Topaz Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 While surfing the web, I came across this article and I think there is some truth in it and I wonder why any of you on the forum thought about it. http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/Article_64073.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydraboss Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 So, do you think the "testing" of private citizens is appropriate? I thought that you were against "jack boot" tactics. Guess you're no better than Mein Herr Harper, eh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydraboss Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 One other quick question: What would you do if a CEO showed to have very bad tendencies? What's the next step? Does the person get forcibly removed from his office? Is that person discriminated against because of a mental illness? Isn't that against all of your hug-everyone leftist doctrines? Okay. That was five questions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimG Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 Is that person discriminated against because of a mental illness?Ironically - the lefty creed would not only require that psychopathy be treated as a mental illness - it would then qualify for employement equity treatment! IOW - corporations would be legally required to hire and promote psychopaths based on their representation in the community. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Manny Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 I think the intention is to remove psychopaths from positions where they hold power and influence over others. They often could rise to top positions, because they are ruthless. I have heard of this before, and by the definition, there are many psychopathic types among us. And chances are some of them are in your corporate management. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimG Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 I think the intention is to remove psychopaths from positions where they hold power and influence over others.But that would be discrimination against people with a mental illness! Companies need to be forced to hire and promote psychopaths in order to ensure their representation reflects the community! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldo Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 Ironically - the lefty creed would not only require that psychopathy be treated as a mental illness - it would then qualify for employement equity treatment! IOW - corporations would be legally required to hire and promote psychopaths based on their representation in the community. what would your "righty creed" require? That the manager be given bonus pay? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 I think the intention is to remove psychopaths from positions where they hold power and influence over others. They often could rise to top positions, because they are ruthless. I have heard of this before, and by the definition, there are many psychopathic types among us. And chances are some of them are in your corporate management. Or in charge of right wing political parties... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 But that would be discrimination against people with a mental illness! Companies need to be forced to hire and promote psychopaths in order to ensure their representation reflects the community! From a conversation I had with a psychiatrist on another board, he told me that psychopathy is not a mental illness but a social disorder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimG Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 From a conversation I had with a psychiatrist on another board, he told me that psychopathy is not a mental illness but a social disorder.What is the difference? Is addiction a social disorder? Why would psychopathy be any different? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 The difference is that you are responsible for your behavior if it isn't caused by mental illness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacee Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 (edited) Ironically - the lefty creed would not only require that psychopathy be treated as a mental illness - it would then qualify for employement equity treatment! IOW - corporations would be legally required to hire and promote psychopaths based on their representation in the community. Well that would mean quite a reduction in their numbers in top corporate echelons as they are OVER-represented at those levels. From the OP link: The Occupy Wall Street protesters demanding an end to the reign of the "one per cent" may have unwittingly stumbled on the crux of the issue. Science tells us that 99 per cent of humans have normal emotional function. One per cent are psychopaths. We ignore that truth at our peril. I think "testing" potential employees for diagnosis of "psychopathy" would be a minefield of lawsuits, but employment assessment based on company values might reveal responses/tendencies that wouldn't be consistent with the company's directions. I think one problem is that corporations have been hiring executives specifically for their lack of human empathy, do cut and slash employees and contracts, cut wages and benefits, cut corners in safety and materials, etc. This is a good article and would be a good component of training for corporate Boards and executives and shareholders. TimG I know you are being somewhat sarcastic in your posts here, but do you REALLY think corporations, banks, governments and the economy should be run by psychopaths? Edited December 23, 2011 by jacee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimG Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 The difference is that you are responsible for your behavior if it isn't caused by mental illness.You did not answer my question. Why is psychopathy any different than any other 'behavoir disorder' like addiction or fetal alcohol syndrome or being gay? Do you have any evidence that psychopaths are psychopaths by choice? