lictor616

the fact that there ISN'T AN ENGLISH NEWS SOURCE... AND THAT THE CARIGNAN ACGRESSION WAS GIVEN ZERO MEDIA ATTENTION OUTSIDE LOCAL NEWS IS EXACTLY THE ISSUE AT HAND.... THE DOUBLE STANDARDS IN CHOOSING WHAT CRIME IS WORTHY OF COVERAGE AND WHICH ISNT... the relatively harmless assault of a hardened black 38 year old male by 3 whites (which wasn't even shown to be racially motivated) gets start billing in the news... the black male victim is made a hero, and is now trotted around to talk to kids about "raycissum"... again invert the races: a 14 year old little white girl, assaulted by a mob of 10 or so grinning blacks while they scream anti-white bigotry at her, and scrawl anti-white slogans on her school and the media FREAKING IGNORES IT! Not even an english cbc report is issued! The little girl.s welfare is completely ignored, and we actually hear sympathy for the attackers! again this is pretty obvious evidence of a biased news model... that deliberately seeks out and aggravates white-on black assaults, but completely ignores black on white assaults (which are more numerous and often more serious)... the difference is along racial lines... again... how can one deny this?

again proof that racial and ethnic ties are hard to break and always come out on top... See what integration has brought the US?

looooool... it would probably resemble something like this:

Two African AIDS Spreaders Convicted in Winnipeg in One Week For years we’ve warned that poorly screened immigrants (AIDS, hepatitis) can quite literally kill you.:eek::mad: “An HIV-positive African immigrant in Winnipeg has been convicted of having unprotected sex with women and not telling them about his condition. The 34-year-old man from Zambia, whose name is protected by a publication ban, has been found guilty by a judge on two counts of aggravated sexual assault.Court heard that two of the man's three partners did not contract HIV, while a charge stemming from a complaint brought by the third woman, who did test positive, was previously dismissed.The man, who remains in custody and could face deportation, will be sentenced August 13.” (Canadian Press, July 18, 2008) Then, there’s the conclusion of the notorious Sudanese Clato Mabior. One wonders whether this one man AIDS infection machine was tested before he came to Canada. Likely not. Protecting the Canadian public is not high on Immigration Canada’s list of priorities. “Clato Mabior, 31, now faces likely deportation after what's believed to be the country's largest case of its kind.Queen's Bench Justice Joan McKelvey said Mabior's conduct was "deplorable and despicable . . . and must be condemned in the strongest possible terms. ‘Those that are infected with HIV cannot inappropriately and indiscriminately engage in sexual relationships for their own pleasure without regard to the consequences to others.’ … Mabior was convicted on six of nine sexual-assault allegations, plus additional charges of invitation to sexual touching and sexual interference. … One of Mabior's victims was a 15-year-old girl who repeatedly broke down in tears as she described being raped by Mabior after he lured her with the promise of drugs and alcohol from a temporary Child and Family Services "shelter" inside a downtown Winnipeg hotel. She was only 12 years old at the time. ‘The accused preyed upon these vulnerable women, many of whom were underage and came from significantly compromised circumstances. Further, these women were supplied with alcohol and/or drugs, and lured into a sexual relationship by a sexual predator,’ said McKelvey. Mabior was arrested in early 2006 after an unprecedented public warning by police and the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority that prompted several young women to come forward - many of them teenage runaways. “ (Winnipeg Free Press, July 15, 2008) In the US (which unlike suicidally liberal Canada, does keep racial stats on AIDS) and we know that blacks in the US are on average about 18 to 24 times more likely to have aids then whites... Blacks females in particular are riddled with the deadly disease. Of the 126,964 women living with HIV/AIDS, 64% were black, 19% were white, 15% were Hispanic, 1% were Asian or Pacific Islander, and less than 1% were American Indian or Alaska Native (http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/women/resources/factsheets/women.htm) They don't talk about this AIDS disparity because they are concerned that this might fuel racism and might make a few white or non blacks unwilling to copulate with a black... another instance in these absolutely crazed times, where health and public safety takes a backseat to political correctness... I swear you couldn't imagine this stuff is happening. We do know however... that Every year, 25% of new cases of AIDS/HIV are due to the Canadian government's known importation of people with AIDS/HIV. 95% of which are from Africa or the Caribbean. This will cost the Canadian taxpayers Billions of dollars and possibly the lives of our children. Half of the South African military has HIV/AIDS, are we sure we want to congregate with them?

