Chrissy1979

It shows what kind of people they are, and what their peers find acceptable. I suggest the “locker room talk” defence again. That was funny to watch.

So-called conservatives: The government has too much control over our lives and is corrupted by derp state political prosecutions and COVID overreach! Also so-called conservatives: The government should have the power to kill us!

There was Russian collusion. That was proven long ago. And you’re a dickless mamby-pamby. You prove that every day. Lol

I don't think even someone out of touch as you really thinks there was no Russian collusion. It seems far more likely you're a weak-kneed dickless mamby-pamby who is frightened to admit you're wrong ..like when you defended the paedophiles

You mean Pam Bondi,who wants to prevent sociall media from saying anything bad about ICE. You're confusing corporatist Carney with the leftist MAGA Trumpers that are already nationalizing Intel.

Carney is a right wing conservative. He worked for Goldman Sachs for G-d's sake. He plans on implementing austerity, and you're going to be crying for your government handouts when he does

I figured you were programmed to never disagree with Trump no matter what.

You're saying you disagree with Trump about Canada becoming the 51st state? I doubt you would have the nerve to disagree with dear leader.

You won't do anything because everybody knows you're lying and Trump is in Putin's pocket. Although they may have had a falling out since he humiliated Trump at the Alaska summit.

Obama won't face consequences because then you guys would have to face scrutiny.

Poor Trumpers wanted to be the 51st state by now.

But you can file a defamation suit against someone for making false statements against their character. That's what a defamation suit always means. But initiating the suit would require disclosure to find out if it's really defamation. Can't have that, can you? Lol

I said I have no reason not to believe her. That means she could be lying (I don't know), but neither of us have any evidence she is. You say an alleged lack of a police report is evidence she's lying. One could also just as easily say the lack of a defamation suit from the notoriously litigious Trump is evidence he's guilty.

No, I never said that. I said you don't know she's lying. There's a difference, but I don't expect you to catch such things. Just like when I said you had no evidence the Kirk shooter was a leftist. You then shrieked and called me a liar for saying he wasn't one. You have a chronic miscomprehension problem.

John Lennon didn't have anything to do with Yesterday. Paul had working lyrics and then wrote real ones.

You don't seem to know what a conspiracy is

I have no idea if she filed a police report or not. I was merely speculating why she might not have if she didn't. Unlike you, I don't form conclusions based on nothing but a desire to defend Epstein and his associates.

No, I have no conspiracy. I stopped at "We don't know if this threat was legitimate, perceived, imaginary or a lie." You guys are the ones who decided she's a liar, even though you admit: "We don't know if this threat was legitimate, perceived, imaginary or a lie." That's all I've called out: calling an alleged victim a liar, even though "We don't know if this threat was legitimate, perceived, imaginary or a lie."

It's embarrassing he assumed you were so stupid and you proved it to be so, right?

Neither do you. But you have made your conclusion already. I have no reason to doubt her story, but I haven't declared it to be true or false. The only thing I know for sure is you guys are lying when you say you know she's lying. And the fact that you would lie and disparage an alleged victim is low...even by your extremely low standards

How stupid does he think his followers are that he assumes they don't even remember who was president on Jan. 6?

She said there was a threat. If she took it seriously, there would be no police report because then they'd just kill her. Of course, that wouldn't bother you either.

She said she was threatened. She took it seriously. If she said she was threatened by a Democrat, you guys would have no doubt it's true. Because it's dear leader, you have to stoop so low as to call her a liar, based on nothing but your own desire for it not to be so I do enjoy rubbing your noses in your pathetic, craven, lying hypocrisy though. Lol

Speaking of behavior that strongly suggests lying...there you go. Lol

Again, if this is the politics you want. It will be hard to cry and play the victim when the Dems are in power again. I guess you're counting on being dead by then, being 90 years old and all. Lol