Guilty: Harper Government Found in Contempt of Parliament

[ToadBrother]

Sorry toad I have moved on and I believe I was expressing an opinion at the time.

Uh huh.

But somehow you felt that I had to provide proof to legitimize an opinion I have had.You aswell could not dis-prove an opinion that I had and then resorted to name calling and replying with half-wited comments that are not even funny or witty.

Maybe if you show a little more entertainment value in what you say then ok but otherwise lets move on

Your still the buddy,Buddy

WWWTT

You didn't frame it as an opinion but as a statement of fact, and then told me that I was wrong in stating the opposite.

But if this makes you feel better about yourself, you go right ahead and think I've got amnesia.

[Jack Weber]

No I actually prefer writing something creative,funny and interesting!

WWWTT

Well...

Keep working at it!!!

[Charles Anthony]

Everybody,

Stop the trolling. The last couple of pages of this thread have been filled with nitter-nattering and childish banter. Focus on discussing the topic and avoid personal attacks.

Review the forum rules and guidelines which start with the following:

BE POLITE AND RESPECT OTHERS

Mapleleafweb operates these forums in the hopes that they will promote intelligent, honest and responsible discussion. We encourage you to speak your mind on relevant issues in a thoughtful way. Please respect others using this board and treat them with respect and dignity.

NO TROLLING/FLAMING

Do not post inflammatory remarks just to annoy people. If you are not bringing anything new to the argument, then do not say anything at all.

From now on, anybody who trolls should expect to be suspended without warning.

Charles Anthony

moderator

[WWWTT]

Well...

Keep working at it!!!

Wow

More incredible quotes from Jack Weber!

When I started reading your quote I was crying and asking why?Why? Jack its not fair,life's not fair!?!?

And by the time I finished reading I was up on my feet shouting in the air Hallalulua!Let us rejoice!

Keep the awesome articles and quotes coming man.I read everyone of them and then I print them out and post them over my bed and when I look at them before I go to bed I say to myself "Jack is a great man"

And then I put on my tinfoil hat and mumble to myself"Ya what am I thinking of now toad!""Think your so smart with your super powers hey buddy!"Or no wait thats Jack still.

WWWTT

[Harry]

Games Harper plays - "oh what a tangled web we weave, when we set out to deceive". What with Harper Goverment already in contempt of Parliament, and Harper already weakened on the ethics file, this coalition BS will come back to bite Harper in the ass. Harper could dig himself out of this mess by telling the truth, but will he?

Deal in 2004 had Harper singing different tune on opposition collaboration

OTTAWA - Prime Minister Stephen Harper stood outside Rideau Hall on Saturday railing against the idea of opposition parties trying to band together and form a government.

But seven years ago, Harper sent a letter to the same address suggesting he'd be open to that, right down to working with the very party he now says should have no role in the government.

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/deal-2004-had-harper-singing-different-tune-opposition-20110326-134329-425.html

Edited March 26, 2011 by Harry

[WWWTT]

Games Harper plays - "oh what a tangled web we weave, when we set out to deceive". What with Harper Goverment already in contempt of Parliament, and Harper already weakened on the ethics file, this coalition BS will come back to bite Harper in the ass. Harper could dig himself out of this mess by telling the truth, but will he?

Yes I couldn't agree more with you Harry

But I think he has already reached th point of no return and in the next couple of weeks we may even see his party drop to around 35% in most of the polls.

I don't think you will hear to many people call him a brilliant strategist anymore now after this latest huge blunder

WWWTT

[Saipan]

Games Harper plays - "oh what a tangled web we weave, when we set out to deceive".

Clearly Chretien.

[Harry]

Clearly Chretien.

Does anyone know how many clandestine meetings Harper had with Duceppe and Layton in 2004 before they reached their accord when Paul Matin was in power? Apparently there were quite a few. Maybe the media should ask Harper, or if we don't want to be lied to perhaps it would be better to ask Duceppe or Layton about that.

Edited March 27, 2011 by Harry

[Jack Weber]

Does anyone know how many clandestine meetings Harper had with Duceppe and Layton in 2004 before they reached their accord when Paul Matin was in power? Apparently there were quite a few. Maybe the media should ask Harper about that.

Really...

It's not like they thought that one up over lunch at Micky D's...

There must have been a plan on power sharing??

Edited March 27, 2011 by Jack Weber

[Harry]

Really...

It's not like they thought that one up over lunch at Micky D's...

There must have been a plan on power sharing??

The summer of 2004

http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/26/the-summer-of-2004/

Looks like Aaron Wherry has done his homework. Harper is defintely NOT going to be a happy camper about this. This credibility gap for the prime minister is growing and growing. How much longer does he think he can take Canadians for fools?

Edited March 27, 2011 by Harry

[Jack Weber]

Looks like Aaron Wherry has done his homework. Harper is defintely NOT going to be a happy camper about this. This credibility gap for the prime minister is growing and growing. How much longer does he think he can take Canadians for fools?

Classic...And undeniable...

