lictor616

You're already engaged in a holy war against Western Civilization... I guess your hands are full, I understand.

What political right is that? The centrist conservatives? I mean really what presence does the real articulate, non-religion crazed right have? UKIP? Perhaps the BNP or the NDP in Germany? Who put up with incessant death threats, domestic terrorism, tarring and insults? are those the delicate dainty "right wingers" you refer to?

meh, might as well add some quotes: “Truth is hate to those who hate the truth.” “In a corrupt society, the truth can be found in what is forbidden to say.” “Nations are like leaves; they change color before they fall.” and here's one to you libertarians out there: “Gold is the currency of kings; silver is the currency of gentlemen; barter is the currency of peasants, and debt is the currency of slaves.”

“Masculine republics decline into feminine democracies and democracies into despotism.” –Aristotle I think we're nearing the final stage... see what crypto-communist nanny state welfarism has brought you?

If you sample the bleating sheeple worshiping Obama as a god, in a sea of mindless emotionalism for this mediocrity of a man- you don't see a contradiction with your statement...

it always amazes me how self-described atheists and secular rationalists, when liberal and leftist, put up with the most anti-secularist, anti-freedom policies and schemes... its because ultimately, leftists are suffering from their own religion of political correctness.

lolz, I see no point to hold you in suspense on what my view on this subject would be. But, at this point I believe the question is nugatory, in a few decades... and by few i mean no more then 20 years, Western economies will implode on their idiotically contrived debt, and the weight of their welfare dependents, Canada will be 50% non-european, and probably will be enjoying the type of atmosphere that one can see in Detroit today. At that point we will have become a failed state, like mexico... Why even bother?

I agree, but we should also note that politics today have devolved into a religion, that of political correctness... "Liberalism" is akin to a religion, like the Christianity from which it sprang, it is based on the same social superstitions, yet devoid of a supernatural deity. "All men are created equal", "blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the earth" these are all analogous to our current political ideology, and i'm afraid they are based just as much in the superstitious. I agree though, Churches (and Mosques and Temples and any other salvation shop wink, wink) should be taxed like any other businesses. I'd also love to see the abolition of kirpan daggers, burkas and other grotesque aspects from the more barbarous religions. But that will not come out of our current circumstances, in this age of mass immigration, mass democracy and weak minded liberalism with suicidal political correctness. Our people have simply become too indolent and irrational to act in their own self interest.

if the cotrolled mass media are apoplectic about a statement of his, he must be doing something right then.

First off anyone who uses a montage from the loathsome rachel "madcow" show is doubtless not interested in reasonable discussion. The man is merely stating a fact when he says that the restrictive policies of the Civil "Riots" act leads to decreased freedom of association, decreased freedom to hire and fire who you want and of course GREATLY increases the incidence of government intervention and regimentation of the relationships between citizens. If anyone can dispute that with a straight face... then that person is either an idiot or suffering from severe nearsightedness and what would amount to paralysis of the cerebrum. This brings to mind some "controversial" (cough cough) statements made by one Hans-Hermann Hoppe, a libertarian who teaches economics at University of Nevada at Las Vegas Professor Hoppe takes the interesting view that democracies are inferior to monarchies... largely because Monarchs aim to increase the value of their kingdom (because they own it) and benefit if their people increase in quality. An analogy comes to mind: one who owns a car is more likely to take good care of it then one that merely rents a car... Likewise in a democracy the maximum leader merely is renting the "kingdom" who want to get as much out of their temporary ownership as possible (by braking hard, driving recklessly, fiddling with the gears etc). "They have to appeal to the mob to be elected, and once in office care more about short-term exploitation than long-term improvements." "An owner/king has a simple immigration policy: He expels criminals and losers and admits only productive people. Prof. Hoppe explains how presidents are different" viz: I quote the sagacious professor: “ums and unproductive people may well be preferred as residents and citizens, because they create more so-called ‘social problems,’ and democratic rulers thrive on the existence of such problems. Moreover, bums and inferior people will likely support egalitarian policies, whereas geniuses and superior people will not. The result of this policy of non-discrimination [in immigration policy] is forced integration: the forcing of masses of inferior immigrants onto domestic property owners who, if the decision were left to them, would have sharply discriminated and chosen very different neighbors for themselves.” breath of fresh air...

why don't you follow this point: go ahead and view this documentary: http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=conversation+about+race&emb=0&aq=f# you'll understand that YOU ARE THE ONE WHO ARRIVES: "at the table with conclusions in tow"... earlier you were rejecting CLEAR and unmistakable bias simply because you already accept that only whites can be racist! now please do a little soul searching before you ask me about the evidence of bias in the media again! lol I laughed hard enough already.

