Shady Posted March 25, 2010 Author Report Posted March 25, 2010 Yep. Lets see em. I already linked to them. Nice try. Quote
Alta4ever Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 (edited) I actually found it kind of funny. Not that channeling Hitler is funny, I just took it as a jab at the fact that you and your conservative buddies regularly call "lefties" nazis which is in itself hilarious. This is just icing on the cake. no we call you commies and socialists, and on the odd occasion fascists. Edited March 25, 2010 by Alta4ever Quote "What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” President Ronald Reagan
nicky10013 Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 I already linked to them. Nice try. To your personal pictures from Ottawa? Where are they? Where's the link. If you've posted them to a wesbite you'll have the link on hand and be able to post them again. Quote
nicky10013 Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 (edited) no we call you commies and socialists. All the while not knowing what any of these terms means. Edited March 25, 2010 by nicky10013 Quote
Shady Posted March 25, 2010 Author Report Posted March 25, 2010 To your personal pictures from Ottawa? Not my personal pictures, the personal pictures of the thug protestors who's intent was to silence free speech. It's all there, in black and white. Actually, it's in colour! Quote
Alta4ever Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 All the while not know what any of these terms means. I don't think you know what those terms mean, considering the pathetic job your professors have done on you in your post secondary education. A socialist one who advocates for the government to take control of the economy through either direct worker ownership or public ownership of the means of production in the country. These are people more concerned with the equality of outcome rather then the equality of opportunity. Quote "What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” President Ronald Reagan
Alta4ever Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 To your personal pictures from Ottawa? Where are they? Where's the link. If you've posted them to a wesbite you'll have the link on hand and be able to post them again. Are you that incapable of going back a page or two. You are pathetic you can't even click through a link to view the content and form an opinion based on the info, you form your opinion before you even see it that is what is called self imposed blind ignorance. Someone having or gaining a post secondary education should not be so foolish. Quote "What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” President Ronald Reagan
nicky10013 Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 I don't think you know what those terms mean, considering the pathetic job your professors have done on you in your post secondary education. A socialist one who advocates for the government to take control of the economy through either direct worker ownership or public ownership of the means of production in the country. These are people more concerned with the equality of outcome rather then the equality of opportunity. And how does your definiton make me a socialist? Quote
Alta4ever Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 And how does your definiton make me a socialist? You advocate those very things. Quote "What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” President Ronald Reagan
nicky10013 Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 Are you that incapable of going back a page or two. You are pathetic you can't even click through a link to view the content and form an opinion based on the info, you form your opinion before you even see it that is what is called self imposed blind ignorance. Someone having or gaining a post secondary education should not be so foolish. I'm just asking for him to do what you do all the time. Post a source. Why should I have to go looking for it? It's on the onus of the writer to back up what he says. Not the person who questions it. Considering how many times you do this, you're nothing but a hypocrite. Quote
nicky10013 Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 You advocate those very things. Where? Quote
Alta4ever Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 I'm just asking for him to do what you do all the time. Post a source. Why should I have to go looking for it? It's on the onus of the writer to back up what he says. Not the person who questions it. Considering how many times you do this, you're nothing but a hypocrite. It was posted for you Shady "Posted Today, 11:07 AMQuote We Shut Down Ann Coulter *We figured we'd never get in, but a quick call to pals let us know about a back door that was unlocked. *Once inside we had to find the main lecture area. We met up with lots of other activists trying to do the same. *We met up with two security guards calling for back up instead. *More activists kept coming, but we knew we had to find another way in. We decided to move our growing group back to the front and try to rush the front doors. *So we rushed the doors and quickly overwhelmed security. *After a while we heard that the fire alarm had been pulled and that's why the blue light was on (left). The fire department came, but because we didn't hear an alarm, and the police were the ones saying it was an alarm, and that we all had to clear out...we ignored them again. *Then more police showed up, but they were just more police to ignore. *This is a picture of an RCMP officer who was asking people to move back. He was completely ignored by absoloutely everyone. Manufactured??? BBC: Do you agree that from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warming? Phil Jones: Yes" NickyPosted Today, 11:16 AMShady, on 25 March 2010 - 01:07 PM, said: Manufactured??? Since when is ignoring the police tantamount to violence. You completely ignored it. Quote "What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” President Ronald Reagan
GostHacked Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 We have pictures of what really happened. The group. The protestors. Their strategy. Their intent, etc. You're a denier. http://www.flickr.com/photos/socialcontract/page2/ Not my personal pictures, the personal pictures of the thug protestors who's intent was to silence free speech. It's all there, in black and white. Actually, it's in colour! So when you mean 'we' do you mean yourself and the protesters? I was under the impression 'we' meant you and a couple of your friends wo went to see her. Quote
nicky10013 Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 (edited) http://www.flickr.com/photos/socialcontract/page2/ So when you mean 'we' do you mean yourself and the protesters? I was under the impression 'we' meant you and a couple of your friends wo went to see her. I apologize, I missed the link. Either way, what was so illegal? Now, I've been in a lot of very big crowds. Nothing from those pictures indicates to me anything close to rioting. Some jackass may have pulled the fire alarm, but it was made very clear that the fire alarm was reset and the event wasn't cancelled because of it. So...how do these pictures go to prove anything that has been alleged here? It doesn't. The protestors are allowed to protest just as much as Coulter is able to speak. So are you suggesting that they shouldn't protest? Edit: Sorry, didn't necessarily mean to quote you and ask those questions as if you hold these ridiculous views. Edited March 25, 2010 by nicky10013 Quote