woah woah woah.... thats an absolute LIE: the parc carignan aggression was 100% black on white... it was a troop of enraged animals attacking a defenseless white little girl... ghead and watch it again of course, again since the victim is only a profane little white girl... the media issued only a minor local report on it... and never EVER mentioned the word HATE CRIME... and of course the city complied: "We have to remember this is an isolated case involving only a few individuals," Anthony Bernardelli, who heads the school board responsible for Henri Bourassa, told reporters yesterday. an "isolated" case.. yeah don't worry... who cares... The black assaulters also then took their aggression and vandalized the girl's school.... breaking windows and spraypainting anti-white biggotry on the walls... again invert the races in this case and there would be a world of difference: the media would be apoplectic.. there would be nationwide coverage, there would be human rights council investigations, sensitivity campaigns in the schools, a statue of the girl in the parc as a reminder... there would be a committee on hatecrime assembled... you KNOW that's precisely the way it works... and that's the way it ALWAYS works: black good, white bad... that's the essence of the message.

Which chap was that? link? The evidence Phillips told The Province he would not trade the experience of being attacked because he has turned it into a positive. Again do you think that the Courtenay BC "hatecrime" would have resulted in the same reaction if the attackers where black and the victim white apparently the city is making a hero out of this mediocrity of a landscaper without a car (DUI) "It's been a whirlwind — I've been asked to teach a Grade 7 class about my experience and I've even been asked to run for council," he said. "It's been beyond my wildest dreams." http://www.theprovince.com/news/Victim+Phillips+happy+three+Courtenay+charged+with+assault/1779344/story.html again do you think they'd trot out a WHITE victim of a hate crime? of course not... and we know WHY THIS IS HAPPENING: quite simply because in this country BLACK IS THE NEW UPPER CLASS... and white has become a second class citizen.

I corrected that mistake... but that aside do you agree with the quote?

airplanes go all over the world right?... no of course not... yes ONLY the US would be affected... of course...

indeed reading comprehension would be key.... the report clearly says that homosexuals are the "first known" cases and suspected origins of it... the report also says quite unambiguously: "We do now know that the origin of AIDS and the virus HIV was probably in Africa. " earlier you laughed as ludicrous my proposition which essentially said the exact same thing... Why do you laugh at the proposition that aids is "african" then? Also the Spencer report and CDC reports quoted, mention that the disease came about from Central african people's unfortunate "affection" for the African Green Monkey... I'm not sure were all the comedy is in this... but laugh away!

well keep laughing clown: http://www.avert.org/aids-history-86.htm if you actually read the "history of aids" tab mentioned in your article it essentially confirms what I have written. "In June, the CDC published a report about the occurrence, without identifiable cause, of PCP in five men in Los Angeles5. This report is sometimes referred to as the "beginning" of AIDS, but it might be more accurate to describe it as the beginning of the general awareness of AIDS in the USA." the five men were gays, and copualted with haitain and african boat people looking for entry into the US...

