Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You guys don't get it.

Money runs the world.. can we all agree on that?

So in theory if you controlled money, you would control the world. correct?

Central banks around the world issue and regulate money.

They are private banks(I know in Canada it's considered a Specialty Crown Corporation)

Central bankers run central banks.

Central bankers control the world. This financial meltdown was by design.

Thomas Jefferson

"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."

wake up.

│ _______

[███STOP███]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ :::::::--------------Conservatives beleive

▄▅█FUNDING THIS█▅▄▃▂- - - - - --- -- -- -- -------- Liberals lie

I██████████████████]

...◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙'(='.'=)' ⊙

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Blissful and blind, it's all we are.

Will you at least look into this if this recession turns into a depression.

Look into what ? I'll rent 'V for Vendetta' how's that ?

Yes, money runs the world but it's a big leap from there to the rest of the theories.

Don't call me blind, either, thanks.

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted (edited)

nah, you're just ignorant. Prove this theory wrong. I haven't been able to. Trust me, I am open minded or atleast I try to be.

If you can prove it wrong, man, i would be so happy.

You are half right. There is a NWO. I am the one in control. No one else can see this post, it is for your eyes only.

Tomorrow you will be contacted by someone you know. This operative works for me. My operative will be looking for the signal that I have contacted you. The signal is: you will slap the operative with your left hand on their right buttock.

Do not tell anyone about this. Do not answer your phone tonight. Do not take a hot shower, there are sedatives in the hot water. It is imperative you prepare your body and mind for what you will encounter in the next 72 hours. You should start by consuming as much fibre and water as you can between now and breakfast. You should aim for 150% of your daily requirement.

This is all.

Edited by M.Dancer

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted

really guys..I'm being serious

This isn't really a democracy. It is, but it isn't

It's more of a democratic dictatorship

We shouldn't be voting on politicians, we should be voting on ideas. That would be a democracy

How many of you voted to go into the war in Iraq, or for the government bailout.

Sorry if me calling you blind offended you. I'm just getting a little frustrated.

There is a movement going on, but it is more of a youth movement.

│ _______

[███STOP███]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ :::::::--------------Conservatives beleive

▄▅█FUNDING THIS█▅▄▃▂- - - - - --- -- -- -- -------- Liberals lie

I██████████████████]

...◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙'(='.'=)' ⊙

Posted

How many of you voted to go into the war in Iraq, or for the government bailout.

Not only did I not vote to go into war in Iraq, Canada did not go to war in Iraq.

Didn't I tell you I was in control?

There is a movement going on, but it is more of a youth movement.

You want a movement, follow my fibre advice. It will be much more than a youth movement..

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted

sorry i meant Afghanistan.

│ _______

[███STOP███]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ :::::::--------------Conservatives beleive

▄▅█FUNDING THIS█▅▄▃▂- - - - - --- -- -- -- -------- Liberals lie

I██████████████████]

...◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙'(='.'=)' ⊙

Posted

sorry i meant Afghanistan.

Well, In that case I most certainly voted my approval. More than once.

See...I tell you, you want the NWO, look no farther.

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Guest TrueMetis
Posted

really guys..I'm being serious

This isn't really a democracy. It is, but it isn't

It's more of a democratic dictatorship

I wonder if you would say this if you had ever dealt with a real dictatorship. Moce to china for a while and you will get a taste of it.

We shouldn't be voting on politicians, we should be voting on ideas. That would be a democracy

you ask on person to decide on something you will get a decision, you ask ten you will get a desicion, you ask 100 they will bicker and fight but eventually you will get a desicion, ask 1000 or more and you will be waiting a long time. This is why we went with a representitive democracy.

How many of you voted to go into the war in Iraq, or for the government bailout.

I'm perfectly for the war in afghanistan and the bailout seems to have worked so I'm fine with that.

There is a movement going on, but it is more of a youth movement.

I'm young and haven't heard anything about this. Maybe I'm to busy going out.

Posted

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JVw3M3-CWw



I'm not the only one who thinks this way.