[ToadBrother]

Looks like Aaron Wherry has done his homework. Harper is defintely NOT going to be a happy camper about this. This credibility gap for the prime minister is growing and growing. How much longer does he think he can take Canadians for fools?

Duceppe has been reminding Harper of their lovemaking in 2004.

[Saipan]

Duceppe has been reminding Harper of their lovemaking in 2004.

ALL Canadians should be reminded Liberals almost lost Quebec under Chretien, who was "the goat in the garden".

[ToadBrother]

ALL Canadians should be reminded Liberals almost lost Quebec under Chretien, who was "the goat in the garden".

And all Canadians should be reminded of how the Meech Lake and Charlottetown failures lead to the 1995 referendum... and on and on back to the Fields of Abraham and on and on back to the Hundred Years War.

At what point would you like to stop this historical tour of blame?

[Harry]

And all Canadians should be reminded of how the Meech Lake and Charlottetown failures lead to the 1995 referendum... and on and on back to the Fields of Abraham and on and on back to the Hundred Years War.

At what point would you like to stop this historical tour of blame?

Some comments here are priceless.

Thanks for this TB.

[Harry]

Duceppe has been reminding Harper of their lovemaking in 2004.

- today as well

"They all come to us. They all want to be in our bed, but don't want to marry us."

http://montreal.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20110326/mtl_duceppe_110326/20110326/?hub=MontrealHome

Edited March 27, 2011 by Harry

[Saipan]

and on and on back to the Fields of Abraham and on and on back to the Hundred Years War.

How about Exodus?

And Troy!

[ToadBrother]

- today as well

"They all come to us. They all want to be in our bed, but don't want to marry us."

http://montreal.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20110326/mtl_duceppe_110326/20110326/?hub=MontrealHome

So far as I can tell, the only difference between Harper and Dion was that Harper bothered to wear a condom during his little "romantic interlude" with the Bloc. The Tories will doubtless try to make great hay out of how not negotiating the precise nature of the coalition somehow represents some vast difference, sort of like a Clinton "I got a b---job, but that's not sex" moment.

[Jack Weber]

So far as I can tell, the only difference between Harper and Dion was that Harper bothered to wear a condom during his little "romantic interlude" with the Bloc. The Tories will doubtless try to make great hay out of how not negotiating the precise nature of the coalition somehow represents some vast difference, sort of like a Clinton "I got a b---job, but that's not sex" moment.

"I did not have sex with that woman...Miss Bloc..."

[blueblood]

So far as I can tell, the only difference between Harper and Dion was that Harper bothered to wear a condom during his little "romantic interlude" with the Bloc. The Tories will doubtless try to make great hay out of how not negotiating the precise nature of the coalition somehow represents some vast difference, sort of like a Clinton "I got a b---job, but that's not sex" moment.

And its the liberals that are having to pay child support because of it!

Safe sex=no baby!

Edited March 27, 2011 by blueblood

[blueblood]

N

Edited March 27, 2011 by blueblood

[Harry]

Here it comes, and this is just starting to warm up. This Harper hypocrisy issue is not going away unfortunately for Harper. Harper has made a big, big mistake bringing up this reckless coalition stuff for the Conservatives.

"Not by a backroom deal" Harper says today.

Reflect on Harper's 2004 backroom meetings in hotels with the separatists and the socialists as you asbsorb that statement. Harper is going to ridiculed out of office if he keeps it up.

Harper’s hypocrisy problem

Still, it’s worth pursuing Harper on this point. What would he do if his party was returned with a minority, or if the Liberals were? I presume he, too, would rule out a coalition, and I’m prepared to take him at his word on that point. But if he now believes it is “illegitimate” for one government to replace another without going back to the people, is he then formally swearing that he would never again make the kind of agreement with the other parties, whatever it was, he was so evidently prepared to make in 2004?http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/26/harpers-hypocrisy-problem/

[blueblood]

Here it comes, and this is just starting to warm up. This Harper hypocrisy issue is not going away unfortunately for Harper. Harper has made a big, big mistake bringing up this reckless coalition stuff for the Conservatives.

"Not by a backroom deal" Harper says today.

Reflect on Harper's 2004 backroom meetings in hotels with the separatists and the socialists as you asbsorb that statement. Harper is going to ridiculed out of office if he keeps it up.

Refer to toadbrother's romantic interlude comment. Its the liberals with the baby not the tories.

Harpers letter on the ctv website (from the bloc website) says to explore options, not necessarily a coalition and why harper doesn't have to pay child support unlike ignatieff.

[ToadBrother]

Refer to toadbrother's romantic interlude comment. Its the liberals with the baby not the tories.

Harpers letter on the ctv website (from the bloc website) says to explore options, not necessarily a coalition and why harper doesn't have to pay child support unlike ignatieff.

Well yes, but Harper still jumped in bed with the Bloc. So far as I can see, there's little difference, other than the fact that the 2008 coalition got closer to actually toppling the government than the 2004 coalition.

[Harry]

Well yes, but Harper still jumped in bed with the Bloc. So far as I can see, there's little difference, other than the fact that the 2008 coalition got closer to actually toppling the government than the 2004 coalition.

Right on - you got it TB.