I believe blacks (if they are to be integrated into our society) should be treated equally... with absolutely no considerations made on their race. in short, no affirmative action, no preferential treatment, no "blacks only" associations and churches... knawimean dawg? You seem to be operating under the delusions that blacks already ARE treated equally, when alas in reality: they are TREATED BETTER and are afforded many benefits unavailable to other races (especially whites). About segregation, I think that blacks have been clear that that's their intention at least... why do they set up all black schools, all black neighborhoods, black TV stations, black associations and groups, black liberation theology? why is diversity and togetherness for whites only? blacks certainly don't have anything nice to say about whites generally, in fact they resent us quite a lot. And they resent you micheal, even if you think they don't they do... trust me, they do.

talk about the kettle calling the pot black: why so evasive Mikey pooh? care to explain why naughty songs by white people get the boot, and naughty songs by blacks are A-ok?

if there are 5 black on white hate crimes committed for every ! white on black, then yes, the news should reflect this, and the media by distorting reality, are actually trying to conjure up the image that WHITES are the "dogs" in this instance... which isn't the case. Actually our whole political ideology is based on the notion that white people are somehow supremely evil and dangerous.

outrageously false. The crimes are UNDER-reported, and many of them (stansfeild for exmaple) are NOT REPORTED AT ALL. The rates are published... but the clear data is from the BOJ are completely unmentioned by the mass media- interracial rape rates are completey ignored by the mass media. why lie to make a point you know everyone knows is BS <

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/local_state/story/183867.html Judges have been turning deaf ears to defendants’ requests to delay murder cases to examine whether they face the death penalty because of their skin color. Four months ago, North Carolina lawmakers passed a ground-breaking law that allows defendants to avoid a capital trial or seek relief from a death sentence because of racial bias. In recent weeks, some judges have refused to consider requests to allow time to examine the role of race. snip----------------------- No one has been executed in North Carolina since August 2006, when legal challenges in state and federal courts halted the death penalty. Despite that, prosecutors in the state have been pursuing punishment by death with as much fervor as in prior years. Of the roughly 1,200 pending first-degree murder cases, at least 250 are capital cases, according to the state Capital Defender’s Office. Of the 25 capital trials in 2007 and 2008, juries imposed death four times. The death row population is 163. years ago I recall liberal reporters in NYC asked Mayor Ed Koch how he could support the “racist” death penalty. Their jaws dropped when Koch correctly noted that since capital punishment was reinstated in the late 70s whites were now far more likely to be executed than blacks.

I'll have to concede that her work was indeed far more cogent and better presented then mine, and looking at it now, it is strange that you chose to ask ME to restate what had already been stated by Kimmy... strange behavior for someone who isn't looking to obfuscate an argument.

omg sample this bit of pap: Ayers, Dohrn Accuse Hillary of ‘White Supremacy’ More news stories on Elections Aaron Klein, WorldNetDaily, November 12, 2009 "Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign for the Democrat nomination deliberately appealed to white supremacy, fear and anxiety, charged longtime Barack Obama colleague and Weatherman terrorist William Ayers and wife, Bernardine Dohrn. In a co-authored article in the socialist Monthly Review magazine, the two radicals argued last year’s national elections had “racist” undertones and that President Obama’s ascent to power can be used to “build a new society.” “[Hillary] Clinton flagrantly appealed to white voters’ identity as ‘workers’ or ‘women’—offering white people any reason to vote against Obama without saying he’s black—and followed the ancient and dismal road of racial discourse that appeals to white supremacy, fear and anxiety,” wrote Ayers and Dohrn. The two referenced a New York Times opinion piece by feminist activist Gloria Steinem, “Women are Never Front-Runners,” written on the eve of the New Hampshire primary. Steinem argued the gender barrier had not yet been broken and asked, “Why is the sex barrier not taken as seriously as the racial one?” deary me! oh my GOD! even the most cooked out far-left crypto commie White liberals aren’t immune from being called a racist by petulant lefties. Limousine Liberals, always think that it’s only other Whites who’ll be called “Racist Haters,” while they themselves bask in the self-righteous glory of their own Inclusive Multiculturalism. I for one rejoice at this bit of news.

