Shady Posted December 29, 2009 Report Posted December 29, 2009 From the non-partisan group Judicial Watch.org “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians” for 2009 1. Senator Christopher Dodd (D-CT) 2. Senator John Ensign (R-NV) 3. Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) 4. Secretary of Treasury Timothy Geithner 5. Attorney General Eric Holder 6. Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (D-IL)/ Senator Roland Burris (D-IL) 7. President Barack Obama 8. Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) 9. Rep. John Murtha (D-PA) 10. Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) Link Nancy Pelosi's "Most Ethical Congress ever" meets Barack Obama's "Hope n Change" politics. Quote
waldo Posted December 29, 2009 Report Posted December 29, 2009 From the non-partisan group Judicial Watch.org yes, Shady... certainly a laugh-out-loud at your "non-partisan" group that receives it's financial backing from the Scaife/Carthage and Olin foundations. Quote
bloodyminded Posted December 29, 2009 Report Posted December 29, 2009 yes, Shady... certainly a laugh-out-loud at your "non-partisan" group that receives it's financial backing from the Scaife/Carthage and Olin foundations. Well...let's just say that anyone claiming to be "non-partisan" has the onus on themselves to prove it. I can't imagine why we'd take them at their word. I can't count how many posters I've witnessed on political debate forums with "not ideologically aligned" or some such thing in their signature. And it's never, ever true. Exactly the same goes for any sort of organization...which discusses politics. (Obviously) Quote As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand. --Josh Billings
Oleg Bach Posted December 30, 2009 Report Posted December 30, 2009 Corrupt polititicans are just the ones that do not follow their lawyers instructions on how to commit fraud and get away with it. You must take direction and follow it to a T. It's much like going into a court room..You feed the machine exactly what it expects and out pops the cake at the other end just as ordered. Quote
Oleg Bach Posted December 30, 2009 Report Posted December 30, 2009 Just saw you come on line BC. I figured that you might want to get in on this one. You probably agree with me in the idea that you will not be declared a crook if you follow each letter of the law and make sure you have a lawyer to concoct you a brand new designer alphabet. Quote
Oleg Bach Posted December 30, 2009 Report Posted December 30, 2009 What would happen if the mentioned tainted politicals were situated in China? Would they be scooped up and jailed? I doubt it they would be called to task and given a grand titles like ADMINISTRATION. We are not much different than the bad guys..instead of executing mad dogs in human form we simply turn them into a commodity and allow big pharma to profit. So who are the bad guys here and who are the good guys? Personally I can't distinguish one from the other. It could be me but I doubt it. Just scan our media - channel surf for a few days and count the positive things that are healthy for society..I can't seem to find one thing? Media is our culture and our culture is media. Looks to me that the whole thing has gone into the dumpster and if there was a Satan...he would be beaming in great satisfaction. Quote
Oleg Bach Posted December 30, 2009 Report Posted December 30, 2009 From the non-partisan group Judicial Watch.org “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians” for 2009 Nancy Pelosi's "Most Ethical Congress ever" meets Barack Obama's "Hope n Change" politics. What about that little phoney cut throat opportunist, Conni Rice...? I would say she knew the difference between right and wrong but stuck to what she believed was status and personal glorification. Quote
Shady Posted December 30, 2009 Author Report Posted December 30, 2009 yes, Shady... certainly a laugh-out-loud at your "non-partisan" group that receives it's financial backing from the Scaife/Carthage and Olin foundations. So what you're basically saying is that you can't dispute any of the reasons why the Dem politicians are corrupt. Instead, you try and undermine the source of the data. Pretty sad. How about you actually refute the charges? Here's what Chris Dodd was involved in. Is any of this false? "This marks two years in a row for Senator Dodd, who made the 2008 “Ten Most Corrupt” list for his corrupt relationship with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and for accepting preferential treatment and loan terms from Countrywide Financial" Or how about Barney Frank... "Judicial Watch is investigating a $12 million TARP cash injection provided to the Boston-based OneUnited Bank at the urging of Massachusetts Rep. Barney Frank. As reported in the January 22, 2009, edition of the Wall Street Journal, the Treasury Department indicated it would only provide funds to healthy banks to jump-start lending. Not only was OneUnited Bank in massive financial turmoil, but it was also "under attack from its regulators for allegations of poor lending practices and executive-pay abuses, including owning a Porsche for its executives' use." Rep. Frank admitted he spoke to a "federal regulator," and Treasury granted the funds." If these facts are wrong, please state why and how. If not, STFU. It's laughable that you complain about Judicial Watch's funding, but link to Media Matters, who recieves its funding from George Soros and other far left organizations. Hypocrite. I can't count how many posters I've witnessed on political debate forums with "not ideologically aligned" or some such thing in their signature. And it's never, ever true. Exactly the same goes for any sort of organization...which discusses politics. (Obviously) I couldn't care less about other posters you've had discussions with. Sorry. Quote
