bud

mossad was most likely behind it. they have a long historyof such acts. it's also highly likey the MEK is also in bed with mossad in this.

your attempt at trying to make a point crashed into a wall when you used the old collateral damage argument in order to try to justify your team's actions. what if the 3000 innocent people who were killed at WTC are also consider collateral damage by the groups responsible for flying the planes into the buildings? it's not like al quaeda knew the people personally. they're also not shy about being honest about their intentions, which is to respond to america's meddling and bullying in the arab world. it's like continuously poking a stick into a dog and then complain and cry when it finally bites you. then you start beating the dog and say it deserves it. any side who knows that their actions will lead to the deaths of innocent people but then they go ahead and do it anyway, is responsible for the deaths.

‎"Massive Oil Spill Results In Improved Wildlife Viscosity"

huntsman and perry will be gone.

polls, polls, polls: http://americanresearchgroup.com/pres2012/primary/rep/sc/ Mitt Romney leads the South Carolina Republican presidential primary with 29%. Newt Gingrich is in second place with 25% and Ron Paul is in third place with 20%. Paul has gained the most and Rick Santorum has lost the most since the last American Research Group survey on January 4-5. In that survey, Paul was at 9% and Santorum was at 24%.

iran actually agreed to it and the conditions look good for israel and the west. so why wasn't the deal accepted? here is more on the deal: Having met in Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran, the undersigned have agreed on the following Declaration: 1. We reaffirm our commitment to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and in accordance with the related articles of the NPT, recall the right of all State Parties, including the Islamic Republic of Iran, to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy (as well as nuclear fuel cycle including enrichment activities) for peaceful purposes without discrimination. 2. We express our strong conviction that we have the opportunity now to begin a forward looking process that will create a positive, constructive, non-confrontational atmosphere leading to an era of interaction and cooperation. 3. We believe that the nuclear fuel exchange is instrumental in initiating cooperation in different areas, especially with regard to peaceful nuclear cooperation including nuclear power plant and research reactors construction. 4. Based on this point the nuclear fuel exchange is a starting point to begin cooperation and a positive constructive move forward among nations. Such a move should lead to positive interaction and cooperation in the field of peaceful nuclear activities replacing and avoiding all kinds of confrontation through refraining from measures, actions and rhetorical statements that would jeopardize Iran's rights and obligations under the NPT. 5. Based on the above, in order to facilitate the nuclear cooperation mentioned above, the Islamic Republic of Iran agrees to deposit 1200 kg LEU in Turkey. While in Turkey this LEU will continue to be the property of Iran. Iran and the IAEA may station observers to monitor the safekeeping of the LEU in Turkey. 6. Iran will notify the IAEA in writing through official channels of its agreement with the above within seven days following the date of this declaration. Upon the positive response of the Vienna Group (US, Russia, France and the IAEA) further details of the exchange will be elaborated through a written agreement and proper arrangement between Iran and the Vienna Group that specifically committed themselves to deliver 120 kg of fuel needed for the Tehran Research Reactor (TRR). 7. When the Vienna Group declares its commitment to this provision, then both parties would commit themselves to the implemention of the agreement mentioned in item 6. Islamic Republic of Iran expressed its readiness to deposit its LEU (1200 kg) within one month. On the basis of the same agreement the Vienna Group should deliver 120 kg fuel required for TRR in no later than one year. 8. In case the provisions of this Declaration are not respected Turkey, upon the request of Iran, will return swiftly and unconditionally Iran's LEU to Iran. 9. We welcome the decision of the Islamic Republic of Iran to continue as in the past their talks with the 5+1 countries in Turkey on the common concerns based on collective commitments according to the common points of their proposals. 10. Turkey and Brazil appreciated Iran's commitment to the NPT and its constructive role in pursuing the realization of nuclear rights of its member states. The Islamic Republic of Iran likewise appreciated the constructive efforts of the friendly countries Turkey and Brazil in creating the conducive environment for realization of Iran's nuclear rights.

why can't we agree that both parties have sucked at their job? this is due to the power of special interest groups who fund many of their elections. the problem is that without the support of the special interest groups, most politicians have little chance of being elected. once they are elected, they must return the favour.

heh. reagan is the most overrated president in the history of america.

