bjre

I did not say that. But honestly, I don't think Canada can defeat any of the strong nations without help of US no matter Canada has military or not. But ignore this sentence if you really think it is non-sense. I don't expect send Canadian troops out of Canada to follow US to kill others and make the world more unsafe. I think they should stay in Canada. Most people agree with me. Most politicians don't.

Why should Canadians use their own tax dollars to buy those things to kill people in other nations like US did or doing and support anti-government force like those in Libyr to kill their fellow citizens each other, while people in Canada are still facing so large money problem that even TTC can not build another sub-way for so many years.

The twisted statistics helps nothing but misleading. Why? Because the meaning of house "ownership" has changed so much. Now, ownership does not means you can escape from rampaging capitalist, but just robbed by some other more greedy capitalists. So, ownership can cost more than rent. "Ownership" now becomes means that you does not actually "own" the house, you need to buy it again and again every a number of years. What is the difference with this kind of "ownership" and rent? See this example:

The meaning of the borrowers had to have higher standards of impeccable credit means only the bankers has accurately calculated if the borrowers can work hard to make enough money for bankers to rob. It did not reflect the total extra-money more than goods and services that injected into economy, that is the part of the money (and with the interest) is the amount that bank claimed, and cause the inflation. So it makes workers give more of their work to bankers, so that the labor force price becomes high (because workers need give more to others), eventually makes Canadian job opportunities go abroad where labor price is cheaper. That will make even more people in Canada become poor people. So that less tax will be available, and tax rate will increase, and people become even poor. and so on.

Where most economists take their salaries? banks?

Mortgage is one of the most important factors that makes critical problems in Canada. Originally, mortgage was a good idea, it helped people with less money buy houses earlier. But as time went by, things changes. Now, even when mortgage available, still too many people can not afford a house, all mortgage has done is make debt of everyone increased like a rocket. When bank provide mortgage with lower or zero cash reserve ratio, and make profit upon that, it actually become the most important reason that cause inflation. That is because when more and more money is pour into economy while not so many goods and services are actually available, it makes price of everything goes up. The value of money becomes less and less. That means even you don't buy a house, the bankers still can rob you. In this way, bankers take away everyone's money as much as possible. Most work of most people are actually for the bank bosses. The bankers can happily calculate how much money most people still have and change the interest rate to rob it. Most people nowadays are simply modern slaves. Why this can happen, the laws make it possible.

Zellers becomes Target, ATI becomes AMD Notel crashed RIM is suffering How many Canadian survive? Why Scotties did not cry? Perhaps the only ones who are qualified to cry are the natives.

In the past, the communist Chinese government was the most selfless government in the world that cares only about its people and the people all over the world and helps people in lots of poor countries like constructing railways for Africa countries. Now I don't know what kind of government it is while it becomes more and more like western ones, but certainly much better than western ones because it still has a long way to go to become totally same as western ones, who cares most only the interest of party itself and need interest groups to support so that it like a corporation itself. Does such kind of western government care about its people? If it is, why it create so many laws that rob money from the people and give it to large corporations like allow only large private banks to provide mortgage at zero cash reserve ratio.

If I were the PM, the first thing I want to do is the set cash reserve ratio to 100%. Any one has the equal right to lend money to others as mortgage, not just the privileges of banks. That would stop banks from law protected robbing the wealth from everybody immediately . The second thing I want to do is to stop creating any new law. And begin to review old laws one by one, and abolish most obsolete laws that only for interest groups to rob from all people. The third one is the abolish CAS immediately. and let the parents to have the freedom to take care of their own kids. So that brilliant kids will be there, the future criminals will be less. The fourth thing I want to do is to let anyone be a doctor, and people choose their own doctor he trust, if a doctor made a mistake, then he can not be a doctor again. So that people need not to go to American when they need a doctor in unguent. And most people need not to waste time in family doctor's waiting room or emergency waiting room in hospitals. When the these things done properly and efficiently, the economy will grow like rocket, most people will benefit from it. Only the greedy super interest groups will take less wealthy in short period of time.

"Can you lay eggs?" the hen asked. "No," replied the duckling. "Can you purr and arch your back?" asked the cat. "No." "Then what can you do?" they wanted to know. "I can swim," exclaimed the ugly duckling. "It's delightful to dive into the water and feel it all around you." "You must be crazy," said the cat and the hen.

What N.K. people are doing at this moment? Here are lots of pictures: http://www.wenxuecity.com/news/2011/12/19/1572496.html

When he was ill, Kim Jong-Il promote free house for N.K ordinary people to live, that make Chinese people jealous, who need to pay mortgage to buy house (because they love capitalism I guess): http://bbs.yahoo.cn/read-htm-tid-11813359.html (do you also need to pay mortgage?) (hard work to feed bankers to exchange "freedom"?) (except you would still be advised move away from James Park by professional cops if you tried to express yourself by "occupy Toronto")

Canada is just same as the United States, is a nation of dictator, democracy is a lie, just for fooling people. Otherwise, why don't vote for the war, to see how much percent support it.

