Smitherman, gay by choice?

[Oleg Bach]

The polls state that Smitherman is "on top." I would safely assume that being on top is his personal preference. Looking at the candidates embroiled in the mayoral campaign for the throne of Toronto...I have come to the conclution that the nice Italian guy is probably the best bet. Culturally and as far as his great education...along with his honest and sincere bumbling demeanor..This man is probably the most unlikely but probably the best in the long run to run the corporation of Toronto..T.O.is the core and life blood of all that is Canada. It is a city state similar to Rome in the days of old.

Now if the down fall of Rome resulted from corruption and moral debachery the last thing we need is a selfish dominator..so I believe it is time to smear Smitherman with what he deserves...I have seen this phenomena on a few occassions..Men who do not want the responsiblity of a woman and take the easy route in so far as life style...Like a male dog that mounts another male...as I am sure Smitherman is the mounter...It is not about love or socialization - it is about DOMINATION...I believe that Smitherman MIGHT just be what was refered to in a bygone era as a common sodomist.

Having stated that - The city of Toronto is being buggered up by socialist - phoney and delluded do-gooders...The city is a mess and in sever decline. If Smitherman has the mentality of a dominator in his personal life, it just MIGHT be that he will attempt to further dominate and decay the city state of Toronto into oblivion. FORD would make a good henchmen I am sure..but he is not a centralist or a moderate of good logic...He also is an energy sucker and not a giver- much like Smitherman these two are takers and not givers - nor will they make good public servants..Ford even though his big deal is the suppression of his own office expenses..that he makes great hooplah about...shows a character that restrains the public purse..to a fault and in the meantime he does not restrain himself with very rich and expensive luncheons..as is evident by his body.

Back to Smitherman...I do not want to persecute the guy but I really don't want to see a Captain of the good ship Toronto, who has his way with the cabin boy but does not allow the cabin boy the right to refuse being screwed - Smitherman really has no platform or real agenda other than to dominate...and be a big shot. In the long run you will see a person IF he is mayor who will pander to every weakling and loser that sucks up to him literally...also there is the question of the feud Smitherman has with his brother who is endorsing ANOTHER other than his brother..What's all that about? Probably a nasty skeleton in the Smitherman closet that he should have never left.

[Oleg Bach]

The polls state that Smitherman is "on top." I would safely assume that being on top is his personal preference. Looking at the candidates embroiled in the mayoral campaign for the throne of Toronto...I have come to the conclution that the nice Italian guy is probably the best bet. Culturally and as far as his great education...along with his honest and sincere bumbling demeanor..This man is probably the most unlikely but probably the best in the long run to run the corporation of Toronto..T.O.is the core and life blood of all that is Canada. It is a city state similar to Rome in the days of old.

Now if the down fall of Rome resulted from corruption and moral debachery the last thing we need is a selfish dominator..so I believe it is time to smear Smitherman with what he deserves...I have seen this phenomena on a few occassions..Men who do not want the responsiblity of a woman and take the easy route in so far as life style...Like a male dog that mounts another male...as I am sure Smitherman is the mounter...It is not about love or socialization - it is about DOMINATION...I believe that Smitherman MIGHT just be what was refered to in a bygone era as a common sodomist.

Having stated that - The city of Toronto is being buggered up by socialist - phoney and delluded do-gooders...The city is a mess and in sever decline. If Smitherman has the mentality of a dominator in his personal life, it just MIGHT be that he will attempt to further dominate and decay the city state of Toronto into oblivion. FORD would make a good henchmen I am sure..but he is not a centralist or a moderate of good logic...He also is an energy sucker and not a giver- much like Smitherman these two are takers and not givers - nor will they make good public servants..Ford even though his big deal is the suppression of his own office expenses..that he makes great hooplah about...shows a character that restrains the public purse..to a fault and in the meantime he does not restrain himself with very rich and expensive luncheons..as is evident by his body.

