Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I wonder why it is Canada, that allegedly stands for democracy and free speech can't tolerate in an international forum the free speech of others?

I mean shouldn't Canada set an example to the world of how much free speech is valued?

How we may disagree with what is said, but, we say your entitled to your opinion.

Isn't that what Canada is supposedly doing in it's export of "democracy"

Free speech is a fundamental right, so what message is Canada sending to the world, regarding it's real stand on freedom of speech?

Insults are the ammunition of the unintelligent - do not use them. It is okay to criticize a policy, decision, action or comment. Such criticism is part of healthy debate. It is not okay to criticize a person's character or directly insult them, regardless of their position or actions. Derogatory terms such as "loser", "idiot", etc are not permitted unless the context clearly implies that it is not serious. Rule of thumb: Play the ball, not the person (i.e. tackle the argument, not the person making it).

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I agree. Canada's walkout only tells everybody that it now can be counted on to be a member of the pack. It does nothing to address Iran's or any other problems.

Now the pack mentality is a scary thing, and Canada demonstrating pack mentality doesn't bode well for it's people.....

Insults are the ammunition of the unintelligent - do not use them. It is okay to criticize a policy, decision, action or comment. Such criticism is part of healthy debate. It is not okay to criticize a person's character or directly insult them, regardless of their position or actions. Derogatory terms such as "loser", "idiot", etc are not permitted unless the context clearly implies that it is not serious. Rule of thumb: Play the ball, not the person (i.e. tackle the argument, not the person making it).

Posted
I wonder why it is Canada, that allegedly stands for democracy and free speech can't tolerate in an international forum the free speech of others?

So you are suggesting that Amindingdong wasn't allowed to speak? That he wasn't allowed announce his holocaust denials or spread his tinfoilery about the "International Jewish Conspiracy"? Even though free speech is not tolerated by Amindongdong?

Funny, I watched Amindindong give his hate speech..no one stopped him.

But right along side the right to free speech is the right not to be forced to listen to imflamatory hate speech.

I mean shouldn't Canada set an example to the world of how much free speech is valued?

By listening to a speech of little value?

Free speech is a fundamental right, so what message is Canada sending to the world, regarding it's real stand on freedom of speech?

That no one should compelled to listen to hate speech or compelled to give a holocaust denying pinhead the semblence of respect.

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted

Like Afghan "nazi" and Iraq "nazi" before (and Vietnam "nazi" some years back)? Everybody we don't happen to like must be a "nazi". That certainly explains so many things, pack mentality in particular.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
Like Afghan "nazi" and Iraq "nazi" before (and Vietnam "nazi" some years back)? Everybody we don't happen to like must be a "nazi". That certainly explains so many things, pack mentality in particular.

No...Holocaust denying fans of the 3rd Reich like Iran's president are Nazis. Terrorist Jew-baiting scum like Mullah Omar are Nazis. Friends of yours, I gather?

Posted

Yes, a nice example, please continue, it's very entertaining (and educating for those who have yet to find out what pack mentality is all about).

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted

Yes, correct: I have to respect and even love him, or he is a "nazi" (and all such things). Please keep telling us all about how pack mentality works.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted (edited)

the audience, point taken. And so, any other comments on the subject, we've made (you and I) great inroads into understanding pack mentality so far?

Edited by myata

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
Just that you seem to have a fondness for terrorist leaders and dictators while my 'pack' despises them...

Oh so NOW your pack despises dictators? :lol:

Its a little late for that don't you think?

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

No, it doesn't despise all dictators, only the unfriendly ones.

Of course, any critism of my pack means automatic fondness for theirs, haven't we (you and I) already established that here, but thanks anyways.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
My 'pack' is me...I've always despised dictators.

Then why do you spend so much time backing a pack that hasn't?

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
Who do I support again?

A pack that hasn't despised dictators the way you always did.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
lol...you can't tell me, can you? Next you'll have me voting for Harper.

You're completely freaked out aren't you?

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
Of course, we simply have to be the ones deciding the legitimacy of others elections, governments, ways to run the country, laws, beliefs, and so on. And if we don't like them, we'll walk out, proudly. Such a novel recipe for the world in the new millenia!

(Applause) yay! someone else who offer criticisms without actually looking at the argument.

No we are not the ones deciding the legitimacy of other people elections. The Iranian are the one deciding the legitimacy of their own. You may have conveniently forgotten but after the fraudulent Iranian elections this summer: there where riots demanding recounts. Followed by a severe beat downs from police and paramilitants. Arrests for being on the same street as a protest/being British or working for a western organisation. followed by the show trial of opposition leaders. I'm not the one saying that's the government isn't legitimate. If there's one thing we learned from this summer its that the Iranians themselves don't think their own government is legitimate.

Maybe I didn't make this point strong enough in the original argument.

"I am a sick man, I am a spiteful man... My liver hurts" - Dostoevsky

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,896
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
    • josej earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • josej earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dave L went up a rank
      Contributor
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...