the justice system already is doing that, it excuses hateful behavior if that hateful behavior is perpetrated by non-whites. They also excuse the acts of people if they are of a certain non-white race. Everyone knows that a "hatecrime" is synonymous with "white on black crime" ... that's what everyone thinks of when they say the word. A hatecrime is for all practical purposes a white's only crime and sentenced to whites only..

of course black people, who are victims are far less interracial crimes, and who don't have to submit to the nonstop "watch your mouth" self censorship that whites have to go through, who get preferential treatment in hiring and admissions, who get affirmative action, race based organizations, tv Stations (BET)... these are the people who are discriminated against and need to organize and talk about whitey? really? What about the little white 14 year old girl in Carignan, who was assaulted and targeted because she was white? What about the thousands of white people who are targeted and attacked because of their race? What about the many white people who are snubbed out of a job for not having dark enough skin? What about the thousands of white women who are raped by blacks each year? they don't need to get together and talk about the REAL racism they endure? again, just admit it HARDNER WAHT ARE YOU WAITING FOR... just tell us how you think white people can't be victims of racism! just spit it out!

AH! I see so their nation IS THEIR RACE! ¸ silly me now I understand... But again if whites try with equal fervor to connect on that level: they're called hate mongers, neonazis and dangerous bigots... and amazingly you don't see the double standard here? by the way, most of them can easily trace back their ancestry as coming from the african west coast, and even there, a DNA test can usually tell you with a great degree of precision where your ancestors came from. but nevermind...

Hate crimes are abhorrent apparently only when WHITE PEOPLE commit them, as we've seen, blacks are far more likely to assault whites then vice versa, and the media coverage of such crimes clearly does not corroborate this reality. And again, the media's evidence of "racial motivation" is pretty flimsy, if a person's utters the N-word that in itslef seems to be sufficient validation of a hatecrime... and again in many cases if the attacker is simply white, the media have NO PROBLEM at all at least asking the question: WAS HATE INVOLVED? In the Channon murder/rape/torture, and the Anne Pressly rape/murder, the words "race", "hate", "racial bias", "hate crime" appear NOWHERE IN the articles cited... I find that conspicuous in deed don't you? oh that's right of course you don't! because you think that only white people are racists. i,m asking for more coverage because people should know about these heinous crimes... if most interracial crimes involve white victims, I think people should be alerted by the news media (who's job it is to INFORM). For the media to cherry pick almost exclusively: white on black crime is a willful distortion of the truth, and leads many people to live in a dreamworld that doesn't exist, where only white people are potential haters and dangerous... and so people are less likely to try to change things, and the interracial crime rates will persist and continue to make the white body count skyrocket

oh puuuhlease!!!! ahahahah! do you actually believe that tripe Hardner? or are you trying to fleece the right winger? African american? In toronto?!?!!? wth? And do they need a race based association group for the purpose of "tracing back their original ancestry"? Why must they form group associations that are RACE BASED IN UNIVERSITIES if as you say: the point is just to connect with their Nationality and ethnic origins (be taht Rwandan, Congolese or what have you)? and then to go from there and denying such race based organizations for WHITES (and ONLY WHITES MIND YOU) because apparently whites all know exactly where their ancestry is from and hence... um don't need to connect with it? Why don't you just admit that you don't like the idea of white people getting together AS "white people" for any purpose at all! Just admit it, its time for you to save a little face here, you seem pretty ridiculous Hardner! instead of trying to get me on the run again by talking about the silly, boring, repetitious litany of ... "ohh, sniff sniff, slavery", and sob about what I think about black people's aptitudes in universities... This is your typical bias showing up again, you know that blacks get preferential treatment in college admission and then, can form race based associations that are for all practical purposes off limits to "whitey" and what are you saying about it? you call me a racist, and say that the privileges and perks given to blacks because of their race ... somehow.. SOMEHOW... isn't "reverse racism" or racist at all.. oh no, not in the slightest! lool go on !

