lictor616

so you reject my arguments simply because I'M SAYING THEM? not because they're incorrect? I consider no races INFERIOR, that is simply slanderous filth and an obvious attempt at bullying others who noticed the double standards in interracial crime coverage into silence. So far you have no argument except insults and personal attacks towards me. Kimmy has been making the same arguments about media disparity BEFORE I even started, I really don't think that making the inescapable deductions about the crimes mentioned (namely that the media deliberately exaggerate and blow up interracial crimes with non-white victims, and censor the ones with white victims) is an indication that one is "helping a white supremacist"... its just saying the truth or "calling it like it is". Kimmy probably disagrees with huge portions of what I write in these boards, and probably cringes that we are essentially "agreeing", but the fact that a moderate like her is capable of making the uncomfortable suggestion that the media is festooned with anti-white bias, and hence risk being called a "racist" herself by the likes of you "left wing irreconcilables" shows us one thing: *that the reality of our situation is that the media positively IS guilty of anti-white bias and ABSOLUTELY DOES treat interracial crimes based on the color of the victims (or alleged victims) skin. the evidence is quite indisputable i'm afraid, and so far Hardner, your feeble attempts at defusing the manifest racism present in the media shows us that it is YOU who seems to think that some races (namely the white race) are inferior or less worthy...

there are two types of media: 1/Americanized, which is liberal and at worst neo con (and hence left wing) or 2/ Socialist: which is crypto communist there is no articulate right wing , or centrist outlet anymore. I find it very discouraging that people who criticize the american media, talk about the Guardian and other such liesheets as alternatives...

aahahahahaha oh what the hell, i'll ask: link?

oooh pooh pooh language! clearly you didn't watch the clip of what happens to GMO cell invasion... its a pretty straightforward diagram.

no indication it was a hatecrime? oh really now!?!! speculate on gender and ignore race in this!? Yoy don't see any evidence or potential of hatred in the Channon murder/rape/torture? what is wrong with you? no... yes ... no reason at all, that thuggish rap listening "kill whitey" screaming(who have been told all their lives taht they are victims of white oppression) southern blacks would attack "white devils"... yeah its not like they selected their victims at all because they were white in the wrong part of town.. oh no... no this was more like a love-crime! I no longer think i'll be able to carry on a conversation with you without resorting to ad hominems, i think your comment is disgusting and execrable and quite frankly I don't think I'll be able to give you the respect demanded by the forum rules. I'll leave it at that

n please read: Obama's favorite ideologue James Cone: "Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community ... Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love." (Quoted in William R Jones, "Divine Racism: The Unacknowledged Threshold Issue for Black Theology", in African-American Religious Thought: An Anthology, ed Cornel West and Eddie Glaube.) black liberation theology maintains that black people are gods on earth... so much for supremacy eh? black godhood...

but hello? racial minorities ARE being vile and offensive towards whites - calling our women whores, scoffing at our culture, talking darkly about killing us, enslaving us and turning our countries and civilization over to them? Watch the video again! They are ALREADY very vocal about their implacable hatred of us, but WE CAN'T REPLY IN KIND... you're so completely obvious to reality it seems. We don't even allow our news editors to publish cartoons that offends them! that's you're freedom of speech? What are you blind!?!? They can talk about our own dispossession, raping our women, killing our children and spitting on our culture in UTTER IMPUNITY, we say the "N word" and the freaking sky is falling! If we even suggest that third world immigration is bad, we get labelled a racist, or xenophobe, and that too, can ruin careers, result in law suits, or put us into trouble. Please tell me you're not this cynical!

1/ the Heritage week never took place... i mean you do realize that it was SHOT DOWN right? Despite people wanting to celebrate their European roots... they were denied this for flimsy "racist" potentialities! 1/ blacks definitely are encouraged to be proud of their race: http://thechronicleherald.ca/ArtsLife/1152726.html http://www.365black.com/365black/index.jsp I mean how else do you figure that blacks are permitted a history MONTH, Negro College funds and all sorts of racially based associations completely UNAVAILABLE TO WHITES and be none the wiser? 2/German student association has not much int the way of racial connotation, its linguistic, in fact its a good bet that even suggesting that would get you kicked out of the german association, and perhaps form campus... also, http://www.magazine.utoronto.ca/tag/u-of-t-black-alumni-association/ still no sign of white almuni associations or White Law Students Association of the University of Toronto. Just the sound of that is obviously impossible. can you imagine suggesting it in polite society? You could probably get kicked out of the university for even THINKING about such an association. but of course you claim not to see "what the big deal is" Dahlhousie has a Black cultural Center... 3/ Oktoberfest, is not a racial or ethnic pride event... people don't go there to be proud to be white... they go there to have beers in tents, and have a grilled wurst... 4/5/6/ you still haven't acknowledged the evidence and reject clear double standards such as widely different media coverage of certain interracial crimes. in all cases I showed: the crimes with non-white victims are presumed a victim of racism, and the coverage is huge, in every white example racism often isn,t even mentioned as a potentiality, and coverage of them is so scarce as to be even hard to find on the internet. The pattern is there... your willful blindness and out of hand rejection don't change that. 7/Your belief that white victims are less worthy is obvious by your constant effort of denying that whites (even with very obvious evidence) can be victims of racial hatred, and your unconcern for coverage disparity... you don't seem disturbed at all that a dragging death of a mother receives no coverage (despite its obvious public interest) and think its fine that a black ex con james byrd was given a memorial parc, statue and holiday... you obviously don't care about the difference in treatment, which is why I think its fair to think that you have some sort of bias... prove me wrong... 8/ your questioning on the numbers was another admission of your obvious anti-white bias... you downplay the fact that 1.9 million violent interracial crimes were black on white, and 350 000 were white on black, by pathetically suggesting that: "obviously there should be more white victims... there are more white people"... which is simply crack pot logic, especially since the Census data on ALL CRIMES shows regularly that blacks (a 12-13% minority) commit roughly half the nation's TOTAL violent crimes. I mean it never occurred to you that there should be more white perpetrators too by your logic? what a silly way of looking at the stats... there also the interracial rape stats which are even more incredible: less then 10 black women are raped every year by whites, yet 34 000 to 45 000 white women are raped by blacks every year... i'll let you work out the arithmetic on that. again all you're trying to do is excuse and minimize the criminal activity of blacks and the crooked media who cover for them.