No, what I do is talk about matters which show CLEARLY the way the different races are treated by the media and by other posters... In another thread for instance there was endless yammering about a black criminal who was manhandled and left with tiny injuries by 3 white youths... in BC... everyone said the attack was definitely racist, and deserved exemplary punishment... and attacked everyone who didn't agree... I brought up a case where an 18 year old boy was beaten within a quarter inch of his life while his black aggressors (all 10 to 15 of them) while screaming racial epithets at him... the event elicited only minor local news outrage, and didn't get anything like the star billing WE ALL KNOW this would have had if the races had merely been inverted. The courtenay BC "hatercime" was far less worse... and had even less evidence of racial bias in it... yet it was shown on every major newservice in Canada... far far more conspicuous is the reaction ... or rather lack thereof for the white victim... there was scarcely any here who commented on it... http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums//index.php?showtopic=14890&st=0&p=460969&fromsearch=1entry460969 yet the courtneay one was festooned with hand wringing posts and angst laden shrieks of outrage... these are pretty unambiguous admissions of RACIAL BIAS... its clear to anybody with half a brain that the only reason white victims of hatecrimes don't matter is because they're WHITE... I don,t see any of this as a "logical fallacy"... this confirms everything that i've mentionned. The fact that you see my asking for EQUALITY in treatment of racial hate-crimes for example, as "pro-white bias" and a logical fallacy, is very illustrative of the mindset I deplore and critique often here.

obviously Obama is determined that every AIDS ridden African from whatever cesspit in that unhappy continent should be given every opportunity to infect americans... and indeed the whole world... Already in their befouled country, it is illegal to "discriminate against" people with AIDS... and so schoolchildren with the deadly disease are permitted to toddle around with healthy ones, AIDS victims are permitted to work in hospitals, restaurants, massage parlors, and in short are permitted to pass their disease on to all of us... Keep in mind that the disease is African, and that apparently began when a homosexual man in the early 80's "copulated" with a Haitian and African male and passed the disease on to his dear boyfriends... Such are the strengths and advantages of a liberal egalitarian multiracial society I suppose. Actually, again I'd like to know if anyone here can come up with a concrete specific strength given to us by our "diversity" (the type our government tells us to "celebrate")

again, I dno't see myself as special or anything, actually, I know a great many ordinary people who are working away at their liberal foundations... as for being a prophet... you say this ONLY to ridicule me... I'm not a "messenger" or prophet or whatever... I merely talk about taboo subjects and don't use politically correct filters in talking about them... some people think this is uncouth or harsh... But that's the way I want to talk about things... as harsh and straightforward as possible... and I am honest in these debates, to me the truth if far more worthwhile then niceness or political correctness...

a rare cause for cheers in our crumbling country...

We and our planet and our entire solar system are infinitesimal motes in a galaxy that is itself an insignificant part of the known universe. We live in a universe in which all organic life is a rare and utterly insignificant epiphenomenon, meaningless on the scale of the majestic and eternal movements of stars and galaxies. It is only to the animals it has produced that organic life has any importance, but it is the whole of life to them. We organisms live in a hostile world, the tiger may not see itslef as an evil creature but in the eyes of its prey, the tiger is indeed an evil creature. Our pain, suffering and happiness affect nothing in the infinitely immense movement of the galaxies. They may be important to us, but the the forces of nature they are not in themselves "good or evil" nature knows of no such concepts... they exist only to humans (and are extremely subjective even at that)... ---- edit- taken from Francis Parker Yokey/REvilo Pendleton Oliver's "The Enemy of Our Enemies, The Enemy of Europe" 1981 liberty bell publications, pp-128

there is a difference between belief and NON-BELIEF. Atheism is NOT a belief but absence of it.

Nothing good ? according to who? What are your standards for judging "good" ? the bible? Why should something be there to make up for things? If a dog is beaten... does he go to dog heaven while other well treated dogs go to doggy purgatory or hell? I mean again, what is your reasoning for this? Why do you think in terms of "there has to be" at all? because you want there to be an afterlife? That's usually the case... people think that there's some cosmic force that ordains what individuals think is god and right (in their subjective way).

I've already quoted the Jewish Book of Why, on this 4 times in these forums... mentioning an article written by the royal rabbinical mohels of London stating quite clearly that the males of every Royal male was ritually circumcised by the mohel of London... its a 400 year tradition. The queen is also gran patroness of the Masonic order, which has kabbalistic initiation ceremonies, there's also the fact that the COburgs of the Royal family are jews... Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha was a confessed jew... many other things point to the same direction, not merely the speculation of symbology.

