Chrissy1979

You and your gay son are horrible victims of this anonymous person! You shouldn't stop at spreading this post here! Make it a wider social media campaign about your gay son!

Turns out it was a MAGA shooter (again) so it must just be that he hates Mormons and that he is not a reflection of his wider community as a whole. Making a broad generalization based on one (more) MAGA shooter would be ridiculous, right?

You’re going to be shocked when you find out the Liberal and Democratic parties are corporatist and therefore not left wing at all. But the olygarchs convinced you to give up democracy because trans people scared you. 😆

You’re even dumber than I thought. I get the impression pretend you don’t know what you’re talking about when you feel trapped and exposed, just to save face. Brendan Carr said “we can do this the easy way or the hard way.” You think everything is fine because ABC chose the easy way. 😆

You admit there was a threat and your only defence is ABC might have chosen to do what they were threatened to do or else.

The threat is the point, dummy. Again, you’d be better off saying the threat was no big deal than trying to say maybe no one responded to the threat so therefore it’s okay for the government to threaten businesses.

The threat was as clear as can be and everyone saw it. You'd be better off trying to defend it than to pretend it didn't happen.

I thought the Republicans were shameless about how they were gleefully exploiting Kirk’s death to destroy the free speech he fought for, and then the wake made their previous gleeful exploitation look almost tasteful by comparison.

Again, you don’t seem to understand how threats work. We saw the threat. Everything else is just a threatened party responding under duress.

You're saying it's okay to make threats if the threats are ignored...even when the evidence suggests they weren't ignored?

Yes, when people give in to threats they typically say what you want, don’t they? That’s kind of how threats work. What we know for sure is they made the threat and you guys don’t care that they did, even though it’s exploiting Kirk’s death to destroy something he dedicated his life to. And you thought those random people online were disrespectful of his death. It was all projection.

Because of a threat by the FCC. Now you’re going to argue it’s okay for them to make threats?

You have to pretend the FCC made no threats because you can’t justify the FCC making threats.

If he were president he wouldn’t have to go to prison at all.

Defend it? I even posted links to clarify and back up what I was saying. Then you had nothing. In the same position yesterday, you were afraid to say anything further because you knew you were lying, so you posted no link at all. Busted again. 😝

Trump just instructed the Department of Justice to go after his political enemies, and he even made it public to show that the old rule of law doesn’t apply anymore. The only law in a dictatorship is whatever the dictator wants.

Of course he shouldn’t be.

Can you provide me with the link where it was found the government ordered that? Because I’m talking about the first amendment, not what private companies and individuals do in their own time. Besides, even if your whataboutism were relevant, it would then just be something that is also wrong.

You misunderstood what I was saying. Of course he’s president.

If lawfulness still mattered, Trump wouldn’t be president. It was also against the law to shoot Charlie Kirk, but it happened. It almost seems like the response was coordinated in advance too.

They are in the process of approving a merger involving ABC. They can take away broadcast licences. They have total control. What they're doing isn't lawful (see the first amendment) but neither was electing an insurrectionist for president. When you have the supreme court in the bag, lawfulness doesn't matter

What are you talking about? You’re just making things up again. They have all the power.

You think it was an empty threat?

Yes, continue to celebrate Kirk’s death by using it to destroy what he stood for.

Even if that were true, the Republicans got rid of the Fairness Doctrine that you seem to think still exists.