Black Dog

Look at you: lying again. Here's what I said FTR: "It says "incidents involving imminent risk to children caused by neglect and/or physical or sexual abuse." I can guarantee this does not mean "a kid told us they are afraid they might be abused at some unknown time in the future" you doorknob." And again this is in the specific context of a kid telling a teacher they fear they'll get abused if their parents find out they're trans/questioning. Here's how that would go: "Hello, police? Yes i'd like to report an incident of child abuse. No it hasn't happened yet, but i have student who says they're trans and is sacred they'll be abused if their parents find out. No, the parents don' know yet and the student isn't planning on telling them. No, I'm not telling them either but I was hoping you cold go investigate and tell them to not hit their secret trans kid. Hello? hello?" What's the big deal, you do that all the time. You literally did that in this post!

LOL I already explained this to you, dummy. imminent means "about to happen" or "happening soon". It does not mean "possibly at some distant and unknown point in the future, maybe." And look, still no cites for any of your other specific claims. It's almost as if you're a lying piece of shit!

Oh you're one of those dummies. One question: how does Putin's dick taste?

Neither of those situations are remotely analogous to Russia's you ******. No missiles within striking distance, no troop build ups, nothing but the prospect of Ukraine putting pen to paper. The day your family finally puts a pillow over your face and holds it there will be a great one for all of us.

It's not the teacher's decision here, it's the student's. All the more reason to leave the decision to come out to the kid and not a third party or the government. But outing kids against their wishes is, apparently. See, again, it's all about you. What the kid wants doesn't even cross your mind. I'm sorry but if you think a teacher keeping a student's confidence is them "getting involved", but a teacher outing a kid to parents and creating god knows what kind of drama is not, you've got it ass-backwards. And i think that principle logically extends to outing kids to their parents.

I'm confused: do you want teachers involved or not? Because calling the cops/CPS is getting involved.

And maybe they have a good reason, has that occurred to you? Maybe you should have a better relationship with your kid so they don't want to keep secrets from you. And if you think teachers should stay in their lane, requiring them to insert themselves into intrafamily dynamics by telling parents information their kids would prefer be kept from them is a weird way to show it. You know what else can have permanent, life-altering consequences? Snitching to a non-supportive parent. It's so weird how you guys constantly centre parents in a discussion about child welfare. It seems like you care more about exerting control than what's best for kids. Or that just guarantees the worst possible outcome for the kid.

So to be clear: you believe anyone can decide that something is a threat to them by their own definition of the term, regardless of any concrete, demonstrable danger and instigate a military conflict accordingly. The brave freedom fighters of Khamas thank you for your endorsement!

This is a completely contradictory statement. If you think teachers should stick to teaching it's none of their business if a kid is coming to school with cigarette burns on their arms and black eyes. But no, turns out the line where you think teachers should get involved is arbitrarily drawn exactly where you want it. Convenient!

Again: You literally said all those things, so the "buhhh distortions" argument doesn't fly. And you still can't provide cites for any of them, I'm not even gonna bother batting you around anymore.

Because I'm sure a parent who won't approve of their child's gender identity is going to react well to having the cops/CPS show up on their doorstep. You'd sue the school because your kid was afraid of you? Good luck!

LMAO you truly have pudding for brains. Article 2(4) of the UN Charter states “all Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court holds the crime of aggression as one of its four core crimes along with genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.Granted Russia is not party to the Rome Statutes, but the crime obviously exists under international law.

LOL I don't support Nazis, I share none of their beliefs. The Venn digram between you and these neo Nazis is practically a circle.

The teacher isn't making any decisions about kid's gender identities in this scenario. It's the child's decision to tell the teacher and the child's decision to request their parents not be told. So if a kid says "I'm trans but if my parents find out they will kick me out of the house or worse" you feel the teacher should inform the parents anyway?

I'm literally playing your game here. Here's a few things you've invented in this thread: the claim that nearly zero trans kids get abused by their parents when they come out that I said conservative homes weren't supportive that "it's the lefties who are making the claim that no right wing home is supportive." And then there's the time in another thread where you claimed I said any mass shooter with that if someone happens to be right wing in their politics and they kill someone it is because of their beliefs and failed to provide any quote for that. In short: it's clear you have an extensive and documented history of making baseless claims and fabrications and you're too stupid to see I was trolling you by doing the same to you and you fell for it like the rube you are.

My guy the shit you're into you couldn't sell at Burning Man.

That's not a denial.

They're your guys! You believe the same stuff! Name on thing you disagree with them about other than "Putin should get to f**k Ukraine." Just one.

Imminent. Google it. No I quoted it already. Now you're just babbling. V. funny to see you, a deeply mentally ill individual, try to process this all in real time. I wonder if it will click. It was in your post I quoted, what are you talking about?

Imminent means "about to happen" not "could possibly happen in some undetermined time frame." Your illiteracy is only exceeded by your unearned confidence in your own diminished capacity. Nope; didn't say it and you can't prove I did because you're a liar with an inflated sense of self and a victimhood complex. No no you literally said it in one of the posts I quoted. It was literally the entire point of the exchange dummy. You should definitely post more emojis to show how Not Mad you are.

Sounds you have something in common with them!

It says "incidents involving imminent risk to children caused by neglect and/or physical or sexual abuse." I can guarantee this does not mean "a kid told us they are afraid they might be abused at some unknown time in the future" you doorknob. I didn't actually say anything of the sort. You made that up. I didn't talk about political ideology at all until you brought it up. And that wasn't even what you were whining about in the first place when you made the very dumb statement that "it's the lefties who are making the claim that no right wing home is supportive" which is a different thing altogether (and also a fabrication). "Abuse didn't come up" are you eating lead paint chips again? The entire frigging discussion was about the risk of abuse! You truly are spectacularly dumb! The guy who constantly invents "facts" ("close to zero kids get abused for being trans") and strawmen like the ones above, then slinks away like the cur he is when asked to provide proof, now demands proof. lol eat me.

Nah I'll get your mom to do that as soon as she's finished blowing me.

Your first post was nonsense, this is just you telling the world your mom huffed paint when she was pregnant with you.

It was the 8th highest grossing film of 2023. But let's say you're right and it was a flop and that was because they made Ariel black (and not because people are tired of reboots and the film itself didn't get good reviews). What kind of person doesn't go to a move because of the race of the lead actor?