Moonbox

If he did, then you'd just quote it. That takes 10 seconds. Instead, you'll spin your wheels insisting that people said something dumb that you've made up to debate against, because you're literally too dumb to debate with anyone but yourself. There's no better way of proving you have nothing going on in your life than carrying on for pages and pages pleading and insisting that people believe your fantasies when, if true, you could objectively prove it in a couple of clicks. 🤡👌

It wasn't all I was quoting, and I could give you pages and pages of sources with similar conclusions, from countries all over the world and it wouldn't make a difference. You're not actually interested in any of the empirical or objective data because none of it, from anywhere, supports your viewpoint. You're going to continue dismissing it without even a moment's consideration, and then distort reality around yourself and pretend none of the data exists, as you've done in this thread. 🙃

That's especially true online, and on an unmoderated forum like this. Sometimes you can actually engage with some of these self-taught "geniuses" face-to-face, as they're less likely to insult you for asking questions. My oldest friend (known him since daycare) lost his business, his fiancé, stopped talking to his family and lost most of his friends on account of his vaccine denialism and his belligerence on the topic. Amidst one of his poor-me rants, I asked him if he believed that his year or so of internet scrolling and "research" gave him comparable levels of knowledge and expertise on COVID and the vaccines as the doctors and specialists who spent 7+ years studying these topics. Naively, I thought this would elicit a moment of humility and reflection on his part. To my astonishment, he actually answered yes. That led me to my next question, where I asked him what sort of information, data or source would he have to see/hear from to change his mind on the topic. His answer was something along the lines of it requiring a fundamental shift in reality...essentially he was already certain and the cosmos would have to flip upside down to change his mind. 🤷‍♂️

You're literally describing your existence on this forum. 🙃 Like I said, I'm not presenting "opinions". You getting bamboozled by AI-generated slop (and purchasing it) and then citing it here as reference material is not an opinion. That happened. That's fact. Pointing out the double-standard of you complaining about Flyer's antics here while upvoting Fox as he derails threads here 24/7 is not an opinion either, nor how you habitually whine about other people's insults while happily lobbing them around yourself. Those are provable, objective facts. The truth is that you're not actually here to debate with anyone. You just want to vent and rant, and then fuss and complain when people challenge you.

You mean other than the clear correlation of lower vaccine rates with higher death rates? Sure. Tons. Vaccination against covid-19 has reduced deaths in Europe by at least 57% and saved at least 1.4 million lives, the World Health Organization has estimated. https://www.bmj.com/content/384/bmj.q125 Vaccination against covid-19 has reduced deaths in Europe by at least 57% and saved at least 1.4 million lives, the World Health Organization has estimated. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9537923/ Unvaccinated people are 11 times more likely to die from COVID-19 than those who are fully vaccinated, new research has found, bolstering evidence that the inoculations continue to provide powerful protection, even against the delta variant. https://www.npr.org/2021/09/10/1036023973/covid-19-unvaccinated-deaths-11-times-more-likely https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-covid-19-deaths-by-vaccination-status I don't expect any of this to matter to you, since it didn't the first few hundred times it was presented to you.

Except those weren't "opinions". You can't dispute a single thing I said there, because they're objectively true. 🤡👍

Just an average day in the life of a deadbeat no-life: You're just happy that someone, somewhere, is acknowledging your useless existence. 👍

Except all of this happened much slower, and the mortality and severe outcomes results were much worse, when vaccine rates were lower. 😑 No, the vaccine produced few side effects, of which most were marginal, and the cases of severe problems were lottery-rare, despite all of the social media squawking you echoed. On the other hand, they saved millions of lives, and in places where you and your fellow ignorati were common, way more people died than necessary. That's a fact. Here you are, years later, still whining and about it.

Only because you did everything you could do avoid reading or acknowledging the large scale and diverse academic and official studies, from all over the world, consistently showing higher vaccination correlated with lower rates of severe COVID outcomes/deaths. Instead, you cherry-picked the odd dissenter and/or quack and pretended they were the pre-eminent experts. Right, which is why higher education is correlated with higher vaccination rates, and why the most educated among us on the topic (the doctors) were widely and wildly in favor of the vaccine. 🙃

This coming from the guy so desperate for sources that confirm his uninformed biases that he's not only fallen for an AI-generated slop "biography" on Carney and sourced it here, but he actually purchased it. 🤣 If you were remotely interested in the actual debate, you wouldn't be upvoting and encouraging the little cretin that Flyer is trolling. One person is the common denominator derailing the majority of threads on this board, and in most cases it doesn't even get to page 2. Just like you whine about people insulting you while throwing around insults of your own, here you are complaining about trolling while sticking up for noisiest and most immature troll the forum has ever seen. I'm not sure how you even manage to breathe, drowning as you are in your oblivious hypocrisy.

