UShaditComing

Off topic!

Yes, that's correct and they also have begun a concerted effort to have me banned from their forum. It's being led by American woman. I've even offered to change my name but that's not really the problem and it's not going to be enough. Thanks for your support and thanks to the others who have offered support publicly and privately via PM's. The US is responsible for their actions and the least we can do is bring it back on a forum such as this to haunt them. Keep it civil with them and let them be the ones to hurl the abuse and personal insults and this forum can help us to accomplish at least that meager goal of exposing them. They need to know that the world is aware of their lies and aggression. Thanks again for the encouragement! We good and decent people need to stick it out and stick together.

Off topic. Start new thread.

There are lots of people in Canada who believe exactly what I say and there are many books expressing the same view and most of those books are by American authors. Yes, it is off topic and if you want to know more about me then ask questions in the appropriate place.

I have been asked by the moerators to either ignore this kind of thing or keep it on topic. If you haven't been warned yet too then maybe you should be. Start another thread if you want to learn some facts.

The Times published the stinking photos you bozos say didn't exist. Read some of this which contains some stories of some other lies too. http://www.new-enlightenment.com/like_son.htm

Say what you like from now on. It's makes no difference to me. But don't try to pretend our military is in Afghanistan defending Canada because it is not. It is in Afghanistan at US request and supporting US aggression. Nothing else. I draw the line on that lie even though I feel sorry for you and have backed off kicking your ass around here.

Children please!

The question of whether or not Saddam used chem/bios on his own people is another one altogether. According to Stephen Pelletiere, it's likely that he didn't. They killed Saddam without investigating that question further because of the inconvenient facts of the matter. They now want socalled Chem ali handed over because of what he might say. The entire issue deserves a thread of it's own. Not here please.

I put you on my friends list as a gesture of kindness and to show that I didn't want you to leave the forum. Please come back and if you would like me to change my name then ask nicely and I will go to the mods and make the request. Really! If it's that terrible for you to be reminded of the truth then I can spare your feelings at least. I think the reason why Canada pays so much attention to the US agression and evil it is doing in the ME is because we care about you Americans. We were your best friends before you had to start your Iraq war and we told you we didn't want to be a part. It's called tough love dear. You won't get the same tough love from France because you people sincerely hate them with all your heart and soul because it turned out that they got it right on your phoney Iraq war.

Well, is it true or not sonny boy? The US is even now using as an excuse the need to stay in Iraq to protect the Sunnis and the Kurds because they're toast as soon as the Shiites get to them. I 'TOLD' you and I 'TOLD' you repeatedly the other day to do your homework on the satellite issue but you just didn't want to listen. Now look at the mess you have yourself in!

In the interest of maintaining a higher level of debate, please rehearse your ideas at sub-committee level before bringing them to my attention. http://psweb.sbs.ohio-state.edu/faculty/jm...er/shafapsa.pdf Thanks anyway!

You see folks, this example of shady's silliness is why sub-committees are important. Had he talked to his supporters he would have been informed ahead of time that what he is doing is waving the flag for what the US has created in Iraq. Namely, a Shiite dominated society which allows no other religious persuasion to exist and which in going to align itself closely with Iran, itself being a Shiite dominated nation. And all along Saddam allowed freedom of various religious persuasions including Chrisitanity and only needed an ocassional heavy hand to keep his country together. Duhhhhhhhhh!

Promise? If you break your promise you are then going to be a liar as well as a fool! (you never make that kind of offer to your opposition dancer because it's as good as tying your hands behind your back) (I thought I had made that clear to you people but you must have missed it) (I can't overemphasize the importance of reading what I say more carefully)

Do your homework at sub-committe level before bringing uninformed questions to me.

I think people look at how Bush has nearly destroyed the country and then contrast that with the prosperity Bill Clinton brought to the country. Maybe some of them are grown up enough now to understand that doing an intern is not all that important. I have heard it said by Americans that Bill Clinton was one of the most popular US presidents. Didn't he leave office with a high approval rating which rivaled any of them?

If people like you would try to rebut the facts as opposed to trying to insult others this forum could be a much better place.

Because the religious right think they have the right to tell people what to do?

Think about my idea of forming a sub-committee with some of your ilk here shady. That way only reasonable and valiid ideas will be elevated to my level. I'm sorry but I don't have time for all the riff-raff and it's nonsense. That's what pm's are for.

Good one dancer! You have said something relevant now and it qualifies for another excuse. But you err in not understanding that where they were is very relevant and it shows that you don't understand the issue. I'm sorry but I'm not going to go back and help you out on the latter. But the former I will comment on for you. Tanks can be hidden but tracks in the sand can't be and troops can't be hidden from satellite photos. If you will read the full report and learn you will begin to understand that troops require much support and facilities when placed in the desert and the satellite resolution was way too good to not see any of it. No, that excuse is not valid and nobody ever claimed it was. The troops and the tanks were either there or they weren't there. Period! They weren't there on the dates the US claimed they were there. That is hardly in question now. And the US has never relied on that excuse because it would have been futile. In fact the US is really not making excuses nearly as much as it's just attempting to bury the lie. It won't show it's own satellite photos which it claimed showed the troop and tanks buildup on the Saudi border with Kuwait and one of the reasons it has used is that it didn't want to show how sophisticated it's satellite imagery was. Well we all kinow now that a satellite can see individual people easily and even tell the coluour of their clothes. And that's on google earth's free version! It's quite time consuming entertaining your wild ideas dancer and It would be appreciated if you do some of your own groundwork before you come to me with your ideas in the future. I like to help you be a part of this issue but I can't afford to entertain silliness. Perhaps you people would find it useful to form sub-committees for a proving ground forum for your ideas before you take them to the top in the future?

You sonny boy are way out of your league and you shouldn't be doing this. I give you this advice for your own good. One person's freedom fighter is another person's terrorist. Work on understanding that for a while.

Shii, Sunnis, Kurds, are all fighting each other in Iraq for reasons which are historical and mainly because of Western meddling but I think it would be too deep for this forum to understand at this point. There is a lot of work to do first before we get complicated. Suffice to say that it's the violence which Saddam had under control in his country. But having to use heavyhanded measures offered a good opportunity for the US to demonize him and make him out to be a brutal dictator. Had the West not created the problem to begin with he wouldn't have had to use heavyhanded measures. Saddam had created a country where all religions had freedom to practice and women were equals to men in society and worked in professional careers alongside of Iraqi men. It will take decades, if ever, to restore Iraq to that kind of peace and prosperity. Probably never because the US obviously doen't want any ME Arab country to become powerful again. The US needs to force it's will on the people of the Arabian peninsula. These are some of the simple facts and Osama wasn't confused in the least on what the facts were. That is why he attacked the US on 9/11 and that is why the US had it coming. Among other US crimes against his people of course.

You denial monkeys need to put your heads together in private and choose which sort of denial story you want to go with. There are several choices now. It didn't happen. The Russians faked the photos. The Times made it up. It doesn't matter because it was after the invasion of Kuwait. Lying is justified by the US. None of it matters because the US is good. -------------------------- Get back to me when you have decided.

You should watch it and you will see more than irony my friend. I watch it for the comedy alone!

army guy- I don't need to make up things that you said because I'm relying on what you said. And in this case I'm not playing to others. If you think you are safe in what you have said then run with it anc continue. If you don't understand what you said then that's not my fault. Just be more careful but that's only my advice. And others please, this is not an opportunity to come to the kid's rescue. I feel sorry for him and I don't want him to screw himself any more. Even though it's hard to feel sympathy for a military mentality, he is Canadian I think. But please don't try to encourage him for your own sport because that 'will' get me mad.