Boges Posted December 14, 2011 Report Posted December 14, 2011 Stop, you're making Blatchford wet. Now who's being sexist. Quote
Black Dog Posted December 14, 2011 Report Posted December 14, 2011 (edited) Now who's being sexist. You're right. Since Blatch is the self-described "toughest guy in the room" I should have said: "Stop, you're making Blatchford hard." Edited December 14, 2011 by Black Dog Quote
Boges Posted December 14, 2011 Report Posted December 14, 2011 You're right. Since Blatch is the self-described "toughest guy in the room" I should have said: "Stop, you're making Blatchford hard." Oh because she's advocated male masculinity, she a butch now? As long as the stereotype go both ways I guess I can't complain. Quote
Guest Peeves Posted December 14, 2011 Report Posted December 14, 2011 She seems to get a lot of work for a horrible writer. ? "horrible writer", if that's a critique, give me an example. I find her writing exemplary. Quote
Boges Posted December 14, 2011 Report Posted December 14, 2011 ? "horrible writer", if that's a critique, give me an example. I find her writing exemplary. I'll direct this post to Black Dog. He's the one who thinks she sucks. I don't often read the Post. I listen to her on the radio almost daily though. Quote
Black Dog Posted December 14, 2011 Report Posted December 14, 2011 Oh because she's advocated male masculinity, she a butch now? Well, again, she did describe herself as the toughest guy in the room. Quote
Shakeyhands Posted December 14, 2011 Report Posted December 14, 2011 You're right. Since Blatch is the self-described "toughest guy in the room" I should have said: "Stop, you're making Blatchford hard." Coffee...out....my....nose.... bastard. Quote "They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Boges Posted December 14, 2011 Report Posted December 14, 2011 Well, again, she did describe herself as the toughest guy in the room. This is not terribly difficult South of Bloor. Quote
Black Dog Posted December 14, 2011 Report Posted December 14, 2011 ? "horrible writer", if that's a critique, give me an example. I find her writing exemplary. Thankfully soemone else has done the legwork on this: the Blatchford bad writing hall of shame Or hell, just start with the article in question. It was in Toronto recently, while temporarily resuming my semi-charmed kind of life there and briefly ditching the other semi-charmed half in Kingston, that I realized how much in need the modern male of the species is of some toughening up. The tip off is her reference to the 1997 hit "Semi-charmed Life" by Third Eye Blind: she wrote this one in the depths of a meth bender. Quote
Black Dog Posted December 14, 2011 Report Posted December 14, 2011 This is not terribly difficult South of Bloor. Okay: let's fight. Quote
Boges Posted December 14, 2011 Report Posted December 14, 2011 Okay: let's fight. Can we hug after. Quote
Black Dog Posted December 14, 2011 Report Posted December 14, 2011 Can we hug after. Why, are you some kind of limp-wristed, knock-kneed homo or something (not that there's anything wrong with that pace Blatchford)? Quote
Boges Posted December 14, 2011 Report Posted December 14, 2011 (edited) Why, are you some kind of limp-wristed, knock-kneed homo or something (not that there's anything wrong with that pace Blatchford)? When in Rome. . . I'm assuming you wouldn't come to the 905 for said fight the TTC doesn't go that far. Edited December 14, 2011 by Boges Quote
Black Dog Posted December 14, 2011 Report Posted December 14, 2011 When in Rome. . . I'm assuming you wouldn't come to the 905 for said fight. 905? What's that? My map of the GTA ends at Bloor/High Park/the DVP with empty space beyond that says "Here be douchebags". Quote
Boges Posted December 14, 2011 Report Posted December 14, 2011 905? What's that? My map of the GTA ends at Bloor/High Park/the DVP with empty space beyond that says "Here be douchebags". You mean it doesn't say "Stupid Harper/Ford Lovers" Shocking! Quote
Black Dog Posted December 14, 2011 Report Posted December 14, 2011 You mean it doesn't say "Stupid Harper/Ford Lovers" Same difference, really. Quote
guyser Posted December 14, 2011 Report Posted December 14, 2011 You mean it doesn't say "Stupid Harper/Ford Lovers" Shocking! Not really, Ford only serve the 416. Quote
The_Squid Posted December 14, 2011 Report Posted December 14, 2011 I hug friends if I haven't seen them in a long time. And then we may be heading out to shoot things in the woods, chop them up and eat them. No, masculine men never hug... Holy crap, what an absurd notion. How does she come up with this garbage? Quote
jacee Posted December 14, 2011 Author Report Posted December 14, 2011 (edited) I don't have much problem with Blatchford's writing ... well ok her sentences are often meandering and embedded and her "mawkish" emoting is tacky ... but it's her opinions that I abhor! I posted it for a laugh, and I've had a few reading the comments. Yes, I'm sure that Toronto men seem 'light' after listening to the "manly-men" of the Shafia (trial) family. Blatchford doesn't have a light-hearted bone in her body, except for ridiculing others, and I don't find that light-hearted. Perhaps I likewise shouldn't laugh at her ... but I can only assume that if she didn't expect to be laughed at for her ridiculous opinions, she'd keep them in her diaries instead of a national paper. Men shouldn't hug ... boys shouldn't hug ... what crap! Discomfort with a man-hug is a sign of something distasteful imo. Not sure what, but it makes me uncomfortable to see it. Fortunately it's a declining phenomenon. Hugging without skin contact is safer (contagion-wise) than shaking hands. As for Ford being "too pink" ... I expect that's a rather disgusting racial reference but the irony of her calling him "too pink(o)" as I read it, is just too fun to pass up! I believe Blatchford's real heartthrob is Conrad Black ... you know, the sleazy ex-con manly-man ... poet. Edited December 14, 2011 by jacee Quote