nicky10013 Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 You completely ignored it. What you completely ignored was proving how I'm a socialist. It shows your more interested with throwing labels at people to try and get them to shut up when you hear things you don't like. Glad to see you're so pro-free speech. Quote
Shakeyhands Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 You are pathetic loser. That wasn't very nice. Not unexpected however, which says a lot more about you than me. Quote "They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Alta4ever Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 What you completely ignored was proving how I'm a socialist. It shows your more interested with throwing labels at people to try and get them to shut up when you hear things you don't like. Glad to see you're so pro-free speech. Who's trying to get you to shut up, I'm not the one posting pictures of 1930's nazi rallys. Quote "What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” President Ronald Reagan
nicky10013 Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 An interesting article from Lawrence Martin of the Globe asking Conservatives to give a moment of pause before declaring the centre and left wings of this country with censorship and restriction of freedom of speech. Details all the exampls of Harper doing the exact same thing (which it isn't even really the exact same thing, clearly this was a publicity stunt designed to create conservative outrage). http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/a-capital-where-freedoms-in-short-supply/article1511101/ An early indicator of how things might go came in 2006 when the Conservatives first took office. Mark Tushingham worked at Environment Canada. His publisher had arranged for him to promote a book he'd written on climate change. It was a work of fiction, and it didn't challenge government policy. But 15 minutes before the speech, the no-freedom bells rang out. Mr. Tushingham was ordered by the minister's office to cancel his talk. The scope of the clampdown was unprecedented. The government tried censoring coverage of dead bodies returning from Afghanistan. It tried to curtail freedom of the press like never before, at one point having the police move out journalists from a Charlottetown hotel lobby. Restrictions on the access-to-information process effectively put a “stranglehold” on communications, information commissioner Robert Marleau reported.Individuals or organizations that didn't heel soon got their comeuppance. There was Linda Keen at the Nuclear Safety Commission, the church-based aid group Kairos, Elections Canada and the Military Police Complaints Commission. There was the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP, the Wheat Board and the Montreal-based Rights & Democracy. Leaders were replaced or their organizations dismantled or overhauled. Freedom of expression all depended on the type of expression. Diplomat Richard Colvin was dragged through the mud for offering honest testimony on the Afghan detainees. Critics of the Afghan mission were called disloyal. Critics of the Israeli government were insinuated to be anti-Semitic, even though, like Irwin Cotler, they were pro-Israel. Personal attack ads against opposition leaders reached unrivalled levels. The Prime Minister's operatives put out a secret handbook instructing members how to muzzle parliamentary committees. They went so far as to try to have vetting power over the communications of Auditor-General Sheila Fraser; she told them to bug off. Minister of State Diane Ablonczy lost some of her responsibilities because, a colleague said, she tried to give gays a voice to fund their parade. A noted academic, Michael Behiels, was attacked for criticizing the Harper government's Quebec policy; Government Senate Leader Marjory LeBreton went all the way to the University of Ottawa's chancellor in a bid to have him disciplined.More recently, the government, perhaps having misplaced its copy of the Magna Carta, defied the will of Parliament in not producing documents on the Afghan detainee file. It again shut down Parliament because it wasn't getting its way. It's how our freedom bells chime in the nation's capital. And here we are, in a stew over Ann Coulter. Quote
Alta4ever Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 That wasn't very nice. Not unexpected however, which says a lot more about you than me. Niether is you equating that those wanting to hear ann speak to that of those attending 1930's nazi rallies. Quote "What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” President Ronald Reagan
Shakeyhands Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 Niether is you equating that those wanting to hear ann speak to that of those attending 1930's nazi rallies. Actually I equated those who you say were violently protesting her planned speech to those attending 1930's Nazi rallies... Quote "They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Shakeyhands Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 Who's trying to get you to shut up, I'm not the one posting pictures of 1930's nazi rallys. Thats ok.. just TRY to outshine the other lightbulbs. Quote "They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Alta4ever Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 Actually I equated those who you say were violently protesting her planned speech to those attending 1930's Nazi rallies... Either way it was silly the protesters had every right to protest. Quote "What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” President Ronald Reagan
Alta4ever Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 An interesting article from Lawrence Martin of the Globe asking Conservatives to give a moment of pause before declaring the centre and left wings of this country with censorship and restriction of freedom of speech. Details all the exampls of Harper doing the exact same thing (which it isn't even really the exact same thing, clearly this was a publicity stunt designed to create conservative outrage). http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/a-capital-where-freedoms-in-short-supply/article1511101/ So why did they roll over so easily? Whats missing? Quote "What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” President Ronald Reagan
nicky10013 Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 So why did they roll over so easily? Whats missing? First of all, who rolled over? Second of all, even if someon did roll over, what's the difference? That doesn't excuse Harper's behaviour. Conservatives complain that there's a double standard, but dismissing the actions of this government while complaining about Anne Coulter is an example of the same double standard, is it not? Quote
Shakeyhands Posted March 25, 2010 Report Posted March 25, 2010 An interesting article from Lawrence Martin of the Globe asking Conservatives to give a moment of pause before declaring the centre and left wings of this country with censorship and restriction of freedom of speech. Details all the exampls of Harper doing the exact same thing (which it isn't even really the exact same thing, clearly this was a publicity stunt designed to create conservative outrage). http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/a-capital-where-freedoms-in-short-supply/article1511101/ how about then booster club? this article brings up some very interesting points. of course because it's from the G&M you will claim bias and try to marginilize it, correct? Quote "They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.