Alta4ever

Any socialist boogey man who broke into my house to take my property, would be subdued by any means necessary until the policy arrived to put them jail. They won't be redistributing my wealth to pawn brokers. So I sleep very soundly.

HERE, HERE!

If you did a survey out on the street with Canadians passing by and asked if they cared that he taught at Harvard, I doubt you would get wow, you wuould get so what. Many people don't really care about our leaders that much, most have the attitude that all politicans are crooks, and have become very apathetic about our government. If Canadians were really that excited about Iggy the liberal number would have moved more then 3%. Your enthusiasm isn't shared by most Canadians. The polling makes this obvious.

So know you are imparting your opinion on stock here, have you ever talked to the man. Why was it so important to teach other countries future leaders, but not ours? If he cared about Canadians and its future leaders why didn't he spend at least some of that career here? Besides stock didn't say how long a lot of years was, your opinion decided that measurement was that a lot of years means more then five. Five is a lot of years to be away from your home, unless, at that point the US was home. Never in his career did he decide to come back to Canada, he decided to come back and seek the liberal nomination after retiring in the US. So if that opportunity wasn't their would he have bothered coming back to canada. I am betting that stock is smarter and more politically adept then you anyway.

An extreme leap in logic to think that when these issue were very prevelant, we decided not to offer any support, and the trade negocations got a little cold. I'm sure this stance had an effect. If I was in a possition where i really didn't have a despart need for the goods and you ticked me off, I would probably find another source, or give you a bit of a cold shoulder and let you twist in the wind a little.

I didn't know that Harper formed the government in 2003. Although he did make a statement.

you cannot be fically conservative and socially liberal, as you have to pork barrel spend to those liberal social policies. Look at the gun registry boon doggle, and EI problems. For all those liberal promises you have to pay for them and that means extra wasted spending. You can't be both. You are confusing balanced budget with fiscal conservatism. (something I don't think harper gets either). You can creat balanced bugets every year with liberal spending if you raise taxes to meet this end, instead of trimming spending to meet the tax income of the country.

Because of the socialist governments that they elect. By you measure of resource wealth Sask should be an economic juggernaut. Potash, vast amounts of farmland and fresh water. Uranium, not to metion the reserves of Natural gas and oil that rival albertas. So why again were they on the receiving end of socialist equalization payments for so long? Might have something to do witht he welfare mentality the socialist governments of the past. A couple of years under a conservative, Brad wall and wow, they are very close to leading the country in economic growth.

So you don't think their is a link between national politics and trade negocaitions. Just like people aren't vindictive.

If a university docterate is the only measure of a politician ralf should never have been the most sucessful politican in Canadian History and Dion should have been been more sucess full by that measure. Stock as Finance Minister for Alberta was the first to return his province to balanced budgets. He was the one who introduced the flat tax to alberta, and is largely responsible for Alberta being in its current debt free state. Something that can't be said for any other province in Canada. In those years Stock served Canadians and Albertans, where was Iggy?

So he is always willing to go along with what is politically expediant to keep his position. So in essence he doesn't ever do our say what he thinks is right, just what he thinks you want to hear. What a great quality for a politican, just same old same old.

I guess I'll have ot watch question period tonight on CPAC

Our lack of support effected our trade relations, I doubt the boarder would have even been closed to beef had JC given some kinf of support even moral. As for the lumber the issue had been close to being solved but it put us back three years. So you the great dobbin can't see how political relations effect trade negociations?

Warren kinsella is one of Iggy's inner circle, a supporter and strategist. In last two years he has supported Richard Warman and his complants to the CHRC. ( Richard Warman is an ex employee of this commsision and the biggest complantant CHRC its something like 26 complaints.). In the last 2 years Richard has mounted comlaints against bloggers and online forums. IF you really want to learn about Warren Kinsella I suggest you do some reasearch out side of his blog. Currently he is under attack for publically insuling chinese canadians.

You are an extreme left winger, If what happens in the US rubs off on Iggy hewill be in trouble, in obamas frist week he has already signed into legislation economic bills that are in effect nulifing NAFTA. He has his named on bill that is not stimulus, but good lod liberal pork, a bill that has most of its spending happening 3 years from now. Some Stimulus. If Obama continues on the present coarse he will destroy the liberal and progressisves in the court of public opinion and I doubt that Iggy with want to be assocaited with that.

So you don't know about Richard Warman and Warren Kinsella? time to do a little research on the CHRC (section 13) and the war on freedom speech.

The core support of the CPC is still the same IGGY is not the Canadian Obama, in fact the media didn't even really like talking to him befroe because he didn't give exciting sound bites. Only now are they even attempting to elevate him to something he is not. I doubt the Liberal support will rise past 35%. If he is a sucess full liberal leader he may just return them to a minority goverment. The country is divided.

At a huge cost to the lumber and beef industry, had he at least given words of support, I doubt these to industries would have suffered the fates that they did.

I think he is a little better the Iggy's council Warren Kinsella. I hope he gets whats comming to him after the comments he made about chinese canadians, it would be nice to see the CHRC have to "prosecute" one of its own. You should see what he and the inquistors have been up to.

Sccience has never been about consesus, why do you people not get this? If it was about consensus there are great many theories that never would have been accepted. Most theories have been changed by a crack pot working outside of the consensus of the accepted science community and have had to continual prove and reprove their findings until just one in the establishment, starts to change their mind. Consensus is more about politics then it is about real science. Everyday more and more scientists are starting to question the consesus, and all the climate cultist will be revealled.

I suggest you forget about those friends they obviously had no idea about what is popular and what will fly politically in this country. In other words they are out of touch with the political realities in this country.

If that socialist crap is part of being canadian then you have a big problem because their are vast areas of this country that don't agree or idenitify with it. As for the part about wanting to help those that need help, why is the left so adverse to being in afganistan? We are giving opporities to people that never would have had them, but you want to leave. Females their can now go to school and have rights, but if we leave they won't so you have one standard for the world but another for us. But I'm sure your happy with the status quote of the socalism, when somebody else is footing the bill for you.

Why is it you all fail to understand that Harper was elected as part of a CPC government, they are suppose to try to pass policy from the conservative party policy into legislation by any legal means necessary. The fact that the cpc is the only center right party in the comons means that they have ot try to ram this stuff through in minority parliment, this doesn't make PMSH a bully it make him effective. quit whining and cryign because your lefist socialist leaders took three years to develop the brass to attempt to stand up to him in the commons.

So Canada wasn't a great country in the 60's before for all of this socialist crap was started? Trudeaus social engineering has destroyed everything that the country was, we don't even really have an identity any more, ask most Canadians what it means to be Canadian and you get the same response we're not American. Before Trudeau tried to create his socialist utopia most Canadians had a better answer then we aren't American.

We have listed to liberals, and centeral canada, we have tried it your way for a very long time, and it doesn't seem to be working. We have listened to your types, now it might be time for liberals and centeral Canada to take heed and listen to us.