capricorn Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 ...and too close to hydro towers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 (edited) It's always helpful to remember this web-site. Mr Evil Clown here...lol. http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/ (Note: Hit the tiny blue 'begin' to start the parade.) Edited August 17, 2010 by DogOnPorch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbg Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Is it frustrating that you're powerless to remove them? Be careful of whom you insult. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dre Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 (edited) Why are you idiots feeding the troll? Stop talking to it. Edited August 17, 2010 by dre Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dre Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Sucks when your side chooses 'Nazi' during WW2, doesn't it? No worries...Germany got the same treatment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Amin_al-Husayni Now if you could only raise an army competant enough to pull of your fantasy vision, eh? When Syria loses 80+ MiGs to the Israeli's zero in a dogfight, it doesn't bode well for your namby-pamby plans of world conquest. Sucks when youre dumb enough to get goaded into an exchange with an obvious sock puppet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Weber Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 (edited) Sucks when youre dumb enough to get goaded into an exchange with an obvious sock puppet. Lictor wears socks on his hands??? What a headcase!!! Edited August 17, 2010 by Jack Weber Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Sucks when youre dumb enough to get goaded into an exchange with an obvious sock puppet. You're a sock puppet now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 (edited) Why are you idiots feeding the troll? Stop talking to it. Voted yourself king, too, have we? Edited August 17, 2010 by DogOnPorch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betsy Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 (edited) I am deeply troubled when I read a couple of pages from this topic. WHY IS THIS MANSOUR MOHAMMED....or whatever his name is....ALLOWED FREE REIGN TO SPEW HIS VENOM IN A CANADIAN FORUM???? PLEASE, DON'T SPEAK ABOUT THE VALUES OF FREEDOM FOR ALL! wE ARE AT WAR, AND CLEARLY THIS GUY IS AN ENEMY SYMPATHIZER AT THE VERY LEAST! If Maple Leaf would not remove him on this board....I urge the rest of the forum community to show solidarity as one....and ignore and refrain from acknowqledging his existence on the board! He is nothing! Edited August 17, 2010 by betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 On the contrary, I welcome the weakness of the West. If we can conquer the West through words and ideas, all the better. Why spill the blood of our holy warriors to triumph in this clash when our enemy sits ready to submit? This is quite the character account. What names did you use before that are now banned? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dre Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 I am deeply troubled when I read a couple of pages from this topic. WHY IS THIS MANSOUR MOHAMMED....or whatever his name is....ALLOWED FREE REIGN TO SPEW HIS VENOM IN A CANADIAN FORUM???? PLEASE, DON'T SPEAK ABOUT THE VALUES OF FREEDOM FOR ALL! wE ARE AT WAR, AND CLEARLY THIS GUY IS AN ENEMY SYMPATHIZER AT THE VERY LEAST! If Maple Leaf would not remove him on this board....I urge the rest of the forum community to show solidarity as one....and ignore and refrain from acknowqledging his existence on the board! He is nothing! PLEASE, DON'T SPEAK ABOUT THE VALUES OF FREEDOM FOR ALL! wE ARE AT WAR, AND CLEARLY THIS GUY IS AN ENEMY SYMPATHIZER AT THE VERY LEAST! No dippy... We are not at war... and that guy is not an enemy sypathizer. Hes a sock puppet whos strings are being pulled by one of the dorks around here with a hate on for Islam. How obvious does something need to be for you to get it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naomiglover Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Why are you idiots feeding the troll? Stop talking to it. I don't know about you, but I put DogsOnPorch on block over a month ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 I don't know about you, but I put DogsOnPorch on block over a month ago. dre's not a cowardly anti-Semite like yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodyminded Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Anyways, just like Wal-Mart's had to accept the sensibilities of the communities they want to build in, and sometimes change plans. This mosque may have to do the same thing. WalMart doesn't change plans in respect of anyone's "sensibilities." they change plans when required to by law. (You know, I follow the law, too: you must think me a magnificent human being, worthy of high praise.