Jump to content

stopstaaron

Member
  • Posts

    917
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by stopstaaron

  1. its a waste of money to pursue this.. it will be fought for years and in the end after a million wasted they'll be fined 20,000 dollars Canadians need to burn and blow shit up as punishment let it be known to them that since EC is a POS organization with no real consequences the only real justice is vigilante justice
  2. American Left wing activist groups helped left wingers during robocall and American right wing groups helped right wingers during election .. this has probably been going on for years I am not offended by any of it I wonder though if the conservatives who were offended are offended at this? we know who you are
  3. Those people that live there had escaped Castros rule.. getting suspended was less than what I would have done. I'd have fired him you just don't make insensitive comments like that in an area where the issue is very sensitive
  4. Canada should just cut a deal with Russia and leave everyone else out of it
  5. Lol wut? I really don't know what to say anymore.. it's left me speechless, I just have to laugh http://rt.com/usa/news/arizona-bill-conception-abortion-387/ Under Arizona’s H.B. 2036, the state would recognize the start of the unborn child’s life to be the first day of its mother’s last menstrual period. The legislation is being proposed so that lawmakers can outlaw abortions on fetuses past the age of 20-weeks, but the verbiage its authors use to construct a time cycle for the baby would mean that the start of the child's life could very well occur up to two weeks before the mother and father even ponder procreating. On page eight of the proposed amendment to H.B. 2036, lawmakers lay out the “gestational age” of the child to be “calculated from the first day of the last menstrual period of the pregnant woman,” and from there, outlaws abortion “if the probable gestational age of [the] unborn child has been determined to be at least twenty weeks.”
  6. I guess there is no point in getting nukes if we are doomed anyway
  7. They haven't been in combat yet in the arctic with those jets... there is a possibility Canada will in the next 10 years
  8. And what if those are the countries we are feuding with?! What if U.S wants something we have and tries taking it and the British & French back down from helping us cause of their alliance with the US?
  9. my main problem with the F35s is that it is a single engine jet... and the Canadian arctic is vast, you know that single engine jets protecting the arctic is a fail. I don't want to spend that much money on single engine jets too much can go wrong
  10. Who cares?! That is your argument? Why not just divy up the arctic and get it over with then cause why should we care about it
  11. i dont think we want all those ships carrying oil and stuff through our waters
  12. on the flipside .. we build major communities up there and a pissed off rejected country bombs it .. we can't just build and expect no push back from dejected countries
  13. I'm a left winger and I am all for it.. I doubt I am the only one! That is true that for now we are protected by the US influence however US seems to be at odds with Canada on a few claims so they will not back us up unless we give them some land and or resources in exchange I say no! We get our own nukes and tell them if they really want what is ours to come and get it but be prepared to get nuked.. they will back down
  14. that just proves we need our own nukes they aren't going to stick up for Canada or give us nukes
  15. Russia is years a head of us in developing the Arctic .. so are the Scandanavian countries The liberal governments did not give a crap about the Arctic.. nor would the NDP
×
×
  • Create New...