MACKER Posted March 27, 2012 Report Share Posted March 27, 2012 I'm confused. Didn't they just have an election last year? that was for premier. Its like the presidential election, not the congress. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry J. Fortin Posted March 27, 2012 Report Share Posted March 27, 2012 that was for premier. Its like the presidential election, not the congress. This should be interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornAlbertan Posted March 27, 2012 Report Share Posted March 27, 2012 Nothing personal, but I have explained the transition in detail earlier in this thread and others. I don't want to do it again. Suffice it to say that Stelmach managed to purge the Tories of their right wing faction and into Wildrose, get a centrist leader in place, and add a big chunk of former Lib voters to Tory ranks. It was not all his doing of course, but he had to leave for that to happen. Wildrose is isolated on the right fringe and has no constituency left to capture. Wow...never thought anyone would liken Stelmach to Christ in that in order to save the masses he had to sacrifice himself. Quite funny. Too bad the results of the staff statisfaction/engagement survey that is currently underway will never get released to the public. You would then have thousands of validations to Raj Sherman's position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newfoundlander Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 I saw Dave Rutherford on Power Play and he said that public dissatisfaction is building after 40 years of PCs and he's expecting a big Wildrose win, he started to say they'd sweep but then corrected himself because of Edmonton. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stopstaaron Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 what is the difference between Wildrose and the PCs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Circle Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 The latest polls. http://www.electionalmanac.com/ea/alberta/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Circle Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 what is the difference between Wildrose and the PCs? The Wildrose are an actual "conservative" party. The PC's are a Liberal type party, lead by a Liberal/NDP type leader! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stopstaaron Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 The Wildrose are an actual "conservative" party. The PC's are a Liberal type party, lead by a Liberal/NDP type leader! I don't know what actual conservative party means because the one in Ottawa are not conservatives fiscally conservative ..and, where are they on social values? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Circle Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 I don't know what actual conservative party means because the one in Ottawa are not conservatives fiscally conservative ..and, where are they on social values? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildrose_Alliance Danielle Smith identifies herself as a fiscal conservative and while she believes in libertarian principles,[41] the party is home to many social conservatives.[42] Opponents have attempted to paint the party as being extremist; former Liberal leader David Swann, in congratulating Smith on her election as leader, argued that Albertans would be "uneasy" with the "rather extreme, socially conservative, economically irresponsible vision of the party".[43] Smith stated that controversial social issues such as would not play a part in the party's election platform.[44] Two task forces were created in late 2009 to help build party policy. The energy task force was announced first with the mandate to review the government's controversial changes to the provincial oil royalty scheme and the process for energy transmission, both of which the Wildrose Party argues has damaged Alberta's economy.[29] The second task force was created to scrutinize the pay and benefits of MLAs and government employees.[30] The party plans to launch additional task forces early in 2010, including those focused on agriculture and health care.[45] Election reform is a focus of the Wildrose Alliance. The party proposes to set fixed election dates rather than the current format which allows the Premier to call an election at any time. It would allow more free votes in the legislature and would seek to elect the province's Senators rather than have them appointed by the Prime Minister.[46] The party also plans to introduce a bill giving voters the right to recall their MLA.[47] The Wildrose Party proposes numerous changes to how the province delivers health care, which it claims will remain compliant with the Canada Health Act, as well as controls on government spending.[44] The party is also critical of international climate change treaties, believing corruption and politicization have surfaced in the scientific peer review process, thus climate change science remains inconclusive.[45] Opposing politicians have criticized the Wildrose Party's policies as vague and undefined (including the topic of gun ownership),[48] while supporters have praised the party under Smith as being "refreshing".[44] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stopstaaron Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 (edited) Some of their policies don't seem all that bad to me.. like Fixed election dates MLA Recalls Critical of climate change treaties but those were only a couple. I still couldn't vote for a party that has a lot of social conservatives. She should be all for legalizing prostitution if she's a libertarian though Edited March 29, 2012 by stopstaaron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiddleClassCentrist Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 (edited) Some of their policies don't seem all that bad to me.. like MLA Recalls She should be all for legalizing prostitution if she's a libertarian though And marijuana, deregulation of alcohol, gambling, etc. MLA recalls - More democratic power to citizens is a great thing, IMO. The world's only example of a true libertarian paradise is Somolia. I do like some of the more extreme ideas from that spectrum. "I didn't like my neighbour cutting over onto my lawn, so I shot him." "I didn't like that teacher saying that my son is beating kids up with sticks, so I shot her." Utopia, indeed. Edited March 29, 2012 by MiddleClassCentrist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybercoma Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 what is the difference between Wildrose and the PCs? Imagine if the Tea Party were separate from the