bud Posted February 13, 2012 Report Posted February 13, 2012 Because they're a friendly former NATO proxy. israel is anything but friendly. there are hundreds of other countries that would be considered friendly above israel. there is a reason why most of the world agrees that israel is one of the biggest threats to peace in the world. link new poll commissioned by the European Commission show that Israel is believed by Europeans in 15 countries to be the greatest threat to world peace, greater than North Korea, Iran or Afghanistan. Iran is a pit of vipers supporting international terrorism. israel supports terrorism as well. look at the group MEK which is listed as a terrorist organization by most western countries including the united states. yeah i know. double standards are okay as long as israel is involved. BTW, can you describe one of these Israeli nuclear weapons to me and give a date and place where it was tested? BTW, can you describe iran's nuclear weapons to me and give a date and place where it was tested? Please save your Vela Incident for a poster with no knowledge of atomic weapons. You say it's a fact, afterall. Or are we talking more 'bud facts'?? as a person with atomic weapons knowledge, tell me, why do you think israel should be above the law when it comes to having nuclear weapons? would it be okay if iran pulled out of the npt just like israel has? then, whenever they actually do create nuclear weapons, i'm assuming it would be okay since israel is doing it. Quote http://whoprofits.org/
DogOnPorch Posted February 13, 2012 Report Posted February 13, 2012 Yeah...should have said friendly to normal folks. I keep forgetting you're anything but. Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
DogOnPorch Posted February 13, 2012 Report Posted February 13, 2012 BTW, can you describe iran's nuclear weapons to me and give a date and place where it was tested? Stay tuned. They will. I thought he was going to pop one off last weekend. Must have been delays. As for your attempts to make Israel out to be Hamas. :lol: Yeah...keep spinning those woes, bud. It consumes you....will consume you. Evil Zionists are under your bed. Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
bud Posted February 13, 2012 Report Posted February 13, 2012 just as i thought; no answer. it's really really difficult to respond when you know you are a hypocrite and have double standards. don't tell me i didn't give you another chance. you're back on the block list. Quote http://whoprofits.org/
DogOnPorch Posted February 13, 2012 Report Posted February 13, 2012 Oh, thank goodness. Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
bush_cheney2004 Posted February 14, 2012 Report Posted February 14, 2012 israel is anything but friendly. there are hundreds of other countries that would be considered friendly above israel. But none of those that bombed Libya or Serbia, invaded Iraq/Afghanistan, or kidnapped Haiti's president! Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
DogOnPorch Posted February 14, 2012 Report Posted February 14, 2012 But none of those that bombed Libya or Serbia, invaded Iraq/Afghanistan, or kidnapped Haiti's president! I'm sure we'd be enjoying some nice Israeli hospitality on arrival. Not so sure about buuuuddy. Probably an intensive full body cavity search plus "free" flight out. Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
Army Guy Posted February 14, 2012 Report Posted February 14, 2012 no. you're b.s.ing again. the money and offers were made with israel's official blessing and were additional to the usual state packages it provides to Jews emigrating from the diaspora. to downplay the amount of money is dishonest: I stand corrected, Israel has offered it's blessings and a small cash offering, with the bulk of the Funding being offered by private Isrealis citizens. Down playing the amount of money is not dishonest but reality i mean the orginal offer of 5000 pounds per person is not alot when considering what they have to leave behind, homes, businesses, friends and family. leave it all to start all over...even you would agree that 5000 is not a serious offer. The Offer has been boosted to 10,000 per person or upto 60,000 per family...with some success... but still one could only imigine the costs being alot more to the families involved than a mere 60,000, one first has to get out of the country, after all it is illigal to emigrate to Israel, punishable by death....so it's not like you could sell your home , board a plane and tell Iranian officals your leaving for the mother land....getting out of the country must consume alot of those resources...and those that could afford it have already done so... The identity of Iranian Jews is not tradeable for any amount of money," the society said in a statement. "Iranian Jews are among the most ancient Iranians. Iran's Jews love their Iranian identity and their culture, so threats and this immature political enticement will not achieve their aim of wiping out the identity of Iranian Jews." And while it has not had the results they had hoped for , they have had some successes...Note that they have blurred out the faces to protect their families back home...why is that if Iran treats them so well...Just a question this is old news back from 2007 , did you really have to go back so long to find something postive.... link Quote We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.
Guest Peeves Posted February 14, 2012 Report Posted February 14, 2012 (edited) I think the world should tell both Iran & Israel to shut the hell up Do you have any idea of the relative geographic size of the anti-Israel Islamic states or their numbers when you consider their relative security? You lot opine as if Israel stands or falls on the same basis as do theocratic or dictatorships etc. throughout the Islamic world. Just check out what I have offered any here that have a conscience or impartiality in the continued existence or alternative potential neo-Hollocaust of the Jews of Israel. Drag your mouse over Islamic territories. http://www.nature.com/news/specials/islamandscience/map/islam-map.html They did that once, it turned out bad for Jews. For Arabs and their lot, not so much. Israel is a democracy, name an Arab democracy or any with comparable human rights. Israel can't afford to hesitate, err, or underestimate a threat, bin there done that. Map of Israel in comparison to Arab states http://www.iris.org.il/images/arabwld3.gif Now who do you think has an interest in protecting Jews and Israel in the area ? BTW not being Arab, Iran isn't in the comparison, nor do I think is Turkey. Israel? That sliver of democracy surrounded by an empire that wishes to rise again? Hamas, ? Hezbollah??? Iran? Syria?? Egypt and 'the Muslim Brotherhood'?* Turkey? The UN? I expect were I an Israeli, An Israeli Jew, I might just give thought to a defensive attitude especially when rockets are (This week) fired at civilian targets and millions were lost the last time the world stood by and pretty much told Jews to shut up. srael is a democratic nation 1/19th the size of California, and is one of the smallest nations on the face of the earth. With only about 8,000 sq. miles of land mass it is roughly two times the size of Rhode Island. Israel is 260 miles at its longest, has a 112-mile coastline, is 60 miles at its widest, and between 3 and 9 miles at its narrowest. The nation of Israel is surrounded by twenty-two hostile Arab/Islamic dictatorships that are 640 times her size and 60 times her population. Arab propagandists call Israel "expansionist." There is NO truth to this statement. Israel, occupies one-sixth of one percent of the lands called Arab. There are 13 million Jews in the world (almost 5 million fewer than they were in 1939) and 300 million Arabs. Arab propagandists and biased irresponsible news services call Israel "expansionist" and the "aggressor" against Arab peoples. Israel has fought only defensive wars; to the Arabs, Israels resistance to their aggression — which would lead to Israel’s total destruction if allowed to go unchecked — is illogically viewed as an "act of aggression." Is "illogical" the proper term to be using here? Of course it is. But is logic really a considered factor in much of today's news propaganda? * http://ivarfjeld.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/muslim-brothers-lets-wipe-israel-off-the-map/ Edited February 14, 2012 by Peeves Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.