lictor616

how can one assess the "damage" caused by words? of course... you CAN'T... which is why its simply not possible to accurately criminalize words in rational legal system- and in a rational legal system: no damage, no tort = no crime. If someone calls me a whitebread cracker... maybe i'm offended.. maybe i'm not... if someone punches me in the face and breaks my nose... there's no way I can't be affected by that... again there's absolutely no comparison... none whatsoever. there is ZERO equivalency. this is nothing like "record settling" or "eye for an eye" ... I call someone on the street an idiot and he stabs me: does that somehow make him "right" ... again... nonsense... this is a non-issue.

you couldn't even define "racist" a few posts ago. And the subject is Obama, and rather his ideological underpinnings- not the pooh=pooh nasty non-egalitarian anti-communist Heretic "sitting on the other side of your screen". Again with unsupported accusations... where have I been anti-semetic? WHERE!!&!!&!&!!?!?!?! And it follows btw that if the people who are B.O's favorite ideologues hate white people and america... that its quite right for us to suspect that Obama also hates "his" country. Right? I mean if the US were majority black, and a country founded by blacks, and a white president had as his favorite ideologue a white supremacists who hates black people and the blackness of a countries history (as Cone and Obama and Wright do with the "white-ness" of america) ... it'd be fair to say that the white president hates the country... right?

since when are words substantially equivalent to assault causing bodily harm? in what planet do yo live? And bullying and school metal detectors and shootingsn didn't happen before "diversity" happened... which is why this little incident occurred.

Ballsy Ballsillie mentioned financing a new arena in Québec... Hopefully this will come to fruition... I'd love for Hamilton and (especially Québec city) to have teams... support there would be an automatic sellout for like... forever..

yeah its not like crime rates and a history of majority black countries (who have the worst violent crime rates, worst record of achievements and progress) corroborate that... how does it feel to be so willfully obtuse in front of somebody that knows that you know that he knows that you don't really believe what you say you believe in ... who are you trying to fool ?

Yeah I'm sure the patriot act and other clear violations of the Constitutions were exactly what the forefathers would have applauded... are you this much of a cretin? you see, BC, this is why your country is heading over the cliff... you (like too many americans) are simply out of touch with reality. You take for granted the precarious safety given you by generations of complex and difficult statecraft, and also take for granted that america can only get better, not worse... you only think in a timeframe that goes back 4 years and, look ahead in a time frame of the next 1 or two years... you have no ability to understand your past and how you got here, and hence no ability to navigate your future. you don't understand how fragile freedom is... Jefferson would have warned you (probably in vain) that "the price of Freedom is eternal vigilance" and really, what understanding do ordinary americans have of this? None whatsoever. How vigilant are your credit card abusing, beer swilling American idol watching idiots who constitute the MAJORITY of the American electorate? How many of them even know the rough outlines of the constitution? How many can situate Korea on a map? How many even know anything about Adams, Jefferson et al.? You permit 13 to 20 million illegal aliens to squat in your country, destroy the social fabric, cost BILLIONS in taxes, run your hospitals and schools down into the ground, and also invite the possibility of violent rioting and revolution in your country... that's right you actually WILLINGLY invited the prospect of having a piece of your territory (the land your forefathers settled) broken off and given to a FOREIGN GOVERNMENT. You turn your republic into an empire: a hated and ill-stared empire that is inviting the prospect of terrorism and nuclear war... You turn a capitalist system with a well run gold and silver standard currency system, to have it replaced with trading stamps that are intrinsically worthless. You turn a capitalist and free economy, that once operated under the principle that the government must be tied down to ONLY essentials: national defense and property rights, to a huge communistic socialist welfare state, with taxes that would have scandalized Americans even 60 years ago... Would the forefathers or even americans from the 50's tolerated the prospect of having a large number of people in a territory with intentions on that territory? no no... I don't think they would have been quite so stupid as modern americans... You don't even realize that you ahve passed the point of no return and that you are now living under a dictatorship and tyranny as absolute as any known on earth. If you haven't noticed that fact, it is only because the tyrants have not yet used their power over you. Obambo has more power than Mao ever had--more, because Mao did not have the means of electronic surveillance and record-keeping that "your" Federal government is now using, and Mao, furthermore, could not change the long notorious inefficiency and ineptitude of all Communist governments. B.O.'s tyrannical powers, moreover, are entirely legal, as legality now goes in the country your parents and grandparents discarded in fits of idiocy, smug self-righteousness and complacency. By one of those progressive innovations in democratic governments that make me laugh cynically when I hear American simpletons talking as though they had a Constitution or a fairy godmother, remember that "Tricky Dicky" Nixon was empowered to issue in 1969 Executive Order 11,490, which became the Law of the Land sixty days later, when the Congress failed to use its theoretical power to annul it within that space of time. Get a copy of that order, read it, and shudder. Obama has only to utter four syllables, "Emergency," to exercise an ostensibly legal power to take over all the means of communication in the United States. He will have the power to seize all supplies of food and allocate the use of them, denying nourishment to you, if he has a whim to do so. He will be authorized to seize all of your property, including bank accounts, and determine what part, if any, of what was once your own you will be permitted to use at his pleasure. He will be able to haul you and your family from your home and turn it over to noble blacks or magnanimous mestizos. He will have power to ship you to any part of the United States, including Alaska and Hawaii, to become slave-labor and given any task that he sets for you. He will have, of course, a multitudinous bureaucracy, divided into twenty-seven departments, to carry out his tyranny, and they, needless to say, will obey his every nod. Obambo has only to say "Emergency!" So this, dear Americans, is what your Christian righteousness and humanitarian sentimentality have now brought you: an impending Orwellian Socialist state... but who cares right - why be vigilant when you can charge up a 52 inch LCD boob tube on your credit card and 30 pack of natural light beer? your ancestors would have said of you, that it would have been far better had you never been born...

