lictor616

i'm sorry I know of no advocacy groups such as the NAACP for whites... there's a black legal caucus... i've never heard of a white one.. and obviously we can imagine what the reaction would be on capuses if someone proposed say: a white engineers club... of course this is tread drift: we were on the subject of double standards in media coverage of interracial crimes... you've ignored the many and repeated details which show up an obscene double standard... you're stalled... I don,t know waht else to say... all you do is repeat the same question and ignore the evidence: kimmy also did a far better job at exposing these double standards... perhaps you should attempt a rebuttal at her last comment? I really don't understand your feigned confusion, one crime is a scuffle between 3 whites and a black, the word racism is used rampantly, it is described as a hatecrime, and charges of hatecrimes are investigated by the human rights council... invert the races, in montreal a little white girl is mauled by a still larger gang of snarling blacks, and the media gives it only local and short coverage, and no article even hints at the potential of a hate crime or racism (even though the evidence is far more abundant in the montreal case) you gloss over that as if your question hadn't been answered! it's actually rather funny. from there you say that whites are also permitted to be proud of their race, as if you didn't know the intricacies and disastrous consequences that a white would inevitably face if he was ballsy enough to say he was proud if his race! lol imagine a public figure... Ignatief say, making apublic comment about how proud he was of the white race! his life would be finished in an instant! and you know it... but I don't expect you to be honest about it at this point... what a torrent of obvious deception and ploys!

I said the hated "bell curve"... Of course many people resist the obvious data, because it undermines their religion of political correctness... political correctness and ideological bias is very real in scientific quarters, many scientists stay away from such research because it means harassment by the stupid and hate filled media goons. The Bell curve is one of the most misquoted and misunderstood compendium on race biometry in the world. and of course people usually mention it side by side with words such as "hitler" "nazi" "holocaust" etc... Political correctness after all is a religion based on a blind emotionalism, as other religions (Christianity for one), and never fails to inspire hatred in its votaries.

(http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,573826,00.html?test=latestnews) (copy paste link in browser) also try: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2384087/posts "Arkansas Anchorwoman's Face Shattered 'Like an Egg' During Attack" the wonders of the "colored brother" snip-- "LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — One blow ruined her smile and others crushed the middle of her face, but the attack on television personality Anne Pressly didn't end until after her jaw was forced to the back of her head and cut off blood flow to her brain, a medical examiner said Tuesday." A black savage raped, horribly disfigured and robbed a white woman... does news about the story include the word "hate" or "racism" or "bigotry"... ahahahaha! of course not! This is just another incident that will not be described in the SPLC’s Intelligence Report as a hate crime of course... and actually I'm ready to bet that if it ever gets discovered that this white woman rejected the black man's advances, that SHE'D be the one called a "hater" or "bigot" by the reptilian like prostitutes who manage our press. my god, I weep for the future.

The complete degeneration and suicide of the UK, once the cynosure of the Western World, is almost complete. Britain has shown herself unfit for survival. Muslims are allowed and in some cases encouraged to talk loudly about their whim to DOMINATE the UK and kick out all non-muslims: see this video clip and shudder: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttz8-ucWhYc were are all those naysayers now? all those duped liberals and labourites who keep assuring us that immigrants have good intentions... who force us to integrate our enemies and even pay for them? what do they have to say now?

reread the article yourself. "cell invasion that use bacteria and viruses to forcefully break a cell's natural defences to allow foreign genetic material to enter and create the ‘genetically modified organism'. And then there's the antibiotic markers inserted into the cell to confirm that the new genetic sequence is working. Underlining this violent process is the 40-year-old outdated ‘science' and false belief that the selected and inserted single gene controls the one unique and desirable trait. Researchers now know that one gene expresses many traits and can recombine when released to the wild with unknown outcomes." for a nice explanation of how cell invasion is done: pause this film at 25 minutes and watch on: http://www.personalgrowthcourses.net/video/gmo_food_genetically_modified.php

you have no idea once again what you are talking about: GM crops are crafted by attacking the cells and GENES of plantlife: they achieve this by compromising the plants immune system (injecting it with various bacteria and viruses) and then putting foreign DNA directly into the genetic structure of the plant. Cell invasion is nothing like normal plant evolution... it really is a completely different thing. btw, you should know that the latest outbreaks of salmonella and e-coli have been shown to be caused in part by GM crops... again please learn more.

