bud

don't lecture people on credibility argus. you have NOT provided any proof on any of the crap you've written. your comments are rue-sque, but a lot shorter. instead of patting yourself on the back, start backing up your claims with at least a little more than "i read it in the newspapers and therefore i am right and you have no credibility."

argus, you speak with such confidence. even obama has not yet been able to show concrete evidence that the chemical weapons were used by assad. despite what the newspapers have said. maybe you have some concrete evidence that you can show to the world, including the UN. who is the propagandist? "a couple of them"? get real. how many people do you see in this video? who said the priests were "catholic". they are said to be christian priests. so what if they're not "catholic". these are the fanatical wahabist islamists, who are coming in from and backed by saudi, qatar and with the blessing of u.s. and israel. these guys are going to be replacing assad, a secularist dictator, who happens to be supporting the main piece of the chess piece, the queen, that the zionists want to remove, iran.

oh no. NOT GLENN BECK! HE'S WORKING FOR ASSAD! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfHSPLW63Gg

i wonder if august ever brought masturbation into his equation. perhaps august is right and it's all about how much ass these ragheads can get. the more ass they get, the more peace there would be in the middle east. it's so simple. why didn't my brain come up with this? all this time, i thought the anger and resentment was about the occupations, the bombings and the puppet regimes installed in their countries by the west.

hey rue? focus buddy. seriously, try to focus on what i will be posting from the article that you say doesn't say that the u.s. helped iraq with its chemical attacks. there are more than 1 pages in the article. you need to focus on this as well. there are also copies of memos and letters that have been released which follow the article. focus on that as well. okay, here we go. i will only post this once. even if you post a long winded response denying it, this will be my last time that i will share this information with you and acknowledge your denial of facts. because if you are going to deny the following, then you are beyond hopeless. okay, so this is from the same article from page 3: President Reagan read the report and, according to Francona, wrote a note in the margin addressed to Secretary of Defense Frank C. Carlucci: "An Iranian victory is unacceptable." Subsequently, a decision was made at the top level of the U.S. government (almost certainly requiring the approval of the National Security Council and the CIA). The DIA was authorized to give the Iraqi intelligence services as much detailed information as was available about the deployments and movements of all Iranian combat units. That included satellite imagery and perhaps some sanitized electronic intelligence. There was a particular focus on the area east of the city of Basrah where the DIA was convinced the next big Iranian offensive would come. The agency also provided data on the locations of key Iranian logistics facilities, and the strength and capabilities of the Iranian air force and air defense system. Francona described much of the information as "targeting packages" suitable for use by the Iraqi air force to destroy these targets. The sarin attacks then followed. By 1988, U.S. intelligence was flowing freely to Hussein's military. That March, Iraq launched a nerve gas attack on the Kurdish village of Halabja in northern Iraq.

no need to validate yourself to slimeballs like shady. this conversation clearly shows that saddam was told that what saddam wants to do with kuwait is not associated with the u.s. of course, in the face of facts, the usual will still deny, in order not to disturb their narrative. people without integrity don't care about facts. Saddam Hussein: "If we could keep the whole of the Shatt al Arab - our strategic goal in our war with Iran - we will make concessions (to the Kuwaitis). But, if we are forced to choose between keeping half of the Shatt and the whole of Iraq (which, in Saddam's view, includes Kuwait) then we will give up all of the Shatt to defend our claims on Kuwait to keep the whole of Iraq in the shape we wish it to be. (pause) What is the United States' opinion on this?" U.S. Ambassador Glaspie: "We have no opinion on your Arab-Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait. Secretary (of State James) Baker has directed me to emphasize the instruction, first given to Iraq in the 1960's that the Kuwait issue is not associated with America."

israel loves the syria war because it will beget him war with iran. damn you bud! you anti-semite! leave israel and its warmongering chicken-hawk zionist parasites who want u.s. to do israel's dirty work, alone! Dershowitz: Obama Should Ask Congress to Approve Red Line for Iran

can we all calm down and send out a prayers for our pilots before they get on their planes and blow up some shit?

that's if the only history you know is from september 11th , 2001 to september 12th, 2001.

you often get things wrong and comeback with your typical cries of anti-semitism. i am embarrassed for people like you. this time it's no different: AIPAC to deploy hundreds of lobbyists to push for Syria action Pro-Israel lobby says 250 activists will meet with their senators and representatives in Washington in a bid to win support Congressional support for military action in Syria. you know it's all about israel when you see john mccain, lindsey graham and that other full time prostitute, eric candor, regurgitate AIPAC's agenda. these guys will do and say anything their pimp tells them to.

who has more to gain if chemical weapons are used? especially since assad has been so-called winning the war? why would assad take the risk of using chemical weapons? all we hear about is the use of chemical weapons. yes, it was used, but by who? is there concrete proof that the chemical weapons were used by assad? why must we automatically believe it was his regime without proof? why isn't there talk about accusations of anti-assad groups using chemical weapons? for example, this one: Jabhat al-Nusra Rebels Admit Responsibility for Chemical Weapons Attack what about this report from may of this year: UN's Carla Del Ponte says there is evidence rebels 'may have used sarin' in Syria why is it difficult to believe that they would do it again?

as ron paul says: “The whole theory is we’re going to Syria because that’s the way you march into Iran,” Paul said in an interview with CNN on Tuesday.

