Queenmandy85

Vance vs Biden in 2028.

President Trump 271 EC votes. The former President will take PA. Vice President Harris 267 EC votes.

Just how will President Trump get Russia out of the Donbas, Crimea and the rest of Ukrainian territory? If he can restore Ukraine's borders and sovereignty, I will be happy to praise him. The same if he can get a two state solution to bring peace in Palestine and Israel.

I think we have identified the problem. You are wrong on most things except immigration. Conservatives are monarchists and Grits are more inclined to republicanism.

It is ironic. Mr. Poilievre will be appointer Prime Minister in 10 months with over 200 MP's supporting him in the HofC. If we had proportional representation, he would never become PM. The CPC stands at 42% to 43% and that has not changed in over a year. Under PR, that trnslates into 142 seats. Since all of the other parties have voted non-confidence in Mr. Poilievre, it is clear none of them would support his appointment to the office of PM.

You are incorrect on both counts. A. I am not a Liberal. If there were a Conservative Party, I would vote Conservative, if the candidate was a good one. Since MacKay stabbed the Conservative Party in the back and sold out to the Reform Party, I have no party. I did join the CPC some months ago to support Jean Charest, but Mr. Poilievre is too immature and too estranged with truth and reality for me to support him. So, I will vote for a local candidate who happens to be an excellent MP. It is unfortunate that he is CPC, but life is full of difficult choices. B. I strongly disapproved of the Prime Minister's request to ask the Crown Prosecutor for a deferred prosecution for SNC Lav. I lost a lot of respect for him over that and even worse, the fallout demonstrated that he has a problem working with women. His claim to be a feminist has proven to be a Poilievre style one liner. I don't think Mr. Poilievre has thought through his options. Firstly, he should be savouring his role as Leader of His Majesty's Loyal Opposition. It is the best job in Parliament. Secondly, his fetish to "axe the tax" is painting him into a corner. He will have to come up with an alternative and even Scott Moe says that when his Government looked at the alternatives, they were all more expensive and less efficient than the carbon tax. Thirdly, he will be tasked with navigating Canada's future against the President Trump administration, with its tariffs and runaway inflation. The economic chaos the Americans will inflict on us will make the previous difficulties pale to insignificance. Finally, ( returning to the purpose of this thread) when he is appointed Prime Minister, he will have to make a dreaded choice about his own security clearance. He is terrified of something in his closet and it will come out. The only question is, what is it? He is sitting pretty right now. He is popular and at his peak. A year from now, he will be Prime Minister and it will be a rapid fall from favour. He will lose the following election because it will be a minority situation and no other party will be willing to hold their nose and give him the confidence of the house.

That would be just as wrong as the Prime Minister asking for a deferred prosecution for SNC Lav. You would be interferring in the Justice system. That's easy. Justin Trudeau is a card carrying member of the Liberal Party of Canada. Anna Di Carlo is the leader of the Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist). Elizabeth Rowley is leader of the Communist Party of Canada. If memory serves, the both Communist Parties combined received les than 10,000 votes in the last Federal election. Now, since it is a secret ballot, there is no way to know for certain that Prime Minister Trudeau did not vote for Garnet Colly running under the banner of the Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist, (the other Communist Party did not run a candidate in Papineau) you are only speculating that the Prime Minister voted against himself. You are really stretching credulity to believe Prime Minister Trudeau is a marxist. However, when you say, "The Covid big pharma scamdemic was one of the biggest hoaxes ever played on mankind," when over a million Americans and 50,000 Canadians died from Covid, you are not inspiring confidence in your version of events. But, on the other hand, your posts are always interesting. Thank you.

And cheers to you as well. Have a good weekend.

Then, be patient. We will have a Socred government led by Mr. Poilievre in 11 months and it will be his task to deal with the economic chaos that will hit us from the Trump administration. Let us wish him luck.

I don't think you do. My MP is Kevin Waugh. I may not like Mr. Poilievre, but Kevin is an excellent MP. I will likely vote for him. So, now we both know who I will vote for...unless I change my mind. 11 months is a long time in politics. 😎 Trudeau has been a decent Prime Minister. Inspite of your unfortunate rhetoric, he got us through covid with fewer fatalities than many western countries, he managed to get a decent result in NAFTA and in the post pandemic economic turmoil, our inflation was lower and shorter than many western countries, including the Mother Country. Imagine you are sitting down with the Prime Minister and you have the opportunity to point out all the mistakes he is making. His response, "If you know so much, why am I Prime Minister and you are not." In 11 months, my meeting with Prime Minister Poilievre will be the same. Cheers.

You seem fixated on China. Until Canada had to arrest Meng Wanzhou, we had better relations with China. In 83 days, we may regret not having better relations with them, but that belongs in another thread. China is interfering without a doubt. But China is not the only player. According to former Premier Ujjal Dosanjh, Prime Minister Trudeau is heavily influenced by the Khalistani movement, resulting in animosity with India, our great hope as a counter balance to China. The Khalistanis are a major cause for concern at the moment. We need India.