A Master's Degree in "biology" makes him about as qualified to evaluate the subject as your average high school biology teacher, which is not at all. 🙄

Real adults have jobs, families, friends, and go outside sometimes. You wouldn't know anything about that though.

Because like many of the angry venters on this forum, their brains short out if they can't argue from their pre-determined and generally self-serving assumptions. Mike tried to engage on an intellectual level and break the arguments down logically, and rather than engage in defending his own points or even considering them from a different viewpoint, he chose petulance.

Because it means nothing when you use it. You're the political equivalent of a drunk soccer hooligan. You are wearing the jersey, and shouting a lot of juvenile slogans and cringe-level insults, but it's just noise. It's like your brain only holds a small selection of words and phrases on these topics, and before every post you just sort of shake your head a bunch to jumble and re-arrange them for your next slurry of banal ranting. "Something something Globalists, something something Lieberals, something something Marxists, something something WEF, something something Carnage, something something Fascists". There you go. You don't have to respond to me now. I've already paraphrased your next post. 🤡

Calling yourself a "conservative" is funny. Good one! I literally just told you I couldn't, but I understand why it didn't register in your brain. Without framing the debate as an existential battle of good ("conservatives") vs evil (lefties), your emotional venting looks pretty silly!

WHITE GENOCIDE! LOL!

Able to, yes. Bother to? No. There's not much point in answering a ridiculously predicated question like this. Not really. I'd argue that the Liberals did a terrible job and that Trudeau was the worst PM we've ever had. I suspect that most Canadians even agree with that. That's what makes Poilievre's failure even more pathetic. His echoing of the dumbest parts of Canada's right wing and his Maple MAGA monkeying convinced the voting public that he was an even worse option than the bad one we already had. YIKES!

it's why it's such an easy task to shut you down. Obvious facts and simple reasoning can be stated concisely in a couple sentences. You, on the other hand, are compulsively driven to pounding out longwinded and deranged emotional rants, pleading and insisting through paragraphs and paragraphs of useless insults and wishful fantasy that you didn't just make a fool out of yourself for the 1000th time.

It's too bad for you that insisting on your fantasy "a million times" doesn't actually manifest it in reality. Beyond you admitting you take absolutely no time to think before you barf out your essay-length posts, you're generally just repeating the same shit you've already said in different ways, over and over again. To you, winning a debate is just pissing all over yourself and making noises until people stop responding to you.

If it wasn't already clear to everyone that near-zero thought or reasoning goes into your spam-rants, you've at confirmed it here unequivocally. As always, nobody makes you look like more of a fool than yourself 🤣👍

Yep that's why you prepare 10+ paragraph responses to my one-liners. That makes so much sense! 🤣👍

If you actually had a point, you should have led off with it rather than burying it in 10 paragraphs of useless projection and limp, recycled insults. You're the one assuming I spent my weekend stewing and preparing a response to your buffoonery, rather than just...enjoying my weekend. That says a lot more about you than it does about me. 🙃

That's just a sad commentary on your headspace though, isn't it? The notion that other people actually do things on a summer weekend is alien to you, because you have nothing and nobody in your life. Hope it felt good pounding that rant out on your keyboard, because nobody is going to read it. If someone's read one of your useless, longwinded tirades, they've read them all. 🙃 Losing the election = Fantastic Result - CndFox, 2025

When you say stuff like that, you're just confirming you have nobody in your life, and nothing else to do with your time. I'm sorry I kept you waiting muppet, but there are more interesting things to do and people to talk to on a summer weekend than a loser seething on the internet like you. As for twisting your words, LOL. I'm just outlining how retarded your reasoning is. If saying Poilievre is the reason the Conservatives only got 41% is somehow the same as me saying someone "only" won 100 million dollars, then you're implying these are similarly "fantastic" outcomes. If not, then your statement is retarded. Doesn't matter to me which one you want to go with. You've clowned yourself again either way. 🤡👍

...which resulted in losing the election, and losing his own seat. This, according to you, is a "fantastic result", somehow comparable to winning 100 million dollars? Someone like Mulroney (or maybe even Harper) would have probably won. Nope. That's just something stupid that you made up to debate against, because you're not capable of much else. My argument is that Poilievre is the reason the Conservatives lost the election, just like it was my argument that he was their best shot at losing it during their leadership campaign years. He didn't disappoint! 🙃