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimG Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 TimG I know you are being somewhat sarcastic in your posts here, but do you REALLY think corporations, banks, governments and the economy should be run by psychopaths?I think people should be judged for the actions - not for what some test says they might be. People running corporations should be held accountable if they commit fraud or cause harm via intentional neglect. The biggest problem, unfortunatly, is proving the latter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydraboss Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 The Occupy Wall Street protesters... Are nutcases. I think "testing" potential employees for diagnosis of "psychopathy" would be a minefield of lawsuits, but employment assessment based on company values might reveal responses/tendencies that wouldn't be consistent with the company's directions. Except that in many, many cases the "company values" are written by the executives. I think one problem is that corporations have been hiring executives specifically for their lack of human empathy, do cut and slash employees and contracts, cut wages and benefits, cut corners in safety and materials, etc. That is what makes them good executives. Financial management skills. Want empathy? See a counsellor (or your grandma). This is a good article and would be a good component of training for corporate Boards and executives and shareholders. It is very accusatory and serves no purpose. TimG I know you are being somewhat sarcastic in your posts here, but do you REALLY think corporations, banks, governments and the economy should be run by psychopaths? Nothing should be run by psychopaths. Name one thing that should be. I wouldn't want a psycho delivering my mail, so I guess you think we should test them too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Manny Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 Are nutcases. That is what makes them good executives. Financial management skills. Want empathy? See a counsellor (or your grandma). There is a real lack of empathy in your reply. Ergo... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Manny Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 I think "testing" potential employees for diagnosis of "psychopathy" would be a minefield of lawsuits, but employment assessment based on company values might reveal responses/tendencies that wouldn't be consistent with the company's directions. The problem with testing is that many so-called "psychos" are in fact very intelligent, and able to hide their psycho nature from others quite well. My boss is an excellent example. Many people think he's a really nice, jovial fun guy. But these people only know him superficially. Those who work in his department know it to be just an act that he puts up when meeting people, and in fact he is completely the opposite! Most vindictive, petty SOB I have ever met. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacee Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 There is a real lack of empathy in your reply. Ergo... True ... he says they make good executives ... but then he turns around and says nothing should be run by psychopaths, so it's a bit contradictory. Some researchers are now studying the costs of such behaviour by bosses: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workplace_bullying It affects staff turnover, lawsuits, productivity, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Manny Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 True ... he says they make good executives ... Indeed, and notice his username, "HydraBoss"... I have come to believe that there is a certain psychology that seeks to acquire power, "The Boss". Not a leader as such, but one who rules over others for their own personal gain. More like an oppressor. One who has personal issues, self image issues. True leadership is something completely different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted December 23, 2011 Report Share Posted December 23, 2011 You did not answer my question. Why is psychopathy any different than any other 'behavoir disorder' like addiction or fetal alcohol syndrome or being gay? Do you have any evidence that psychopaths are psychopaths by choice? Those examples are all different. Whether psychopaths are the way they are by choice is more of a philosophical question, along the lines of "do we have free will" IMO. They choose their behavior as we all do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiddleClassCentrist Posted December 25, 2011 Report Share Posted December 25, 2011 (edited) A corporation is by definition, a psychopath. No empathy or moral compass. A drive only for profit to shareholders. To lead a corporation, it is likely that you too must also be a psychopath without any empathy for others. We should abolish corporations. They are a modern frankenstein. You won't see companies purposefully harming people or the environment when their owners aren't protected by limited liability. Edited December 25, 2011 by MiddleClassCentrist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Weber Posted December 25, 2011 Report Share Posted December 25, 2011 (edited) Are nutcases. Except that in many, many cases the "company values" are written by the executives. That is what makes them good executives. Financial management skills. Want empathy? See a counsellor (or your grandma). It is very accusatory and serves no purpose. Nothing should be run by psychopaths. Name one thing that should be. I wouldn't want a psycho delivering my mail, so I guess you think we should test them too? Says the guy with an economic 8.38... Does'nt that put you in the category of the likes of General Augusto Pinochet??? Not that I advocate for psychopath's running anything... Edited December 25, 2011 by Jack Weber Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Weber Posted December 25, 2011 Report Share Posted December 25, 2011 A corporation is by definition, a psychopath. No empathy or moral compass. A drive only for profit to shareholders. To lead a corporation, it is likely that you too must also be a psychopath without any empathy for others. We should abolish corporations. They are a modern frankenstein. You won't see companies purposefully harming people or the environment when their owners aren't protected by limited liability. Welcome to the "free market" that,at least a few here,advocate for... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimG Posted December 25, 2011 Report Share Posted December 25, 2011 (edited) Those examples are all different. Whether psychopaths are the way they are by choice is more of a philosophical question, along the lines of "do we have free will" IMO. They choose their behavior as we all do.Nothing but special pleading on your part to rationalize and irrational position. Psychopathy has genetic links like all of the other disorders I listed. It is not likely a choice - it is simply the way their brains are wired. The question I have is why people on the left are so quick to condemn psychopaths as 'abnormal' when they demand that people and organizations bend over backwards to accomodate people with similar disorders that are just as disruptive. Edited December 25, 2011 by TimG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydraboss Posted December 28, 2011 Report Share Posted December 28, 2011 Indeed, and notice his username, "HydraBoss"... I have come to believe that there is a certain psychology that seeks to acquire power, "The Boss". Not a leader as such, but one who rules over others for their own personal gain. More like an oppressor. One who has personal issues, self image issues. True leadership is something completely different. Ha! Actually, "Hydraboss" is a line of O&G drill bits I helped design back in the 90's...but nice try Freud. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.