Shwa

Canadian "citizenship?" Who said you could have "our" Canadian citizenship? I didn't. I didn't get the right to approve you or not. So I think your "citizenship" must be a mistake, a sham, a piece of paper with no weight to it. Unless you would like to attempt to prove otherwise, you are just another foreigner with a passing knowledge of "our" language.

Apparently your identity anxiety has been observed before. Perhaps this paper can help you out: American Identity Crisis Post September 11th: Nationalist vs. Internationalist Discourses in Online Discussion Groups

Being "in" Canada doesn't make you Canadian. So who decided eh?

Perhaps "most people" aren't interested in a technocracy or the mad ramblings of the technocrat. As for technology being the overwhelming driver or societal change, perhaps a driver, but hasn't quite yet overshadowed moral thinking. Until science can prove morality and develop a high-functioning neural network, all the tools in the world are mere artefacts in a 100 years. Of those times, technology says nothing. But I do hope they develop the technology to allow me to find out.

Fascinating. But anyways... I am sure you are still anxiously gawking.

"our resources" another head-in-the-sand attempt at an appeal to popularity. You don't even do French or English very well, who said you can belong to "our" country?

Yes, I've seen the simpleton argument before. Some of the police Mohawk Warriors acted up here or there, and therefore, all police Mohawk Warriors are bad. They're all bad because, well, they're mostly white BROWN people, and they have guns and wear uniforms and stuff, all of which is horrible. You know this because, well, who else would want to wear a uniform but someone horrible and depraved? But that doesn't change the facts. It doesn't change the eyewitness reports, or the media reports. Your friends enemies are vermin. And the fact you rush to their defense is simply an indication of your own lack of morality and judgement. Duh. Like you dummy, a pussy argues like you. And a dumb pussy I might add, since you had to ask. Oh now the crybaby schtick is it? Gawd, what a pussy.

With apologies to eyeball... Notwithstanding an American gawking at Canadians observing international news, a $725 billion military budget during troubling economic times is more indicative of anxiety than anything else.

There is no need for me to contradict you because you do it to yourself, often in the same post. Continually, like a broken record. Not to mention the actions of the police themselves, let's say at the recent G20 conference in Toronto. Colour has nothing to do with it. I was being totally honest - I think you are a pussy and argue like one. That is, weak, but lots of cute, meaningless hissing. I am sure "anyone" indicates another shameless appeal to popularity. Once again. Like a broken record. Did the fur your back get all bristly when you wrote that? "widespread public reputation" Another appeal to popularity. Because you are muckstuck and have no other method of discourse once you are so easily owned. But quoting some old article from the MacKenzie Institute gives you some magical powers of suddenly having undeniable insight into the cumulative impressions of what constitutes reputation in the Canadian public eye. Ironically you seem to be completely unaware of the connection between your absurd assertions and the fact that the military will be making apologies to "radical first nations." In other words, it is people like you that get it wrong in the first place.

I am not trying to contradict what you said, just simply pointing out how you blithely contradict yourself by using a very limited and inexperienced view. The fact is, you really don't know what you are talking about and your statements are merely uninformed opinions. The you continually bury your head in an appeal to popularity as if this is some sort of consolation for being completely wrong. You do this often. It's predictable by now. .No more than the bureaucracy, RCMP or Metro Toronto Police. BROWN has nothing to do with it. Another useless self-fulfilling opinion based on an unimportant viewpoint. No, I am betting it because all you appear to be is a pussy. Nothing more. BROWN has nothing to do with it. Nope, has nothing to do with genetics, BROWN people or language comprehension and everything to do with your poor writing skills and even more pathetic expressive ability. No wonder you are a low level government clerk. Dime a dozen. Stick to filing. Again with the inability to comprehend the obvious, like an Argus Muckstuck, trying to weasel out of getting pwned once again. Sorry Mr. Muckstuck, your Gazoo-like weaseling doesn't work. Talk to me about the bias of my several knowledgeable sources all the in defence of a single article from the MacKensize Institute from 15 years ago. Riiight. Says a guy who is so easily owned, like you are in this thread. You don't know what you are talking about and that extends to every other opinion you have, including your tepid personal attacks. You must be a drunk.

Oh yeah? Prove it! Oh... you just did. Well... thanks then!