Republicans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newfoundlander Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 I really like Danielle Smith. I'm actually surprised people consider the party to be radical, I consider myself to be socially liberal and haven't see anything that scares me about the party. I find Harper much scarier then Smith. I don't think all of Smith's policies could work in every province but I think she has great policies for Alberta Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newfoundlander Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 She should be all for legalizing prostitution if she's a libertarian though It seems that Smith is supportive of having red light districts. However her position on many social issues seems to be that the public should have a say, and in this case she knows it's not a popular idea. As well just because someone believes in libertarian principles doesn't mean they have to have libertarian views on every single issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topaz Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 Since I don't live in Alberta, is there a difference between the Wild Rose Party and the old Alliance party? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newfoundlander Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 Since I don't live in Alberta, is there a difference between the Wild Rose Party and the old Alliance party? I believe there was a merger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stopstaaron Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 (edited) It seems that Smith is supportive of having red light districts. However her position on many social issues seems to be that the public should have a say, and in this case she knows it's not a popular idea. Are you sure about that? http://www.torontosun.com/2012/03/28/canadians-coming-around-to-brothels-poll While a larger percentage approved of the decision to legalize brothels, the numbers show a significant gender discrepancy among the supporters: 56% of respondents who approved were male, compared to 39% who were female. Western provinces were the most supportive of the law with 58% of respondents in Manitoba and Alberta backing the decision. In British Columbia, 57% of respondents supported the decision. By comparison, 43% of respondents in Ontario thought favourably of the court’s ruling. Edited March 29, 2012 by stopstaaron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newfoundlander Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 Are you sure about that? http://www.torontosun.com/2012/03/28/canadians-coming-around-to-brothels-poll While a larger percentage approved of the decision to legalize brothels, the numbers show a significant gender discrepancy among the supporters: 56% of respondents who approved were male, compared to 39% who were female. Western provinces were the most supportive of the law with 58% of respondents in Manitoba and Alberta backing the decision. In British Columbia, 57% of respondents supported the decision. By comparison, 43% of respondents in Ontario thought favourably of the court’s ruling. Just one poll of course. I'm not sure exactly what she has planned but I believe she has talked about free votes on social issues, and she has mentioned referendums but I don't know if it applies to these issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stopstaaron Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 Just one poll of course. I'm not sure exactly what she has planned but I believe she has talked about free votes on social issues, and she has mentioned referendums but I don't know if it applies to these issues. There should be referendums for a lot of things that politicians are usually afraid of I would be okay for referendums on abortion, gay marriage, prostitution, whether to stay in the monarchy, assisted suicide, legalization of marijuana That is how a democracy should work.. I know they cost money but its fair Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newfoundlander Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 There should be referendums for a lot of things that politicians are usually afraid of I would be okay for referendums on abortion, gay marriage, prostitution, whether to stay in the monarchy, assisted suicide, legalization of marijuana That is how a democracy should work.. I know they cost money but its fair You also vote for people to stand up for you, your MP should reflect their constituents views. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stopstaaron Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 You also vote for people to stand up for you, your MP should reflect their constituents views. So why are politicians so afraid to tackle the above issues since majority of canadians agree with them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newfoundlander Posted March 29, 2012 Report Share Posted March 29, 2012 So why are politicians so afraid to tackle the above issues since majority of canadians agree with them? I guess we aren't electing good politicians. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stopstaaron Posted March 30, 2012 Report Share Posted March 30, 2012 I guess we aren't electing good politicians. yeah, we're electing career politicians, they let the courts do their dirty work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNewTeddy Posted March 30, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 30, 2012 (edited) I used the ElectoMatic to project this: http://i1218.photobucket.com/albums/dd408/TheNewTeddy/albertaregions1.png Note that in the 2011 federal election, my website and ElectoMatic provided the most accurate riding-by-riding results of anyone in the world (who cared to share their projections online) including in Quebec. A caution however, these are based on the old ridings. I've yet to find the transposition of votes. Edited March 30, 2012 by TheNewTeddy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newfoundlander Posted March 31, 2012 Report Share Posted March 31, 2012 The PC Party seems to be self destructing, a staffer in the premier's office has now resigned after critisizing one of Danielle Smith's family policies because she didn't have children. Smith has released a statement revealing that her and her husband have been unable to conceive after several years of trying. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/alberta-election/government-staffers-tweet-makes-fertility-an-issue-in-alberta-election-campaign/article2388261/?utm_medium=Feeds%3A%20RSS%2FAtom&utm_source=Politics&utm_content=2388261 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.