bud

lols. obviously you didn't watch the video, because it doesn't respond to what you're trying to say.

great comparison. enjoy these heartwarming photos of geller's vandalized racist posters. here is one:

Leaked Fox News Memo Reveals News Division Told To Echo GOP Talking Point Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/leaked-fox-news-memo-reveals-news-division-told-to-echo-gop-talking-point-2010-12#ixzz2dTOTomFv Let me know when you admit the obvious.

it's not my responsibility that you're unable to understand the clear analogy. once you're able to get it, then get back to me. in the meantime, go find the spine to answer the many questions you have avoided responding to in several threads.

moving past u.s.' hypocritical and empty cries for justice, ethics and morality, i wonder how will the u.s. involvement make things better in syria. i long for an example of u.s. intervention where they have succeeded in removing a monster and creating something better. iraq? no. afghanistan? no. the only thing a u.s. intervention will do is to empower the extremist islamists on the other side, the salafists who are funded by saudi arabia, and we've seen what they've done. on the other hand, we have over 100,000 people dead and the carnage will continue with the (foreign) opposition continuing to feed the fire and assad showing that he has no moral compass. i hope the syrians succeed in getting rid of both assad and the salafists. but i'm not sure how u.s. involvement will help and wont turn it into a completely different struggle. i found this interesting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrEPadG0pQk

i support saving the raped victims and bringing those who have committed crimes to justice. i just don't believe karla homolka's cries for justice and i don't believe she has any conscience or should be given any credibility when she says the right thing should be done. she probably just wants to take over the rapists apartment when he's taken away. if karla really had a conscience and cared about doing the ethical thing, she would have done something when israel paul bernardo, the psychopath was doing what he was doing.

you got my answer.

would i think it would be a bad thing if karma homolka reported the rape and killing of children done by someone so something can be done about it? no, i wouldn't. would i believe that she's shocked, outraged and that her conscience was bothering her that it was happening? no, i wouldn't.

i don't think there is anyone here that thinks the people being attacked is not a bad thing. of course it is. i am talking about obama's supposed outrage and conscience. it's empty. it has no value. he doesn't care about the syrian people. if obama really cared about civilians being killed or being hit by chemical weapons, then he would have spoken out against israel's illegal use of white phosphorus against civilians. the same goes for you. why pretend this is about morals and values of obama and the u.s.? this is geopolitical. this is about feeding the war machines who are starving for another firework.

thanks for pointing this out rue! god bless you and god bless america, the leader and saviour of the world! it's a good thing they have suddenly decided to flip on the moral and ethical switch. it's too bad u.s. decided to help saddam while he gassed his own people and the iranians! but now, they hold up the moral compass for all of us to see! usa usa usa!

if it isn't american woman: miss misunderstood. you obviously don't get the point. the value of this anger and outrage is empty considering the u.s. had a big role in iraq's chemical weapons attack against its own people and the iranians. it's like watching karla homolka being upset and outraged that people are sitting back while children are being raped and killed.

are you still making excuses for the u.s. helping saddam to use chemical weapons? shame on you. The declassified CIA documents show that Casey and other top officials were repeatedly informed about Iraq's chemical attacks and its plans for launching more. "If the Iraqis produce or acquire large new supplies of mustard agent, they almost certainly would use it against Iranian troops and towns near the border," the CIA said in a top secret document. But it was the express policy of Reagan to ensure an Iraqi victory in the war, whatever the cost.

thanks! of course, this thread was created to show the hypocrisy of the u.s. government and those who repeat their b.s. in order to justify their actions.

if it isn't the evil empire's mouthpiece! how phosphorus is used is the issue. report after report have determined that israel used it illegally. ie; they hit civilians with them. similar to what syria has reportedly done. it got so bad that the high court in israel asked israel not to use them anymore. so please stop making excuses for israel. let's get beyond the illegal use of white phosphorus. WHAT ABOUT U.S.' SUPPORT FOR SADDAM'S USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS? 'splain and rationalize that one doggydog.

i don't get it. syria is allegedly using chemical weapons and this is supposed to be the red line for the u.s.? this is their reason for wanting to attack? what about when the u.s. helped saddam as he gassed the iranian people? aren't the reports saying that the syrian government used phosphorus in the attacks? what about when israel used phosphorus on civilians during its attack on gaza? why this selective outrage by the u.s. and its mouthpieces?

so you're basing your conclusion not on what all these women in the documentary and other cases reported to the israeli government but on what "others may" feel about the birth control? nice. bonam is also on board with your twisted narrative. is there a central place, a think tank, that israeli apologists go to, to try to twist, excuse and justify every single diabolic and racist israeli action?

check out the hippie momma's confronting america's dark practice:

jbg.. don't you think that it's time that the hasids and heredis women are injected with birth control?

wow. you guys try in different ways to excuse and justify israel's actions. bonam is now trying to say that we don't understand what they're saying because of language barrier and they really were okay with the whole process. he calls it a 'big freaking deal'. after all the advancements we've done in the west, i can't imagine canada and u.s., now, in this day and age, would ever stoop so low and commit such a disgusting, racist and immoral behaviour. this is the broken moral compass that jbg, bonam, american woman and many zionists that is the problem. if you need to constantly justify or apologize for immoral and unlawful actions, then you will be seen as such.

why should their choice be between staying in ethiopia or not having babies in israel? giving those as options is idiotic and not something an 'enlightened' western country with good moral values would do. it's like saying you don't agree with rape, but you understand it. stop trying to sneak in another way to try to justify israel's actions. lame.

a good point. just like there is a difference between raping and killing.

actions like this is exactly why israel is seen as a law breaking, arrogant, bordering on fascist state. The Israel Defense Forces demolished an encampment set up by Palestinians near the West Bank village of Burin over the weekend even though the Civil Administration says the army is not authorized to operate there. Before the demolition, the Civil Administration informed the IDF that it was not authorized to take action because the land is in Area B, which is under Palestinian civilian control. An officer from the Civil Administration, which is responsible for enforcing building and planning laws, was present and said that since the structures were erected in Area B, only the Palestinian Authority has the right to enforce civil law such as that governing illegal construction. Hetzroni ordered the encampment demolished anyway and the soldiers began to break up the tents with their hands. Residents of the nearby Jewish outpost made off with the tin structure. link the list of indefensible actions by israel continue to pile up and they are making it difficult for the western world to ignore.

i don't think anyone is under the impression that israel is about to suddenly respect and follow international law. the problem for israel in this situation is that other countries will begin to put pressure on israel if or when the ICC gets involved. economic pressure can be quite powerful. the bds (boycott, divestment and sanction) movement is already putting pressure on israel as companies and organizations are pulling out of working with israel. since majority of countries are signatories to the ICC, any ruling against israel will accelerate the bds movement.

meaning that they allowed it to be formed. without the u.n.'s blessing, israel would not be a country.

the u.n. allowed israel to be formed.