http://www.nems360.com/pages/full_story/push?article-UPDATE-+Ole+Miss+song+banned%20&id=4409147-UPDATE-+Ole+Miss+song+banned&instance=home_news_1st_left Continued chants “The South Shall Rise Again” today cost Ole Miss fans a favorite game tune, “From Dixie With Love.” Chancellor Dan Jones banned the playing of the pep song medley because fans refused to stop the chant. {snip} The song is a blend of “Dixie,” “All My Trials” and the “Battle Hymn of the Republic” written by an assistant band director in the mid-1970s apparently as a way to get away from just “Dixie,” which had become offensive to many peoploe [sic] in the post Civil Rights era. yes this song is the new enemy and bar to "equality": see when something is offensive to non-whites, we have to ban it, but when something is offensive to whites ... its called "freedom of speech"... understand?

This latest bit of British insanity comes to us from the Daily mail: Stephen Wright, November 9, 2009 "Officers have been advised to use the phrase ‘multi-perpetrator rape’ when describing sex attacks Politically correct Scotland Yard chiefs have stopped using the term ‘gang rape’ because it is too ‘emotive’, the Mail can reveal. Instead officers have been advised to use the long-winded phrase ‘multi-perpetrator rape’ when describing sex attacks involving three or more culprits. Critics branded the move by the Metropolitan Police an ‘affront’ to the victims of appalling sex crimes and are preparing to launch a campaign on the issue. Six years ago the Met was at the centre of a similar row over its choice of language to describe ‘gang rapes’ after a senior officer referred to them as ‘group rapes’ during an interview on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. Some community activists had previously suggested the phrase ‘gang rape’ had racist connotations. Details of the latest police terminology are contained in an official Scotland Yard report which reveals a sharp increase in the number of gang rapes in the capital. New figures revealed there were 93 gang sex attacks in the financial year 2008-9, compared with 71 in 2003-2004. Meanwhile the age of victims has fallen with 64% aged 19 or younger in the last financial year compared with 48% in 1998-9. Detective Chief Inspector Mark Yexley admits in his report on ‘Multi-Perpetrator Rape and Youth Violence’ for the Metropolitan Police Authority that the ‘common parlance for this offence is ‘gang’ rape’. But he adds: ‘This is an emotive term—but it is used widely in the public domain. There have been instances in the past where the term ‘gang’ has come to mean different things—either groups known to each other, criminal networks or peer groups. ‘Care has been taken with the definition of the term ‘gang’ in this paper. It is however accepted that there is a public perception/understanding of what this term means. Recent academic studies have suggested that the term ‘Multiple Perpetrator Rape’ should be used as the overarching term for offences involving two or more perpetrators. ‘When examining rapes committed by multiple perpetrators, it should be noted that the number of offenders involved and the methods used by assailants, vary. Analysis on such offending is primarily based on victim testimony and any other supporting evidence, so links to ‘gangs’ cannot necessarily be established. ‘These offences are complex in nature, ranging from allegations of consensual sex between the victims and a known party followed by non-consensual assaults committed by associates, to stranger attacks involving large groups.’ Chrissie Maher, founder of Plain English Campaign, told the Mail: ‘I am disgusted to my very bones and weep for the victims of gang rape. I don’t usually approve of ‘four-letter words’ but there is no better way of defining gang rape. Ask the public if they need an academic study to work that out. ‘Jargon has been used to hide and confuse all sorts of things, that’s why Plain English Campaign was started. But using jargon clean up crime is the last thing I ever expected to see. ‘Ask any victim—rape is an emotive crime—it deserves an emotive term not some sterile, politically correct nonsense. This doesn’t deserve a Golden Bull award—this deserves a new campaign to give victims the respect they deserve.’" Gang rape is a racist term?!?!? huh?!? because of the races who are usually involved in this horrendous act?!? So here the UK is... making excuses for CRIMINALS of the very lowest kind: rapists... a sickening reminder that to the multicultural racism is more of a crime then even RAPE! This comes a day after the same Scotland Yard released a report showing that 92% of all individuals that participate in what used to be called “gang rapes” are non-white, though the only place where you read that was the BNP. I suppose they did find a cracker jack solution to ending gang rape.