Alexandra Posted March 30, 2009 Report Posted March 30, 2009 b_c2004 ... you can leave your democrats behind, K? and take some of our tories with you ... and wander the earth for centuries looking for a home ... only to return home finally recognizing that living in a place where people care for each other is really as good as it gets: a dash of socialism never hurt anybody! But make sure you take Fox news with you, eh? And don't bring them back. Oh gawd, it's you again, SAGA! How many incarnations is this after you have been kicked off this board a dozen times or more? Back again under Tango must mean you have been kicked off Babble -- again? How about you take your own advice and wander the earth for centuries looking for a new Message Board to rant on ad nauseum about your tribes and six nations and, yada, yada. Other more intelligent and moderate people than you have been shown the door from this board and why you persist in your efforts to return here again and again after people have complained to Charles about you and your 'agenda' just proves how desperate you are to have a space to rant and rave. Try babble again. ` Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 31, 2009 Report Posted March 31, 2009 Hmmm..... would you mind moving out? We'd be a lot safer without you next door. America "moved out" many years ago...and moved on too. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 31, 2009 Report Posted March 31, 2009 b_c2004 ... you can leave your democrats behind, K? and take some of our tories with you ... and wander the earth for centuries looking for a home ... only to return home finally recognizing that living in a place where people care for each other is really as good as it gets: a dash of socialism never hurt anybody! ...but then we couldn't read yet another thread about Canada merging with the USA. But make sure you take Fox news with you, eh? And don't bring them back. But then your CRTC would have nothing to do. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Vancouverite Posted March 31, 2009 Author Report Posted March 31, 2009 Troll is as troll does. Canada doesn't count, but he's around stirring the pot. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 31, 2009 Report Posted March 31, 2009 Troll is as troll does. Canada doesn't count, but he's around stirring the pot. Canada counts....not American wannabes. Now go back to ignoring me like you promised. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Topaz Posted March 31, 2009 Report Posted March 31, 2009 I think the REAL question is ...will America be taken over by the Chinese BEFORE it mergers with Canada?? America can't keep printing money and China is owed alot from the US. I see now China is into Canadian industries and I hope Tories are paying attention to that, maybe China will own all of North America....anyone speak chinese?? Quote
M.Dancer Posted March 31, 2009 Report Posted March 31, 2009 I think the REAL question is ...will America be taken over by the Chinese BEFORE it mergers with Canada?? The real question is: Does your toaster do pizzas as well as feed you nonsense? Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
bush_cheney2004 Posted March 31, 2009 Report Posted March 31, 2009 I think the REAL question is ...will America be taken over by the Chinese BEFORE it mergers with Canada?? America can't keep printing money and China is owed alot from the US. I see now China is into Canadian industries and I hope Tories are paying attention to that, maybe China will own all of North America....anyone speak chinese?? Mandarin or Cantonese? Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Vancouverite Posted April 1, 2009 Author Report Posted April 1, 2009 I don't see the Chinese coming anywhere close to taking over America - quite the contrary, in fact. The US has a younger population, while China will be hitting a demographic wall in a decade or two - Japan is already facing that problem. So China will have to feed an increasingly elderly population, which will be a dead weight. Canada also has a relatively young population, like the US, so, as it gets more and more integrated into the US, the combined strength of both nations will ensure American supremacy for the century ahead. And, if we can get Mexico to get its act together and also join the North American Union ... Quote
tango Posted April 1, 2009 Report Posted April 1, 2009 I don't see the Chinese coming anywhere close to taking over America - quite the contrary, in fact. The US has a younger population, while China will be hitting a demographic wall in a decade or two - Japan is already facing that problem. So China will have to feed an increasingly elderly population, which will be a dead weight. Canada also has a relatively young population, like the US, so, as it gets more and more integrated into the US, the combined strength of both nations will ensure American supremacy for the century ahead. And, if we can get Mexico to get its act together and also join the North American Union ... The US does not need our 'strength'. We'll be fine on our own as usual. Quote My Canada includes rights of Indigenous Peoples. Love it or leave it, eh! Peace.
tango Posted April 1, 2009 Report Posted April 1, 2009 (edited) So China will have to feed an increasingly elderly population, which will be a dead weight. yikes! A rather unfortunate turn of phrase describing elders. We'll all be there someday. Edited April 1, 2009 by tango Quote My Canada includes rights of Indigenous Peoples. Love it or leave it, eh! Peace.
