Jump to content

So I ask, what is or defines a Canadian?


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I agree, but there are distinctions and I've lived in both.

Possibly the one major distinction being the "melting pot" philosophy there and the multi-cultural fiasco here.

I see this kicked around quite a bit but from my experience in the US for the most part I see the same kind of ethnic balkanization that we see in Canada. Latino neighborhoods, black neighborhoods, ethnic ghettos and slums, etc.

I think somebody forgot to plug in the melting pot.

Edited by dre

I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger

  • Replies 243
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
[Y]ou'll never get anyone to agree on anything besides the legal classification.

I'm not certain about that. I already raised the example of the Royal Family; all but four aren't Canadian citizens, there's no special law for them, and yet the government still regards them as Canadian.

Posted

I'm not certain about that. I already raised the example of the Royal Family; all but four aren't Canadian citizens, there's no special law for them, and yet the government still regards them as Canadian.

Yes, but we're talking about our definitions of Canadians, here, on MLW. It's a nebulous issue, conflicting and weird...and legal matters are the only clear answer.

I'm not saying they're the only answer; I'm saying it's the only one that is (almost!!!) universally agreed upon.

“There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver."

--Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007

Posted

They both seem to work quite well, on the whole.

Multiculturalism is effectively a melting-pot, with the addition of a national identity of accepting and welcoming difference. MP and MC are not either/or - no government policy can negate the melting pot effect, however a multicultural identity will create a bedrock of welcome for diversity - institutionally and non-institutionally.

Posted

Multiculturalism is effectively a melting-pot, with the addition of a national identity of accepting and welcoming difference. MP and MC are not either/or - no government policy can negate the melting pot effect, however a multicultural identity will create a bedrock of welcome for diversity - institutionally and non-institutionally.

Nicely said.

“There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver."

--Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007

Posted

Why thank you. I actually didn't SAY this, I posted it, but maybe I'll repeat it quietly to myself to validate your comment.

:)

Nicely posted.

“There is a limit to how much we can constantly say no to the political masters in Washington. All we had was Afghanistan to wave. On every other file we were offside. Eventually we came onside on Haiti, so we got another arrow in our quiver."

--Bill Graham, Former Canadian Foreign Minister, 2007

Posted

What defines "Canadian"? Nothing anymore other than small words and niceties. Canada lost its direction and soul 20 years ago. Working with many other countries and asking many of my associates overseas the common theme is the "sheer inability to say "no"". We are a country of a vocal weak population in the minority but have a strong majority when push comes to shove. The weakness in the minority is making Canada look bad. What defines a canadian? There is no more "canadian".

Posted

I'm sure it must mean to be comfortable with vast distances. I am going to spend the weekend in the northern-Finnish town of Oulu which is 600km away and takes six hours by train to travel to and that's the fast train. Everyone here considers Oulu to be terribly far away.

Surely hardly anyone in canada considers a distance of 600km being far away. However, am I right in assuming that it is not at all uncommon for Canadians not to have visited every corner of their country because of its vastness? I mean, if someone lives in toronto it is by no means strange that he may have never visited Vancouver, or vice versa?

Guest Peeves
Posted

I'm sure it must mean to be comfortable with vast distances. I am going to spend the weekend in the northern-Finnish town of Oulu which is 600km away and takes six hours by train to travel to and that's the fast train. Everyone here considers Oulu to be terribly far away.

Surely hardly anyone in canada considers a distance of 600km being far away. However, am I right in assuming that it is not at all uncommon for Canadians not to have visited every corner of their country because of its vastness? I mean, if someone lives in toronto it is by no means strange that he may have never visited Vancouver, or vice versa?

I admit a preference for traveling to the islands..Trinidad - Tobago, Bahamas, or the Southern USA. Te coasts of Canada have not drawn me as yet.

Posted

That same thing has been going on since before 1867.

Well many things have been going on but we don't need talk about dividing, unless of course, one can prove the other is doing it,then its more than talk.

Posted

Hmm....not sure of any point , or if one is made, you are trying to make.

Care to expand on this?

You said murderers never videotape their crime...and within a couple days here later you have one right in your backyard. Admittedly it is merely a coincidence...and sure it is rare. But it is proof positive it does happen.

In case like this...death penalty absolutely. There is no way the guy can be deemed innocent. There is video he did it. There is no way he can be deemed "mentally unfit" as he knew damn well what he was doing.

For that....I suggest this advice:

(of coure meant to add humour to an otherwise grisly topic).
Posted

You said murderers never videotape their crime...and within a couple days here later you have one right in your backyard. Admittedly it is merely a coincidence...and sure it is rare. But it is proof positive it does happen.

Actuallly I mean Paul Bernardo never taped a murder but I went back and re-read and ....meh, not very clear.

So yes, obviously some sick idiots do in fact tape them.

In case like this...death penalty absolutely. There is no way the guy can be deemed innocent. There is video he did it. There is no way he can be deemed "mentally unfit" as he knew damn well what he was doing.

This early in the scenario unfolding about this Magnotta guy and we cannot really call this. I myself would think it rather normal to call him mentally sick which would means he is unfit but I suspect it may be his vanity that does him in.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,890
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    armchairscholar
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...