how so? the master is israel and its lobby group who pays millions to many in congress to obey its commands. an attack on syria is exactly what bibi and the zionist hawks want. they want assad, iran's strategic partner, to be removed. of all the lobby groups, AIPAC has the biggest influence over u.s.' foreign policy and their priority is what is best for the zionist hawks.

this isn't about israel! serious! stop dragging israel into this! AIPAC Strongly Urges Congress To Back Syria Strike WASHINGTON - After weeks of quietly working behind the scenes to build support for U.S. military intervention in Syria, the American Israel Political Action Committee (AIPAC) formally called on Congress Tuesday to authorize airstrikes aimed at degrading the Syrian military's ability to use chemical weapons. the master has spoken and the servants will obey.

you sound like you hate israel.

sharkman, you still haven't shown policy change towards israel. what you are showing is the obvious and understandable dislike for netanyahu. it's quite silly to harp on obama for not liking bibi, considering it is netanyahu and the current israeli government who has been nothing but disrespectful and rude to obama, the president of united states. this is the president and country who gives israel over $3 billion each year. this is the country that stands up for israel in the UN. why is netanyahu and the israeli government so arrogant? what kind of a friend would do this? here are two totally disrespectful actions by netanyahu and his government: 1) when netanyahu made an ad supporting the president's opponent during u.s. elections? what a stupid mistake. 2) how about when the israeli government, disrespectfully and arrogantly, announced settlement expansion, a day before the vice president were to arrive in israel for talks about peace negotiations? Clinton: Israeli settlement announcement insulting

oh and here is a link for you: http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0004_0_03769.html

lonjowett said his policy has been the same towards israel and he is correct. who cares if obama doesn't like netanyahu. not many people do. the policy towards israel has been the same for decades. the only president in the past 30 years who mildly stood up to AIPAC and israel's policy was bush sr, when he threatened to hold back loans if israel didn't dismantle and freeze the settlements. AIPAC crucified the guy and he lost the next elections. bush jr. didn't make the same mistake. obama, even though he obviously doesn't like netanyahu, continues to give the yearly billions to israel (in fact, he has increased it), he has dropped his demand for israel to freeze the settlements in order to start talks (even though that is part of the road map policy) and obama continues to shoot anything down at the UN that may disrupt the zionist regime.

ah, another attempt at stopping the conversation about the realities with accusations of conspiracy theories or anti-semitism. israel wants assad gone because syria is in a pact with iran and hezbollah. stop pretending otherwise. look at the list of people who wrote an open letter to obama, repeating what netanyahu and AIPAC are saying. these are israel-firster who also pushed for the war in iraq: Seth Cropsey James S. Denton Paula A. DeSutter Larry Diamond Dr. Paula J. Dobriansky Thomas Donnelly Dr. Michael Doran Mark Dubowitz Dr. Colin Dueck Dr. Nicholas Eberstadt Ambassador Eric S. Edelman Reuel Marc Gerecht Abe Greenwald Christopher J. Griffin John P. Hannah Bruce Pitcairn Jackson Ash Jain Dr. Kenneth Jensen Allison Johnson Dr. Robert G. Joseph Dr. Robert Kagan Lawrence F. Kaplan Jamie Kirchick Irina Krasovskaya Dr. William Kristol Bernard-Henri Levy Dr. Robert J. Lieber Senator Joseph I. Lieberman Tod Lindberg Dr. Thomas G. Mahnken Dr. Michael Makovsky Ann Marlowe Dr. Clifford D. May Dr. Alan Mendoza Dr. Joshua Muravchik Governor Tim Pawlenty Martin Peretz Danielle Pletka Dr. David Pollock Arch Puddington Karl Rove Randy Scheunemann Dan Senor Ambassador John Shattuck Lee Smith Henry D. Sokolski Ammar Abdulhamid Elliott Abrams Dr. Fouad Ajami Dr. Michael Auslin Gary Bauer Paul Berman Max Boot Ellen Bork Ambassador L. Paul Bremer Matthew R. J. Brodsky Dr. Eliot A. Cohen Senator Norm Coleman Ambassador William Courtney go on! cry conspiracy theory!

you failed to "get it", i know.

i answered the question just fine. you failed to get the answer you were looking for.

you have an opinion about my analogy and i disagree with it. i think it fits perfectly in regards to what this thread is about. i answered the question with an analogy. this is a lot more than you have done in several other threads where you've failed to answer questions.

uhmmm... the post you replied to had the source. the page included copies of letters and memos from the u.s. government which showed that the u.s. helped saddam use chemical weapons. you're so busy pounding your keyboard that you can't even pay attention to what you're replying to. focus rue. focus.

you might think that, but many other don't. including: U.S. military officers have deep doubts about impact, wisdom of a U.S. strike on Syria Former and current officers, many with the painful lessons of Iraq and Afghanistan on their minds, said the main reservations concern the potential unintended consequences of launching cruise missiles against Syria. Some questioned the use of military force as a punitive measure and suggested that the White House lacks a coherent strategy. http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-military-officers-have-deep-doubts-about-impact-wisdom-of-a-us-strike-on-syria/2013/08/29/825dd5d4-10ee-11e3-b4cb-fd7ce041d814_story.html