B. Max

Yeah. Alberta has lots of coal we would gladly sell to that power plant.

Sure "sounds" like...But it wasn't -- it was said by the Chairman of Arkansas Republican Party. Looks like you missed it. He never called for a terrorist attack.

Wow, that spin must have been manufactured at the very outer edge of the left wing lunatic fringe. Chairman of Arkansas Republican Party Calls for More Terrorist Attacks Sounds like something John Edwards would come up with or Cindy Sheehan.

You wouldn't ride a bike on Deer foot, would you? It looks like a lot of work on Glenmore so I can see why it's taking a lot of time. One of the guys down there was telling me that Glenmore is suppose to hook up with the new north south road they are going to start building over on the east side.

Actually I think you've already given it the best possible summation.

You need some roads in Calgary. I spent most of the week down there. Barlow Tr. and Deer Foot north turn into parking lots everyday at about four o'clock. That new construction on Glenmore looks like it it will be a good thing.

name='GostHacked' date='Jun 4 2007, 01:27 PM' post='225064'] No one disputes that the yellow cake wasn't from years before. The fact is they were trying to buy more. So what. If they found it under Saddam's bed would that make any difference. No. Not all of it. We know saddam's agents were there. They weren't there to buy peas. -- He never intended to find anything. Wilson had been running around outing Plame and feeding misinformation to all kinds of people. People who were intent on discrediting Bush. http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/007484.php http://slate.com/id/2148555 I would say they have already investigated him and rebuked his story. Now they should be seeing that charges are laid.

name='shoggoth' date='Jun 4 2007, 04:33 AM' post='224947'] Did you even read it. There is no cherry picking. That is real science. When you say there is no heat island effect and then use Hansen to back that up. I know you've strayed into the realm of science fiction and falsification. Also nice diversion trick. The argument put forward was "Then why has the worlds temperature level been near zero up or down since 1998?" which is false. Now you're both doing a 180 and saying "ah it hasn't warmed much since 1998". No appealing to the satellite records doesn't help because those too show warming since 1998 (another thing: dont trust satellite graphs on skeptics sites like john-daly.com - go and look up the actual UAH data from their own website) Actually I went to Steven Milloy's site. His site has the data from UAH and all others. I did the math from the data sets of the lower troposphere global, and the average temperature from the year 1998, compared with the average temperature from the year 2006 is - .23725 lower in 2006. http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/t2lt/tltglhmam_5.2 If you are referring to that graph in the article. I asked him about that. He indicated it was not what he used, by saying it looked like something Hansen had produced. The man who changed the known US historical temperature records. I assume in order to match is phony computer models which don't work. Under the assumption there is no heat island effect. Which those records had been adjusted for. Fortunately the original graph still appears on Daly's site and used to be on the US government site until Hansen changed it. Making that site unreliable. http://www.john-daly.com/usa-1999.gif

Unless they are bills of meaningful tax cuts and reducing the size of government, then shut it down before they do anymore damage.

Again, want to back up that claim? Or are you just trolling? Go and watch the great global warming swindle and here it in there own words.

Oh, well, if you say so, I guess everyone here will just have to take your word for it. Seriously though, why don't you try to provide at least some sort of argument to back up your claim? Actually everyone here but you already knows or should. Plenty of scientists have said if you don't toe the global warming line you don't get the money.

They are some of the biggest bunch of bums up there you ever saw.

The government funds most science research, and the level of funding does NOT change as a result of global warming. Nice try though. That's a big lie.

He should take a look in our SC, he might find those missing french fries.

The UN has milked us for billions and they want billions more. We sure as hell don't need the UN for anything. I had hoped Bush would have gotten rid of it in his first term, but was disappointed. Then I thought Harper would have removed us from all the loonie things that our previous governments signed onto. But he's turned out to be just the same as the rest of them.

But this is getting off topic. We are talking about the Senate and Joe Wilson. The end result is the Niger yellow cake documents were forged. Is the IAEA part of the UN at all?? Those documents were forged by who though, and for what reason. Those documents were not the only source and the British still claimed even after the documents were discovered to be forged that Iraq had been trying to buy more material in Africa and the senate has agreed and rebuked Wilson. http://www.americanthinker.com/2005/07/abo..._of_yellow.html

It is continuing to go up, look at the black trendline: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/nhshgl.gif Those are not considered reliable and here's why. http://www.john-daly.com/cause/cause.htm

Take a look at there links page.

The fact remains that once all the hype, fear mongering, mights and maybes are removed there is no evidence of man made global warming. http://www.junkscience.com/ByTheJunkman/20070524.html http://www.ewire.com/display.cfm/Wire_ID/3967

There is just to much government, period. Like Ronald Regan said, government is not the solution, government is the problem. http://www.webcommentary.com/asp/ShowArtic...erb&date=070601

Another piece of UN propaganda.

The UN is a pack of criminal liars with no credibility what so ever. Who were sucking billions of dollars out of the oil for food scam to keep themselves living like kings in their New York penthouses. Along with funding the agenda's behind their Marxist one world government. And this debunks my statements how? And if you are talking about credibility, I am sure the Bush Administration could use some right about now. Your statements are all based on UN statements and are the statements of an organization trying to protect it's oil for food scam and cover up it's conntection to international organized crime. That even involved the liberal government of Canada. http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2...17/133225.shtml

The UN is a pack of criminal liars with no credibility what so ever. Who were sucking billions of dollars out of the oil for food scam to keep themselves living like kings in their New York penthouses. Along with funding the agenda's behind their Marxist one world government.

What's that commie talking about. Congress has already cut off the money to build the European part of missile defense which were silo based interceptors.

Except for the 500 tons of yellow cake the US flew back to the US that Iraq already had. But this is about Iraq trying to buy more which clearly it was. Which is what Wilson mislead the senate committee about.