maple_leafs182 Posted December 9, 2009 Author Report Posted December 9, 2009 You guys don't get it. Money runs the world.. can we all agree on that? So in theory if you controlled money, you would control the world. correct? Central banks around the world issue and regulate money. They are private banks(I know in Canada it's considered a Specialty Crown Corporation) Central bankers run central banks. Central bankers control the world. This financial meltdown was by design. Thomas Jefferson "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." wake up. Quote │ _______ [███STOP███]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ :::::::--------------Conservatives beleive ▄▅█FUNDING THIS█▅▄▃▂- - - - - --- -- -- -- -------- Liberals lie I██████████████████] ...◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙'(='.'=)' ⊙
Michael Hardner Posted December 9, 2009 Report Posted December 9, 2009 Blissful and blind, it's all we are. Will you at least look into this if this recession turns into a depression. Look into what ? I'll rent 'V for Vendetta' how's that ? Yes, money runs the world but it's a big leap from there to the rest of the theories. Don't call me blind, either, thanks. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
M.Dancer Posted December 9, 2009 Report Posted December 9, 2009 (edited) nah, you're just ignorant. Prove this theory wrong. I haven't been able to. Trust me, I am open minded or atleast I try to be. If you can prove it wrong, man, i would be so happy. You are half right. There is a NWO. I am the one in control. No one else can see this post, it is for your eyes only. Tomorrow you will be contacted by someone you know. This operative works for me. My operative will be looking for the signal that I have contacted you. The signal is: you will slap the operative with your left hand on their right buttock. Do not tell anyone about this. Do not answer your phone tonight. Do not take a hot shower, there are sedatives in the hot water. It is imperative you prepare your body and mind for what you will encounter in the next 72 hours. You should start by consuming as much fibre and water as you can between now and breakfast. You should aim for 150% of your daily requirement. This is all. Edited December 9, 2009 by M.Dancer Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
maple_leafs182 Posted December 9, 2009 Author Report Posted December 9, 2009 really guys..I'm being serious This isn't really a democracy. It is, but it isn't It's more of a democratic dictatorship We shouldn't be voting on politicians, we should be voting on ideas. That would be a democracy How many of you voted to go into the war in Iraq, or for the government bailout. Sorry if me calling you blind offended you. I'm just getting a little frustrated. There is a movement going on, but it is more of a youth movement. Quote │ _______ [███STOP███]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ :::::::--------------Conservatives beleive ▄▅█FUNDING THIS█▅▄▃▂- - - - - --- -- -- -- -------- Liberals lie I██████████████████] ...◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙'(='.'=)' ⊙
M.Dancer Posted December 9, 2009 Report Posted December 9, 2009 How many of you voted to go into the war in Iraq, or for the government bailout. Not only did I not vote to go into war in Iraq, Canada did not go to war in Iraq. Didn't I tell you I was in control? There is a movement going on, but it is more of a youth movement. You want a movement, follow my fibre advice. It will be much more than a youth movement.. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
maple_leafs182 Posted December 9, 2009 Author Report Posted December 9, 2009 sorry i meant Afghanistan. Quote │ _______ [███STOP███]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ :::::::--------------Conservatives beleive ▄▅█FUNDING THIS█▅▄▃▂- - - - - --- -- -- -- -------- Liberals lie I██████████████████] ...◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙'(='.'=)' ⊙
M.Dancer Posted December 10, 2009 Report Posted December 10, 2009 sorry i meant Afghanistan. Well, In that case I most certainly voted my approval. More than once. See...I tell you, you want the NWO, look no farther. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Guest TrueMetis Posted December 10, 2009 Report Posted December 10, 2009 really guys..I'm being serious This isn't really a democracy. It is, but it isn't It's more of a democratic dictatorship I wonder if you would say this if you had ever dealt with a real dictatorship. Moce to china for a while and you will get a taste of it. We shouldn't be voting on politicians, we should be voting on ideas. That would be a democracy you ask on person to decide on something you will get a decision, you ask ten you will get a desicion, you ask 100 they will bicker and fight but eventually you will get a desicion, ask 1000 or more and you will be waiting a long time. This is why we went with a representitive democracy. How many of you voted to go into the war in Iraq, or for the government bailout. I'm perfectly for the war in afghanistan and the bailout seems to have worked so I'm fine with that. There is a movement going on, but it is more of a youth movement. I'm young and haven't heard anything about this. Maybe I'm to busy going out. Quote
maple_leafs182 Posted December 12, 2009 Author Report Posted December 12, 2009 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JVw3M3-CWw I'm not the only one who thinks this way. Quote │ _______ [███STOP███]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ :::::::--------------Conservatives beleive ▄▅█FUNDING THIS█▅▄▃▂- - - - - --- -- -- -- -------- Liberals lie I██████████████████] ...◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙'(='.'=)' ⊙