and I'm terribly sorry for taking the bate... I got distracted.. I should have known that it was merely an attempt at thread drift... anyways its not as if this thread was going anywhere, how much do you wanna bet that Harnder and Dancer et al are going to ask us again for the proof of media bias, despite the devastating examples you just lifted.. call it willful obtuseness I suppose...

utterly false, biotech crops (cell invasion biotechnology) are about 14 years old... the only BT crops that are largely cultivated are corn, cotton, soya, canola, tomatoes and a few other minor crops... the rest is still normal agriculture that is not genetically modified. again, just educate yourself.

again, you simply don't know what you're talking about... BT corn and other GM crops cross-pollinate and create genetic monsters all around the eco system in which they are introduced. its extremely unstable..

lol! Yet in Courtnay it did! why? just because the race of the victim was BLACK! again you fail to realize that RACIAL EPITHETS DID TURN THE COURTNAY SCRUM into a HATECRIME, that's what the media kept yammering about, "racists attacks" "biggotry fueled attack" and other clear statements... the balck victim Phillips, in Courtenay is actually touring schools to give talks about racism! Do you suppose the little white girl was given any sort of similar invitation? of course not! all of this you once again, simply ignore to suit your failed argument. When a white person's says the N word, his very livelihood is at risk, that's another double standard that I don't want to get into, but clearly you're being dishonest by pretending not to notice these things...

Race certainly has IQ implications, because race indicates certain types of gene clusters... that's what race is essentially, clusters of genetic material that expresses itself in very obvious and measurable ways. Brain growth and IQ is genetically determined, Race differences in average IQ are genetic: http://www.news-medical.net/news/2005/04/26/9530.aspx we all know this. Likewise we know that different races have different genetic traits, contrary to the dogma and absurdity of liberal egalitarianism, race is not merely a skin tone... it affects all manner of developmental processes... there are many many studies who have established that the cranial sutures in black children "solidify" at earlier ages then whites... that's one way in which racial characteristics often express themselves. and black children also have very high rates of Familial idiopathic hypertrophic osteoarthropathy http://www.springerlink.com/content/nk2881q245n7l454/ Of course again racial taxonomy does not say that every black is doomed to have an IQ of 75, however reports such as the vehemently hated Bell Curve do measure the available data with very sound methodology to put forth suggestive estimates. And so far the conclusion reached by the bell curve still are largely correct... black children in the US for instance, are at the bottom rung academic achievement DESPITE preferential treatment and affirmative action and the no child left behind act... have you looked at the READING ACHIEVEMENT GAP in black kids? Its nearly 3 grades lower! and again, these stats are UNIVERSAL ANYWHERE AND EVERYWHERE BLACKS are, whether its haiti, South Africa,the Congo, south america, the US, the UK etc... its the same today as it was thousands of years ago, you have to admit that there is no shortage of evidence.

the Courtenay example is one which you still continue to ignore: the three whites were not ideologically racist... they weren't white nationalists, and no one would describe them as racists... of course that didn't stop the police from saying it was hate motivated without even prodding in the matter... apparently saying the N word makes one a dangerous Ku Kluxer... again compare that the parc carignan assault: where 3 blacks are insulting the white girl calling her: "Sale pute blanche" ie: "dirty white whore" "stupide singe de cave" ie: "cave monkey" and in creole: "bobotte senti de sale blanche" ie: "dirty white c***" "nique ta race" ie: "f**k your race" if black people use these words... strangely no one notices it, and the media certainly don't automatically use the word hatecrime because of these racial expletives... keep ignoring reality though...