Really? Like all those Hells Angels and Mafia tpes that literally get away with murder? How about all those cops in Toronto that shoot people, run people over, beat people up for nothing - at get let off by the SIU? How about all the killings, beatings and mayhem by the RCMP? Etc. How about all those corporations that polluted the shit out of our environment, destroyed lakes, wiped out entire environments, gave people cancerous diseases - all in the name of profit - where's their prison runs? One law indeed. One delusion is more like it. Yet the military is set to apologize to the Mohawks for getting it wrong. And it has nothing to do with BROWN people because you don't have a clue about Mohawk people. Other than the fact an average BROWN person is likely quite able to kick YOUR ass. And pretty easily I bet. My ancestors? You have no idea who my ancestors were and yet you assume. You are hilarious Argus, truly Argus Muckstuck, struggling in crapulance of your own muddled mind. Unbiased source? AS IF those are the only sources I have read, written or exerpienced! LOFL! The only problem is that you assume to deduce something from incomplete information and, no doubt, you make the same by assuming you are some 'regular citizen.' The old appeal-to-popularity again. Heck Argus Muckstuck, you're not even a "regular" conservative citizen, since most conservatives I know have far more on the ball than you do. You are fringe at best. Marginal. Weak and powerless. "we?" Appeal to popularity much? Of course you do since you are regularly pwned so much, what else do you have left? I gave you my sources, my experience with our Aborginal folks dwarfs yours, what are you going to do about it? Call me BROWN? Or a BROWN lover?? Or a BROWN sympathizer? LOLF!!! Seriously, you must be a drunk!

You too LoonBox, have a good one!

Not to interrupt another pwning of Saipan, but it occurred to me that him watching Fox News or SunTV is not likley going to hurt him one little bit. Now, back to your regularly scheduled pwning...

Yep, easy to recognize something once you practice it enough eh son?

I'm a PC lefty I guess, so where do I line up to make reparations to me? Just text me, I am taking the kids out for a steak and a hockey game and we are taking the Land Rover. The satellite should pick up your message.

It has nothing to do with skin colour and if you knew even the slightest thing about the Mohawk people you wouldn't have said something so dumb. Now I am not sure what skin colour you are, but surely you making stupid comments like this - repeatedly - is your own fault. Deduce what you will. What have I read? LOFL! Do you want a book listing, paper listing or do you want some of the names of Mohawk elders I have known and talk with at great length? How about Ojibway elders, or Cree elders or Cherokee elders or... etc. I suggest you start with John Ralston's Saul's 'A Fair Country' and try and grasp just even a little weensy bit of Canadian history. Otherwise you occupy the low ground and, as some wise old Mohawk warriors would say, are firmly stuck in the muck. Argus Muckstuck. Has a nice ring to it.

And yet we continue to spend hundreds of millions, largely on others. Not including charities. All this despite economic pressures.

Gotta clean up the domestic policy glossary first I suppose. You know, setting off bombs and murdering people at will isn't terror when it's in Montreal, but God forbid people stand up and throw squatters off their land. Where are the Black Donnellys when you need 'em?

He'll have to wait until SunTV comes up with a story about it. Then, you know, he'll have his proof.

Nope, wrong again Argus. Of course, all the pig ignorant lefties simply need to read 1996 articles from the MacKenzie Institute to develop their "realities." Blue skies and sunny days eh Argus? Or did you completely miss the point in the OP. You did, didn't you? Here let me summarize:

I hardly think that making a determination about a group of people based on the actions of a few is rationally worthwhile. Otherwise, the RCMP or Toronto police are 'like the mafia' since they have had members conduct illegal activities, drug smuggling, fraud, shootouts, etc. Equating the Mohawk Warrior Society - or any other traditional Native warrior society - with the Mafia is a real leap. Sure there are Native street gangs where the comparison might be closer to the truth, but not here. Otherwise your logic is extended into applying to whole communities and that is just plain dumb.

Seriously dre, this sort of remark is really disappointing. Now, had you said: "Maybe the sperm dealer should apologize to yo momma" you would have scored full points, but unfortunately I can only give you one laugh for this:

Of course you know I agree that we need to open the system up for inspection and data mining, etc. However, I don't understand how you arrive and privatization as the "only option" if we don't open the system up soon. How do you make that sort of leap?