Jump to content

The Tao of 'Complete Nonsense'


cybercoma

Recommended Posts

Once again, your premise is complete nonsense. The fed's fiscal capacity was negatively impacted by the global recession, brought upon by the American financial and real estate crash, and also the European debt crisis. Harper's so-called tinkering pales in comparison. You're polical flatulence is getting tiresome.

Complete nonsense.

What's wrong with your picture is that it's completely untrue. Just more lies and propaganda.

Complete nonsense. There are more controls and regulations on business than ever before. Each year, government adds more and more regulation on top of the already existing regulatory framework. You're premise is pure fantasy.

More nonsense, as usual. Anyone that doesn't agree with your fantasy based premise is a fascist. Err, wait, didn't is used to be crypto-fascist? :lol:

Complete nonsense. When the Reagan economy was producing 700,000 jobs per month, very few were government jobs. It's funny though. Whenever anyone criticizes Obama, you're reflex is to yell Reagan, Reagan, Reagan! As if that's an excuse for your hero Obama. :lol:

The thread is Obama vs Romney, not Obama vs Reagan. Enough with the strawmen.

Complete nonsense. Just more hyperbole from you. :rolleyes:

Complete nonsense. Home ownership isn't falling off. And you can't extrapolate the current recession type economy as the economy that's going to exist for the next 2 to 3 decades. That ridiculous. And it has nothing to do with attacking unions, whatever that means. :rolleyes:

Complete nonsense. The government's fiscal capacity was damaged due to a severe recession. If not for the recession, our so-called fiscal capacity would be right around a balanced budget, plus or minus a little bit, exactly where it should be.

Complete nonsense. I realize that you're not a big fan of free speech, but limiting the amount of time one gets to criticize people in power is exactly the opposite of what should be done. If I want to pay for an ad, criticizing the actions or policies of a particular government or party, I have, and should always have that right.

Move to the Soviet Union if you don't like it. [rolleyes]

Complete nonsense. You may as well be a mouth piece for the Assad government. But why am I not suprised. You're the same person that continues to defend the brutality of the Iranian regime, while at the same time, wishing ill on Canada and Canadians for paying attention.

The fact is, there are two sides. One with an army, and one without. The side with an army, is the side of a murderous, totalitarian, miniority regime. The other side is regular people, pushing back on their dictatorship.

That being said, I don't think, as of now, we should get involved. But to pretend that it's two well organized armed factions is complete and utter fantasy, and tantamount to Assad propaganda.

Complete nonsense. It doesn't mean that at all. Perhaps to you. Keeping a practice legal doesn't mean it's immune to any sort of regulation. Free speech is a right too, but we have regulations concerning that in certain situations.

Complete nonsense. Everyone here has the freedom to move. This isn't Cuba. We don't have a giant wall keeping people here against their will.

Complete nonsense. I suggest you re-read Romney's position of a structured settlement that would have left GM and Chrysler in much better shape than they even are today.

Anyways, if you wanna truely give credit, it'd be to George W Bush, who extended the first auto bailouts. :)

It's good to know you guys are such fans of his!

Complete nonsense. It's much better, and in many cases necessary for the mother to be with a new-born for the first little while. Regardless, our so-called "sexist" society provides time off for a mother or a father.

Complete nonsense. Companies are, and continue to be responsible for defined contribution pension plans. They're just not eager to get involved in the defined benefit pyramid schemes.

Complete nonsense. Productivity can mean many things. In many cases, it's the same number of people accomplishing more work for the same, or more money. It all depends, and each situation and industry is different.

Complete nonsense. Gingrich didn't use any so-called coded race words during the South Carolina campaign. The only coded race words reside in your head.

Edited by cybercoma

"Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions." --Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will these thread generate any kind of real discussion ? I have a feeling that it won't. Is this just a troll then ?

It's more like gill-netting, which always results in a lower quality product.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will these thread generate any kind of real discussion ? I have a feeling that it won't. Is this just a troll then ?

This is the political philosophy forum, so I thought it would be a good place to talk about ideology, bias, and dismissiveness in political discourses. Maybe this isn't the best approach?

Edited by cybercoma

"Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions." --Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the political philosophy forum, so I thought it would be a good place to talk about ideology, bias, and dismissiveness in political discourses. Maybe this isn't the best approach?

Ok, start with your own biases and we'll join in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the political philosophy forum, so I thought it would be a good place to talk about ideology, bias, and dismissiveness in political discourses. Maybe this isn't the best approach?

(professorial) COMPLETE NONSENSE!!!!!!

The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the political philosophy forum, so I thought it would be a good place to talk about ideology, bias, and dismissiveness in political discourses. Maybe this isn't the best approach?

Maybe it's a real discussion. What is "grounds for dismissal" and - objectively - what are your views that others (who?) should properly dismiss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,804
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Quietlady
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Legato went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • CrakHoBarbie went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • Videospirit went up a rank
      Contributor
    • SkyHigh went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Mathieub earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...