Yes, welfare indeed does us a great disservice by removing the teeth away from failure... Back in the olden days, failure inevitably meant starvation and/or death... today it merely means going to the welfare line, signing your name, answering a few question. The dysgenic effects of this are already catching up with us, and in enough time will mean the difference between savagery and civilization.

Well that's sooooo negative... I mean no Jesus descending on a chariot made of gold diamonds, chocolate and feathers? lol

yes we all have our beliefs, but more importantly, we have different standards for accepting our beliefs... I believe things out of evidence, others believe them out of blind faith. That's an important distinction. And how typical of a "defender of god" to not want to show me her evidence for her reasoning... what is this a shell game?

disproving something requires a claim that something exists... for instance: disproving the existence of santa claus... or the jackrabbit. these things came to be, because people produced evidence of their existence (however flimsy)... Likewise god has to first be "dreamed up, explained and demonstrated" before it can be DISPROVED. Which means someone has to say, that the sun is the eye of jesus's big poppa up in space or something, and then we can go about disproving it... To the best of my knowledge no one has ever attempted to produce evidence of god ( either a autographed rock, or star or special gas, or anything)... his existence is purely nondescript... no one has PROOF OF GOD... how then can one DISPROVE IT? really there is as much reason to believe in the existence of mermaids, as "god" especially the one of the three desert dogmas... (again the only ones that need concern us here- and Julianna'S parents)

I envy your knowledge, tell me of this evidence of god that you process... i'm dying to hear it.

no because I hold opinions which are contradictory to the prevailing religion of political correctness.. to the prevailing ORTHODOXY of this society... People are mad at me, not because i'm saying incorrect things, or deducting incorrect conclusions, they are agitated and reacting emotionally because I am attacking their religion: political correctness: (and in particular the doctrine of equality) which they have swallowed their whole lives. I am shaking the foundation of their beliefs and this angers them because often they have no suitable refutation. As I have said I get the same hatred and vitriol when I debate evangelicals and evolution as I do equality with liberals... Most of the hatred, this disapproval and pressure to conform directed towards me, can be annoying for me, but that's hardly enough to make me change my mind... People who can't cope with my unexpected behavior resort to threats, and insults. Many of the most viscious posts I get are from people who are surprised to see that not everyone is equally weak and eager to parrot the liberal party line of "diversity is our strength"... I'm not surprised by this reaction, its the way MOST people react: we all want to conform to prevailing "orthodoxies" that's just human nature... we all WANT to believe what our government is telling us, its much more comforting to live under the impression that the government isn't malign and isn't lying to us on important matters, for so many people: its much more agreeable to believe in pleasant fantasies then looking at reality... Indeed, 50 years ago the stuff I say about religion would have elicited the same hate filled screeches and yelps that I get today from racial egalitarians... and for exactly the same reasons: because they run against the prevailing religious orthodoxy. Liberalism is the new Christianity, and its flocks (I am sorry to say) are no different from the ones who burned Giordano Bruno at the cross 400 years ago... (if I may be so supremely presumptuous as to compare myself with Bruno...). They don't like for people to rock the boat.

There is not a single observable shred of evidence for a concept of god... and certainly not the Abrahamic god envisioned by the confused christians, jews and muslims of today... or any other god from whatever dogma for that matter. Science has done extremely well in identifying the origins of life... and thus far, the science of evolution and other fields denies the above mentioned gods and doctrines... that you conspicuously think we should "respect" and understand people who want to believe in this obsolete nonsense IN SPITE of the evidence... is beyond me. We have quite a good idea of what happens when you die... ever fallen out of consciousness? had a concussion... oh that's right... you don't remember anything... nothing happens when you die. And even if we discover that we become some sort of ectoplasmic blob floating about the earth, still, none of this is a validation of the big creeds... ie: Christianity: which is the main one that concerns us here (again). again absence of proof or evidence... IS NOT IN ITSELF PROOF OR EVIDENCE... so there can be no reason to give any mind to people who believe in a god... or a fairy godmother or santa clause. especially when the "heavenly minded" end up being moral basketcases like the clueless parents of Julianna Wetmore.