These is a cheating culture, especially for politicians. Without cheating, politicians can not be elected. And, they enjoy cheating themselves too. That is what the daylight saving all about. Politicians can not solving problem, what they can is only creating new problems. If politicians really want to saving energy, why can't they just get up early one hour each day, why can't they just change all the public office open and close time an hour earlier each day, why they tend to cheat themselves and every others each year twice more?

Good idea, that could be better than put him into endless law troubles. And it seems that you support physical discipline too. I think you yourself may do that when you in anger from you first intention exposed in your word. But it seems that when you can control youself, you prefer your children become criminals than physical discipline them? Wrong, the lower level workers of CAS are just do what they are told to do, just like cops, or any other job. the manager of those workers are just like any company that care only about money, because each child "in care" can bring money to them, (see previous posts for detail.) They don't care of "help" or "protect" child, there are many abuses under CAS care, just like animal protect organizations take dog and abuse them under their own place. They care only money. Children in CAS care are more likely to end up in correction system than in high school. What is why "Children's aid" don't care children. Money is the only thing they care.

Yes, we have. You've forget what I said. I said when the wealth created by workers in developing countries be robbed to develop countries, the people in developing countries should have the right to go to developed counties to use the wealth they created. Actually, they have used too little amount compare with the value they created. It looks like that Americans love to steal intellectual property. Google's search algorithm is "similar" with the invention by a Chinese but later than him. Actually when Li gave a lecture in Australia was before Pager apply the similar patent, Pager was among the listeners. http://www.rankdex.com/about.html RankDex was established in 1996 by Robin Li who previously worked for Infoseek, an Internet search engine in the early years, as an engineer. RankDex was the leading Internet search provider from 1996-1999. RankDex was the first search engine that used hyperlinks to measure the quality of websites it was indexing. Many experts and commentators are unaware that RankDex was cited in Lawrence Page’s patent application for Google PageRank as the first qualitative search engine. In 1998 RankDex was acquired by a Dow Jones subsidiary Tradeline.com (formerly IDD Information Services and GARI Software Associates). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank A small search engine called "RankDex" from IDD Information Services designed by Robin Li was, since 1996, already exploring a similar strategy for site-scoring and page ranking.[11] The technology in RankDex would be patented by 1999[12] and used later when Li founded Baidu in China.[13][14] Li's work would be referenced by some of Larry Page's U.S. patents for his Google search methods.[15] [11] ^ Li, Yanhong (August 6, 2002). "Toward a qualitative search engine". Internet Computing, IEEE (IEEE Computer Society) 2 (4): 24–29. doi:10.1109/4236.707687. [12] ^ USPTO, "Hypertext Document Retrieval System and Method", U.S. Patent number: 5920859, Inventor: Yanhong Li, Filing date: Feb 5, 1997, Issue date: Jul 6, 1999 [15] ^ Cf. especially Lawrence Page, U.S. patents 6,799,176 (2004) "Method for scoring documents in a linked database", 7,058,628 (2006) "Method for node ranking in a linked database", and 7,269,587 (2007) "Scoring documents in a linked database"2011 But when you turn on CBC, CTV, that goes to every house, most of the content are from America. What you can do is only watch it or turn off. Why? law makes Canadian companies cost high and can not compete with American ones. Really? It's revenue is shrinking. Why, the innovation cost is higher here in Canada, law make it so.

That is not the point. Even they don't use "free" public wash rooms in that Park, they use other "free" public wash rooms in other parks. And the "free" water is too small amount of money compare with the banks take free interest from everyone who use mortgage, why "free"? because the The reserve requirement (or cash reserve ratio) is zero in Canada. But only private banks can do that, the laws do not allow others to do that, so it is the laws that make only private banks can rob money based on nothing. That is why people work hard and they can not afford their own house without bank, no matter how many wealth you create, the law makes banks to rob it all, sometimes, I think most people are just same as the small rat on a wheel, keep running and running. And let the money they created be robbed away.

It is because US keep paying small and take higher value from all other countries with the help of the international laws, with its bank systems and many others. So wealth all over the world keeps be robbed to the US, so that people who want a better life attracted to the country, again, the new immigrants give out more and take less. The question is why Canadian companies are not able to grow into big fishes? The law make it. The law makes Canadian companies need to have heavier cost in tax and labour tax cost, labour social service cost, government employee cost and many others. And the law makers were grown up under the influence of American media/movie/TV, so their value system is the traps that they fall into.