lol what a silly statement! well again if you look at ALL violent crime: the stats are that half the violent crimes in a country of 300+ million are caused by one group: blacks... a 12-13% minority. whites are 6 times more numerous, yet cause half the violent crimes that blacks do... and you see this as "normal"?! There's also asians stats which further complicate the issue: Asians commit crimes at 22% the white rate... that's right Asians are 4 times less likely to be criminals then whites! asians don't commit a sliver of the black crime and are even MORE of a minority...

awww really? really? Hardner? REAlly? did I employ the word dominant? You on the other hand said that it was INSIGNIFICANT... ie: not a factor at all. Yes a person's race CAN be a clue, race does generalize to a certain degree of accuracy, now obviously racial taxonomy is not 100% error proof, but if we consider the record, it yields predictable results. In controlled tests all over the globe, in the record of scientific and problem solving abilities, you can clearly see that all races do not produce the same results. As is obvious from the very different historical records and civilization craft found among broadly defined races: sub saharan africans have been around longer then Asians... yet China has a very respectable 6000 year literate history, that cannot be said of sub saharan Africans, who to this day despite trillions in "aid" are still incapable of producing the rudiments of a stable, viable civilized society. Landing 1 million congo pygmies or Dinka tribesmen in an area will produce a very different society then an area populated by one million northern asiatics say. No "scientist" has ever come to say that a person's aptitudes was 100% derived from nature or completely derived from nurture... At least I have never heard of anyone make such an argument. The consensus is generally that both play nearly equal parts. Both nurture and nature play very real and important roles.

what an absurd statement. Our government bends over backwards to accommodate the fragile petulant whims and temper tantrums of natives. Natives have resorted to straight up armed insurrection and occupation lands and businesses (as surely as they did in caledonia) to hold up the government. So much is already given to the sacrosanct natives, and you want more? Its amazing that you can say that about natives while babbling about equality and the "evils of racism" from the other side of your mouth... its clear you're a racist and detest equality.

well obviously i'm talking about the ones who DON'T assimilate. Certain immigrant groups are vastly capable of adapting constructively (even if they don't become super orthodox canucks), northern asiatics usually contribute much to this country, opening many businesses, being very capable and well disciplined (often more so then "white" canadians).

that's not what I meant through A and B... but anyways. That "explanation" doesn't hold any water as anyone will tell you that kenyans for instance do indeed share genetic aptitudes that DO reflect group differences. too much genetic variation? What you're implying is that it isn't measurable... but it is... a black couple will never have a blond haired asian looking child... anyways, apparently holding all these damnable opinions (which you aren't able to refute or even attenuate, and in many aspects agree with) are what you think make me a neo-nazi... and some sort of mental defective that needs to be put in a concentration camp or something... and you call me the extremist?! lol

the attack was 100% black on white... I don't understand how people keep avoiding that... the video evidence is pretty obvious... Its only when an attack is non-white on white that people start to look for excuses: "oh it was a high school rivalry" "oh it was just teenage hormones" "oh there was a latina in the crowd stomping the white girl" "Oh it was anglo vs french" painfully obvious... If i'd be giving similar excuses to the Courtenay incident, I'd get labeled a racist for ignoring the potential for racism... when the victim is white however, its the reverse situation, you get called a racist if you even think of saying the word "hatecrime"...

all of which are temporary band aid solutions with pretty drastic consequences... machinery equals energy, genetically modified foods are terribly unsafe (for both human consumption and the environment) and unviable (and can actually destroy an entire eco system), sythetic fertilizers pollute enormously and do not allow for the earth to regenerate naturally (look up over fertilization... ) these are not solutions so much as new problems... potentially fatal unsolvable problems... none of which will see us through the coming disaster that people with your mindset are bringing to all of us. you don't understand the reality of our plight... and I shouldn't have to educate you... seek the answers yourself. your comment on making potatoes "immune to disease" would be funny if it weren't so utterly dangerously absurd. here's part 1 of the Future Of Food:

please I beg you, explain why through A and B...