that's some pretty intense Forum transgressive nonsense right there...

of course not, he's been taught by TV and crypto communist "educators" to be a victim, that racism against blacks is the worst moral offense one can commit (akin or worse then pedophilia) ... so of course the black lashes out at perceived "raycissum an sheeeyut" and to lash out violently at anybody who says anything remotely interpretable as "racism"... they've been told all their lives that they are beyond reproach adn that any wrong doing on their part is the fault of whites... they've been brainwashed into thinking that all fortunes and benefits flow to whites only... they are out of touch with reality... hence the reactions you see... also blacks as a general rule have had (at least historically) huge problems with self discipline... little wonder then...

correction, American's forgot what America WAS all about, what do you suppose any of your forefathers would have said had they seen the racial, cultural mess wrought by illegal mestizos? What about the federal reserve and socialist state? America is flushing all of its hard earned freedoms and time proven statecraft practices down the toilet, and here you are prating on canada... how silly...

Yeah, there is real relvence in La Raza movement.. who want to break off a part of the US and give it back to mexico (of course kicking out all the whites, blacks and asians)... The americans in their folly actually are taught to appreciate their parasites and look forward with glee to their impending doom.. Maybe we'd get more clout and respect if some French canadians decided to pour into New York, Vermont, Massachusetts et al. illegally, costing billions in tax subsidies to the doltish American Tax paying bovine animals, spitting on their culture and their people, desecrating their institutions, insisting to speak and be SPOKEN to in French, make crime skyrocket, and produce a movement bent on breaking off the north East to give it to their rightful owners: Quebec... maybe then the French Canadians could simply scream "racism" and get everything they want on a silver platter like the Mestizos do... maybe then the US would like us....

don't comment then silly

do us a favor and smoke opium alone in your basement... stop spewing noisome garbage to those rational "evolutionists" (!!!) among us... sit down quietly and keep your insolent and impudent "creation" cough** ""science"" cough cough** to yourself and other crazed dervishes...

Its funny how you don't see the sickening double standards in your method of judging racists... Earlier you called me a "despicable violent racist anti semite hate filled bigot" for correctly saying that Males of the royal family are circumcised by the Mohel of London.... (which again is an indisputable fact) Yet when a black "theologian" like Cone CALLS OUT FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF WHITE PEOPLE, or ignominious subjugation of whites (if they do not commit suicide) your reaction is all ho-hum... and that "there is no evidence he belieces in whites being inferiors" what a despicable and inglorious forfeit on your part... James Cone invariably calls white people "the Enemy" ... I mean for god's sake CANADIEN tell me your not this insanely blind and devoid of logic... If Bush had as his favorite ideologue a guy taht refered to blacks as "the enemy" what would be your reaction... like the grotesque hypocrite you are: you'd doubtless be foaming at the mouth with all the usual liberal epiteths and squeaks and squawks "racist" "fascist" "white supremacist" "bigot" etc ad infinitam nauseam... James Cone, quoted in William R Jones, “Divine Racism: The Unacknowledged Threshold Issue for Black Theology”, in African-American Religious Thought: An Anthology, ed Cornel West and Eddie Glaube, Westminster John Knox Press, 2003, pp. 850, 856. "Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community … Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love." From James Cone’s own, Black Theology and Black Power, 1997, Orbis, p.150: For white people, God’s reconciliation in Jesus Christ means that God has made black people a beautiful people; and if they are going to be in relationship with God, they must enter by means of their black brothers, who are a manifestation of God’s presence on earth. The assumption that one can know God without knowing blackness is the basic heresy of the white churches. They want God without blackness, Christ without obedience, love without death. What they fail to realize is that in America, God’s revelation on earth has always been black, red, or some other shocking shade, but never white. Whiteness, as revealed in the history of America, is the expression of what is wrong with man. It is a symbol of man’s depravity. God cannot be white even though white churches have portrayed him as white. When we look at what whiteness has done to the minds of men in this country, we can see clearly what the New Testament meant when it spoke of the principalities and powers. To speak of Satan and his powers becomes not just a way of speaking but a fact of reality. When we can see a people who are controlled by an ideology of whiteness, then we know what reconciliation must mean. The coming of Christ means a denial of what we thought we were. It means destroying the white devil in us. Reconciliation to God means that white people are prepared to deny themselves (whiteness), take up the cross (blackness) and follow Christ (black ghetto).

