers below the average wage for any given position. Why would a company pay more? How can free market principles work if wages are not allowed to rise as they should? Quote
Fletch 27 Posted December 14, 2012 Report Posted December 14, 2012 http://m.theglobeand...?service=mobile People would work in coal mines if the employers paid them enough. Since they don't want to pay them enough, they turn to the government and beg them to bring in foreign workers. There is not a labour shortage that needs to be filled by foreign workers here. There is a shortage of people willing to do the work for the price that the companies want to pay. A true free-marketer would find it appalling that they would go to the government and beg for foreign workers. Instead, you would rally behind the market and criticize them for not adapting to the market conditions without government intervention. Instead, you want to have your cake and eat it too. You want to pretend the free-market corrects itself, but you ignore the fact that these companies are undermining the labour market by importing cheap labour. It's readily apparent in this case example that the free market is a sham. Conservatives like yourself like to argue that a company offering minimum wage that doesn't find employees will raise those wages until the reach the fair market value for labour in those positions. Except that's not the way it works. The company offers a low wage and if that's not what the fair market value is for the labour, they ask the government to go to import employees from piss poor developing countries and pay them unfairly low wages. Further to the point, the government has even made this situation worse. How do they know there's a "shortage" of labour? It's the companies that tell them. The government doesn't then look at whether or not the company is offering fair market value for the jobs. They just assume that they are. But why should they? The government has recently allowed companies to pay temporary foreign workers below the average wage for any given position. Why would a company pay more? How can free market principles work if wages are not allowed to rise as they should? How much should an apple-picker be paid? Should he be paid 10 bucks an hour? 30? Should an education not be taken into account? Some jobs simply do not warrent high pay.. Unless you dont mind paying 7 buck an apple! The Market has indeed corrected itself,, and it will continue. No one wanted the Job... End of story... Well, unless you wish to force people into the mines again Cyber Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted December 14, 2012 Report Posted December 14, 2012 No, the "labour market" includes more than just Canada, just as it always has. This isn't the first time Chinese workers have been "imported" to do Canada's dirty work. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Michael Hardner Posted December 14, 2012 Report Posted December 14, 2012 We're seeing the end-game here though. If we see any kind of economic boom in the next 4 years then people will realize that the gloom-n-doom against all things Obama are for naught. Diminished returns for investors aren't always a bad thing. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
Guest Peeves Posted December 14, 2012 Report Posted December 14, 2012 We're seeing the end-game here though. If we see any kind of economic boom in the next 4 years then people will realize that the gloom-n-doom against all things Obama are for naught. Diminished returns for investors aren't always a bad thing. " Diminished returns for investors aren't always a bad thing.' since many of us working stiffs are investors, how would it rather be a good thing? Since there then would follow lower tax from the diminished returns, how would it be a good thing. On reflection the only way it might be a good thing if it resulted from lower sale prices. i.e gas companies face diminished returns from lowering price at the pump...oh yeh.... Quote
Guest Peeves Posted December 14, 2012 Report Posted December 14, 2012 (edited) It's funny, you free-market zealots. truncated for brevity. This assault on the working class needs to end. Another move in the 'right' direction... Citizenship and immigration Canada has accepted over 20,000 foreign skilled workers and international graduates since the inception of the program in the year 2008. It is expected that up to 10,000 permanent residents through CEC will be accepted during the year 2013. “The CEC has become Canada’s fastest growing economic immigration program and is part of our plan to attract the best and brightest from around the world,” Jason Kenney further said. CEC provides an opportunity to the foreign nationals who meet certain criteria to obtain Canadianpermanent residency. Source: http://news.visato.com/canada/new-canadian-experience-class-criteria-for-permanent-residency/20121212/ [ http://nexuscanada.blogspot.ca/ Edited December 14, 2012 by Peeves Quote
Michael Hardner Posted December 14, 2012 Report Posted December 14, 2012 " Diminished returns for investors aren't always a bad thing.' since many of us working stiffs are investors, how would it rather be a good thing? Since there then would follow lower tax from the diminished returns, how would it be a good thing. It could be a good thing if the money that isn`t returned to the investor is used for better benefit overall. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
bush_cheney2004 Posted December 14, 2012 Report Posted December 14, 2012 We're seeing the end-game here though. If we see any kind of economic boom in the next 4 years then people will realize that the gloom-n-doom against all things Obama are for naught. Diminished returns for investors aren't always a bad thing. Not sure what Obama has to do with temp workers in Canada, but be advised that US presidents do not really drive economic booms or busts. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Michael Hardner Posted December 14, 2012 Report Posted December 14, 2012 Not sure what Obama has to do with temp workers in Canada, but be advised that US presidents do not really drive economic booms or busts. I wish more people agreed with you on that. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
MiddleClassCentrist Posted December 14, 2012 Report Posted December 14, 2012 I wish more people agreed with you on that. That depends on who is in power. Quote Ideology does not make good policy. Good policy comes from an analysis of options, comparison of options and selection of one option that works best in the current situation. This option is often a compromise between ideologies.