you are indeed very clueless and very arrogant in your ignorance. see this for biotechnology, and where its taking us: http://www.imdb.com/video/snag/vi273285913/ even the hopelessly liberal crs: has issued countless warnings about an impending food crisis (deemed IMMINENT): http://crs.org/egypt/worldwide-food-crisis/ http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=213343 what's wrong with having only a few varieties of potatoes what are you a high schooler? HAve you ever heard of the Irish famine!? Having few varieties means that if a plant disease pops up (as it always does) it eradicates your food source! go ahead and remedy the inadequacies of your knowledge on the subject before you go and spew your nonsense...

remebering what? our homophobic, xenophobic, racist ancestors who gave us this country? pffff meh! so politically incorrect!

different cultures, are a byproduct of different human stock and human communities... so cultural factors are side effect of sorts... To say that a person's biology is not SIGNIFICANT in determining weather a person will have certain attributes is absurd. Cultural and environmental factors only go so far... besides nurture... there's a little thing called nature, you cannot make a genius out of someone with Downs no matter how great your teaching technique is. Emphasis on reading, will not change the biology of a person and give him "cerebral potency" he did not have in his genes. To say that human stocks with different hormonal levels, different IQ's and types of intelligence have "INSIGNIFICANT" effects on the type of societies humans create, is simply as outrageous and brazenly ridiculous as anything I've ever heard from liberal egalitarians. There is no such thing as a "debate" on nature vs. nurture... it's 50/50. and one's nature is not insignificant... sorry, it just isn't.

That's disputable, we can at present, but please know that (for instance) 68% of Europe's arable land is over fertilized, and that many areas of the world are running out of of the precious commodity... please understand also that the earth is not an infinite trash can, producing food, produces waste... much waste and consumes enormous amounts of energy (in india, most of the billion+ strong population (58%) cook on open fires, which is disastrous for global warming... Most "agricultural scientists" agree that we can continue produce food at this rate for ALL of 20 to 40 years... after that... world famine. There is no reason to expand the human population... we should focus on LIFE QUALITY... not human stock quantity. As for exploring space to colonize other world and use THEIR resources... that's not within the next 200 years... we don't have that kind of time... we definitely should aim for space conquest... but that isn't a practical solution at all for the time being. Our food crisis is actually much more dramatic... science actually is ENDANGERING our food supply, synthetic fertilizers are polluting water, and wasting lands... also mass farming is creating a lot of "monoculture" (ie: cultivation of small varieties of produce- for example: 3 types of potatoes constitute 98% of North American production... it used to be 80 20 years ago, and 300 a century ago). then there's the dread BT corn soya and tomatoes, who may singlehandedly wipe out our entire food source. I understand that its more pleasant to look at the world with rose tinted glasses, but we're not playing with our live here... do you really think we need 3 +billion more humans? what if there's a 10% chance that we may self destruct by doing so? I really have a hard time understanding the humanitarian lunacy of wanting to feed the wretched refuse of the third world to help them multiply

So you concede that we are different... the only difference is your absurd claim that the differences amount to zero.... Differences between humans of the same cline or race are very noticeable and yeild measurable results... likewise (and even more so) ACROSS racial lines. Different races have different susceptibility to specific disease, different types and degrees of intelligence, different skeletal structures, craniometry, facial angles, different maturation rates, different maturity ages, different muscle composition, hormonal secretion, on top of that, races produce vastly differing societies, produce different language systems, different "ways of viewing the world"... only a madman would say that these differences are ZERO and insignificant... even the difference between two identical twins IS significant... What you propose amounts to reducing everything to the lowest common denominator, reducing everything the their basest simplicity so as to lessen or efface (or buff out) the inequalities. This type of discounting doesn't impose on anyone who is willing to consider this objectively. Second, the opinion of many people didn't account for anything... what you're saying is that you HOPE that many people would have these rights... but in reality, they do not... they simply DO NOT HAVE THEM... ergo there is no such thing as "universal human rights"...