The information is classified for a reason. CSIS and the RCMP have explained the reasons why releasing the information would be injurious to national security. It would also cause irreparable damage to innocent people. If there is sufficient evidence to charge an individual, the justice system is the vehicle for dealing with them, not a witch hunt. You are incorrect that the PM can simply declassify classified information. There is no system in Canada for the declassification of documents. It would problematic to give a Prime Minister that authority. It could lead to a politisization of the process. https://www.thestar.com/politics/federal/does-justin-trudeau-need-a-way-to-declassify-election-meddling-secrets-his-top-aide-is/article_1c4c3e98-421f-5a0f-96ac-da2eb01868a9.html Mr. Poilievre's problem springs from the pre-testimonial interviews that pointed out that there is "explosive" information regarding the CPC leadership campaign. If that information was inaccurate, the Commissioner would have jumped on it. She has access to all of the documents. We do not know which candidate was compromised but why is Mr. Poilievre so reluctant to find out? His excuse that he would be muzzled is ridiculous. I think he is frightened. Now, a Liberal would say that the interests of Canada and the Liberal Party are aligned. That is why it is "The Natural Governing Party." As a Progressive Conservative, given a choice between a flawed Prime Minister Trudeau and an immature Mr. Poilievre and the Social Credit Party, I have to think long and hard about whom I vote for. Which one has experience in dealing with a Trump administration? Disclaimer: I had the same feeling about Justin Trudeau in 2015: All flash and no bang. We will find out in about 11 months when Mr. Poilievre is appointed.

Would you be willing to go to jail if you were Prime Minister? That would be the penalty for breaching the Act. It is strange that Mr. Poilivre is afraid to find out for himself. With the explosive information about the interference in the CPC leadership race lurking in there, it begs the question of why he is afraid to go through the clearence process. He is going to have to do it when he is appointed Prime Minister. As M. Blanchet pointed out, Mr. Poilievre is keeping the Commons frozen in order to avoid a non-confidence motion that could bring down the government. Is he actually afraid of an election he can't lose? Of course, I'm just spouting silly things . I don't believe Pierre is a Manchurian candidate... maybe not even an Indian spy. But he is afraid of something and whatever it is, that secret is more important than a couple of obscure politicians who have been mentioned as maybe have spoken to chinese agents.

Good point. I apologize. I have edited my post to make my edit to User's post more explicit.

I tend to be skeptical about anything produced by CSIS or any other intelligence agency. I am not saying the allegations are without merit, just that CSIS, Mi6, CIA, GRU etc have a lousy track record going back to before the execution of Margarite Gertrude Zelle.

to paraphrase User's statement: Well, Fluff, have you? 😉

Wanna bet. I know a person in Calgary who spent $120,000 on her surgery. You would never know she was born a male.

I guess you did not see the film, so you missed the meaning. You can get it from the library on DVD. The theme song (Travelling Through) by Dolly Parton is great. It has Graham Greene in a major supporting role. The star is Felicity Huffman. 🥰

“Don't you find it odd that plastic surgery can cure a mental disorder?" Bree Osbourne in Transamerica. 😘

People don't decide to become trans. They are born trans. It is not a choice. The choise comes when the individual chooses to have gender re-assignment surgery that can cost tens of thousands of dollars. Even then, In Canada, the presrson needs to be assessed before surgery. At the Menard Clinic, candidates who have already been assessed, are in the clinic for a month for rigourous counselling before surgery. Transitioning is a long and expensive procedure. F2M transition is more expensive than M2F.

You are unaware that through out history, marriage wae a means of financial and political advancement for families.

Has anybody noticed in this thread that Deluge and others are only have issues with only half of the transgender people. They believe it is wrong for M2F transgender individuals to participate in sports, but they seem to have no problem with F2M people in sports. They also confuse crossdressers with transgender. There has been reference to being transgendered as a mental illness? Half the human population is born female both mentally and physically. Almost half the population is born male, both mentally and physically. some of the population is born with the body of a female, but is mentally male and an almost equal number have the body of a male and the mind of a female. If the latter two groups are mentally ill, it stands to reason we all are. With the pronoun issue, common courtesy demands that we refer to people by the pronoun they prefer. Washrooms: Why is it okay for women to use mens washrooms but not the other way around. I had a summer job many years ago as a janitor in residences. I would be cleaning a toilet in a mens bathroom while a woman was using the stall next to where I was working. In a high school, if a transgender girl is forced to use the boys' washroom, how long do you think it will be before she is beaten up. "Your issue, Sir, is not with me, but with my Creator." Secretary Peter Buttigieg.

That is incorrect. Traditional marriage is a union of a man and a woman's estate and status. It is a business and political contract between families. It has been that way for thousands of years.

He's either off his meds again, or his AI program is malfunctioning. Spetch must have slept through his physics classes.