bush_cheney2004 Posted December 12, 2009 Report Posted December 12, 2009 I'm not the only one who thinks this way. Chuck Norris spends more time selling Total Gyms on infomercials. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
maple_leafs182 Posted December 12, 2009 Author Report Posted December 12, 2009 man that was a fast reply. Just cause you see the commercial over and over again, doesn't mean thats all he does..its a recording... Quote │ _______ [███STOP███]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ :::::::--------------Conservatives beleive ▄▅█FUNDING THIS█▅▄▃▂- - - - - --- -- -- -- -------- Liberals lie I██████████████████] ...◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙'(='.'=)' ⊙
bush_cheney2004 Posted December 12, 2009 Report Posted December 12, 2009 man that was a fast reply. Just cause you see the commercial over and over again, doesn't mean thats all he does..its a recording... So is manufacturing in China...just a recording. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
maple_leafs182 Posted December 13, 2009 Author Report Posted December 13, 2009 (edited) There are alot of people who think this way. any of you listen to Muse at all? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tkio6TF0Ufg Edited December 14, 2009 by maple_leafs182 Quote │ _______ [███STOP███]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ :::::::--------------Conservatives beleive ▄▅█FUNDING THIS█▅▄▃▂- - - - - --- -- -- -- -------- Liberals lie I██████████████████] ...◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙'(='.'=)' ⊙
Michael Hardner Posted October 25, 2010 Report Posted October 25, 2010 Bump for maple_leaf. I finally saw V For Vendetta. It's 1984 meets Batman. 1984 is comic booky enough but if you need the sci-fi action sequences, and a much dumber version of the same message then VFV is good enough. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
ToadBrother Posted October 25, 2010 Report Posted October 25, 2010 Bump for maple_leaf. I finally saw V For Vendetta. It's 1984 meets Batman. 1984 is comic booky enough but if you need the sci-fi action sequences, and a much dumber version of the same message then VFV is good enough. The comic book... err graphic novel, is considerably different on key points than the movie, and I much prefer the graphic novel. Quote
GostHacked Posted October 25, 2010 Report Posted October 25, 2010 Alan Watt talks about the NWO, and how you have been manipulated on multiple fronts at the same time. 4 parts to this bit. Hosted on Alex Jones Youtube Channel for an interview Alan did for Alex's PrisonPlanet.TV Sure call me a tin foil hat nutter, but there is much truth into what he says. Only an idiot and a fool would ignore what he is talking about. There is a move to a one world order. Financially it's been going on, and governmentally it has been going on for a looong time. The move to these unions is an obvious step towards it. The European Union exists, as does the African Union. There is much talk about the North American Union through the entity that is the SPP. I have not heard much of any other union at this point, but you can expect to see a South American Union, a union including Austrialia and other Pacific states, and then an asian union. Once all those unions are in place, then it won't take much effort to put the NWO into place. Regardless of actions of countries, there is a trend towards this NWO. I don't know if it's benign or evil, it's still going to happen. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted October 25, 2010 Report Posted October 25, 2010 I'm all for having these things as part of common (comic book) culture. It's a kind of check on the accumulating power that is undeniably fusing together our large institutions into global mega-institutions. However, the context needs to be set right. Corporations need to be monitored, and have their power counterbalanced. They aren't as likely to engage in mass-murder as popular culture would indicate. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
GostHacked Posted October 25, 2010 Report Posted October 25, 2010 I'm all for having these things as part of common (comic book) culture. It's a kind of check on the accumulating power that is undeniably fusing together our large institutions into global mega-institutions. This has been the trend for a couple decades now, and I like the way you used 'undeniably'. No matter if you endorse it, or are against it.... it's happening.. whether you notice it or not. It is happening. But to what end? This is where I am still in the dark of. However, the context needs to be set right. Corporations need to be monitored, and have their power counterbalanced. They aren't as likely to engage in mass-murder as popular culture would indicate. I do agree on the context. It seems that there is no problem with having individuals monitored, but having corporations monitored is something the corps don't want. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted October 25, 2010 Report Posted October 25, 2010 I do agree on the context. It seems that there is no problem with having individuals monitored, but having corporations monitored is something the corps don't want. Of course they don't want it. Nobody wants to be monitored. Further to that, they only want 'qualified people' to comment on their comings and goings. Luckily, we live in an open society so they can't stop us from talking about them. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