many palestinians are not taking the terrorism approach. that's a false claim. in fact, even hamas have said they'd agree to resolution 242 and take the peaceful approach. too soon to include them in the non-violent hippy crowd, but at least they've shown restraint in the past few years. even though the way israel was created is questionable, time has passed and there is no going back. i support the state of israel. what i don't support is their continual land theft and the government backed settlement increases which violate international law. i also do not support the brutal occupation that violates numerous human rights laws. unfortunately, majority of zionists, including you and several people in this forum are okay with that. not speaking out against an obvious wrong while continuously trying to justify their actions makes you a supporter. having a homeland at the expense of another people's rights is wrong. israel has a chance to end all of this but they choose not to. majority of palestinians, including their government (fatah and hamas) accept the 1967 border. but the israeli government, which is controlled by extremists continues to steal more palestinian land and has vowed to never allow a palestinian state. you don't seem to have a problem with that. Settlement construction soared in 2011 NGO's report says government authorized 1,850 building starts for West Bank housing units in past year. http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4173945,00.html Self-Rule The Government of Israel flatly rejects the establishment of a Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan river. http://www.knesset.gov.il/elections/knesset15/elikud_m.htm this is the zionist ideology at work. my take being, two states based on the 1967 border? you're wrong. even obama agrees with it. no. that's not what i think. because i support the existence of israel and even though i do, i'm not a zionist. unfortunately, majority of zionists, including you, do not condemn the annexation of palestinian land and increasing of settlements and the theft of palestinian resources. palestinians do not strive to annex israeli land, to put settlements in israel and to steal israeli resources. so your comparison does not make sense. i didn't say they're alike. i said whatever ideology that tries to achieve its goals at the expense of another group's rights is wrong. this includes the mainstream ideology of zionism.

NO! IRAN HAS TO STOP BEING SO PROVOCATIVE! provocation.

i don't support terrorism. i support the non-violent approach which majority of palestinians are taking. you can say i believe that, but i don't. whatever ideology that promotes the theft of another person's land (annexation of land which includes settlement increase) and the consistent human rights violations and ruthless behaviour over another people in order to achieve its goal is wrong. it may not be to you and many other zionists, but it is to me and most people around the world. i despise zionism just like i despise the taliban and their ideology.

Israel needs to stop acting in a provocative and bellicose manner. They do not need nuclear weapons.

zionism is an ideology just like nazism. anyone who is okay with either of those ideology is either deluded to how morally wrong they are or they are sociopaths. my question was in regards to why she hates ron paul so much. since she has never actually told us why she dislikes him and calls him crazy all the time, my take is that she's not happy about his views on the unconditional support for israel, which includes $3 billion military aid. isn't this why zionists fear ron paul so much? because ron paul actually has a chance of winning?

PIK.. what do you know about the environmental effects of the oil sands operations on land and water?

yes wild bill. no one says anything about atrocities committed by taliban and other radicals.

i love jews. zionists on the other hand are bad for the world. i find many of them to be sociopaths.

like what?

just because he wants to stop sending aid to israel and other countries, it doesn't make him crazy. israeli nationalists are so afraid of ron paul.

there goes wild bill again with his typical lies. iran has a reputation of wanting to nuke their neighbours? you're so off with the crap you spew out that even foxnews wouldn't let you on their shows.

rogue regimes you say? time to start cheering for the assassination of the zionist regime.

i point out your blatant hypocrisy and dishonesty and you reply with a nonsensical comment. oh and, oh my god, you actually used the holocaust in your reply. lols.

even the israeli courts are showing their anti-democratic side: Israel’s High Court rejects petitions against ‘Citizenship Law’ Law prevents Palestinians married to Israeli Arabs from receiving Israeli citizenship or residency. http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/israel-s-high-court-rejects-petitions-against-citizenship-law-1.406794

okay. thanks for finally admitting that you were just making another 'wild' comment about how iran routinely captures americans and then stones them to death or cuts off their heads. i recommend sticking with the facts and not make comments like this: Iran would simply grab the first American they could find and stone him to death! Or lop off his head. especially when you want to attack people about getting their facts straight like the following comment: No, you have shown that most of them have proved to be such. You have not proven that THIS specific person is indeed a CIA spy!

yeah, anyway, to call it over and out after NH is premature. south carolina will be a good measuring stick and will show which way the evangelicals/tea party supporters will go.

what's the points in posting information on catholics when you know that it's the evangelicals that are a factor: Romney's Mormon Faith Likely a Factor in Primaries, Not in a General Election White evangelical Protestants – a key element of the GOP electoral base – are more inclined than the public as a whole to view Mormonism as a non-Christian faith. And this view is linked to opinions about Romney: Republicans who say Mormonism is not a Christian religion are less likely to support Romney for the GOP nomination and offer a less favorable assessment of him generally. But they seem prepared to overwhelmingly back him in a run against Obama in the general election. http://www.pewforum.org/Politics-and-Elections/Romneys-Mormon-Faith-Likely-a-Factor-in-Primaries-Not-in-a-General-Election.aspx this is why south carolina is going to be a good indication as to where the nomination is heading towards.