Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 367
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Didn't take Science?

To have sound, there needs something more important than a listener...and that something didn't exist.

Sound does not travel in a vaccuum. Or actually since nothing existed before that, how could anyone witness it? With any of the senses.

Posted
Michael Hess witnesses the WTC7 explosion with all his five senses.

Same question I asked before, and you seem to be ignoring (not suprising, since you're likely unable to answer this question...)

If this Michael Hess were close enough to experience WTC7 explosions first hand, and those explosions were part of a controlled demolition, how exactly did he survive? During controlled demolition, the building collapses only seconds after explosions are set off. If he were inside WTC7 during a suposed demolition, he'd likely be crushed under a few tons of rubble.

Or are you suggesting that Michael Hess is some sort of superhero, able to withstand the crushing effects of a ton of concrete landing on him? Or maybe he has super-speed like the Flash, and was able to see and here the explostions and run out before the building collapsed.

Posted (edited)

Hess and Jennings are having contradictory recollections of what they lived through in WTC7. This can be explained by the monetary incentive Hess has to lie: Hess has been hired in the meantime by Giuliani as senior managing partner in Giuliani Partners. This security firm has earn $100 millions in just five years of operation.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2008...page=6#comments

Edited by benny
Posted

:lol:

For good measure the truthers at Ground Zero added one final criticism, saying that the BBC is funded by General Electric. I'm not sure what that's based on, but I can say with absolute, yes absolute certainty, it isn't...nor have I ever been part of a conspiracy to cover up what really went on 9/11
. :lol:

Tr00thers :lol:

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
Hess and Jennings are having contradictory recollections of what they lived through in WTC7.

Let me get this straight....

You use Hess as 'proof' that there was an explosion (as part of a controlled demolition) even though you yourself admit his recollections contradict with other evidence you yourself presented.

This has to be a joke, right?

Posted
Let me get this straight....

You use Hess as 'proof' that there was an explosion (as part of a controlled demolition) even though you yourself admit his recollections contradict with other evidence you yourself presented.

This has to be a joke, right?

Let a real commission get this straight. The Kean commission was really only a series of omissions. The names of the firefighters who worked in WTC7 right until its fall have not been published; Rudolf Giuliani’s testimony is not in the Kean report; etc.

Posted
Let a real commission get this straight. The Kean commission was really only a series of omissions. The names of the firefighters who worked in WTC7 right until its fall have not been published; Rudolf Giuliani’s testimony is not in the Kean report; etc.

Perhaps before you start running around demanding new investigations, you should sit down and, you know, come up with some sort of description of 9/11 events that, you know, actually makes sense. Hey, you supposedly have a lot of 'smart' (ha ha!) people to draw on, like Jones. Should be able to come up with something.

And just out of curiousity, do you think the existance of 'supermen' (you know, about to be in a collapsing building so they can witness 'explosions' yet still surviving) is somehow proof of something?

And where is your demand for an investigation into whether the earth is really round and not flat?

Posted
Perhaps before you start running around demanding new investigations, you should sit down and, you know, come up with some sort of description of 9/11 events that, you know, actually makes sense. Hey, you supposedly have a lot of 'smart' (ha ha!) people to draw on, like Jones. Should be able to come up with something.

And just out of curiousity, do you think the existance of 'supermen' (you know, about to be in a collapsing building so they can witness 'explosions' yet still surviving) is somehow proof of something?

And where is your demand for an investigation into whether the earth is really round and not flat?

Smart people are scared to talk after what happened to Jennings.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xca6o38ZNY

Posted
Smart people are scared to talk after what happened to Jennings.

Except for the fact that this whole thread was started by someone posting a reference to a recent paper regarding demolition of the towers. If people are 'scared', then why are there supposedly "smart" people trying to publish their junk science? Why hasn't Jones been silenced if there is supposedly some evil conspiricy?

Once again, you have illustrated a lack of critical thinking skills.

You HAVE to be doing this as a joke... aren't you.

Posted
Except for the fact that this whole thread was started by someone posting a reference to a recent paper regarding demolition of the towers. If people are 'scared', then why are there supposedly "smart" people trying to publish their junk science? Why hasn't Jones been silenced if there is supposedly some evil conspiricy?

Once again, you have illustrated a lack of critical thinking skills.

You HAVE to be doing this as a joke... aren't you.

Jones has not been killed but he has been half silenced by being forced to take early retirement from Brigham Young University.

Posted
Jones has not been killed but he has been half silenced by being forced to take early retirement from Brigham Young University.

How can you be 'half silenced'?

And once again, if there were some evil conspiricy running around killing off people who questioned the 'official story', why would Jones even be allowed to publish anything? Why are people like him and Judy Wood allowed to speek at various Troother conferences?

And once again, given the fact that the 'conspricy' hasn't stopped people like Jones and Wood from speaking out, why have neither you nor they come up with some sort of plausible description about what happened on 9/11?

Posted (edited)
How can you be 'half silenced'?

By losing the (scientific) instruments to backup your views.

Hmmmm... you claim the 'smart' people don't have the scientific instruments to back up their views.

Ok, lets forget for a second the fact that those 'smart' people wouldn't necessarily need an special equipment to actually come up with some sort of description of 9/11. (They'd need to think logically and rationally, which of course they can't.)

The opening post of this article dealt with and artical which was published by 'researchers' who claimed to discover explosives. Now you're saying that they don't have the 'scientific instruments' to back up their views. So now, are you saying that whatever research they did was faulty? After all, if they really didn't have the 'scientific instruments', then doesn't that mean that their research (and their claims) of explosives is bunk?

So what is it, are the researchers 'silenced', or are their claims bunk?

Edited by segnosaur
Posted
The opening post of this article dealt with and artical (sic) which was published by 'researchers' who claimed to discover explosives.

Here the names of the authors of the paper: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,017
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    taylor66
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...