Listen I cited the evidence, you're the one simply rejecting out of hand without refuting... again its plain old argument avoiding... And why call me a gentile? To use a parallel term (although not equivalent) it would be like me calling you an infidel (while not being a Muslim)... so again, why do you call me a gentile goy boy?

? this information is readily available on any reasonably complete genealogy of the royal family... I took mine from Alfred J. Kolatach's The Jewish Book of Why (Middle Village, New York; Jonathan David, 1981): and read up on the Battenbergs (who changed their name to Mountbatten) ... none of this is secret or even debated... whether the information is on kkk.org has zero relevance... If the fact of heliocentricity was on kkk.org... would it make Galileo's work "anti-semetic" and hence "false"? And why do you call me a gentile? Are you jewish?

yes indeed, read this and shudder. what a diseased creature. How could such a brazenly Marxist degenerate be permitted to hold any public office? much less as president squatting in the white house... For those capable of resisting nausea, you should also read on his favorite ideologue, James Cone (a pint sized creature who resembles an enraged chimpanzee) who wrote a bundle of drivel called "Black liberation theology"... who teaches that (of course)"white devils" were created by a "Black scientist" named Yakub (9000 years ago near the earth's core) and that he "was determined to create, artificially, a race of debased and inferior creatures"... but "something went wrong" with the experiment... From there, Cone attests that the ancient Israelites were sub-Saharan "negroes" and that Jesus was a black man with dark black skin and dreads, and even that China used to be a black civilization 2000 years ago... He also predicts that whites will have to commit suicide or self exterminate in order to submit to the will of "Yakub" If a white candidate for the presidency had as his favorite ideologue: a white racist man who wrote about how White men invented blacks near the earth,s core and called for the extermination of blacks... ask yourselves, would he have a chance at the presidency? What would the media do to him? What more proof does one need to understand that America has passed the point of no return and is occupied by its implacable enemies?

Lol I even NAMED the Jewish name that was incorporated into the Royal family.... and Explain please (as I asked you) HOW any of what I said is anti-semetic... could you actually for once have the rigor to explain your accusations? Why is it somehow "racist or anti-semetic" to say that Jews are royalty in England and have been for a very long time? Why should it be illegal to mention the routine circumsizion of the males of the Monarchy by the Mohel of london? I still fail to see how any of this qualifies as antipathy towards jews...

Yes that's right compare yourself to the communism-ravaged portions of the world... but even still, Slovania, has a higher Life Quality index then mexico. And i dunno, shouldn't we be aiming for BETTER rather then worst? Actually don't reply bushy...

Eventually, the Amero will come to replace the canadian and american dollar... and we will merge with mexico and see our standards of living plummit to about the level of MAY-HEE-ko

noting that the British aristocracy is at least HALF Jewish, and that the Mohel of London has ritually circumsized all the men of the royal family since henry the 8th is a mere, unpolished historical fact. how is it "anti-jewish"? Does it even make Jews look bad? Absolutely not! so what's with the stupid accusations? Oh yes that's right... to sidetrack and obfuscate an argument...

none of that is anti jewish...

talking with no action= talking...

blah blah blah... more empty verbiage and hot air ... meaningless drivel to make the American sheeple bleat. haven't you people learned anythign yet?

Again, why don't you just come out and say then that diversity IS NOT A STRENGTH then? The main idea of multiculturalism that you've outlined here is the equal value of all cultures & races (i.e. cultural relativism). However, multiculturalism does not mean cultures as usually understood but rather as biologically-defined (i.e., ethnically, racially, or sexually defined) groups. Multiculturalism, a politicized form of cultural relativism, rejects the idea that there are general truths, norms, or rules with respect to both knowledge and morals. And multiculturalism doesn't treat people as individuals either... It treats people as replaceable atoms collectively constructed by their racial, ethnic, or sexual group. Multiculturalism hyphenates Canadians, divides them. Multiculturalism aims to swap individual rights with collectivism by assuming that a person's identity and value is derived solely from biology and origin, and that what is important is not what a person does as an individual, but rather what some members of his biological group currently do or did years ago. So why aren't you opposing it then? You're telling me it doesn't matter whether your co-citizens: speak the same language as you, look like you, think like you, have similar values, similar dietary habits, similar ways of viewing the world, similar customs/traditions mores etc? Thats irrelevant to you? Ah so what you're describing is a environment where people try to rub shoulders as little as possible with people who are unlike themselves and for the most part try to ignore. You're describing the precise opposite of a community. What sort of social fabric would that produce? a cluster of disconnected rootless and suspicious people all trying their damnedest to ignore each other as much as possible... and actually that's WHAT WE HAVE TODAY (at least in our big cities) Add to that the prospect of minorities competing with each other and the majority (euro-canadians) for who gets the most "breaks" and preferential treatment from the gubmint' How is this NOT a weakness? AND WHAT THE HELL DID I SAY THAT WAS ANTI-JEWISH!??!

and look at how well that turned out! Look at how much ABO love there is for "white guys" today... And strangely... I don't remember any native celebrating European presence anytime in my life... If diversity was bad for Natives... why is it wise to assume that it will be good for "whitey".