Leafless Posted June 3, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 It was only claimed that BC worked with nuclear weapons, not that he knew how to manufacture them. That false statement (topic is nuclear weapons 'by what you know about them' is not the intended topic) and claim was intended as a personal attack and insult by DogOnPorch: "Not to mention the topic is nuclear weapons and you disregard the viewpoint of a person who actually worked with nuclear weapons...shows you're either being obtuse or you really don't have a clue" Maybe DogOnPorch can then elaborate what he exactly meant (which he did not) initially, when he stated B.C. "actually worked with nuclear weapons". What does this rather senseless statement exactly mean: 1. - B.C. has preliminary understanding of nuclear weapons and I don't? 2.- B.C. has a superior knowledge of nuclear weapons equivalent to that of any nuclear scientist and I don't? Obviously, I can interpret and reply any way I choose when confronted with this type of nonsensical insulting reply. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 That false statement (topic is nuclear weapons 'by what you know about them' is not the intended topic) and claim was intended as a personal attack and insult by DogOnPorch: The statement was not false. Your experience, or lack thereof, does not constitute an insult. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 What does this rather senseless statement exactly mean: lol...while I don't speak for BC-2004, I'll take his informed opinion re: nuclear weapons over yours any day. So take it as an insult if you wish. ------------------------------------- Hey, hey, hey! It's Faaaaaaaat Albert...and I'm gonna sing a for you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted June 3, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 The statement was not false. Your experience, or lack thereof, does not constitute an insult. Your experience as master googler could leave you looking 'not to smart' without the benefit of your computer. Virtual intelligence means nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted June 3, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 lol...while I don't speak for BC-2004, I'll take his informed opinion re: nuclear weapons over yours any day. This is understandable being an obsequious parasitical person like yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 Your experience as master googler could leave you looking 'not to smart' without the benefit of your computer. Virtual intelligence means nothing. We didn't have Google during the Cold War. 1...16...3...14...5...12...7...10...9...8...11...6...13...4...15...2 Google that rookie.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.Dancer Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 We didn't have Google during the Cold War.1...16...3...14...5...12...7...10...9...8...11...6...13...4...15...2 Google that rookie.... The new season of Lost? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharkman Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 Maybe DogOnPorch can then elaborate what he exactly meant (which he did not) initially, when he stated B.C. "actually worked with nuclear weapons". What does this rather senseless statement exactly mean: 1. - B.C. has preliminary understanding of nuclear weapons and I don't? 2.- B.C. has a superior knowledge of nuclear weapons equivalent to that of any nuclear scientist and I don't? Obviously, I can interpret and reply any way I choose when confronted with this type of nonsensical insulting reply. You really don't know? Hmm, you must have missed every discussion where this came up. BC was in the US navy and served on subs that carried nuclear weapons, I believe. Thus, his knowledge about the subject would be superior to most civilians. His informed opinions carry more weight than yours and whatever declassified info you can google. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 This is understandable being an obsequious parasitical person like yourself. Such mean words...oww. Got any sticks and/or stones? ---------------------------- Hah, hah! ---Nelson Muntz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.Dancer Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 Such mean words...oww. Got any sticks and/or stones? ---------------------------- Hah, hah! ---Nelson Muntz or a new thesaurus? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 or a new thesaurus? Indeed...what's another word for floccinaucinihilipilification, while we're at it? I think that pretty much sums up the leafy situation. ----------------------------- Radar: [loud whisper] Hawk! Hawk! Nurse Dish: Who's that!? Hawkeye: That's my wife...she always hawks like that. ---M*A*S*H Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.Dancer Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 Indeed...what's another word for floccinaucinihilipilification, while we're at it? I think that pretty much sums up the leafy situation. picayune? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 That'll do... ------------------------------ I'm looking over a four leaf clover... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted June 3, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 You really don't know? Oh I know him, from some obscure Montreal web site where he spewed the identical type U.S. propaganda, day after day, after day, after day, before they shut down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted June 3, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 or a new thesaurus? Don't worry googler Dancer, we know all about your little tricks. So which is it Dancer? The other day you were an investor. A while back it was all about the the gang at the office. Further back it was the family buisness in Montreal. So what are you to-day? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted June 3, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 We didn't have Google during the Cold War.1...16...3...14...5...12...7...10...9...8...11...6...13...4...15...2 Google that rookie.... Hey, not bad for a Black guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guyser Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 Hey, not bad for a Black guy. Quoted this gem for posterity....oh and editing reasons. On another note "obsequious" . From leafless no less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.Dancer Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 Don't worry googler Dancer, we know all about your little tricks. So which is it Dancer? The other day you were an investor. A while back it was all about the the gang at the office. Further back it was the family buisness in Montreal. So what are you to-day? Well there is an office, and like most Canadians I have investments and I invest..... ut I swear I won't call you an idiot, promise.....if you can find where I claimed there was a family business in Montreal.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted June 4, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 Well there is an office, and like most Canadians I have investments and I invest.....ut I swear I won't call you an idiot, promise.....if you can find where I claimed there was a family business in Montreal.... Claiming you are an investor is not in the same category as a casual investor. But that's okay as we are accustomed to your imaginary self-importance. You claimed it, find it yourself. Threatening to be called an idiot by an adult with the mentality of a child means little but only induces one to express genuine pity towards one, such as yourself, inflicted with this serious mental disorder. Poor Dancer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.Dancer Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 Claiming you are an investor is not in the same category as a casual investor. But that's okay as we are accustomed to your imaginary self-importance. You claimed it, find it yourself. Threatening to be called an idiot by an adult with the mentality of a child means little but only induces one to express genuine pity towards one, such as yourself, inflicted with this serious mental disorder. Poor Dancer. I promise not to call you a delusional crack pot.....but since you are the one who claims I have made claims, I'm sure someone who isn't a crack pot or an idiot will have no trouble finding them... off you go now.... find the family business you claim I have claimed....and while you are at it, show me your are not a delusional monomanical crackpot idiot and find where I have claimed to be a professional investor too... ....but even though I won't call you an idiot, deluded, monomanical or a crack pot, I bet you can't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted June 4, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 I promise not to call you a delusional crack pot.....but since you are the one who claims I have made claims, I'm sure someone who isn't a crack pot or an idiot will have no trouble finding them...off you go now.... find the family business you claim I have claimed....and while you are at it, show me your are not a delusional monomanical crackpot idiot and find where I have claimed to be a professional investor too... ....but even though I won't call you an idiot, deluded, monomanical or a crack pot, I bet you can't. Pick through thousands of post. Forget it. If you are in a state of denial over the way you perceive the seriousness of a trivial issue and I am not going to bother to pursue the issue, what does this say about your mentality? I mean what are you a child man who cannot take a little comedy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.Dancer Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 Pick through thousands of post. Forget it. If you are in a state of denial over the way you perceive the seriousness of a trivial issue and I am not going to bother to pursue the issue, what does this say about your mentality? I mean what are you a child man who cannot take a little comedy? Could you rephrase that in a lucid manner? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.