Shwa

There is no "splitting hairs" here. Leona Aglukkaq is not First Nations. Period. Do you refer to Scottish people as Welsh?

But you understand what I mean right? Inuit are not "First Nations" and neither are Metis. This provides disctinctions for the purposes of administration of the Indian Act, an Act of Parliament. Hence Indian and "Northern" Affairs. Surely, after the most excellent explanations over the past few pages, you understand this.

Like I said, shit-hole. Then you come here and try turn Canada into shit-hole too. Hitler Posse. Yet you here, taking, not giving back. Whining but no brains or balls to go back to shit-hole to fix it. For shame.

Yep, it really is that simple.

Leona Aglukkaq is Inuk. Inuit are not First Nations.

Are you sure about that? Please provide a cite for this, I would be interested to read all about the "drunken indians and corrupt indians chiefs" that didn't properly maintain the "water filtration plants." Please, hurry and provide me a cite or I will have to keep reminding you to.

Of course lying about a few little old procedures here and there is just so complex and unimportant. Who needs to see any documents or tell the truth in Parliament, those are just little games played by the silly politicians. How could contempt of Parliament possibly an issue at all?

But the truth that wasn't avoided was contempt of Parliament was it? I mean *how dare they* not answer direct questions about some alleged phantom "coalition" but how fast the CPC slink away when the contempt of Parliament questions start flying. But then again that is social conservatism right there isn't it. Contempt of Parliament is just the bsymptom of contempt for Canadians in general. Contempt for our democratic institutions? Why look, over there, they might be forming a coalition. Quick, look over there.

'Except you because you had to come here to get anywhere because your country was a shit-hole. Or you didn't have the guts to stay there and make it better place like so many Canadians have done here. You simply move and take advantage of what we have built up. The spend all your time complaining about it. Let me guess, your dining table is located in your bathroom.

Yeah, when we see you as the example of who they are letting in these days, we should be alarmed. Do us a favour and correct our mistake for us will ya?

We'll see. I wonder what is more condescending though? That people will focus so much of their time and effort on some phantom coalition all the while raising up those who were found - as in fact - that they were in contempt of Parliament? I mean, let's weight that out: On the one hand, a phantom coalition. On the other hand, contempt of Parliament Phantom coalition. Contempt of Parliament. Delusion. Reality.

What's funny is how someone like you could be a Canadian citizen after such a dismal score on the citizenship test. Right. You say so yourself. They let anyone in nowadays.

No, no, no, no. The "new and unused concept" is contempt for Parliament. That is just any old low, it is a new low. But it was just a little contempt and they really didn't mean it did they? I wonder if the majority of Canadians will take this into account when voting? At least the concept of a coalition is respectful of Parliament and our democracy and perfectly legla as it turns out. Can't say that about contempt of Parliament can you?

To be fair, the data is from Stats Canada, which makes the distinctions available.

And take pictures.

Answered already, read before. Stats not important, claim is proven before. Right, can't trust gun owners to be responsible and not like Jamaican posse. No threats. Just buy meat from supermarket and feed conservative food corporations. An enemy generally says and believes what he wishes. Thomas Jefferson No need for inventing of the guns or Olympic, more rights because of better contract negotiators.

But Europeans exterminated 6 million Jews and Ukrainians. Plus millions more. Of course to Spaceman Spiff. You have no proof because if you did you would use it. You don't, so you can't use it. The same 6 million that the Europeans exterminated?

No, YOU are suggesting that anyone that owns a gun should be able to be a crime fighter, which is exactly the reason we have gun crimes in the first place. Plenty of people have been killed by guns used for sports. Why do gun hunters wear special vests now? Go back and read. Already proven. No I am telling you that you should have rights only to buy meats in supermarket. Makes less criminals with illegal guns to spread around. The Indians.

Does gun ownership make them think they can? Can you explain WHY? Are members of a sport club legally allowed to carry handguns and arrest criminals? No, YOU explain. Nope, the guns are fine, you are the one shooting blanks. Doesn't matter what Olympic competitors think, even for barbaric sports using guns. Nope, they have a reason for sustenance hunting. You don't. You should get yours in the supermarket like everyone else. Leave the hunting to those who know how to properly care for their guns. Irrelevant.

No, since they can't control guns or the people that use them, the government has to do it for them. Rightfully so, since they are so incompetent the government has to babysit. Because the NFA is so uncooperative. See above. No, your guns are probably all fine. It is you who is shooting blanks. Which explains your fixation with guns. I don't think that, but from your paranois postings, I can see why you think they are. The only people who need guns are the police and soldiers. Go hunt deer with knife. It be more sporting and entertaining. Especially with a full grown rutting buck.

Interesting little tidbit from the Sun: White pride event sparks controversy Well, it seems like QMI is sparking controversy actually, by writing a story about it. But maybe people at the agency were thinking it would spice things up. However, is some guy - even though be was a former Canadian Nazi and White Supremacist - having a party on his property really controversial at all anymore?

Europeans exerminate 6 million Jews and tens of millions of others. America hasn't been around "for thousands of years" and you don't have any proof that the Indians did either. If you did, you would use it. You don't, so you can't use it. Still doesn't change the fact that Europeans exterminated 6 million Jews.

Nope, no you don't. If you did, you would use it. But you don't, so you can't use it. Europeans exerminated 6 million Jews among millions more. Europeans did that.

However, the phenomenon of creationism/intelligent design could be examined under psychology and anthropology.

Well, you have no proof whatsoever that the Ojibway experminated anyone, but the whole world knows that the Europeans exterminated 6 millions Jews and that ain't all. All of 'em.