GostHacked Posted October 25, 2010 Report Posted October 25, 2010 Of course they don't want it. Nobody wants to be monitored. Further to that, they only want 'qualified people' to comment on their comings and goings. Luckily, we live in an open society so they can't stop us from talking about them. True. You let on to something here. 'Qualified people'. Other terms include, scientific experts, military expert speaking anonymously, governmental officials, ect ect ect. So many anonymous sources these days you gotta wonder what really is real and what is fake. We do live in an open society, however that seems to be coming to a close with the information age. Actually, it's more of a reversal of what we think an open society is. Governments are no longer open, while we as citizens have to be as open as the governments wants us to be. All that is done through regulation, laws and various other means. All one needs to do is look at Britain and how big .. Big Brother is. Big Brother monitors everything through very heavy CCTV, and extensive internet monitoring and data mining. It is designed to be open, but not for the citizen, it's designed so that our lives are open and transparent,to the point where there is no more privacy, but when we want to turn the looking glass around and peer into the governments actions, it is met with much resistance and we are told it is all for our security. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted October 25, 2010 Report Posted October 25, 2010 True. You let on to something here. 'Qualified people'. Other terms include, scientific experts, military expert speaking anonymously, governmental officials, ect ect ect. So many anonymous sources these days you gotta wonder what really is real and what is fake. We do live in an open society, however that seems to be coming to a close with the information age. Actually, it's more of a reversal of what we think an open society is. Governments are no longer open, while we as citizens have to be as open as the governments wants us to be. All that is done through regulation, laws and various other means. All one needs to do is look at Britain and how big .. Big Brother is. Big Brother monitors everything through very heavy CCTV, and extensive internet monitoring and data mining. It is designed to be open, but not for the citizen, it's designed so that our lives are open and transparent,to the point where there is no more privacy, but when we want to turn the looking glass around and peer into the governments actions, it is met with much resistance and we are told it is all for our security. And now, luckily, we have Wikileaks. Just when the web started rising up with it's tsunami of rumours and innuendo, Wikileaks rises in response. None of this is new, it's just new. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
GostHacked Posted October 25, 2010 Report Posted October 25, 2010 And now, luckily, we have Wikileaks. Just when the web started rising up with it's tsunami of rumours and innuendo, Wikileaks rises in response. None of this is new, it's just new. True. How much can we trust what Wikileaks has put up? Could this be just another disinformation operation from governments? I would not be surprised if that was the case. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted October 25, 2010 Report Posted October 25, 2010 True. How much can we trust what Wikileaks has put up? Could this be just another disinformation operation from governments? I would not be surprised if that was the case. That fails the smell test. Faking that many documents would be pretty difficult to do for anybody who doesn't have the information. Couple this with the fact that they arrested a low ranking intelligence officer, and that the information is embarrassing to the US government and you have a likely answer. Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
GostHacked Posted October 27, 2010 Report Posted October 27, 2010 That fails the smell test. Faking that many documents would be pretty difficult to do for anybody who doesn't have the information. Couple this with the fact that they arrested a low ranking intelligence officer, and that the information is embarrassing to the US government and you have a likely answer. Yeah it's a hypothetical. He could have been leaked the documents by a higher up and the low ranked officer firing is just a distraction. Which could lead to the conclusion that the docs are either not that sensitive, or fake. In this day in the information age, I have no doubt (as unlikely as it may seem) that this is a possibility. But probability would be low. I do applaud the efforts of Wikileaks to provide the stories of war that we never hear about, because of the sanitized media. The website is offline (just has a holder page there) but you can hop into the IRC channel ... ... IRC still exists??!?!?!?!? Wow. Quote
maple_leafs182 Posted October 28, 2010 Author Report Posted October 28, 2010 Bump for maple_leaf. I finally saw V For Vendetta. It's 1984 meets Batman. 1984 is comic booky enough but if you need the sci-fi action sequences, and a much dumber version of the same message then VFV is good enough. I read 1984 after I saw VFV, I liked 'em both. Alan Watt talks about the NWO, and how you have been manipulated on multiple fronts at the same time. That was a pretty good watch. You should give Zeitgeist a watch, it is divided into 3 parts, 1st is religion, 2nd 9/11, 3rd the federal reserve. The first 2 parts are alright but if you are willing to watch any of them, watch the 3rd part. Quote │ _______ [███STOP███]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ :::::::--------------Conservatives beleive ▄▅█FUNDING THIS█▅▄▃▂- - - - - --- -- -- -- -------- Liberals lie I██████████████████] ...◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙'(='.'=)' ⊙
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.