Back to Smitherman...I do not want to persecute the guy but I really don't want to see a Captain of the good ship Toronto, who has his way with the cabin boy but does not allow the cabin boy the right to refuse being screwed - Smitherman really has no platform or real agenda other than to dominate...and be a big shot. In the long run you will see a person IF he is mayor who will pander to every weakling and loser that sucks up to him literally...also there is the question of the feud Smitherman has with his brother who is endorsing ANOTHER other than his brother..What's all that about? Probably a nasty skeleton in the Smitherman closet that he should have never left.

In my usual reply to myself...MAKE THE ITALIAN MAYOR...He is establishment - and is connected..and we need someone who is friends with the banks and the old guard...Lets bring this city back to being an elegant and thriving place rather than a bad replica of AMSTERDAM the damned...enough political correctness and submissioin to things that are bad for us and our children..Let us prosper and have peace in this town once called Toronto the good!

[Topaz]

Lets try to leave out if a person is gay, white, black, purple , man, woman etc.. out of a reason to/not to, vote for a person.

[Black Dog]

[M.Dancer]

HIp Hip Hooray this man

[Shady]

and in the meantime he does not restrain himself with very rich and expensive luncheons..as is evident by his body.

One can become overweight by eating fast food. I'd hardly consider that rich and expensive.

[bloodyminded]

One can become overweight by eating fast food. I'd hardly consider that rich and expensive.

True. People from low-income backgrounds generally have the greatest problems with obesity.

[kimmy]

Another fascinating visit to Planet Oleg.

-k

[Dog]

Lets try to leave out if a person is gay, white, black, purple , man, woman etc.. out of a reason to/not to, vote for a person.

First being gay is not like being black and saying it is insults black people . According to Stats Can only 1 % of the population is gay and most Canadians still believe homosexuality is aberrant behavior . Being gay is a very good reason not to vote for someone just like you may not want to vote for a schizophrenic .

[Shakeyhands]

First being gay is not like being black and saying it is insults black people . According to Stats Can only 1 % of the population is gay and most Canadians still believe homosexuality is aberrant behavior . Being gay is a very good reason not to vote for someone just like you may not want to vote for a schizophrenic .

How is it not the same? Neither is a choice.

[Dog]

How is it not the same? Neither is a choice.

Both are mental illness . Try reading Dr. Satinover The Politics of Truth .

[Black Dog]

Both are mental illness .

Meh, not worth it. you'll be banned in short order.

Edited September 30, 2010 by Black Dog

[Dog]

I don't think they ban people for believing Sigmund Freud and 100s of experts .

[Melanie_]

This is too funny!

First being gay is not like being black

How is it not the same? Neither is a choice.

Both are mental illness.

[Dog]

While that is quite humorous i was comparing schizophrenia and homosexuality .

[bloodyminded]

While that is quite humorous i was comparing schizophrenia and homosexuality .

Some crazed left-wing radicals trying to push the gay agenda might offer you the heretical argument that homosexuality and schizophrenia are two different things, and that you can't just alter word denotations to suit your political argument.

[g_bambino]

Neither is a choice.

Having homosexual feelings, their intensity, and the fluctuations thereof is out of a person's control. But, labelling one's self as "gay" is pretty much a personal choice.

[Shakeyhands]

Having homosexual feelings, their intensity, and the fluctuations thereof is out of a person's control. But, labelling one's self as "gay" is pretty much a personal choice.

Ahh I see, when did you personally decide to be straight? Or I guess to label yourself as straight? Have you ever, on a whim of course, decided to call yourself gay? If only for a few hours?

Edited October 5, 2010 by Shakeyhands

[g_bambino]

Ahh I see, when did you personally decide to be straight? Or I guess to label yourself as straight? Have you ever, on a whim of course, decided to call yourself gay? If only for a few hours?

I don't think you saw anything; certainly not what I wrote, given that the questions you proffered (with faux haughty attitude) are so irrelevant and presumptuous. How do you know what I label myself as? How do you know I've ever labelled myself? How do you know I considered labelling myself at all, if only for a few hours?

[c/e]

Edited October 5, 2010 by g_bambino

[Shakeyhands]

I don't think you saw anything; certainly not what I wrote, given that the questions you proffered (with faux haughty attitude) are so irrelevant and presumptuous. How do you know what I label myself as? How do you know I've ever labelled myself? How do you know I considered labelling myself at all, if only for a few hours?