I'm saying that language should never be criminalize or given any legal penalties. The very notion of "hate speech" is repugnant to any free minded individual. My post was about what the policy of third world immigration have now brought the british people: an occupational hazard and violent insurrection. the liberal pro immigration policies always promised to voters that immigrants would adapt and be a strength... alas we see how foolish the British people were to actually believe them.

and yet it didn't stop the media of making a media circus around the DUke Lacrosse "rape" incident (even if the speculation was badly unwarranted), before the facts were known, it didn't stop them speculating about racism when the Byrd draggin death happened in texas... why do we see no such speculation in the channon murders? no such speculation about the Stansfield dragging death? no such speculation in this horrible act of savagery?

yes but conveniently, it never occurs to the media to "speculate" about racial angles when the crime victims of the news story they're covering happens to be WHITE... the record is painfully obvious. the examples lifted are a solid indictment of clear and indisputable bias.

I,ve been kicked numerous times, last time for calling the Singer seal a "pock faced baboon"... that earned me a two week suspension. M.Dancer has called me just about every name in the book without so much a warning. You're right though most of the time I just get emotional responses that are riddled with ad hominem attacks... liberals are very very hateful and intolerant of people with contradicting opinions. and they don't really like debating... About being thrown out of employment: ever heard of the texaco scandal? some management in a texaco plant said something about not wanting to hire the "black jelly beans" and not liking black jelly beans. everyone in on the private conversation: fired: "scandal over racial slurs forces the oil giant to rethink - and remake - its corporate identity." http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2000_Oct_4/ai_65735152/ read on 1/ "A director of Boris Johnson's Olympic management team has been sacked for allegedly using the word 'n****r' during a meeting. Nick Hoare, 56, an interim director at the London Development Agency, was sacked hours after three staff made official complaints." Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1223786/Boris-Johnson-sacks-senior-director-LDA-using-racist-word-meeting.html#ixzz0WzhGQtQu'>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1223786/Boris-Johnson-sacks-senior-director-LDA-using-racist-word-meeting.html#ixzz0WzhGQtQu http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1223786/Boris-Johnson-sacks-senior-director-LDA-using-racist-word-meeting.html 2/ "WTXF TV news anchor Tom Burlington has sued his former employer claiming discrimination after he was fired for using the “N-word” in an editorial meeting called at the Philadelphia station to discuss a news story about a mock funeral to bury the “N-word.” read more: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/articles/19076/1/Fired-for-using-N-word-news-anchor-sues/Page1.html# 3/ "Radio host fired after saying "coon" during Condi Rice discussion" "A radio personality at 550 KTRS was fired on the spot this morning after using the word “coon” on the air in a conversation about Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Dave Lenihan was dismissed after what he called an inadvertent slip of the tongue. Within 20 minutes, station CEO Tim Dorsey apologized on the air to listeners and announced that Lenihan, who had been with the station for less than two weeks, had been let go." read more: http://blogcritics.org/culture/article/radio-host-fired-for-slip-of/ 4/ Radio shock jock "Greaseman" Doug Tracht who was fired for a shocking racist remark made on station WARW-FM in Washington, D.C., apologized at a recent press conference in the capital. "It was a pathetic attempt at morbid racial humor. My sorrow is for anyone and everyone who was hurt by my statement ...," Tracht said." http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1355/is_16_95/ai_54731434/ 5/PHILLY SHOCK JOCK KIDD CHRIS FIRED FOR RACIST SONG PARODY: http://binsidetv.net/2008/05/philly-shock-jock-kidd-chris-fired-for-racist-song-parody/ listen to the song... a guest of the show calls black people "Schwoogies" and his popular show (who specializes in offensive humor) gets the boot... and then there the Imus and his pathetic "nappy headed hoes"... that you probably heard about and conveniently forgot? and many many many others, anyways you'll reject this out of hand and ask for the evidence again...

