KrustyKidd

Where would they 'flee?' Egypt? Nope. Israel? Perfect for Hamas. best solution would have been for Hamas not to have put their people in danger by using them as shields when attacking Israeli civilians. What think about that idea Tango?

Sure. Amnesty International has pandered to Hamas and ignored it's use of civillians and civilian facilities to wage war while condemning Israel's actions to stop this. The Former Commander of British Forces in Afghanistan explains; If you will note, there are more than a few discrepancies in his account to what the biased AI article rants on about.

Sure. How would you begin a conversation designed to promote peace Kuzadd? This so far seems fairly logical if one wanted peace. makes sense to me. Do you not agree that children should not be raised in an environment of hate? And they do according to the PMR which I linked to above. Surely you do not believe that text books extolling the virtues of blowing yourself up should be widely taught? I would agree. And you don't? I certainly don't believe the palestinian people are terrorists do you? Hamas is a terrorist organization, not the people. You don't believe Palestinians deserve good leaders? You think they want to bomb more than they wish to build a thriving future for themselves? Incredible! They all have stated that purpose so Kuzadd, how do you do this considering that Hamas has as one of it's prime cornerstones a complete refusal to negotiate? And I suppose you disagree with this statement as well? By avoiding specifics, you concentrate on the general purpose which is to build a rapport, not blame Israel for settlements, Palestinians for rocket attacks. I see nothing heinous about this either but I suppose you just want to turn any discourse into a complete blame Israel thing which is not what this is designed to do just as it is not designed to blame Palestinians. Yep. Suppose you disagree with that as well? You disagree with this? Seems logical to me. They do. I've been there and seen the security set up in cities and towns. In all, this is basically saying that we have to lower barriers and talk. Understanding that both have mutual needs in each others future. The spin put on it in the article is telling in that the author applies a blame Israel slant on all of the quotes. Quite the reverse to what the document intended.

Let's see how you do; Did the Arabs accept UN Resolution 181, Partition and the borders contained within that resolution? Did Israel? Did the Arabs attack Israel the day they declared themselves a nation according to the above Resolution and borders? When nations made peace with Israel they returned land, totally destroying that argument. 2007 Palestinian Media Watch report These textbooks don't give Palestinian children an education, they give them an indoctrination." Seems somebody doesn't plan on making peace, just war.

Agreed to it, actually made it the cornerstone of their nation despite the Arabs unanimously flat out refusing it and then, were attacked with the intent of murdering every last one of them and now you are poo pooing that for some reason they don't roll over and give up land from which they have been continually attacked from? Israel has a history of giving back land to those who have made peace with them. I imagine when genuine peaceful intent is ingrained in a competent government in Palestine, they will probably get land. Until then, keep firing away and they get nothing but misery comforted by biased left wing organizations such as Red Cross, AI and all the moon bat jew haters. You are so deluded that you mistake our not joining in on the anti Israel 'pileon' you continually pump out here for support. I dare you to find one instance of me actually supporting Israel other than to explain why they have to do certain things.

what are those past atrocities you refer to?

Little bit more than that Dub

The former however, it is now, thanks to the aggression of 1958 by the Arabs impossible to return to the borders as per 1948 so we are left with the 67 borders as reality. Continued attacks by a chaotic PA ensure that even this be a passed opportunity.

Were the vehicles reported stolen?

Uh uh. The question was;

Yea! And even the qualifiers made sense.

Without answering a question with a question what do you think of the breaking of international law committed by the Arab League on May 15 1948 when they attacked a country named Israel who accepted the borders of Resolution 181 and Partition? Wondering if you think it's ok to just try to wipe a people off the face of the world like they attempted to do.

They are the ones who made war on a country that wished peace. I would say that when they become peaceful, stop creating death (as proven when they hold their own elections) then progress may start.

Long as it's got Joooos you hate it huh? Seig heil. Anything with an anti Jewish/Israeli slant you bring up. We know you Dub. Pure hate with no logic or truth, I could tell from the word twisting on the Res 181 issue. Just hate. Oh, and your little dog Toto too.

DOP. Are you stupid or what? That's just Hamas' way of indoctrinating their new leaders who were previously Fatah. You know, like Harper swears in former Libertards to his new cabinet.

They certainly were not intent on that in 1947/48 when they accepted UN Resolution 181 along with the borders it called for as well as Partition and the Arabs immediately did not. Instead they were attacked by forces who wished to kill every last Jew. And here you are, erasing truth time and time again.

Holy! You have no idea do you Kuzadd. Fatah and Hamas were at war and frequently beat the living daylights out of the others supporters. And now, here you are believing that a Fatah supporter would not only be allowed to escape torture but be given a position of authority. Good work Dancer. This has been a 2/2 moron check.

Unless they have said they are working with Hamas or, reported their vehicles stolen the night the vid of Hamas using their ambulances as troop carriers was shot they certainly do. Or are you just another apoligist Jew hater Dub? Heck, don't even bother to answer that last comment. It's a given.

They accomplished getting airheads to jump in on the hate Jews band wagon. Heck, we don't have to go far to see the proof.

If this is the case, would you provide the Palestinian accounts of the numbers of rockets fired and Israeli casualties. The targets they were firing at would be helpful as well. Crickets.

Obviously these are derranged people that are being interviewed. No wonder you seem to revel in it Dub.

Nice vid by the way Dub. Seems that when emotions run high you favor ten twenty something year old year guys with rocks killing an old guy over a scared shitless old man pulling out his bluderbuss to protect himself when settlements are closed due to the evil Israeli government doing what you keep harping they should.

I agree. Seems Dub is for mob rule as long as it is not a Jew with a gun in which case, the guys throwing lethal rocks at an old man are just poor guys who needed bigger rocks.

Which war?

I approve of Palestine's right to exist but I wonder if Dub approves of Israel's right to exist.