│ _______

[███STOP███]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ :::::::--------------Conservatives beleive

▄▅█FUNDING THIS█▅▄▃▂- - - - - --- -- -- -- -------- Liberals lie

I██████████████████]

...◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙'(='.'=)' ⊙

Posted

man that was a fast reply.

Just cause you see the commercial over and over again, doesn't mean thats all he does..its a recording...

│ _______

[███STOP███]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ :::::::--------------Conservatives beleive

▄▅█FUNDING THIS█▅▄▃▂- - - - - --- -- -- -- -------- Liberals lie

I██████████████████]

...◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙'(='.'=)' ⊙

Posted (edited)

There are alot of people who think this way.

any of you listen to Muse at all?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tkio6TF0Ufg

Edited by maple_leafs182

│ _______

[███STOP███]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ :::::::--------------Conservatives beleive

▄▅█FUNDING THIS█▅▄▃▂- - - - - --- -- -- -- -------- Liberals lie

I██████████████████]

...◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙'(='.'=)' ⊙

  • 10 months later...
Posted

Bump for maple_leaf. I finally saw V For Vendetta. It's 1984 meets Batman.

1984 is comic booky enough but if you need the sci-fi action sequences, and a much dumber version of the same message then VFV is good enough.

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted

Bump for maple_leaf. I finally saw V For Vendetta. It's 1984 meets Batman.

1984 is comic booky enough but if you need the sci-fi action sequences, and a much dumber version of the same message then VFV is good enough.

The comic book... err graphic novel, is considerably different on key points than the movie, and I much prefer the graphic novel.

Posted

Alan Watt talks about the NWO, and how you have been manipulated on multiple fronts at the same time.

4 parts to this bit. Hosted on Alex Jones Youtube Channel for an interview Alan did for Alex's PrisonPlanet.TV

Sure call me a tin foil hat nutter, but there is much truth into what he says. Only an idiot and a fool would ignore what he is talking about.

There is a move to a one world order. Financially it's been going on, and governmentally it has been going on for a looong time.

The move to these unions is an obvious step towards it. The European Union exists, as does the African Union. There is much talk about the North American Union through the entity that is the SPP. I have not heard much of any other union at this point, but you can expect to see a South American Union, a union including Austrialia and other Pacific states, and then an asian union.

Once all those unions are in place, then it won't take much effort to put the NWO into place.

Regardless of actions of countries, there is a trend towards this NWO. I don't know if it's benign or evil, it's still going to happen.

Posted

I'm all for having these things as part of common (comic book) culture. It's a kind of check on the accumulating power that is undeniably fusing together our large institutions into global mega-institutions.

However, the context needs to be set right. Corporations need to be monitored, and have their power counterbalanced. They aren't as likely to engage in mass-murder as popular culture would indicate.

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted

I'm all for having these things as part of common (comic book) culture. It's a kind of check on the accumulating power that is undeniably fusing together our large institutions into global mega-institutions.

This has been the trend for a couple decades now, and I like the way you used 'undeniably'. No matter if you endorse it, or are against it.... it's happening.. whether you notice it or not. It is happening.

But to what end? This is where I am still in the dark of.

However, the context needs to be set right. Corporations need to be monitored, and have their power counterbalanced. They aren't as likely to engage in mass-murder as popular culture would indicate.

I do agree on the context. It seems that there is no problem with having individuals monitored, but having corporations monitored is something the corps don't want.

Posted

I do agree on the context. It seems that there is no problem with having individuals monitored, but having corporations monitored is something the corps don't want.

Of course they don't want it. Nobody wants to be monitored. Further to that, they only want 'qualified people' to comment on their comings and goings. Luckily, we live in an open society so they can't stop us from talking about them.

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted

Of course they don't want it. Nobody wants to be monitored. Further to that, they only want 'qualified people' to comment on their comings and goings. Luckily, we live in an open society so they can't stop us from talking about them.