I don't Hate America, but it is not accurate to call those "American" tools, apps. Because the people who invent it, and construct it are from other counties, and the computer it used to create that tool are made in other nations. And the politicians here can not elected without financial and media support from America, so that companies under the laws they made can only either bankrupt like Nortel or be bought by American companies like ATI so that even Canadians work hard, we can only use "American" products with "American" technologies.

I have said many times that technology will come when the knowledge is available, and there is a demand, and there is money. Any one can "invent" it with that. It is ridicules that technology is use for make profit for just a small group of people with patent and many other laws. Plus most who "own" technology does not create the technology, they just buy it, or buy people to invent it. They use money to rob more money from the people who create it, just like some people rob money in the market make future oil price higher and make every consumer pay for it in the future. Those are just blood suckers. If you really care about that, each time when you go to wash room and use paper, you should pay money to the descent who invent paper.

Thanks. I agree with you that it is meaningless without an real reform agenda. I think if they want to change something to make their life better, it is good to do something as a good start. Actually, they did not change anything that rob away their money. For example, during the time they were in street, another law approved, which add more amount of work to cops and judges and lawyers that do not create any real value but just consume your tax. And decrease the tax source in the mean time. http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/27/toronto-bans-shark-fin-sales/ The New York Times is reporting that Toronto City Council has voted to ban the sale, possession and consumption of shark fin and shark fin products within the city. The motion was approved by a 38-4 vote. The law is not helpful because I've heard there is already a 1994 law that makes Canada import Shark fin without shark body illegal. And I think the reason that the lawmakers waste tax dollars to discuss such useless laws is only for relief from the embarrass of that they actually can not solve any real problem other than create more and more problems. I believe if the occupiers want to improve life for most Canadians, they should start to ask for stop approving any new laws. And start to check old laws and start to abolish most of them. The real effect of those laws is just taking money from hard working people and give it to rich ones and the ones that don't create wealth.

I don't like the park been occupied, the good news is that the park is far away from the one where I would often like to go; I don't like the street been occupied especially when I happened want to pass the street, although endless construction seems always happen somewhere in Toronto. But what really make this happening? Where did the wealth go? Why even thousands of years ago, people can feed themselves and build house for themselves to live, now we can not if we don't loan from bank and in high debt after work hard half a life? The system make it like this. The law system make all of this happened. The system create countless laws to impose people do according a small groups of people's testes with large amount of cops and courts, jails that cost so much of your taxes. The system make most people earn so small that they can not afford their own house and let banks provide mortgage so that make you actually need to pay even more for your house. In the means time, most the money redistributed with the help of the law system moves to the richest people and the organizations that do not create any material values, like police, big bosses of medical companies, oil companies and others. That is the real reason why price becomes higher and higher, and people feel life is hard.

Why a family court judge beat his own daughter? Obviously because he himself BELIEVES it is necessary sometimes http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20111103/us-videotaped-beating-texas/ McALLEN, Texas — A Texas judge who presides over child abuse cases said Thursday that his daughter posted a YouTube video of him beating her several years ago because he told her he was reducing her financial support and taking away her Mercedes. Aransas County Court-at-Law Judge William Adams, 51, issued a statement through his lawyer in which he questioned his 23-year-old daughter Hillary's motives for posting the secretly made 2004 video online last week. The three-page statement did not include an apology for the beating, in which the judge lashed his daughter with a belt 17 times in the legs while she begged him to stop. Adams, Aransas County's top judge, was elected in 2001 and has dealt with at least 349 family law cases in the past year alone, nearly 50 of which involved state caseworkers seeking determine whether parents were fit to raise their children.

But why the "freedom"/"Human Rights" lover westerners include President Washington did not free those poor sold slaves but just buy them and keep them as slaves?

Here is a piece which I copied from: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/I-3.3/section-7-20101215.html Employee stock options (1.1) Where after March 31, 1977 a Canadian-controlled private corporation (in this subsection referred to as “the corporation”) has agreed to sell or issue a share of the capital stock of the corporation or of a Canadian-controlled private corporation with which it does not deal at arm’s length to an employee of the corporation or of a Canadian-controlled private corporation with which it does not deal at arm’s length and at the time immediately after the agreement was made the employee was dealing at arm’s length with ( a ) the corporation, ( b ) the Canadian-controlled private corporation, the share of the capital stock of which has been agreed to be sold by the corporation, and ( c ) the Canadian-controlled private corporation that is the employer of the employee, in applying paragraph (1)(a) in respect of the employee’s acquisition of the share, the reference in that paragraph to “the taxation year in which the employee acquired the securities” shall be read as a reference to “the taxation year in which the employee disposed of or exchanged the securities”. I wonder how many Canadians can actually read and understand it. If he/she can, how much time he/she need to spend before understand it?