Wilber Posted December 14, 2012 Report Posted December 14, 2012 http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Chinese+miner+launches+human+rights+complaint/7698112/story.html This cute. A local radio show interviewed this guy through an interpreter. He had a bit of trouble answering questions but when he was asked who's idea it was, he said it was his. When he was asked how he new about the tribunal system and who helped him with it, he said his company. Said he didn't know about any human rights violations in china. Be interesting to see what on of our star chambers does with this. Quote "Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC
Bonam Posted December 15, 2012 Report Posted December 15, 2012 It's funny, you free-market zealots. You claim the market corrects itself and that companies will have to offer higher wages for people to do the work. People are free to not work for a company because they don't pay well enough, so they're forced to offer competitive wages to get the labour. Then you're just absolutely giddy that they will bend Canadians over by hiring "temporary" workers for 14 years, who can be paid less than the industry average thanks to the Conservatives. Personally, I disagree here. The US laws in this regard are a better model: to bring in a foreign worker, temporary or otherwise, a company is required to demonstrate: 1) that there is no qualified American willing to do the job, and 2) that the wage offered is at least equal to the prevailing wage for that occupation in the US. Of course, said laws impose such a high paperwork burden that a lot of immigration and temporary work for low-skill occupations is done illegally instead, but they are a reasonable ideal if they could be implemented in a streamlined manner. Quote
Argus Posted December 15, 2012 Report Posted December 15, 2012 How much should an apple-picker be paid? Should he be paid 10 bucks an hour? 30? Should an education not be taken into account? Some jobs simply do not warrent high pay.. You seem confused. According to the free market, the lack of response to a job paying 10 bucks indicates that the remuneration is insufficient. The market then responds by forcing the employer to raise the level of pay. That is how the free market economy works, and that is how the value of a job is determined. If you are a free market lover, which you have stated before you are, then you be upset about the free market being distorted by importing cheap foreign labour. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Argus Posted December 15, 2012 Report Posted December 15, 2012 It could be a good thing if the money that isn`t returned to the investor is used for better benefit overall. Depends. The less money returned to investors the less investors there will be. If you think investors a necessary part of the economy (they certainly are) then it could well be a BAD thing. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Bryan Posted December 15, 2012 Report Posted December 15, 2012 You seem confused. According to the free market, the lack of response to a job paying 10 bucks indicates that the remuneration is insufficient. The market then responds by forcing the employer to raise the level of pay. That is how the free market economy works, and that is how the value of a job is determined. If you are a free market lover, which you have stated before you are, then you be upset about the free market being distorted by importing cheap foreign labour. That's still free market. When you can't get what you need locally, you import it. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted December 15, 2012 Report Posted December 15, 2012 Depends. The less money returned to investors the less investors there will be. If you think investors a necessary part of the economy (they certainly are) then it could well be a BAD thing. Not necessarily. The numbers matter here. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
Argus Posted December 15, 2012 Report Posted December 15, 2012 (edited) That's still free market. When you can't get what you need locally, you import it. From a different market. Or if you're a total free trader than you believe in tearing down all walls and letting anyone in who wants to. That would flood the country with cheap labour and cause wages to plummet. Who here is a free trader to that extent? And before anyone says 'me me me' consider whether you're ready to see your salary fall by 50%-60% -70% or more. Edited December 15, 2012 by Argus Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Canuckistani Posted December 15, 2012 Report Posted December 15, 2012 From a different market. Or if you're a total free trader than you believe in tearing down all walls and letting anyone in who wants to. That would flood the country with cheap labour and cause wages to plummet. Who here is a free trader to that extent? And before anyone says 'me me me' consider whether you're ready to see your salary fall by 50%-60% -70% or more. Might as well just have open borders. We'll balance out with Asia - they'll drop to 2 billion, Canada and the US will rise to 2 billion. Everybody will be happy. Quote
punked Posted December 15, 2012 Report Posted December 15, 2012 Its a shame Canadians dont want these jobs. Can I just point out Canadians do want these jobs. The only reasons they weren't given to Canadians because your Government approved this Chinese owned mine then approved an application that said they needed people that speak Chinese to work in these mines. That is your government and you wouldn't be allowed to work in these mines either because of your Prime Minster. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.