Machjo Posted April 15, 2009 Report Posted April 15, 2009 I'd be opposed to a 'Fortress America ' mentality. I'm more in favour of multilateralism through intergovernmental organizations such as the Un than bilateral relations between Canada and the US specifically. I'm all for Canada and the US further integrating, but mutually, not one-sidedly. I'd be in favour of sharing a common currency common military, even common citizenship, but only if it involves a large number of countries, including Canada and the US. But Canada and the US only in isolation? I don't think so! Ideally I'd like to see it be more of a world union, or close to it. Quote With friends like Zionists, what Jew needs enemies? With friends like Islamists, what Muslim needs enemies?
Oleg Bach Posted April 15, 2009 Report Posted April 15, 2009 I'd be opposed to a 'Fortress America ' mentality. I'm more in favour of multilateralism through intergovernmental organizations such as the Un than bilateral relations between Canada and the US specifically.I'm all for Canada and the US further integrating, but mutually, not one-sidedly. I'd be in favour of sharing a common currency common military, even common citizenship, but only if it involves a large number of countries, including Canada and the US. But Canada and the US only in isolation? I don't think so! Ideally I'd like to see it be more of a world union, or close to it. You must have money and live in a nice civilized neighbourhood. I am sure you would be against a merger between Jamacia and Canada with a totally open boarder policy. Go live at Jane and Finch in Toronto. Take a walk at night and think to yourself..If you could go back in time would you have imported the Jamacian crimminal culture to Canada...? Then think again about a merger with America which would cause a leak of Mexican migrants and murderous drug dealing thugs that kill for a living - then think ..do you want them here? There is a horrific price to pay with merger regarding America - a decayed atomosphere and human misery...Look at the EU - then think back - was it Europe better before this big mix up? Quote
Vancouverite Posted April 15, 2009 Author Report Posted April 15, 2009 I'd love to have other countries join in, if they could meet our high standards. Britain would be a good candidate. So would Iceland, and maybe, Costa Rica. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 16, 2009 Report Posted April 16, 2009 I'd love to have other countries join in, if they could meet our high standards. Britain would be a good candidate. So would Iceland, and maybe, Costa Rica. What "high standards" would those be? How can this be reconciled with "multiculturalism". Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Vancouverite Posted April 16, 2009 Author Report Posted April 16, 2009 I thought we were going to ignore each other. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 16, 2009 Report Posted April 16, 2009 I thought we were going to ignore each other. No, it was your unilateral decision....which you didn't keep. Since you brought it up, it should be noted that members who choose the "ignore" strategy invariably put themselves at a disadvantage. Please tell us about the "high standards". Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
jbg Posted April 17, 2009 Report Posted April 17, 2009 I don't know about the NAU ... SPP ... needs a LOT of work ... and a LOT of public input.And we all saw how much public input there was at the (SPP protests) G8 in Quebec. NONE. Just government and other corporate input. We weren't allowed. We've never been asked for input. We have to 'protest' outside locked gates and windows that don't open to draw attention to our concerns. They send 'agentes provocateurs' to raise the ante so the police can disperse us. Where's the capital of the NAU? What does it's flag look like? Who is it's PM or President? How many members are its Parliament and/or Congress? Where is the tin-foil hat factory? Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
tango Posted April 17, 2009 Report Posted April 17, 2009 Where's the capital of the NAU? What does it's flag look like? Who is it's PM or President? How many members are its Parliament and/or Congress? Where is the tin-foil hat factory? So ... it appears you are keeping yourself uninformed. You must like surprises, eh? Quote My Canada includes rights of Indigenous Peoples. Love it or leave it, eh! Peace.
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 17, 2009 Report Posted April 17, 2009 So ... it appears you are keeping yourself uninformed. You must like surprises, eh? Canada's population is only 8% of the "NAU"....you do the math. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
tango Posted April 17, 2009 Report Posted April 17, 2009 Canada's population is only 8% of the "NAU"....you do the math. That makes no sense in the context of my quote. What are you trying to say? Quote My Canada includes rights of Indigenous Peoples. Love it or leave it, eh! Peace.
Vancouverite Posted April 17, 2009 Author Report Posted April 17, 2009 (edited) There is no formal proposal for what an NAU would involve, in terms of a capital, a currency, or whatever, but integration will be a historical inevitability. Edited April 17, 2009 by Vancouverite Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 17, 2009 Report Posted April 17, 2009 That makes no sense in the context of my quote.What are you trying to say? There will be no surprises..... Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 17, 2009 Report Posted April 17, 2009 There is no formal proposal for what an NAU would involve, in terms of a capital, a currency, or whatever, but integration will be a historical inevitability. Is that why the Americans are building high tech fences and sensors on both of her borders? Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
tango Posted April 17, 2009 Report Posted April 17, 2009 Is that why the Americans are building high tech fences and sensors on both of her borders? Ya, apparently the borders will be open for goods, but not for people, I guess. Quote My Canada includes rights of Indigenous Peoples. Love it or leave it, eh! Peace.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.