Wild Bill Posted December 26, 2011 Report Posted December 26, 2011 You know, I've lost a few friends to mental illness and eventual suicide over the years. One common point that always struck me was how they lost their sense of humour. They could manage crude and rude sniggers but any sort of higher level humour shot right over them. What's more, they were totally incapable of taking a joke against themselves, no matter how light hearted and friendly. I've loved Blatchford's writing for about 30 years now. Those who claim she's not popular rarely can claim such a record for their own writing. Those that have such a record usually write for the CBC news hour, where popularity is irrelevant. What I find most appealing with Blatch is that she doesn't call a spade a spade, it's a f**king shovel! She has no time for politically correctness, from minds that are clouded by granola fumes!. She writes for the common man, the mainstream. Those expounders of political correctness never want to admit that their views are held by a minority. Their tactic is to pretend they have majority support and hold on long enough to start changing the minds of upcoming younger generations. The tactic seems to be rather successful, I must admit. Orwell was right, I suppose. All this male hugging is just more attempts to feminize men, to make male children more like girls so they will be easier for female teachers to handle. This is in response to the massive overuse of ADHD diagnoses and the SOP drugging of boy students. Teachers who lack the skills to properly educate young boys have found it easier to make them into young girls. In most big cities today this trend is impossible to fight. Those who disagree are entitled to at least make a few jokes about it. Anyhow, like my lost friends, those who are often the targets of her humour are incapable of even seeing the joke! To the common man, tv commercials for men's scented products ARE humorous! In the 416 area, they are a training film. Quote "A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul." -- George Bernard Shaw "There is no point in being difficult when, with a little extra effort, you can be completely impossible."
sharkman Posted December 29, 2011 Report Posted December 29, 2011 Wow, I didn't know she'd been writing that long. I was introduced to her when the National Post started up. That was one fine paper under Black. Quote
Rick Posted December 29, 2011 Report Posted December 29, 2011 Blatchford's a tactless hack and the sooner she becomes worm food, the better this country will be. Quote “This is all about who you represent,” Mr. Dewar (NDP) said. “We’re (NDP) talking about representing the interests of working people and everyday Canadians and they [the Conservatives] are about representing the fund managers who come in and fleece our companies and our country. Voted Maple Leaf Web's 'Most Outstanding Poster' 2011
sharkman Posted December 29, 2011 Report Posted December 29, 2011 And to tick off some so effectively, she obviously is quite successful at what she does. Quote
Black Dog Posted December 29, 2011 Report Posted December 29, 2011 (edited) You know, I've lost a few friends to mental illness and eventual suicide over the years. One common point that always struck me was how they lost their sense of humour. They could manage crude and rude sniggers but any sort of higher level humour shot right over them. What's more, they were totally incapable of taking a joke against themselves, no matter how light hearted and friendly. Yes, clearly people who find Blatchford to be unfunny are mentally ill. I've loved Blatchford's writing for about 30 years now. Those who claim she's not popular rarely can claim such a record for their own writing. Those that have such a record usually write for the CBC news hour, where popularity is irrelevant. No one is even talking about popularity (which is a pretty meaningless metric anyway). What I find most appealing with Blatch is that she doesn't call a spade a spade, it's a f**king shovel! She has no time for politically correctness, from minds that are clouded by granola fumes!. And yet she's so dreadfully boring. She writes for the common man, the mainstream. Those expounders of political correctness never want to admit that their views are held by a minority. Their tactic is to pretend they have majority support and hold on long enough to start changing the minds of upcoming younger generations. The tactic seems to be rather successful, I must admit. Orwell was right, I suppose. So the minority is actually the majority after all? Or did you just crawl so far up your own butt that you've merged from the other side? All this male hugging is just more attempts to feminize men, to make male children more like girls so they will be easier for female teachers to handle. This is in response to the massive overuse of ADHD diagnoses and the SOP drugging of boy students. Teachers who lack the skills to properly educate young boys have found it easier to make them into young girls. In most big cities today this trend is impossible to fight. Those who disagree are entitled to at least make a few jokes about it. At first I then I Anyhow, like my lost friends, those who are often the targets of her humour are incapable of even seeing the joke! To the common man, tv commercials for men's scented products ARE humorous!In the 416 area, they are a training film I guess it makes sense that it's people in the sticks who find Blatchford's ham-fisted attempts at humour to be amusing. These are likely the same people who doubtless kept "Everybody Loves Raymond" on the air for so many years and enjoy the ribald comic stylings of Larry the Cable Guy. Edited December 29, 2011 by Black Dog Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.