True. You let on to something here. 'Qualified people'. Other terms include, scientific experts, military expert speaking anonymously, governmental officials, ect ect ect. So many anonymous sources these days you gotta wonder what really is real and what is fake. We do live in an open society, however that seems to be coming to a close with the information age. Actually, it's more of a reversal of what we think an open society is.

Governments are no longer open, while we as citizens have to be as open as the governments wants us to be. All that is done through regulation, laws and various other means. All one needs to do is look at Britain and how big .. Big Brother is. Big Brother monitors everything through very heavy CCTV, and extensive internet monitoring and data mining. It is designed to be open, but not for the citizen, it's designed so that our lives are open and transparent,to the point where there is no more privacy, but when we want to turn the looking glass around and peer into the governments actions, it is met with much resistance and we are told it is all for our security.

Posted

True. You let on to something here. 'Qualified people'. Other terms include, scientific experts, military expert speaking anonymously, governmental officials, ect ect ect. So many anonymous sources these days you gotta wonder what really is real and what is fake. We do live in an open society, however that seems to be coming to a close with the information age. Actually, it's more of a reversal of what we think an open society is.

Governments are no longer open, while we as citizens have to be as open as the governments wants us to be. All that is done through regulation, laws and various other means. All one needs to do is look at Britain and how big .. Big Brother is. Big Brother monitors everything through very heavy CCTV, and extensive internet monitoring and data mining. It is designed to be open, but not for the citizen, it's designed so that our lives are open and transparent,to the point where there is no more privacy, but when we want to turn the looking glass around and peer into the governments actions, it is met with much resistance and we are told it is all for our security.

And now, luckily, we have Wikileaks. Just when the web started rising up with it's tsunami of rumours and innuendo, Wikileaks rises in response. None of this is new, it's just new.

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted

And now, luckily, we have Wikileaks. Just when the web started rising up with it's tsunami of rumours and innuendo, Wikileaks rises in response. None of this is new, it's just new.

True. How much can we trust what Wikileaks has put up? Could this be just another disinformation operation from governments? I would not be surprised if that was the case.

Posted

True. How much can we trust what Wikileaks has put up? Could this be just another disinformation operation from governments? I would not be surprised if that was the case.

That fails the smell test. Faking that many documents would be pretty difficult to do for anybody who doesn't have the information. Couple this with the fact that they arrested a low ranking intelligence officer, and that the information is embarrassing to the US government and you have a likely answer.

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted

That fails the smell test. Faking that many documents would be pretty difficult to do for anybody who doesn't have the information. Couple this with the fact that they arrested a low ranking intelligence officer, and that the information is embarrassing to the US government and you have a likely answer.

Yeah it's a hypothetical. He could have been leaked the documents by a higher up and the low ranked officer firing is just a distraction. Which could lead to the conclusion that the docs are either not that sensitive, or fake.

In this day in the information age, I have no doubt (as unlikely as it may seem) that this is a possibility. But probability would be low.

I do applaud the efforts of Wikileaks to provide the stories of war that we never hear about, because of the sanitized media.

The website is offline (just has a holder page there) but you can hop into the IRC channel ... ... IRC still exists??!?!?!?!? Wow.

Posted

Bump for maple_leaf. I finally saw V For Vendetta. It's 1984 meets Batman.

1984 is comic booky enough but if you need the sci-fi action sequences, and a much dumber version of the same message then VFV is good enough.

I read 1984 after I saw VFV, I liked 'em both.

Alan Watt talks about the NWO, and how you have been manipulated on multiple fronts at the same time.

That was a pretty good watch.

You should give Zeitgeist a watch, it is divided into 3 parts, 1st is religion, 2nd 9/11, 3rd the federal reserve.

The first 2 parts are alright but if you are willing to watch any of them, watch the 3rd part.

│ _______

[███STOP███]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ :::::::--------------Conservatives beleive

▄▅█FUNDING THIS█▅▄▃▂- - - - - --- -- -- -- -------- Liberals lie

I██████████████████]

...◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙'(='.'=)' ⊙

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...