Oleg Bach Posted December 30, 2009 Report Posted December 30, 2009 Sounds like a herd minded liberal you might be bikering with. It's as disconcerting as making love to a woman as she gives the run down on all of her past partners...You are right in your attitude towards this poster - If you are going to discuss anything it should be one on one....but like an X wife of mine would say "WE don't like you" The "we" is usually an attempt to create a bullying gang that does not exist. Quote
Guest American Woman Posted December 30, 2009 Report Posted December 30, 2009 From the non-partisan group Judicial Watch.org From the non-partisan group Judicial Watch "About Us" page (emphasis mine): Judicial Watch, Inc., a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation ........ Quote
Bugs Posted January 18, 2010 Report Posted January 18, 2010 What about that little phoney cut throat opportunist, Conni Rice...? I would say she knew the difference between right and wrong but stuck to what she believed was status and personal glorification. Ah, yes, Condi Rice ... Darth's Jedi daughter ... Mistress of the Dark Side ... I remember, in those days, we had a road map, and Hezbollah had to start rocketing Israelis, because ... it was making progress. Now that Obama has pushed the 'Reset Button', where are we? Back at square one? Quote
punked Posted January 18, 2010 Report Posted January 18, 2010 Did you even look at the list? Stanford gets to hike the Appalachian trail naked but Obama makes this list instead Shady. This is the stupidist thing I have ever read. Quote
Shakeyhands Posted January 18, 2010 Report Posted January 18, 2010 From the non-partisan group Judicial Watch "About Us" page (emphasis mine): Judicial Watch, Inc., a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation ........ Bwahahaha! Quote "They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche
GostHacked Posted January 18, 2010 Report Posted January 18, 2010 From the non-partisan group Judicial Watch "About Us" page (emphasis mine): Judicial Watch, Inc., a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation ........ Seems odd to say they are non-partisan but have the claim of conservatism which is usually synonymous with Republicans. Quote
DrGreenthumb Posted January 18, 2010 Report Posted January 18, 2010 Seems odd to say they are non-partisan but have the claim of conservatism which is usually synonymous with Republicans. I bet Harper would be number 1 on a Canadian list of corrupt politicians. Democracy creates economic instability??? really? Quote
Guest American Woman Posted January 18, 2010 Report Posted January 18, 2010 Seems odd to say they are non-partisan but have the claim of conservatism which is usually synonymous with Republicans. Can you imagine the response from Shady et al if we cited a source that claimed it was a non-partisan liberal educational organization? I'm sure they'd accept it as non-partisan -- because it said it was. Obviously this is not a non-partisan minded organization, even if it is non-partisan in that it's not linked to the Republican party. Clearly it's actions, by their own admission, are conservative. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted January 18, 2010 Report Posted January 18, 2010 Obviously this is not a non-partisan minded organization, even if it is non-partisan in that it's not linked to the Republican party. Clearly it's actions, by their own admission, are conservative. It's another cuckoo-clock paranoid American think-tank. Lately, these folks have started talking about secession and withdrawal from NAFTA. Let's see how much airtime they get from Fox at that point. If we're going to squash and destroy these groups, as they should be, we need to do it to the smaller-in-number but equally shill liberal counterparts too. Let's get out the DDT. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Alta4ever Posted January 19, 2010 Report Posted January 19, 2010 (edited) Well...let's just say that anyone claiming to be "non-partisan" has the onus on themselves to prove it. I can't imagine why we'd take them at their word. I can't count how many posters I've witnessed on political debate forums with "not ideologically aligned" or some such thing in their signature. And it's never, ever true. Exactly the same goes for any sort of organization...which discusses politics. (Obviously) Don't worry we understand you waldo and the code words of the left wing. non-biased = democrat friendly Edited January 19, 2010 by Alta4ever Quote "What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’” President Ronald Reagan
waldo Posted January 20, 2010 Report Posted January 20, 2010 Don't worry we understand you waldo and the code words of the left wing. non-biased = democrat friendly comin at ya, outa chute #Rednekistan... more MightyRighty truisms. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.