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 WalMart doesn't change plans in respect of anyone's "sensibilities." they change plans when required to by law. Actually, that's not true. But it sound great! Anyways, interesting piece by Abdul Rahman Al-Rashid, the director of Al-Arabiya. He says the mosque near ground zero is a bad idea too. He's obviously a rabid Islamophobic. A House of Worship or a Symbol of Destruction?I cannot imagine that Muslims want a mosque on this particular site, because it will be turned into an arena for promoters of hatred, and a symbol of those who committed the crime. At the same time, there are no practicing Muslims in the district who need a place of worship, because it is indeed a commercial district. Is there a side that is committed to this mosque? The fact is that in the news reports there are names linked to this project that costs 100 million dollars! The sides enthusiastic for building the mosque might be building companies, architect houses, or politicized groups that want suitable investments?! I do not know whether the building applicant wants a mosque whose aim is reconciliation, or he is an investor who wants quick profits. This is because the idea of the mosque specifically next to the destruction is not at all a clever deed Link Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Weber Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 I am deeply troubled when I read a couple of pages from this topic. WHY IS THIS MANSOUR MOHAMMED....or whatever his name is....ALLOWED FREE REIGN TO SPEW HIS VENOM IN A CANADIAN FORUM???? PLEASE, DON'T SPEAK ABOUT THE VALUES OF FREEDOM FOR ALL! wE ARE AT WAR, AND CLEARLY THIS GUY IS AN ENEMY SYMPATHIZER AT THE VERY LEAST! If Maple Leaf would not remove him on this board....I urge the rest of the forum community to show solidarity as one....and ignore and refrain from acknowqledging his existence on the board! He is nothing! That's the beauty of Free Speech... This unhinged Islamofascist can spew his drivel here if he likes.He has that right. We have the right to depict Mohammed with a bomb in his turban(sp)...That is our right that people have shed blood for. Don't ban him,otherwise you'l fall into the trap that the bedwetters at Uof O did last March when dealing with Anne Coulter... By the way,I still think it's Lictor,who is also Ratio,trying to use over the top screen names while doing some sort of societal experiment... Either way,whomever it is,is a kook of the highest order! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodyminded Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 I am deeply troubled when I read a couple of pages from this topic. WHY IS THIS MANSOUR MOHAMMED....or whatever his name is....ALLOWED FREE REIGN TO SPEW HIS VENOM IN A CANADIAN FORUM???? PLEASE, DON'T SPEAK ABOUT THE VALUES OF FREEDOM FOR ALL! wE ARE AT WAR, AND CLEARLY THIS GUY IS AN ENEMY SYMPATHIZER AT THE VERY LEAST! If Maple Leaf would not remove him on this board....I urge the rest of the forum community to show solidarity as one....and ignore and refrain from acknowqledging his existence on the board! He is nothing! The chances are about ten-to-one that he agrees with you on virtually every political point (and possibly religious point, commands against deception excluded). He is using every single fanatic Muslim caricature in the book. (Even imaginative enough to boast of his wife giving him "three strong sons." ) By taking him seriously, you're playing into his hands; further, you're being tricked by someone "on your own side," as it were. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodyminded Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Actually, that's not true. But it sound great! What has WalMart done specifically for the sake of respecting people's sensibilities? (this is how I put it; and you disagree...so, go!) Anyways, interesting piece by Abdul Rahman Al-Rashid, the director of Al-Arabiya. He says the mosque near ground zero is a bad idea too. He's obviously a rabid Islamophobic. And there are Jewish people who support it...so they must be rabid, self-hating Jews! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbg Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Sucks when youre dumb enough to get goaded into an exchange with an obvious sock puppet. You're a sock puppet now? Voted yourself king, too, have we? When Dre's right, he's right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 When Dre's right, he's right. I don't recall dre being voted Lord God King Bufu. Until then I'll respond to anyone I darn well please. I imagine capricorn will also do like-wise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dre Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 The chances are about ten-to-one that he agrees with you on virtually every political point (and possibly religious point, commands against deception excluded). He is using every single fanatic Muslim caricature in the book. (Even imaginative enough to boast of his wife giving him "three strong sons." ) By taking him seriously, you're playing into his hands; further, you're being tricked by someone "on your own side," as it were. That pretty much sums it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guyser Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Holy , 100 pages discussing what property owners can legally put on their site? Even if in bad taste? Is all of Manhattan an HOA fiefdom now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Holy , 100 pages discussing what property owners can legally put on their site? Even if in bad taste? Is all of Manhattan an HOA fiefdom now? The legality isn't being disputed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capricorn Posted August 18, 2010 Report Share Posted August 18, 2010 It's always helpful to remember this web-site. Mr Evil Clown here...lol. http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/ (Note: Hit the tiny blue 'begin' to start the parade.) Thanks DOP. That link's a keeper. I'm halfway down the list of warriors and you can't help pegging some posters here with those descriptions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted August 18, 2010 Report Share Posted August 18, 2010 The legality isn't being disputed. You'd think that after 100 pages, they'd finally understand that by now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.