yes in canada as well, liberalism is spreading all sorts of joys and progress everywhere it rears its retarded head. I remember having a teacher misspell Asia: as "AZIA" I swear to god...

what I mean by "tolerance" is "Political Correctness" which isn't "tolerance" as much as suicidal mania and self hatred. and toleration of INTOLERANT GROUPS, such as the fuzzy faced, feverish denizens of the desert you see howling like a pack of wild banshees about dominating the world and killing our whorish women who dare not wear a burka.. . freedom of speech and assembly? freedom of association? i'm sorry but since when do "whites" have these rights except on a token scale? How many times are anti-immigration people allowed to air their grievances without ebing charged with a "hate crime" by slavishly PC liberals? How many times have white people been thrown out of employment for saying the "n-word"? When are people permitted to address these issues openly? i'd be all for it... I'd love to get into a frank discussion on race and immigration... but where? universities? parliament? TV? all these venues are dominated by lefties, who all think precisely alike and absolutely hate people with divergent opinions. The left is FAR MORE against free speech then anyone else... They hate debate and discussion, when is immigration ever a policy issue for elections? have you ever heard of a candidate saying that if elected he would cut off immigration? there's an excellent documentary on so called freedom of speech and association in american universities: you should watch it, and eat your words. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxSg2oRU6Bs and are you insane enough to suggest that those radical muslims who believe in killing atheists and people who commit apostasy are open to have a free exchange and debate with us? Do you really think they value freedom of speech and association? What's insane is that you accuse ME of being intolerant... while religious basketcases are muttering darkly about killing non muslim women, and converting the whole world to Islam through the sword! I mean for the love of god, can you get any more cynical?

no evidence!?!?? The Newsome murder, Patricia Stansfield, Carignan Agression, the Byrd dragging death, duke lacross team, jena 6 trial... if you can't see that the races in all of these crimes receive very different attention, then as I said you're simply playing dumb, and rejecting facts out hand and obscenely asking "what the big deal's all about". many examples were lifted, but your anti-white bias (which is present in every line your write) shows that you're not interested in being objective on the matter. We've shown case after case of non racist events (Courtenay, Duke Lacrosse rape incident) where the media goes berserk and starts throwing "bigottry" and "racist" accusations, human rights leagues are apoplectic and threaten to demonstrate... the NAACP demands the heads of the accused! yet when you reverse the races, no human rights organization is in sight, the media ignore ANY potentiality (no matter how hard to avoid) of racism, and the news item is given minimal coverage if any. its the standard procedure. its no different in this murder case... the media obviously don't WANT to talk about the obvious racial angle. you know and I know (although you won't admit it) that if that beautiful blonde reporter would have been black, and her attacker/rapist a white thug, you'd have no problem in thinking about the potential racist angle, and certainly the media would be right there talking about "investigating a potential hate-crime"...

its a miracle that she was able to do her job? I don,t get it. what's miraculous about this story? And if we're honest most american teachers are better suited to cleaning latrines then being anywhere near a classroom. sample what kind of trash gets to mold the minds of the young: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DM45kYAKyCU some teachers are barely literate in the states.

further subjugate what his pastor (Jeremiah Wright) calls the "white enemy"?

I have a hard time believing (due to the absolutely animalistic brutality and inhuman savagery) that this was nothing but a simple murder... or a robbery gone wrong... investigators described her face as resembling a crushed eggshell, her cheekbones were fractured to the point of almost being pulverized, her head was matted with blood... all the coroner's reports say that she was beaten long after she lost consciousness still... Of course you fail to acknowledge that the media COMPLETELY IGNORED the potential racial side of it, they still are piecing the elements together, but we all know if the races had been reversed, the media would have no problem at all talking about the racial angle... so you'd hear the reporter say "perhaps some racism fueled the attack" or words to that effect. The fact that the racial angle is not even discussed here is another typical example of the slant that black on white crimes consistently receive. also my fox news link must be copied and pasted into your browser: (for some reason I can,t link it- maybe fox doesn't want mass awareness of this article)

yeah this was the interview from USA today, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cznEC2zndmQ, wrong vid

wow, it a fox employee is murdered you'd expect coverage... but still the coverage has been nothign liek the duke case or any other eminently less atrocious "hatecrime" her parents here: deplore the media for not "probing further into the issue": saying that this was more then just "a robbery gone bad" that racial elements were completely ignored... of course none of this you will concede, you don't want to admit that you're completely biased..

? what 8 points were these? that races are figments of the imagination? that genetic variation is nill or "insignificant" between groups? how did you respond to my claim taht different races produce different cultures?

You said that Pierce had similar things to say on the hate crimes I brought up, why mention pierce if not to tar me with the neo-nazi brush? your covert implication was that I'm just like Pierce.

i'm curious if any liberal is available for comment.

actually I made the point that culture is an expression of racial differences... remember my bit about different races producing different cultures?! i mean, I might as well be talking to a broken record!

you've compared me to what you said was a neo nazi: Dr. Pierce... maybe you should pay more attention to waht you say.