[c/e]

Fair enough, so I made the personal choice to label myself as straight for instance, I don't recall doing that, I think I must have just assumed I was straight and went with it.

I may be missing your point still. And I wasn't being haughty at all.

[P. McGee]

It seems like there may be an element of dogma to the belief that sexual identity is basically predetermined. To ignore the social and cultural forces at play is a bit simplistic. Is everyone who self-identifies as gay attracted only to the same sex at all times? Some people identify as gay quite a bit later on in life, but were previously involved in heterosexual relationships. Was their earlier identification as 'straight' incorrect somehow? It's also been suggested that self-identified bisexuals can sometimes experience social pressure to pick one side and stick with it. To suggest that sexual identification is completely independent of life choices and experiences in all cases would be absurd, although I don't deny that genetics and brain physiology play some role.

[bloodyminded]

It seems like there may be an element of dogma to the belief that sexual identity is basically predetermined. To ignore the social and cultural forces at play is a bit simplistic. Is everyone who self-identifies as gay attracted only to the same sex at all times? Some people identify as gay quite a bit later on in life, but were previously involved in heterosexual relationships. Was their earlier identification as 'straight' incorrect somehow? It's also been suggested that self-identified bisexuals can sometimes experience social pressure to pick one side and stick with it. To suggest that sexual identification is completely independent of life choices and experiences in all cases would be absurd, although I don't deny that genetics and brain physiology play some role.

Undoubtedly there are a lot of complex factors at play; but I think that "genetics and brain physiology play some role" is understating that aspect of it.

The hardwiring is important. That's why human beings simply cannot "learn" to fly, no matter what their environment.

With sexuality, a person can repress it; or a person can (as you have underlined) be inclined towards homosexuality and heterosexuality simultaneously. (Hell, the immense popularity of the homoerotic movie Top Gun is evidence of homosexual desire among nominally heterosexual men.) What I do not believe likely is that a person's sexuality can actually change. Their behaviour; but not their fundamental inclinations. Because of environment, circumstance, experiences, evident alterations can appear; but I see no reason to suppose that somehting truly fundamental has occurred under these alterations, which are relatively trivial.

Edited October 6, 2010 by bloodyminded

[Oleg Bach]

While that is quite humorous i was comparing schizophrenia and homosexuality .

BIBLICALLY SPEAKING...AND i HOPE...i SPELL - this correctly..."Eunuchs - some are created by God (gentetic mutations) - in order no be non-sexual and glorify God...some are created by man - to protect harems ect...casteration.....and OTHER...create themselves"..to para phrase. The ones created by man are much like the wrecks that become adults that were molested by Catholic priests and that creepy baby sitter Uncle Ernie..

As for our liberal granny state...if you so much as have a tad of female in your maleness - you are pushed down the garden path by well meaning social engineers...I have heard mothers say.."Johnny is gay" - I say to them.."The kid is only 9 years old..leave him alone (this is a type of sexual interference and should not be permitted) - So I take young Johnny aside because the kids questions me..eg..."What is gay?" - so I tell the boy..."It is about people wanting to take your power away so you can not have an empire and be king..so that you will have no heirs....The kid gets it and NOW the kid is NOT gay...to the disappointment of his democratically liberal idiot mother..That happens to be a relative that I can not tolerate anymore.

Now back to the Planet Oleg for a moment..Smitherman...is not your classic genetic eunuch..He is to masculine and is most definetly gay by politcal choice...My daughter is a friend of his and she is going to be real pissed off when they find that dad...is a gay basher..which I am if the person is a psuedo gay...Nature plays tricks on sexuality ...by it is rare and when watching CTV...they have a commerical out regarding voting and "my Toronto"...

The characters in the add and there are a total of four of them - TWO are clearly gayish....this is a misrepresention of the demographics...50% of the populace is NOT gay ...so f off.

[Oleg Bach]

Yah and vote for the moderate intellectual..one of the Italian guys...New York did well with Italian mayors..maybe we should give it a try...I would rather have a mob boss run the city that the Marque DeSade in diapers.

[bloodyminded]

If you wish for a violent Master, your desire will be granted.